CIPM Exam Dumps - Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM)

Rationalizing requirements in order to comply with the various privacy requirements required by applicable law and regulation means that you have a systematic and logical approach to harmonize and streamline your compliance efforts. Rationalizing requirements does include harmonizing shared obligations and privacy rights across varying legislation and/or regulators, implementing a solution that significantly addresses shared obligations and privacy rights, and addressing requirements that fall outside the common obligations and rights (outliers) on a case-by-case basis. These steps can help you avoid duplication, inconsistency, or inefficiency in your compliance activities.

 A third-party audit would help an organization achieve the objective of demonstrating compliance with international privacy standards and identifying gaps for remediation. A third-party audit is an audit conducted by an independent and external auditor who is not affiliated with either the audited organization or its customers. A third-party audit can provide an objective and impartial assessment of the organization’s privacy practices and policies, as well as verify its compliance with relevant standards and regulations. A third-party audit can also help the organization identify areas for improvement and recommend corrective actions. A third-party audit can enhance the organization’s reputation, trustworthiness, and credibility among its stakeholders and customers.

A first-party audit is an audit conducted by the organization itself or by someone within the organization who has been designated as an auditor. A first-party audit is also known as an internal audit. A first-party audit can help the organization monitor its own performance, evaluate its compliance with internal policies and procedures, and identify potential risks and opportunities for improvement. However, a first-party audit may not be sufficient to demonstrate compliance with external standards and regulations, as it may lack independence and objectivity.

A second-party audit is an audit conducted by a party that has an interest in or a relationship with the audited organization, such as a customer, a supplier, or a partner. A second-party audit is also known as an external audit. A second-party audit can help the party verify that the audited organization meets its contractual obligations, expectations, and requirements. A second-party audit can also help the party evaluate the quality and reliability of the audited organization’s products or services. However, a second-party audit may not be able to provide a comprehensive and unbiased assessment of the audited organization’s privacy practices and policies, as it may be influenced by the party’s own interests and objectives. References: Types of Audits: 14 Types of Audits and Level of Assurance (2022)

Under the GDPR, a controller must notify a data subject of a personal data breach without undue delay when the breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of the data subject, unless one of the following conditions applies: the personal data are rendered unintelligible to any person who is not authorized to access it, such as by encryption; the controller has taken subsequent measures to ensure that the high risk is no longer likely to materialize; or the notification would involve disproportionate effort, in which case a public communication or similar measure may suffice. In this case, an encrypted USB key with sensitive personal data is stolen, but the personal data are presumably unintelligible to the thief, so the controller does not need to notify the data subject. However, the controller still needs to notify the supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of the breach, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons.

References:

• CIPM Body of Knowledge (2021), Domain IV: Privacy Program Operational Life Cycle, Section B: Protecting Personal Information, Subsection 2: Data Breach Incident Planning and Management
• CIPM Study Guide (2021), Chapter 8: Protecting Personal Information, Section 8.2: Data Breach Incident Planning and Management
• CIPM Textbook (2019), Chapter 8: Protecting Personal Information, Section 8.2: Data Breach Incident Planning and Management
• CIPM Practice Exam (2021), Question 134
• GDPR Article 33 and 3412

A privacy professional should keep in mind that the number of metrics should be limited at first when selecting which metrics to collect. Metrics are quantitative measures that help evaluate the performance and effectiveness of a privacy program. However, collecting too many metrics can be overwhelming, confusing, and costly. Therefore, a privacy professional should start with a few key metrics that are relevant, meaningful, actionable, and aligned with the organization’s privacy goals and priorities. These metrics can be refined and expanded over time as the privacy program matures and evolves. References: [Privacy Metrics], [Measuring Privacy Program Effectiveness]

This answer is the best form of trend analysis that Incipia Corporation should use to analyze the effectiveness of the training over the next six months, as it can provide a quantitative and objective way to measure and compare the results and outcomes of the training against predefined criteria or indicators. Statistical trend analysis is a method that involves collecting, analyzing and presenting data using statistical tools and techniques, such as charts, graphs, tables or formulas. Statistical trend analysis can help to identify patterns, changes or correlations in the data over time, as well as to evaluate the performance and impact of the training on the organization’s privacy program and objectives. References: IAPP CIPM Study Guide, page 901; ISO/IEC 27002:2013, section 18.1.3

Documentation related to audit controls (third-party or internal) should be saved in a permanent format by default, not a non-permanent one. This is to ensure that the organization can demonstrate its compliance with the applicable laws and regulations, as well as its own policies and procedures, in case of an audit or a legal challenge. The other options are valid requirements for data retention and destruction policies, as they help to minimize the risks and costs associated with storing personal information beyond its intended purpose. References: CIPM Body of Knowledge, Domain III: Privacy Program Management Activities, Task 3: Manage data retention and disposal.