Client has provided sample flies of their data from the following data sources:
Google Campaign Manager
Below are the requirements from the client and additional information:
• The sources are linked to each other by shared Media Buy names.
• In addition-to the mutual Media Buys, the sources contain campaign and site values. However, the client would like to see the campaign/site values coming from Google CM and not from Google DV360.
• The source of truth for cost is Google DV360.
As a first step, a Parent-Child relationship was created between the two files, and the following mapping was performed, within both data streams:
Please note:
• All other measurements were mapped as well to the appropriate fields.
• No other mapping manipulations or formulas were implemented.
How many records will the merged table hold?
An implementation engineer has been provided with the below dataset:
*Note: CPC = Cost per Click
Formula: Cost / Clicks
Which action should an engineer take to successfully integrate CPC?
A technical architect is provided with the logic and Opportunity file shown below:
The opportunity status logic is as follows:
For the opportunity stages “Interestâ€, “Confirmed Interest†and “Registeredâ€, the status should be “Openâ€.
For the opportunity stage “Closedâ€, the opportunity status should be closed
Otherwise, return null for the opportunity status
Given the above file and logic and assuming that the file is mapped in a GENERIC data stream type with the following mapping:
“Day†— Standard “Day†field
“Opportunity Key†> Main Generic Entity Key
“Opportunity Stage†— Main Generic Entity Attribute
“Opportunity Count†— Generic Custom Metric
A pivot table was created to present the count of opportunities in each stage. The pivot table is filtered on Jan 11th. What is the number of opportunities in the Interest stage?
Client has provided sample flies of their data from the following data sources:
Google Campaign Manager
Below are the requirements from the client and additional information:
• The sources are linked to each other by shared Media Buy names.
• In addition-to the mutual Media Buys, the sources contain campaign and site values. However, the client would like to see the campaign/site values coming from Google CM and not from Google DV360.
• The source of truth for cost is Google DV360.
As a first step, a Parent-Child relationship was created between the two files, and the following mapping was performed, within both data streams:
Please note:
• All other measurements were mapped as well to the appropriate fields.
• No other mapping manipulations or formulas were implemented.
How many records will the merged table hold?
An implementation engineer has been asked to perform a QA for a newly created harmonization field, Color, implemented by a client.
The source file that was ingested can be seen below:
The client performed the below standard mapping:
As a final step, the client had created the field ‘Color’. As can be seen, it is extracted from the Creative Name (after the ‘#’ sign).
For QA purposes, you have queried a pivot table, with the following fields:
* Media Buy Key
* Media Buy Name
* In View Impressions
The final pivot is presented below:
Which two statements are correct regarding variable Dimensions in marketing Cloud intelligence’s data model?