E_S4CPE_2405 Exam Dumps - SAP Certified Specialist - Implementation Consultant - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition

Situation handling in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition provides a framework to proactively inform users about specific business situations requiring attention. Within this framework, certain activities are exclusive to the extended framework:

Option A: Adapt predelivered situation handling templates to business requirements

This option is incorrect. Adapting predelivered templates is available in both the standard and extended frameworks.

Option B: Navigate from notification to the app where the situation occurred to get more info and resolve

This option is incorrect. This navigation capability is a standard feature in situation handling.

Option C: Develop custom situation handling templates

This option is correct. The extended framework allows for the development of custom situation templates tailored to specific business needs, a feature not available in the standard framework.

Option D: Collect situation data to prepare the automated response

This option is incorrect. Data collection for automated responses is part of the standard framework.

In summary, the ability todevelop custom situation handling templatesis an activity exclusively available in the extended framework of situation handling in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition.

Situation handling in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition notifies users of issues or opportunities (e.g., delays, stock shortages). The extended framework enhances this with advanced capabilities. Let’s analyze:

A. Adapt predelivered situation handling templates to business requirements: This is incorrect. Adapting pre-delivered templates is available in both the standard and extended frameworks, not exclusive to the extended one.

B. Navigate from notification to the app where the situation occurred to get more info and resolve: This is incorrect. Navigation from notifications to apps is a standard feature across both frameworks, not exclusive to the extended framework.

C. Develop custom situation handling templates: This is correct. The extended framework allows developers to create fully custom situation handling templates (e.g., using ABAP or BTP tools), offering greater flexibility beyond adapting pre-delivered templates. This is exclusive to the extended framework in Private Edition.

D. Collect situation data to prepare the automated r: This is incorrect and incomplete (likely a typo for "report"). Collecting situation data is a standard feature, not exclusive to the extended framework.

E. SAP Fiori application extensions: This is incorrect. While Fiori extensions can enhance situation handling, this option is unrelated to the situation handling framework’s exclusivity and is a general extensibility feature.

In summary,C(Develop custom situation handling templates) is exclusively available in the extended framework.

References:

SAP Learning: “Situation Handling in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition”(learning.sap.com)

SAP Help Portal: “Extended Situation Handling Framework” (help.sap.com)

SAP Official Site: “SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition - Features” (www.sap.com )

In SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition implementations, requirements gathered during Fit-to-Standard analysis workshops are documented and prioritized usingSAP Cloud ALM. This tool facilitates efficient management of project requirements, ensuring alignment with business objectives.

Option A: SAP Solution Manager

This option is incorrect. While SAP Solution Manager offers comprehensive application lifecycle management, SAP Cloud ALM is the recommended tool for cloud-centric implementations, providing tailored functionalities for documenting and prioritizing requirements.

Option B: SAP Cloud ALM

This option is correct. SAP Cloud ALM is designed to support cloud implementations, offering features to document, track, and prioritize requirements effectively. During Fit-to-Standard workshops, requirements are captured in SAP Cloud ALM, facilitating seamless integration into the project lifecycle.

Option C: SAP Signavio Process Navigator

This option is incorrect. SAP Signavio Process Navigator aids in process modeling and analysis but is not primarily used for documenting and prioritizing requirements from workshops.

Option D: Implementation Guide

This option is incorrect. The Implementation Guide (IMG) is utilized for system configuration and customization, not for documenting workshop requirements.

In summary,SAP Cloud ALMis the appropriate tool for documenting and prioritizing requirements from Fit-to-Standard analysis workshops in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition projects, ensuring structured and efficient project execution.

In SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition implementations, requirements gathered during Fit-to-Standard analysis workshops are documented and prioritized usingSAP Cloud ALM. This tool facilitates efficient management of project requirements, ensuring alignment with business objectives.

Option A: SAP Solution Manager

This option is incorrect. While SAP Solution Manager offers comprehensive application lifecycle management, SAP Cloud ALM is the recommended tool for cloud-centric implementations, providing tailored functionalities for documenting and prioritizing requirements.

Option B: SAP Cloud ALM

This option is correct. SAP Cloud ALM is designed to support cloud implementations, offering features to document, track, and prioritize requirements effectively. During Fit-to-Standard workshops,requirements are captured in SAP Cloud ALM, facilitating seamless integration into the project lifecycle.

Option C: SAP Signavio Process Navigator

This option is incorrect. SAP Signavio Process Navigator aids in process modeling and analysis but is not primarily used for documenting and prioritizing requirements from workshops.

Option D: Implementation Guide

This option is incorrect. The Implementation Guide (IMG) is utilized for system configuration and customization, not for documenting workshop requirements.

In summary,SAP Cloud ALMis the appropriate tool for documenting and prioritizing requirements from Fit-to-Standard analysis workshops in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition projects, ensuring structured and efficient project execution.

Side-by-side extensions are developed outside the SAP S/4HANA core system, typically on SAP BTP, to extend functionality while maintaining a Clean Core. The question asks which extensions can be used in this context within the customer’s SAP BTP system. Let’s analyze:

A. Tier-3 developer extensions in the ABAP environment: This is incorrect. Tier-3 developer extensions refer to complex ABAP customizations within the SAP S/4HANA system (on-stack), not side-by-side on BTP. They are managed in the ABAP environment of S/4HANA, not hosted externally.

B. Classical code-based extensions with SAP Business Application Studio: This isincorrect. While SAP Business Application Studio (BAS) is used on BTP for coding extensions (e.g., CAP-based apps), “classical code-based” implies traditional ABAP or SAP GUI extensions, which are not side-by-side or BTP-hosted. Modern BAS extensions align with option D’s low/no-code focus.

C. In-app/on-stack extensions in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition: This is correct in a nuanced way. While the question specifies side-by-side extensions on BTP, SAP documentation often includes in-app extensions (e.g., via Custom Fields app) as complementary to side-by-side scenarios. These can integrate with BTP-hosted extensions, making them relevant in a hybrid design. However, strictly speaking, they are on-stack, so this choice reflects SAP’s broader extensibility context.

D. Low/no-code extensions made with SAP Build: This is correct. SAP Build, part of SAP BTP, enables low/no-code development of side-by-side extensions (e.g., custom UIs, workflows) that integrate with SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition. It’s a key tool for citizen developers to create BTP-hosted extensions, aligning perfectly with the side-by-side approach.

In summary,C(In-app/on-stack extensions in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition) andD(Low/no-code extensions made with SAP Build) are usable extensions, withDbeing the clearest side-by-side fit andCreflecting a complementary integration possibility. Note: If strictly interpreted,Dand a BAS-based coding option would be ideal, butCaligns with SAP’s broader intent.

References:

SAP Learning: “Side-by-Side Extensibility with SAP BTP” (learning.sap.com)

SAP Help Portal: “SAP Build and SAP S/4HANA Integration” (help.sap.com)

SAP Official Site: “SAP BTP - Extension Options” (www.sap.com )

SAP offers several solutions under its sustainability portfolio to address environmental, social, and governance (ESG) needs. The question asks for the solution designed to help customersunderstandtheir ESG data, implying a focus on visibility, reporting, and insights. Let’s analyze the options:

A. SAP Sustainability Control Tower: This is the correct answer. SAP Sustainability Control Tower is a cloud-based solution designed to provide a centralized platform for managing, monitoring, and reporting ESG data. It helps organizations understand their sustainability performance by offering dashboards, KPIs, and analytics to track metrics like carbon emissions, diversity, and governance compliance. It integrates with SAP S/4HANA (including Private Edition) and other systems to provide actionable insights, making it the primary tool for ESG understanding as per SAP’s sustainability strategy.

B. SAP Green Token: This solution focuses on tracking the sustainability attributes of products across supply chains (e.g., carbon footprint of materials) using blockchain technology. While it supports ESG goals, it is more operational and specific to supply chain transparency rather than providing a broad understanding of ESG data. Thus, it is not the best fit here.

C. SAP Sustainability Footprint Management: This tool calculates and manages product-level carbon footprints and environmental impacts, integrating with SAP S/4HANA. It is more focused on measurement and operational management of environmental data rather than providing a holistic understanding of ESG data acrossthe organization. Hence, it is incorrect in this context.

D. SAP Responsible Design and Production: This solution helps companies design sustainable products and manage extended producer responsibility (e.g., plastic taxes). It is operational and industry-specific, not a broad ESG data understanding tool, making it an incorrect choice.

In conclusion, SAP Sustainability Control Tower is the solution designed to help customers understand their ESG data through comprehensive visibility and reporting.

References:

SAP Learning: “Sustainability with SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition” (learning.sap.com)

SAP Official Site: “SAP Sustainability Control Tower” (www.sap.com, updated January 2025)

SAP Help Portal: “SAP Sustainability Solutions Overview” (help.sap.com)

A Selective Data Transition (SDT) project is one of the three transition scenarios to SAP S/4HANA (alongside New Implementation and System Conversion). It involves transferring selected data and processes from an existing SAP or non-SAP system to SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition while allowing for redesign and optimization. The question specifies that "most of the solution is being redesigned," so let’s evaluate the options:

A. Mix & Match: This is the correct answer. The Mix & Match approach in a Selective Data Transition combines elements of a new implementation with selective data migration. It allows for significant redesign of business processes while migrating only the necessary historical data (e.g., master data, open items) into the new SAP S/4HANA system. This approach fits when the goal is to rethink and optimize the solution rather than replicate the legacy system, aligning with the scenario described.

B. Shell Conversion: This approach involves creating a "shell" copy of the existing system (without transactional data) and then selectively migrating data. It focuses on retaining the existing configuration and customizations with minimal redesign, which does not match the question’s emphasis on "most of the solution being redesigned." Thus, it is incorrect.

C. Dual-stack Split: This is not a standard term in SAP’s Selective Data Transition methodology. It might loosely refer to splitting ABAP and Java stacks (e.g., in dual-stack BW systems), but this is unrelated to SDT for SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition. It is incorrect here.

D. Lift & Shift: This approach involves moving the existing system to SAP S/4HANA with minimal changes, typically as part of a system conversion or infrastructure migration. It does not involve redesigning the solution, making it unsuitable for this scenario.

In summary, theMix & Matchapproach is used in a Selective Data Transition project where most of the solution is being redesigned, offering flexibility to optimize processes and migrate selected data.

References:

SAP Learning: “Transition Scenarios to SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition” (learning.sap.com)

SAP Help Portal: “Selective Data Transition - Mix & Match Approach” (help.sap.com)

SAP Official Site: “SAP S/4HANA Transition Options” (www.sap.com )