ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps - PECB Certified OHSMS ISO 45001 Lead Auditor Exam

Clause 0.2 of ISO 45001 emphasizes the involvement of top management and alignment of OH and S objectives with the organization’s OH and S policy.

Nonconformities Identified:

The objectives were developed by an external consultant without involving top management, which undermines leadership accountability and commitment.

The objectives were based on a competitor’s framework, not aligned with the organization’s unique OH and S policy or context.

Analysis of Options:

A. Establishing OH and S objectives did not include top management. True. Clause 5.1 (Leadership) and Clause 6.2 (Objectives) emphasize that top management must be involved in defining and supporting OH and S objectives.

B. OH and S objectives are not being implemented by personnel. Implementation relates to operationalization, not the development phase, and is not relevant to Clause 0.2.

C. OH and S objectives are not maintained as documented information. While documentation is required, the absence of documented information is a separate issue under Clause 7.5, not Clause 0.2.

D. OH and S objectives were not established in alignment with the organization’s OH and S policy. True. Clause 6.2.1 requires objectives to align with the OH and S policy, which reflects the organization’s commitment to safety and health.

E. The consultant has not interpreted ISO 45001 correctly. While possibly true, the issue here is the organization’s failure to involve top management, not the consultant’s interpretation.

F. The organization cannot afford to undertake OH and S objectives all at once. Financial constraints are not relevant to Clause 0.2; objectives can be prioritized for phased implementation.

ISO References:

Clause 0.2: Leadership commitment and alignment with organizational policy.

Clause 5.1: Top management’s role in leadership and participation.

Clause 6.2.1: Establishing OH and S objectives aligned with the policy.

The correct answers are B, E, and G .

G is true because ISO 19011 states that a closing meeting should be held to present the audit findings and conclusions . This applies to audits generally, not only third-party audits. ( Oshisis )

E is true because ISO 19011 guidance says that for some audit situations the closing meeting may be formal, but in other instances, such as internal audits, the closing meeting can be less formal and may simply consist of communicating the findings and conclusions. That means a first-party closing meeting is commonly less formal than a third-party certification closing meeting. ( Synersia Foundation )

B is also true . ISO 19011 and related guidance allow the use of remote methods / ICT in audit activities, and remote audit methods may be combined with on-site methods. From that, it follows that the audit team leader may arrange for audit team members to join activities such as the closing meeting virtually , where appropriate and controlled. This is an inference from the permitted use of ICT in audits. ( ISO )

Why the others are false:

A is false because the closing meeting is for presenting findings and conclusions, not for changing findings simply because the auditee is unhappy. Findings can be clarified, but not changed without objective evidence. ( Oshisis )

C is false because there is no rule that the audit team must meet formally immediately after the closing meeting to consider recommendations.

D is false because ISO 19011 says some closing meetings may be formal and recorded, but internal audits can be less formal, so they do not always have to be documented in that way. ( Synersia Foundation )

F is false because the audit team leader is responsible for managing the audit team and assigning roles.

H is false because the closing meeting should be chaired by the audit team leader , not by the audit client. ( Oshisis )

Clause 6.1.2 of ISO 45001:2018 emphasizes the identification of hazards and assessment of risks, and Clause 5.4 highlights the importance of consultation and communication among roles. The auditor ' s role includes verifying conformity to these clauses through evidence gathering and observation.

Analysis of Options:

A. The auditor should advise the organization to get rid of the walled area. This is outside the scope of an auditor’s role, which is to observe and report findings, not to dictate specific actions.

B. The auditor should ask the Maintenance Manager to conduct a safety survey. While safety surveys are useful, asking the Maintenance Manager to conduct one is not the auditor’s responsibility.

C. The auditor should check the lines of communication between the OHS Manager and Maintenance Manager. This aligns with ISO 45001:2018, Clause 5.4, as communication gaps may have contributed to the situation.

D. The auditor should check whether the organization has identified the safety hazards associated with the walled area. Clause 6.1.2 requires hazard identification. The auditor must determine whether this has been done.

E. The auditor should consider surveying more areas of the site for other potentially unsafe situations. Broadening the audit scope to identify additional risks is a good practice in line with Clause 9.2.2.

F. The auditor should demand that the Maintenance Manager deals with the wall. Demanding action is not within the auditor’s authority. The auditor should raise findings instead.

G. The auditor should raise a nonconformity against ISO 45001. While this may be appropriate depending on evidence, raising a nonconformity is not a replacement for good audit practices.

H. The auditor should refer the organization to health and safety authorities. This step is extreme and should only occur if there is an imminent danger and no action is being taken.

ISO References:

Clause 6.1.2: Hazard identification and risk assessment.

Clause 5.4: Worker consultation and participation.

Clause 9.2.2: Internal audit program and execution.