L5M3 Exam Dumps - Managing Contractual Risk

Explanation

The correct answers are as follows:

Table Description automatically generated

This is mediation - there's a third party with no powers. The answer can't be negotiation as negotiation doesn't have a third party. The answer can't be litigation or arbitration as the third party here does have decision making power.

Explanation

The correct answers are as follows:

Table Description automatically generated

This is an anticipatory breach as the breach hasn't happened yet- it's about what will happen to the future summer order.

Explanation

The correct answers are as follows:

Table Description automatically generated

This is a condition. Again the food being organic would be fundamental to the contract as the health of the llamas depend on it.

This is arbitration as it involves a panel.

This is an innominate term as it won't be mentioned in the contract. It won't be until a breach occurs when it is decided whether the issue of subcontracting is a condition or a warranty, and which one it will be, will likely depend on the situation. For example if they subcontract out to a non-organic llama food provider, that would probably be a Condition. If they get help fulfilling an order and the subcontractor is also organic, that's probably a warranty.

Explanation

The purpose is 'to agree a way forward'. This is a direct quote from p.61. The other answers are incorrect- conflict resolution isn't always binding and sometimes not all parties are happy with the outcome. It certainly isn't about punishing about anyone (this is a common red herring option given in the exam)

Explanation

No - There is no consideration. For a document to be considered a contract there must be consideration. This means something of value must be exchanged. In this example John gives Larry something but Larry doesn't give John anything. Therefore there is no consideration and this is not a contract. See p.12

Explanation

The correct answers are as follows:

The answer is liquidated damages as they're seeking compensation for loss.

Explanation

The correct answer is: 'damages attempt to position the innocent party in the position that they would have been had the contract been performed as expected'. This is a quote from p. 121 Option1 is incorrect as unliquidated damages aren't stated in a contract. Option 2 is incorrect because liquidated damages are an assessment of damages before a breach. Option 4 is incorrect because not all breaches are caused by errors (they can be caused by negligence or the offending party withholding something).

Explanation

The correct answers are as follows:

The answer is compete because they're not concerned with preserving the relationship