Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Exam Dumps - Salesforce Certified Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (SU24)

 Creating a release calendar, training and aligning all the teams is the best way to avoid conflicts and ensure smooth releases between major, minor, and Salesforce seasonal releases. A release calendar can help the teams plan ahead, coordinate their efforts, and avoid overlapping or conflicting changes. Training and aligning the teams can help them understand the release processes, the best practices, and the expectations for each release type. Gating all release decisions at the center of excellence, sharing the test plans, or creating a spreadsheet of metadata changes are not sufficient or scalable solutions for this problem.

The best practice is to fix the issues in the development sandbox, migrate them to the testing sandbox, and deploy to production after testing. This ensures that the development and testing environments are in sync and that the changes are properly tested before going to production. Fixing the issues in the testing environment and deploying them to production may introduce errors or conflicts, as the development environment may not have the same changes. Fixing the issues in the test environment and migrating them to the development sandbox may also cause errors or conflicts, as the development environment may have other changes that are not ready for testing.

This is the correct answer because Salesforce prohibits stress testing against production because it is a shared environment that hosts multiple customers and tenants. Stress testing against production may affect the performance and availability of the Salesforce service for other customers and violate the terms of service. Stress testing should be done in a sandbox or a developer edition org that is isolated from production.

Using static code analysis to enforce coding standards is the best way to improve consistency among the development teams working on different projects. Static code analysis is a tool that can automatically scan the code and detect any violations of the predefined coding rules and best practices. It can also provide feedback and suggestions to the developers on how to improve their code quality and readability. Creating a Center of Excellence for release management, requiring pull requests to be reviewed by two developers before merging, or executing regression testing before code can be committed are also good practices, but they are not as effective or efficient as static code analysis for ensuring coding consistency.

How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced is a decision that the Architect should make when planning for releases, as it is part of the quality assurance process and helps to ensure that the new changes do not break the existing functionality. When to test a new UC feature release is also a decision that the Architect should make when planning for releases, as it is part of the release schedule and helps to coordinate the testing activities with the development and deployment activities. Whether Salesforce will wait to upgrade the pod until after a UC release is complete is not a decision that the Architect can make, as it is determined by Salesforce and depends on the release window and the pod assignment. How to roll back to the previous Salesforce release if there are issues is not a decision that the Architect can make, as it is not possible to roll back to a previous Salesforce release once the upgrade is done.

 Using a Source Control system alongside a multi-sandbox development strategy has several advantages, such as performing code reviews before promoting to a pre-production sandbox, keeping a history of changes made by each developer, and creating a branching strategy that tracks each feature or change separately. Automatically deploying changes from sandbox to production is not an advantage of Source Control, but rather a function of a Continuous Integration tool. Acting as a backup in case of catastrophic data loss is not an advantage of Source Control, but rather a benefit of having a sandbox strategy.

B and D are the correct answers, as partner developer edition orgs and developer edition orgs are the appropriate environments for creating a managed package. A managed package is a collection of application components that are locked and versioned, and can be installed and upgraded in multiple orgs. A is incorrect, as developer pro sandbox orgs are not suitable for creating a managed package, as they are copies of a production org that are used for development and testing purposes. C is incorrect, as production orgs with LMA are not suitable for creating a managed package, as they are used for managing the licenses and subscribers of a managed package. You can learn more about this topic in the Package Development Model module on Trailhead.

 An application with many systems and inter-dependencies between components is a project situation that favors a waterfall methodology, as it requires a high level of planning and design upfront to ensure the integration and compatibility of the components. An application with regulatory compliance requirements to be validated by outside agencies is also a project situation that favors a waterfall methodology, as it requires a clear and detailed documentation of the requirements and specifications, as well as a formal and rigorous testing and validation process. An application in post-production, with incremental changes made by a small team is a project situation that favors an agile methodology, as it allows for faster and more frequent delivery of changes, as well as more flexibility and collaboration. An in-house application with a fixed team size, but an open timeline and flexible requirements is also a project situation that favors an agile methodology, as it allows for more creativity and experimentation, as well as more feedback and adaptation.