CMMC-CCP Exam Dumps - Certified CMMC Professional (CCP) Exam

Federal Contract Information (FCI)is any informationnot intended for public releasethat is provided or generated under aU.S. Government contracttodevelop or deliver a product or service.

Enhanced Security Personnel (ESP)refers to employees, contractors, or third parties whohave access to FCIwithin anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC).

UnderCMMC 2.0 Scoping Guidance, anypersonnel, system, or asset with access to FCI is considered in scopefor a CMMC Level 1 assessment.

Since theESP employee has access to FCI, theymustbe included in the assessment scope.

Option B (Out of scope)is incorrect because anyone with access to FCI is automatically considered part of theCMMC Level 1 boundary.

Option C (OSC point of contact)is incorrect because thepoint of contactis typically an administrative or compliance representative, not necessarily someone with FCI access.

Option D (Assessment Team Member)is incorrect because anESP employee is not part of the assessment team but rather a subject of the assessment.

CMMC Level 1 Scoping Guide, Section 2 – Defining Scope for FCI

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide – Roles and Responsibilities

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.204-21(Basic Safeguarding of FCI)

Understanding Scoping in CMMC Level 1 Self-AssessmentsWhy Option A (In scope) is CorrectOfficial CMMC Documentation ReferencesFinal VerificationSince theESP employee has access to FCI, they are consideredin scopefor the CMMC Level 1 self-assessment, makingOption A the correct answer.

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) serves as the authoritative body overseeing the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) program within the United States federal government. NARA maintains the CUI Registry, which is the definitive resource for all categories, subcategories, and associated markings of CUI. This registry provides comprehensive guidance on the identification and handling of CUI, ensuring standardized practices across federal agencies and their contractors.

The other options are delineated as follows:

CMMC-AB:The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Accreditation Body is responsible for overseeing the CMMC program but does not manage CUI classifications.

DoD Contractors FAQ:While it may offer guidance to Department of Defense contractors, it is not an authoritative source for CUI data classifications.

OSC's privacy policies:An Organization Seeking Certification's internal policies pertain to its own data handling practices and are not authoritative for CUI classifications.

Therefore, for authoritative information on CUI data classifications, the NARA's CUI Registry is the appropriate resource.

TheLimited Practice Deficiency Correction Evaluationprocess occurs when anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)has undergone aCMMC Level 2 Assessmentby aCertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)and hasunresolved deficienciesin some security practices.

According toCMMC 2.0 policy and DFARS 252.204-7021, OSCs can still achieveInterim Certificationif they meet theminimum thresholdof security practices while addressing deficiencies through aPlan of Action & Milestones (POA&M).

TheCMMC 2.0 Interim Rulestates that an OSCmust meet at least 100 out of 110 practicesto qualify for aPOA&M-based remediation.

A maximum of 10 practices can be listed in the POA&Mfor later correction.

Failure to meet at least 100 practices results in failing the assessment outright, requiring a full reassessment after remediation.

The Lead Assessor can recommend POA&M placementonly if the OSC meets at least 100 practices.

Less than 100 practices scored as MET means the OSC does not qualify for a POA&Mand mustretest completely.

DFARS 252.204-7021 and CMMC 2.0 policiesconfirm the100-practice thresholdfor conditional certification.

A. 80 practices (Incorrect)– Falls well below the 100-practice requirement.

B. 88 practices (Incorrect)– Still below the POA&M eligibility threshold.

D. 110 practices (Incorrect)– While meeting 110 practices would be ideal,CMMC allows a POA&M option at 100 practices.

The correct answer isC. 100 practices, as this meets theminimum threshold for POA&M-based Interim Certification.

In theCMMC 2.0 Assessment Process, after theAssessment Final Recommended Findings Brief, theLead Assessor and Assessment Team Membersmustreview the accuracy and validity of the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC)’s updated Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) and any accompanying evidence or scheduled collectionswithin180 days.

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)outlines that organizations haveup to 180 daysto address identifieddeficienciesafter their initial assessment.

During this time, the OSC can update itsPOA&M with additional evidenceto demonstrate compliance.

Relevant CMMC 2.0 Reference:

A. 90 days → Incorrect

The CMMC CAP does not impose a90-day limiton POA&M updates; instead,180 daysis the standard timeframe.

B. 180 days → Correct

PerCMMC Assessment Process guidelines, theLead Assessor and Teammust review updateswithin 180 days.

C. 270 days → Incorrect

No official CMMC documentation mentions a270-dayreview period.

D. 360 days → Incorrect

The process must be completedfar sooner than 360 daysto maintain compliance.

Why is the Correct Answer 180 Days (B)?

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Defines the180-day windowfor the OSC to update itsPOA&M and submit evidencefor review.

CMMC 2.0 Official Guidelines

Specifies that organizations are givenup to 180 daysto remediate deficiencies before reassessment.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting this Answer:

In the context of CMMC 2.0 assessments, thesufficiency criteriaare used to determine whether the assessment team has gathered enough evidence to support their conclusions about compliance with a given requirement.

Definition of Sufficiency Criteria:

Sufficiency refers to thequantityandcompletenessof the evidence collected during an assessment.

This ensures that the evidence collected isenough to support an objective and valid determinationof compliance.

Why Sufficiency Matters in CMMC 2.0:

Assessors must ensure that the amount of evidence collected isadequate to substantiate findingswithout doubt or gaps.

This prevents situations where an organization might claim compliance but lacks thenecessary documentation, technical evidence, or procedural validationto prove it.

Official CMMC 2.0 References:

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guidedefines sufficiency as a key factor in validating assessment findings.

According toCMMC 2.0 Level 2 Scoping Guidance, assessors must apply sufficiency criteria when reviewingartifacts, documentation, interviews, and system configurations.

TheDoD CMMC Assessment Guide(aligned with NIST SP 800-171A) emphasizes that compliance decisions must besupported by a sufficient amount of verifiable evidence.

Comparison with Other Criteria:

Adequacy Criteria→ Focuses onqualityof the evidence, not the quantity.

Objectivity Criteria→ Ensures evidence isunbiased and impartial, not necessarily complete.

Subjectivity Criteria→ Not applicable in CMMC since assessments must beobjective and based on factual evidence.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:Conclusion:To verify compliance in CMMC 2.0 assessments, the assessment team must ensuresufficientevidence is available to support a determination. This makes"Sufficiency Criteria" (Option C)the correct answer.