Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam Dumps - Valid Questions Answers

According to the official exam guide1, one of the skills assessed in the exam is to “design, build, and productionalize ML models to solve business challenges using Google Cloud technologies”. TPUs2 are Google’s custom-developed application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) used to accelerate machine learning workloads. TPUs are designed to handle large batch sizes, high dimensional data, and complex computations. TPUs can significantly reduce the training time and compute costs of large language models, especially when used with distributed training strategies, such as MultiWorkerMirroredStrategy3. Therefore, option D is the best way to configure a training architecture that minimizes both training time and compute costs for the given use case. The other options are not relevant or optimal for this scenario. References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

TPUs

MultiWorkerMirroredStrategy

Google Professional Machine Learning Certification Exam 2023

Latest Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Actual Free Exam Questions

The class imbalance problem is a common challenge in machine learning, especially in classification tasks. It occurs when the distribution of the target classes is highly skewed, such that one class (the majority class) has much more examples than the other class (the minority class). The minority class is often the more interesting or important class, such as failure incidents, fraud cases, or rare diseases. However, most machine learning algorithms are designed to optimize the overall accuracy, which can be biased towards the majority class and ignore the minority class. This can result in poor predictive performance, especially for the minority class.

There are different techniques to deal with the class imbalance problem, such as data-level methods, algorithm-level methods, and evaluation-level methods1. Data-level methods involve resampling the original dataset to create a more balanced class distribution. There are two main types of data-level methods: oversampling and undersampling. Oversampling methods increase the number of examples in the minority class, either by duplicating existing examples or by generating synthetic examples. Undersampling methods reduce the number of examples in the majority class, either by randomly removing examples or by using clustering or other criteria to select representative examples. Both oversampling and undersampling methods can be combined with upweighting or downweighting, which assign different weights to the examples according to their class frequency, to further balance the dataset.

For the use case of investigating failures of a production line component based on sensor readings, the best option is to downsample the data with upweighting to create a sample with 10% positive examples. This option involves randomly removing some of the negative examples (the majority class) until the ratio of positive to negative examples is 1:9, and then assigning higher weights to the positive examples to compensate for their low frequency. This option can create a more balanced dataset that can improve the performance of the classification models, while preserving the diversity and representativeness of the original data. This option can also reduce the computation time and memory usage, as the size of the dataset is reduced. Therefore, downsampling the data with upweighting to create a sample with 10% positive examples is the best option for this use case.

References:

A Systematic Study of the Class Imbalance Problem in Convolutional Neural Networks

Option A is incorrect because using AI Platform notebooks to perform a Lasso regression analysis on your model, which will eliminate features that do not provide a strong signal, is not a suitable way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model. Lasso regression is a method of feature selection that applies a penalty to the coefficients of the linear model, and shrinks them to zero for irrelevant features1. However, this method assumes that the model is linear and additive, which may not be the case for a TensorFlow model. Moreover, this method does not provide feature attributions for each prediction, but rather for the entire dataset.

Option B is incorrect because streaming prediction results to BigQuery, and using BigQuery’s CORR(X1, X2) function to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient between each feature and the target variable, is not a valid way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model. The Pearson correlation coefficient is a measure of the linear relationship between two variables, ranging from -1 to 12. However, this method does not account for the interactions between features or the non-linearity of the model. Moreover, this method does not provide feature attributions for each prediction, but rather for the entire dataset.

Option C is correct because using the AI Explanations feature on AI Platform, and submitting each prediction request with the ‘explain’ keyword to retrieve feature attributions using the sampled Shapley method, is the best way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model. AI Explanations is a service that allows you to get feature attributions for your deployed models on AI Platform3. Feature attributions are values that indicate how much each feature contributed to the prediction for a given instance4. The sampled Shapley method is a technique that uses the Shapley value, a game-theoretic concept, to measure the contribution of each feature to the prediction5. By using AI Explanations, you can get feature attributions for each prediction request, and identify the most important features for each customer.

Option D is incorrect because using the What-If tool in Google Cloud to determine how your model will perform when individual features are excluded, and ranking the feature importance in order of those that caused the most significant performance drop when removed from the model, is not a practical way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model. The What-If tool is a tool that allows you to visualize and analyze your ML models and datasets. However, this method requires manually editing or removing features for each instance, and observing the change in the prediction. This method is not scalable or efficient, and may not capture the interactions between features or the non-linearity of the model.

References:

Lasso regression

Pearson correlation coefficient

AI Explanations overview

Feature attributions

Sampled Shapley method

[What-If tool overview]