SAA-C03 Exam Dumps - AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate (SAA-C03)

Requirement Analysis: The database experiences peak traffic multiple times a day but has wasted capacity during non-peak hours. The goal is to reduce costs with minimal operational effort.

Aurora Serverless Overview: Aurora Serverless automatically adjusts database capacity based on current demand, scaling up during peak times and scaling down during non-peak times.

Cost Efficiency: Aurora Serverless charges only for the capacity used, which is more cost-effective than provisioning for peak traffic.

Operational Efficiency: Aurora Serverless eliminates the need for manual scaling or scheduling Lambda functions for capacity management.

Implementation: Migrate the database from the provisioned Aurora PostgreSQL cluster to an Aurora Serverless cluster.

References

Amazon Aurora Serverless:Aurora Serverless Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to centrally collect security data with minimal development effort to assess and improve security across all workloads.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Security Lake: This is a purpose-built service for centralizing security data from across AWS services and third-party sources into a data lake. It provides native integration and requires minimal development effort to set up.

AWS Lake Formation with AWS Glue: While this can be used to create a data lake, it requires more development effort to set up and configure Glue crawlers for ingestion.

AWS Lambda with S3: This approach involves custom development to collect and process security data before storing it in S3, which requires more effort.

AWS DMS to RDS: AWS Database Migration Service is typically used for database migrations and is not suited for collecting and analyzing security data.

Best Option for Minimal Development Effort:

Amazon Security Lake provides the least development effort for setting up a centralized repository for security data. It simplifies data ingestion and management, making it the most efficient solution for this use case.

Understanding the Requirement: The company anticipates a spike in traffic during a holiday and wants to ensure the Auto Scaling group can handle the increased load without impacting performance.

Analysis of Options:

CloudWatch Alarm: This reacts to spikes based on metrics like CPU utilization but does not proactively scale before the anticipated demand.

Recurring Scheduled Action: This allows the Auto Scaling group to scale up based on a known schedule, ensuring additional capacity is available before the expected spike.

Increase Min/Max Instances: This could result in unnecessary costs by maintaining higher capacity even when not needed.

SNS Notification: Alerts on scaling events but does not proactively manage scaling to prevent performance issues.

Best Solution for Proactive Scaling:

Create a recurring scheduled action: This approach ensures that the Auto Scaling group scales up before the peak demand, providing the necessary capacity proactively without manual intervention.

Requirement Analysis: The application was overwhelmed with unexpected data volume, leading to data loss and the need for a replay mechanism.

Amazon SQS Overview: SQS is a fully managed message queuing service that decouples and scales microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications.

Data Decoupling: By using an SQS queue, the application can store incoming tracker data reliably and process it asynchronously, preventing data loss.

Implementation:

Create an SQS queue.

Modify the web application to send incoming data to the SQS queue.

Configure the application instances to poll the SQS queue and process the messages.

Conclusion: This solution meets the requirements with minimal operational overhead, ensuring data is not lost and can be processed at the application’s own pace.

References

Amazon SQS:Amazon SQS Documentation

Requirement Analysis: The company wants to identify cost optimizations for EC2 instances, the Auto Scaling group, and EBS volumes with high operational efficiency.

AWS Compute Optimizer: This service provides actionable recommendations to help optimize your AWS resources, including EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Cost Recommendations: Compute Optimizer analyzes the utilization of resources and provides specific recommendations for rightsizing or optimizing the configurations.

Operational Efficiency: Using Compute Optimizer automates the process of identifying cost-saving opportunities, reducing the need for manual analysis.

Implementation:

Enable AWS Compute Optimizer for your AWS account.

Review the recommendations provided for EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Conclusion: This solution provides a comprehensive, automated approach to identifying cost optimizations with minimal operational effort.

References

AWS Compute Optimizer:AWS Compute Optimizer Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs logs to be highly available for 30 days for frequent analysis, retained for an additional 60 days for backup, and deleted after 90 days.

Analysis of Options:

Transition to S3 Standard after 30 days: Keeps logs in the same high-availability storage, not cost-effective.

Transition to S3 Standard-IA, then Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 90 days: Adds unnecessary cost and complexity since objects need to be accessible for only 30 days and then retained for 60 days.

Transition to Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 30 days: Not suitable for frequent access required in the first 30 days.

Transition to S3 One Zone-IA after 30 days, then Glacier Flexible Retrieval: Provides cost-effective storage for infrequently accessed logs after the initial 30-day period, then moves to the cheapest long-term storage before deletion.

Best Solution:

Transition to S3 One Zone-IA after 30 days, then Glacier Flexible Retrieval: This solution meets the requirements for high availability, cost-effective storage for backup, and scheduled deletion with the least cost.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs a disaster recovery solution for FSx for NetApp ONTAP in a secondary region, accessible using the same protocols (CIFS and NFS).

Analysis of Options:

Lambda Function and S3: Involves copying data to S3, which changes the access protocols and increases operational overhead.

AWS Backup: Suitable for backup and restore but not for real-time or near-real-time replication for disaster recovery.

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: SnapMirror provides efficient replication between ONTAP instances, maintaining access protocols and requiring minimal operational overhead.

Amazon EFS: Does not support CIFS and requires migrating data, increasing complexity and changing access protocols.

Best Solution:

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: This solution ensures seamless disaster recovery with the same access protocols and minimal operational overhead.