SPLK-5001 Exam Dumps - Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst

Continuous Monitoring Cycle:This cycle is part of a broader security strategy that involves constantly assessing and managing the security state of an organization's information systems. The phases generally include defining metrics, collecting data, analyzing it, reporting findings, and implementing improvements.

Analyze and Report Phase:

Data Evaluation:In this phase, the data collected from various monitoring tools and sensors is thoroughly analyzed. Security analysts look for trends, anomalies, and indications of potential threats or vulnerabilities.

Reporting:After the analysis, a report is generated that highlights the findings, including any detected issues, their potential impact, and the current effectiveness of security measures.

Recommendations:Based on the analysis, the report usually includes suggestions for improvements, such as additional security controls, configuration changes, or policy updates. These recommendations are aimed at enhancing the organization's security posture and addressing any identified gaps or weaknesses.

Purpose of Recommendations:The goal of this phase is to ensure that the organization’s security measures are continuously improved based on the latest data and threat landscape. It is a critical step in maintaining an effective security program that adapts to new challenges.

NIST SP 800-137:This publication provides guidelines on continuous monitoring of information systems, detailing the processes involved, including the Analyze and Report phase.

Security Operations Center (SOC) Best Practices:Many SOC frameworks emphasize the importance of the Analyze and Report phase in

References:

The step-by-step description provided is an example of aTechniqueas defined in the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Techniques are the specific methods adversaries use to achieve their objectives during an attack, such as establishing command and control (C2) channels or delivering payloads via phishing emails. In this scenario, the attacker uses a non-default beacon profile in Cobalt Strike, sends a malicious document via email, and establishes a C2 channel once the victim interacts with the document, all of which are examples of adversary techniques.

Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) provides various features to enhance security monitoring, analysis, and incident response. One of the powerful features in Splunk ES isAnnotations. This feature allows security analysts to map and categorize correlation search results according to well-known industry frameworks such as the CIS Critical Security Controls, MITRE ATT&CK, and the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain®.

Purpose of Annotations:

Annotations help analysts understand and categorize security events by aligning them with recognized security frameworks. This alignment provides context, making it easier to understand the nature of threats and how they fit within broader threat models or attack strategies.

How Annotations Work:

When a correlation search in Splunk ES triggers an alert, Annotations can automatically tag the alert with relevant tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) from frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK. This helps in categorizing the event within the context of known attack patterns, offering insights into potential next steps by an attacker and recommended defensive actions.

Annotations can be manually added or configured to be applied automatically based on the nature of the search results.

Integration with Frameworks:

MITRE ATT&CK:Annotations can map alerts to specific techniques and tactics in the MITRE ATT&CK framework, which provides a detailed knowledge base of adversary behaviors, tactics, and techniques.

CIS Critical Security Controls:These controls can also be mapped through annotations, allowing the organization to measure and improve its security posture against these controls.

Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain®:This model focuses on the stages of a cyberattack, and annotations can help identify where in the kill chain a particular alert fits, providing a clearer understanding of the attack’s progression.

Annotations in Splunk ES:Practical Example:Consider a correlation search that detects unusual behavior indicating potential lateral movement within a network. If this alert is annotated with a reference to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, it might map to techniques like "T1021 - Remote Services," which is associated with the lateral movement tactic. This mapping not only categorizes the event but also helps in planning the next steps for containment and investigation.

Efficiency in Response:By aligning alerts with industry frameworks, annotations help in quickly identifying the nature and potential impact of a threat.

Consistency in Analysis:Provides a standardized method for categorizing and responding to alerts, ensuring that all analysts interpret and react to threats in a consistent manner.

Improved Reporting:Allows for better visualization and reporting of threats according to established frameworks, making it easier to communicate risks and actions to stakeholders.

Splunk Documentation:Annotations in Splunk ES

MITRE ATT&CK Framework:MITRE ATT&CK®

Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain®:Cyber Kill Chain

CIS Critical Security Controls:CIS Controls

Why Annotations Are Important:References:

Splunk Enterprise Security provides a feature calledFramework Mappingthat allows correlation searches to be mapped to specific cybersecurity frameworks, including NIST 800-171, which is crucial for DoD contractors. This mapping provides context to the analyst by showing how particular searches align with compliance requirements, aiding in continuous monitoring and reassessment as mandated by the DoD. This feature is integral for organizations that need to demonstrate compliance with NIST guidelines and other security frameworks.

This scenario is an example of aFalse Negativebecause the detection mechanisms failed to generate alerts for a brute-force attack due to a misconfiguration—specifically, the exclusion of Linux data from the detection searches. A False Negative occurs when a security control fails to detect an actual malicious activity that it is supposed to catch, leading to undetected attacks and potential breaches.