ISTQB CT-TAE Exam Dumps - Valid Questions Answers

The optimal course of action involves conducting a thorough risk-benefit analysis of the enhanced Test Automation Solution (TAS). This analysis will weigh the potential benefits of the improvements against the risks posed by the unresolved performance and usability issues. By evaluating the impact of these factors on the maintenance releases, the test automation engineers can make an informed decision on whether the enhancements offer significant advantages over the previous version, and if they justify the potential risks involved.

References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus emphasizes the importance of risk management in the context of test automation. It suggests that decisions regarding the use of different versions of a TAS should be based on a careful assessment of risks and benefits, considering factors such as the stability of the system, the criticality of the application, and the nature of the changes introduced in the TAS1. This approach ensures that the chosen solution aligns with the project’s goals and quality standards2.

When encountering issues with the identification of GUI elements of third-party components within an automated testing framework, the initial step should be to verify the testability support with the providers of those components. This is because the third-party components may not adhere to the same standards or methods of identification that the primary testing tool uses. By contacting the providers, you can determine whether there are known issues or workarounds, or if they offer their own tools or methods for enabling test automation. This approach is proactive and can save time by addressing the compatibility issue at its source, rather than attempting to implement potentially inefficient or unreliable solutions.

References = The answer is supported by the ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus, which emphasizes the importance of understanding the test automation tool’s capabilities and the system under test (SUT), including any third-party components that may be integrated12. Additionally, the resources provided by softwaretestinghelp.com discuss the challenges and considerations when dealing with test automation, including the interaction with third-party elements34.

 When evaluating the impact of new features on the Test Automation Solution (TAS), it would not be appropriate for the Test Automation Engineer (TAE) to gather feedback from Business Analysts to determine if the current TAS will meet the needs of the new features (Option A). While Business Analysts provide valuable insights into business requirements and the intended functionality of new features, their feedback may not directly inform the technical suitability or readiness of the TAS to handle these new features. Instead, the TAE should focus on technical evaluations such as reviewing existing keywords for necessary modifications (Option B), running existing automated tests against the updated SUT to identify any changes in operation (Option C), and assessing compatibility with existing test tools or identifying alternative solutions (Option D). These actions directly address the technical implications of new features on the TAS, ensuring that the automated testing remains effective and aligned with the evolving requirements of the SUT.