Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Exam Dumps - Google Cloud Certified - Professional Cloud Security Engineer

"Date shifting techniques randomly shift a set of dates but preserve the sequence and duration of a period of time. Shifting dates is usually done in context to an individual or an entity. That is, each individual's dates are shifted by an amount of time that is unique to that individual."

Objective: Implement an encryption at-rest strategy that balances key management complexity and control for sensitive and non-sensitive data, ensuring FIPS 140-2 L1 compliance.

Solution: Use Google default encryption for non-sensitive data and Cloud Key Management Service (KMS) for sensitive data.

Steps:

Step 1: Store non-sensitive data using Google Cloud’s default encryption, which automatically encrypts data at rest without additional configuration.

Step 2: For sensitive data, use Cloud KMS to create and manage encryption keys.

Step 3: Configure key rotation policies for the keys managed by Cloud KMS to meet compliance requirements.

Step 4: Ensure that all data encryption keys used by Cloud KMS comply with FIPS 140-2 Level 1 standards.

By using Google default encryption for non-sensitive data and Cloud KMS for sensitive data, you can manage encryption efficiently while maintaining control over key residency and rotation for sensitive data.

To address inconsistencies in your project's Identity and Access Management (IAM) configuration and gain comprehensive visibility into IAM policy changes, user activity, service account behavior, and access to sensitive projects, leveraging Google Cloud's auditing capabilities is essential.​

Option A: While Cloud Monitoring's metrics explorer can track certain metrics, it is not designed to provide detailed logs of IAM policy changes or user activities.​

Option B: Cloud Audit Logs offer detailed records of administrative activities, including IAM policy changes and authentications. By creating log export sinks, you can forward these logs to a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution, enabling correlation with other event sources and comprehensive analysis. This approach provides the necessary visibility into IAM configurations and user activities.​

Option C: Triggering Cloud Functions based on IAM policy changes and analyzing them with a policy simulator is a proactive approach. However, it may not provide the depth of historical data and comprehensive analysis capabilities that a SIEM solution offers.​

Option D: Deploying the OS Config Management agent focuses on VM configuration and patch management, which does not directly address IAM policy monitoring or user activity tracking.​

Therefore, Option B is the most effective solution to gain detailed visibility into IAM-related activities and address the identified inconsistencies.​

The problem states that the organization is using Model Garden and needs to ensure users can only access approved models. This implies a need for a central, enforceable control mechanism.

Organization Policies and Constraints: Google Cloud Organization Policy Service allows administrators to centrally control resources across an organization. Constraints are specific types of restrictions that can be applied. For AI Platform (which includes Vertex AI and Model Garden), there are specific constraints designed to control model usage.

vertexai.allowedModels Constraint: This specific organization policy constraint is designed precisely to restrict which models can be used within a given organization, folder, or project. It provides a centralized way to define a list of approved models that users are allowed to access.Extract Reference: "The vertexai.allowedModels constraint allows you to specify a list of model URIs that are allowed to be used within the resource hierarchy." and "This constraint helps organizations enforce compliance and control which models are consumed by their users." (Google Cloud documentation, typically found under Organization Policy Service constraints for Vertex AI or AI Platform)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Configure IAM permissions on individual Model Garden to restrict access to specific models: IAM (Identity and Access Management) typically grants permissions at a broader resource level (e.g., project, dataset, model resource). While you can control who can manage models, directly restricting access to specific models within Model Garden for consumption via IAM roles on individual models is not the primary mechanism for enforcing a list of approved models across an organization in a preventative way. Organization policies are designed for this kind of broad, preventative control.

B. Regularly audit user activity logs in Vertex AI to identify and revoke access to unapproved models: Auditing logs is a reactive measure. While important for monitoring and detecting violations, it does not prevent users from accessing unapproved models in the first place. The requirement is to ensure they can only access approved models, implying a proactive control.

C. Train custom models within your Vertex AI project and restrict user access to these models: This is about managing access to custom-trained models, not about controlling access to the collection of models in Model Garden, which often includes pre-trained or publicly available models that need to be whitelisted. It doesn't address the requirement of ensuring users only access approved models from the broader Model Garden collection.

Therefore, implementing an organization policy with the vertexai.allowedModels constraint is the most effective and Google-recommended way to centrally ensure that users can only access approved models within an organization using Model Garden.

Cloud Asset Inventory: Using Cloud Asset Inventory allows you to quickly identify all the external assets and resources in your Google Cloud environment. This includes information about your projects, instances, storage buckets, and more. This step is crucial for understanding the scope of your audit. Network Security Scanner: Once you have identified the external assets, you can run a network security scanner to assess the security of these assets. Network security scanners can help identify vulnerabilities and potential security risks quickly.

Objective: Store and retrieve sensitive configuration data for an application running on Compute Engine.

Solution: Use Secret Manager to securely store and manage access to sensitive configuration data.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the Secret Manager section.

Step 3: Create a new secret and add the sensitive configuration data.

Step 4: Set appropriate IAM policies to control access to the secret.

Step 5: Update the application to retrieve the secret from Secret Manager using the appropriate client libraries or APIs.

Secret Manager provides a secure and centralized way to manage sensitive information, with fine-grained access control and audit logging capabilities.

App Engine ingress firewall rules are available, but egress rules are not currently available. Per requirements 1.2.1 and 1.3.4, you must ensure that all outbound traffic is authorized. SAQ A-EP and SAQ D–type merchants must provide compensating controls or use a different Google Cloud product. Compute Engine and GKE are the preferred alternatives. https://cloud.google.com/solutions/pci-dss-compliance-in-gcp