TMMi-P_Syll2020 Exam Dumps - TMMi - Test Maturity Model Integration Professional

The process areaTest Lifecycle and Integrationat TMMi Level 3 focuses on establishing a coherent test process across multiple test levels and integrating the test lifecycle with the development lifecycle. This process area addresses the creation of amaster test plan, which is essential for ensuring consistency and avoiding redundancy or omissions across different test levels.

Thespecific goal and practicefor establishing a master test plan are well documented within the Test Lifecycle and Integration process area. Practices include performing a product risk assessment, establishing the test approach, and developing the master test plan itself​​.

This statement isFALSEbecause in Agile environments, acentralized process improvement projectmay not align with the decentralized, self-organizing nature of Agile teams. Agile emphasizes local, team-driven improvements rather than a top-down, centralized approach. Continuous, local improvements within Agile teams are more suitable than attempting to manage improvements across the organization in a centralized manner, which is more characteristic of traditional environments.

TMMi References:

In Agile contexts, improvement actions are typically implemented locally within teams rather than through a centralized project, aligning with Agile's principles of team autonomy​​.

At TMMi Level 3,Test Lifecycle and Integrationbuilds on the practices ofTest Planningintroduced at TMMi Level 2. This process area focuses on establishing a standardised test lifecycle, integrating the test process with the development lifecycle, and coordinating the testing effort across multiple levels. It also includes creating amaster test planthat builds upon the risk assessments, test estimates, and approaches defined at Level 2 during Test Planning.

By further refining these practices and introducing lifecycle integration,Test Lifecycle and Integrationensures that the testing processes are consistent, well-defined, and fully embedded into the overall project lifecycle​​.

The specific practice "Testers review test basis documents" belongs to thePeer Reviewsprocess area. At TMMi Level 3, the Peer Reviews process area involves static testing activities where testers and other stakeholders review key work products, such as requirements and design documents, to identify defects early in the lifecycle. By involving testers early through these reviews, organisations can enhance testability and improve overall quality.

The specific practice"Define product risk categories and parameters"is part of theTest Policy and Strategyprocess area in TMMi. This practice involves identifying and categorizing the product risks to guide testing efforts and establish a clear understanding of potential product issues. Product risk categories help in determining the focus areas for testing, ensuring that testing is prioritized based on business and technical risks.

TMMi References:

The practice of defining product risk categories is directly linked to theTest Policy and Strategyprocess area at TMMiLevel 2, where risk-based testing approaches are established​​.

Peer ReviewsisNOTaTMMi Level 2process area. Peer Reviews is a process area atTMMi Level 3. At Level 3, organizations formalize their testing processes, including peer reviews, which involve static testing activities like inspections and walkthroughs to identify defects early.

Test Policy and Strategy,Test Monitoring and Control, andTest Environmentare all process areas atTMMi Level 2.

TMMi References:

Peer Reviews are introduced atTMMi Level 3, whereasTest Policy and Strategy,Test Monitoring and Control, andTest Environmentare process areas at Level 2​​.

A key business reason for initiating a test improvement programme is to improve product reliability, which is directly related to the quality of the final product delivered to customers. Enhancing reliability through systematic testing can lead to fewer defects, higher customer satisfaction, and reduced costs associated with fixing issues post-release. This is often a priority in organisations where product quality and reliability are critical success factors, such as in industries like healthcare, automotive, or aviation.

The TMMi framework recognises that a focus on improving product quality, including reliability, is one of the major drivers for test process improvements. Testing processes that evolve and improve reliability provide value by reducing the risk of defects and ensuring that the software meets the defined quality criteria.

In theActing phaseof the IDEAL model, the focus is on the implementation of the proposed solutions. Activities such as refining the solution and implementing the solution are key components of this phase. These actions are based on the plan developed in the earlier phases, and they are designed to apply the solutions to achieve the desired improvements. Specifically:

Refine solutions (i)refers to improving or adjusting the solution based on feedback from pilots or initial tests.

Implement Solution (iii)refers to the full implementation of the refined solution across the test process or organisation​​.

This statement isFALSEbecause TMMi doesnotfocus only on higher test levels like system and acceptance testing. In fact, TMMi coversall test levels, including lower levels like unit and integration testing, as well as static testing (e.g., reviews and inspections).

TMMi is designed to address testing at all levels of the software lifecycle and goes beyond dynamic testing (e.g., system and acceptance) to include static testing techniques as well. The model is comprehensive and is intended to support testing in bothsystems and software engineering. Furthermore, TMMi addresses the fourcornerstonesof structured testing:lifecycle,techniques,infrastructure, andorganization. These are essential to ensure a thorough and structured approach to improving test processes and aligning them with business goals.

TMMi References:

TMMi documentation clearly indicates that it coversall test levelsincluding static testing (such as peer reviews) and dynamic testing across different stages of development​​.

It is lifecycle-independent and can support different models, such as Agile, DevOps, and traditional V-models​.

The generic practice"Establish a defined process"addresses the need to tailor a managed process from the organization’s set of standard processes. This practice is part ofGeneric Goal 3 (GG 3), which aims to ensure that processes are standardized and defined across the organization. By tailoring processes based on established guidelines, organizations can create specific implementations that fit their projects while maintaining consistency and control across the organization.

TMMi References:

In TMMi, establishing a defined process involves tailoring standard processes to suit specific project needs, ensuring the institutionalization of best practices across projects​​.

This statement isFALSEbecauseTMMiis flexible and does not require the imposition of a predefined set of practices in Agile organizations. Instead, it encourages the adaptation of practices to fit the Agile context. TMMi allows for alternative practices that achieve the same goals as the expected practices, making it possible to integrate testing improvements in a way that aligns with Agile principles. The focus is on continuous improvement, not compliance with rigid practices.

TMMi References:

TMMiemphasizes flexibility in adapting practices, particularly in Agile environments where imposed processes would contradict Agile values of adaptability and continuous improvement​​.

TheAdvanced Reviewsprocess area, which is part ofTMMi Level 4, is concerned with measuring product quality early in the lifecycle. It aims to enhance thetest strategyandtest approachby aligningstatic testing(reviews and inspections) withdynamic testing(execution of test cases). The results and data from static testing are used to optimize the dynamic testing approach, making the overall testing process more efficient and effective.

TMMi References:

Advanced Reviewsat TMMi Level 4 focuses on integrating static and dynamic testing approaches to optimize test strategy and product quality evaluation​​.

The TMMi process areas complement the CMMI process areas for Verification and Validation by providing more detailed guidance specific to testing. While CMMI defines these areas at a high level, TMMi elaborates on how to establish and maintain a defined testing process that includes both verification and validation activities. The relationship between the two models is complementary rather than hierarchical, meaning that improving testing processes using TMMi can lead to fulfilling CMMI requirements for Verification and Validation.

Each statement about TMMi level 2 in an Agile context requires careful consideration within the framework:

(a): False. While Agile projects indeed use metrics like Velocity, TMMi requires tracking end-results such as escaped defects. Both team performance and outcomes, including defect-related metrics, aresignificant. Test performance indicators at TMMi level 2 in an Agile context should not solely focus on team performance metrics .

(b): True. The product risk assessment process in Agile projects typically adopts a more lightweight approach compared to traditional sequential lifecycle models. Agile teams often conduct risk assessments in a more collaborative and iterative manner .

(c): False. In Agile, monitoring and controlling processes are still critical to ensure goals and quality targets are met, even if the methodology allows for flexibility and adaptation .

(d): False. Traceability is still relevant in Agile, although it may be implemented differently. Agile methodologies such as Scrum do not eliminate the need for traceability between requirements, test conditions, and tests, which is an essential part of TMMi process areas .

(e): True. Agile allows for flexibility in defining the test environment closer to the execution phase, enabling changes that reflect evolving requirements and design decisions .

Thus, the correct combination isA: Statements (a) and (e) are true, while statements (b), (c), and (d) are false​ .

TheTMMi process area Test Planningis indeed supported by severalCMMI process areas, includingProject Planning,Requirements Management, andRisk Management. These CMMI areas provide foundational support for ensuring that the test planning process incorporates adequate project management, requirement traceability, and risk identification, all of which are critical for effective testing.

Specific Goal 2 of the CMMI Validation process arearelates to validation activities, not peer reviews, and therefore does not support the TMMi Peer Reviews process area.

Causal Analysis and Resolutionis linked toDefect Preventionin TMMi, not Quality Control.

Performance Managementdoes not directly support the Non-Functional Testing process area in TMMi.

TMMi References:

TheTMMi Test Planningprocess area is supported by relevant CMMI process areas, such asProject Planning, which helps in aligning project goals with test planning activities​​.

This statement isFALSEbecause in thestaged representationof CMMI, therearefixed levels or stages that an organization must proceed through in a predefined sequence. These stages guide organizations to improve their processes systematically by following a maturity path, with each stage building on the processes defined in the previous one.

Thestaged representationis designed with predefined levels that organizations must achieve in an orderly manner, making sure that process improvements at each level lay the foundation for the next one.

In contrast, thecontinuous representationallows organizations to select specific process areas from various categories based on their improvement goals and does not impose a strict sequence of levels.

TMMi References:

The CMMI documentation within TMMi clearly states that thestaged representationinvolves afixed set of levelsthrough which organizations progress​.

CMMI also has acontinuous representationwhere organizations can select improvement areas freely from different process categories​.

At TMMi Level 5, theQuality Controlprocess area becomes relevant as it focuses on statistically managing and controlling the test process. Since the organisation is already at TMMi Level 4, moving to Level 5 involves ensuring that the test process is fully predictable, measured, and statistically controlled.Quality Control is a key process area in achieving TMMi Level 5 compliance, alongside other areas such as Defect Prevention and Test Process Optimization.

The process area that addresses the definition of test functions and the establishment of test career paths is the Test Organization process area,found at TMMi Level 3. This process area focuses on creating a well-structured test organisation, defining various test functions, and establishing career paths for testers. Specific practices include defining roles for test specialists, assigning staff to those roles, and establishing career development frameworks to support the professional growth of testers within the organisation.

A test policy is a high-level document that outlines the objectives, goals, and strategic views regarding testing. It serves to align testing activities with the organisation's business objectives and quality goals. One of the critical elements in a test policy is defining thequality levels to be achieved, which ensures that testing aligns with the expectations for product quality, both functional and non-functional. Other aspects, such as risk categories, test types, and regression testing approaches, are typically defined in more detailed test strategies or plans, not in the high-level policy.

The specific practice “Revise the product risks as appropriate” is not directly tied to a specific goal within theAdvanced Reviewsprocess area at TMMi Level 4. While Advanced Reviews do involve coordinating reviews with risk-based testing and adjusting the test approach, revising product risks is a broader concept typically associated with product risk management as part of test planning and not exclusively with Advanced Reviews.

TheDebugging-oriented phasefrom Gelperin and Hetzel's evolutionary testing model is associated withMaturity Level 1 "Initial"of TMMi. At this maturity level, testing is not yet a distinct and well-defined process but is often interleaved with debugging. Organizations at this level have chaotic and ad-hoc testing activities, with no separation between testing and debugging.

Maturity Level 1organizations lack formal processes, and testing is often reactive, performed alongside fixing bugs in the code. This is in line with the debugging-oriented phase, where testing and debugging are seen as part of the same activity.

TMMi References:

TheTMMi frameworkdraws directly from the evolutionary model of Gelperin and Hetzel, associating theDebugging-oriented phasewith Level 1, which describes a chaotic, unmanaged testing environment​​.

The description provided—where testing ismulti-level, with distinct test levels (component, integration, system, and acceptance), and where the processes of testing and debugging are differentiated—applies toTMMi Level 2 (Managed). At this maturity level, testing is separated from debugging, and there are formalized processes for different testing levels. A company-wide or program-wide test strategy is established, and specific testing objectives are defined for each test level.

TMMi References:

TheTMMi Level 2framework defines structured testing withmultiple levels, including component, integration, system, and acceptance testing, as well as the separation of testing and debugging​​.

Thecommunication skills of testersis least likely to be improved using the TMMi model. While TMMi focuses on improving structured test processes, including static testing (such as reviews), unit testing, integration testing, and the management of test environments, it does not explicitly address the soft skills, such as communication, that testers may need toeffectively interact with stakeholders. These skills are typically developed through other training or team-building initiatives, not through process improvements outlined by TMMi.

Thedebugging-oriented phaseof the evolutionary testing model aligns closely with TMMi Level 1 (Initial). At TMMi Level 1, testing is often chaotic and is not formally separated from debugging. The primary focus is on finding and fixing bugs, which reflects the characteristics of the debugging-oriented phase described in the Gelperin and Hetzel evolutionary testing model. Testing at this level lacks structure and is mainly an ad hoc activity aimed at removing defects from the software.

A typical business reason for starting a test improvement program is to achievehigher productivity. Test process improvements can lead to better efficiency in test execution, reduction of defects, and optimised resource usage, all of which contribute to the overall productivity of the organisation. By improving testing processes, organisations can reduce time-to-market and minimise costs associated with fixing defects post-production, which in turn boosts productivity.

In the context of TMMi and test improvement programs, anindirect benefitrefers to outcomes that are not directly tied to the technical improvement of the testing process but affect the overall success of the organization in less measurable ways.

Increased personnel motivationis considered anindirect benefitof a test improvement program because it boosts team morale and engagement, leading to better productivity in the long run. This is different from direct benefits such asimprovements in defect detectionortest execution lead-time, which are quantifiable metrics directly related to the testing process.

TMMi References:

Direct benefitssuch as defect detection rates and test execution speed are frequently mentioned in TMMi as measurable outcomes from process improvement efforts.

Indirect benefits, like improved motivation, are acknowledged as part of the cultural and organizational improvements that can come from a well-executed test improvement strategy​​.

In theInitiating phaseof a test improvement cycle, one of the key activities is toCharter Infrastructure. This activity involves setting up the structure needed to support the improvement effort, such as establishing a project board and defining responsibilities. This phase focuses on creating the foundational support for the test improvement initiative.

The process areaAdvanced Reviewsbelongs to TMMi Level 4 (Measured). At this maturity level, the focus is on quantitatively measuring and managing product quality, and advanced review techniques are employed to integrate peer reviews (static testing) with dynamic testing. These advanced reviews play a key role in ensuring that product quality is assessed early in the lifecycle and that testing is driven by measurable goals.

The three TMMi Level 5 process areas are as follows:

Defect Prevention(A): The key specific goal here is todetermine common causes of defects. This process involves analysing defect patterns and establishing actions to prevent similar defects in the future.

Quality Control(B): This area focuses onevaluating new testing technologies to determine their impact on the testing process. Statistical methods help predict product quality, and these evaluations drive improvements in the test process.

Test Process Optimization(C): The goal here is toestablish a statistically controlled test process, where baselines are set, and improvements are implemented in an orderly manner​​​.

The statement thatall defects should be analyzedto prevent as many defects as possible isFALSE. In theDefect Preventionprocess area atTMMi Level 5, only asubset of defects—those that are recurring or considered to be of significant impact—are analyzed. Analyzing all defects would be inefficient and not always necessary. Instead, a targeted approach is used to identifycommon causesof defects and implement actions to prevent their recurrence.

TMMi References:

TheDefect Preventionprocess area is based on the analysis of a subset of defects to find and eliminate common causes​​.