PC-BA-FBA-20 Exam Dumps - BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis V4.0

TheBusiness Change Lifecycleencompasses multiple stages, including alignment, analysis, design, implementation, and realisation. The role of abusiness analyst (BA)is versatile and can span across all these stages, depending on the project's needs.

Key Considerations:

Involvement Across All Stages:A business analyst can contribute to every stage of the lifecycle, from identifying business needs during alignment to ensuring benefits realization post-implementation.

Implementation Focus:While BAs are often heavily involved in implementation, their role is not limited to this stage.

Realisation Stage:BAs may also be involved in the realisation stage to validate that the intended benefits have been achieved.

Alignment Stage:Business analysis plays a critical role in aligning project objectives with organizational goals.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. A business analyst can be involved at every stage in the lifecycle:This is true; BAs can contribute across all stages of the lifecycle.Conclusion:This iscorrect.

B. The business analyst is involved more heavily during the implementation stage of the lifecycle than any other stage:While BAs are often active during implementation, their involvement is not restricted to this stage.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

C. The business analyst would not be involved in the realisation stage of the lifecycle:BAs can play a role in validating benefits realization, so this statement is false.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

D. Business analysis does not take place in the alignment stage of a business change:Alignment involves understanding business needs and objectives, which is a core BA responsibility.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

TheWaterfall methodologyis a linear approach where requirements are defined upfront, and changes are difficult to accommodate once the project begins.Agile methodology, on the other hand, emphasizes flexibility and adaptability to changing requirements.

Key Considerations:

Inherent Uncertainty in Cost:While cost uncertainty exists in both methodologies, Agile does not specifically address this drawback of Waterfall.

Inflexibility to Changing Requirements:Waterfall's rigid structure makes it difficult to incorporate changes once the project starts. Agile addresses this by allowing iterative development and continuous feedback.

Capturing All Requirements Upfront:Agile does not aim to capture all requirements upfront; instead, it embraces evolving requirements throughout the project.

Stakeholder Agreement on Scope Before Work Begins:Agile encourages ongoing collaboration with stakeholders rather than requiring scope agreement upfront.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. The agile methodology addresses the inherent uncertainty in cost associated with waterfall:Agile does not specifically address cost uncertainty.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

B. Agile development addresses the inflexibility of waterfall as it pertains to changing requirements:This is the primary drawback of Waterfall that Agile addresses through its iterative and flexible approach.Conclusion:This iscorrect.

C. The agile methodology captures all requirements at the start of a project to reduce risks typically experienced in waterfall:Agile does not capture all requirements upfront; it embraces evolving requirements.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

D. Agile development requires stakeholders to agree to the scope of the project before the work begins, reducing uncertainty in the design:Agile does not require upfront scope agreement; it promotes adaptive planning.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

Final Recommendation:

The drawback of Waterfall addressed in Agile is:B. Agile development addresses the inflexibility of waterfall as it pertains to changing requirements.

To identify the stakeholder groups represented in the scenario, we need to analyze the relationships and roles described:

Stakeholder Groups in the Scenario:

Owner:The two founders of AlpineTrails, who each own 50% of the business, are clearly stakeholders as owners. They have a vested interest in the success of the business and its partnerships.

Partner:WalkNation is described as a partner organization that collaborates with AlpineTrails to offer special holidays for its members. This partnership involves shared responsibilities (marketing and booking by WalkNation, holiday organization by AlpineTrails).

Supplier:AlpineTrails books hotels, transport, and equipment to create bespoke holidays. These entities (hotels, transport providers, equipment suppliers) are suppliers to AlpineTrails and play a critical role in delivering the holidays.

Manager:While managers may exist within AlpineTrails, they are not explicitly mentioned in the scenario. Therefore, this group is not represented.

Competitor:Competitors are not mentioned or implied in the scenario, so this group is not represented.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Owner:The two founders of AlpineTrails are explicitly described as owners.Conclusion:This is arelevant stakeholder group.

B. Partner:WalkNation is explicitly described as a partner.Conclusion:This is arelevant stakeholder group.

C. Supplier:Hotels, transport, and equipment providers are implicitly described as suppliers.Conclusion:This is arelevant stakeholder group.

D. Manager:Managers are not explicitly mentioned in the scenario.Conclusion:This isnot a relevant stakeholder group.

E. Competitor:Competitors are not mentioned or implied in the scenario.Conclusion:This isnot a relevant stakeholder group.

To build anenterprise view of processes, we need a framework that provides a holistic understanding of how value is created and delivered across the organization.

Key Considerations:

Class Model:Represents objects and their relationships in software development, not enterprise processes.

Swimlane Diagram:Visualizes workflows and responsibilities within a process but does not provide an enterprise-wide view.

Value Chain Analysis:Analyzes the activities that create value for customers, providing a comprehensive view of enterprise processes.

Porter’s Five Forces Model:Analyzes industry competition and external factors, not internal processes.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Class model:A class model is used in object-oriented design and does not represent enterprise processes.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

B. Swimlane diagram:While swimlane diagrams visualize workflows, they focus on specific processes rather than an enterprise-wide view.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

C. Value chain analysis:Value chain analysis examines the activities that contribute to value creation, making it ideal for building an enterprise view of processes.Conclusion:This iscorrect.

D. Porter’s five forces model:This model analyzes external competitive forces and does not focus on internal processes.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

Kaplan and Norton'sBalanced Business Scorecardis a strategic framework that evaluates organizational performance across four key perspectives:Financial, Customer, Internal Business Processes, and Learning and Growth. To determine which area has not been considered, we need to map the provided KPIs to these perspectives.

Mapping the KPIs:

The time to deliver orders for products:This relates to operational efficiency and falls under theInternal Business Processperspective.

Consumer satisfaction with products:This directly measures customer experience and falls under theCustomerperspective.

Wastage in product production:This also relates to operational efficiency and falls under theInternal Business Processperspective.

The qualifications of production employees:This measures employee capabilities and development, falling under theLearning and Growthperspective.

Evaluating Each Perspective:

Financial:None of the provided KPIs address financial performance, such as revenue, profitability, or cost management.Conclusion:This perspective hasnot been considered.

Customer:Consumer satisfaction with products is a clear indicator of the Customerperspective.Conclusion:This perspective has been considered.

Internal Business Process:Both "time to deliver orders" and "wastage in production" relate to internal processes.Conclusion:This perspective has been considered.

Learning and Growth:The qualifications of production employees indicate employee development, which aligns with this perspective.Conclusion:This perspective has been considered.

Final Recommendation:

TheFinancialperspective hasnot been consideredin the company’s KPIs.