IIA-CIA-Part1 Exam Dumps - Essentials of Internal Auditing

The statement that the internal auditor may initially disagree with management's acceptance of a risk, but reevaluate and agree with management’s judgment after further discussion, is true. This scenario reflects the dynamic nature of risk assessment and management discussions where the auditor, after a comprehensive evaluation and consideration of new information or perspectives, might align with management's decision regarding risk acceptance.References: IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing regarding objectivity and professional judgment.

A control weakness in the oversight of credit sales is evident when the sales department is responsible for determining the credit ratings of customers. This structure can lead to a conflict of interest, as the sales department may be motivated to approve higher credit limits or overlook credit standards to increase sales figures. This undermines the objectivity and effectiveness of the credit approval process, which should ideally be handled by an independent department such as credit control to ensure unbiased evaluation.References: Internal control frameworks and auditing standards that emphasize segregation of duties and the independence of critical control activities.

Entity-level controls are the most effective type of controls for mitigating the largest risks facing an organization. These controls operate across an organization, providing a top-down approach to risk management that affects the entire entity's operations and culture. Such controls include governance frameworks, leadership and management philosophy, and organizational structure.References: COSO Internal Control Framework

A significant threat to internal audit objectivity arises when the chief audit executive reports directly to the chief financial officer, especially if the CFO previously led the internal audit activity. This reporting relationship can undermine the independence necessary for objective audits, as the CFO might influence the scope or outcome of audit engagements to suit certain financial reporting outcomes or to cover previous decisions made while in charge of internal audit.References: The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing on independence and objectivity.

Organizational independence for the internal audit activity is best evidenced when the chief audit executive (CAE) reports functionally and administratively to the CEO. Functional reporting to the CEO or equivalent position ensures that the internal audit activity has direct access to top management, which supports its independence and the ability to carry out audits without undue influence from management. Administrative reporting to the CEO also helps align the internal audit function’s objectives with those of top management, reinforcing its autonomy and authority within the organization.References: IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing regarding organizational independence.

Ethics are indeed not defined by laws alone; they are based on standards of conduct derived from shared principles and values. This statement most accurately reflects the nature of ethics in the context of corporate social responsibility (CSR), emphasizing that while ethics are guided by laws, they fundamentally originate from broader societal values and the ethical norms of the community.References: Basic ethical principles in CSR and business ethics literature

Developing policies and procedures for the internal audit activity is the most effective way for the chief audit executive (CAE) to ensure that internal auditors demonstrate due professional care. This action provides a framework and guidelines that direct auditors on how to perform their duties in accordance with the highest standards of audit practice, including adherence to ethical and professional standards set out by bodies such as the IIA.References: IIA Standard 1300 - Quality Assurance and Improvement Program

An example of risk monitoring to ensure a system is performing as intended includes checking the progress of risk treatment plans. This involves periodically reviewing and updating the risk treatment actions to ensure they are effective and continue to mitigate risks within the organization appropriately. Monitoring the implementation and effectiveness of these plans is a direct method of evaluating the system's performance relative to its intended risk management goals.References: Risk management frameworks and monitoring methodologies.