Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps - AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01)

Option B is correct because ANALYZE COMPRESSION is the Amazon Redshift command specifically used to evaluate existing table data and recommend better compression encodings for columns. AWS states that ANALYZE COMPRESSION performs compression analysis and produces a report with the suggested compression encoding for the tables analyzed. AWS also states that when you already have data in an existing table, you can use ANALYZE COMPRESSION to view the recommended encodings for that table.

Option A is incorrect because the standard ANALYZE command updates optimizer statistics; it does not recommend column compression settings. Options C and D are vacuum operations related to sorting, reclaiming space, or clustering behavior, not choosing better compression encodings. AWS also notes that Redshift supports automatic encoding management with ENCODE AUTO, but when the question asks how to improve encoding for existing suboptimal tables, the direct diagnostic command is ANALYZE COMPRESSION.

Also, once you finish this review set, consider using the Djamgatech App for deeper DEA-C01 prep and practice tests: iOS, Web, Android, and Microsoft Store editions are available. For job opportunities related to Data Engineering certification, a strong platform to use is LinkedIn Jobs.

 Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB offers two capacity modes for throughput capacity: provisioned and on-demand. In provisioned capacity mode, you specify the number of read and write capacity units per second that you expect your application to require. DynamoDB reserves the resources to meet your throughput needs with consistent performance. In on-demand capacity mode, you pay per request and DynamoDB scales the resources up and down automatically based on the actual workload. On-demand capacity mode is suitable for unpredictable workloads that can vary significantly over time1.

The solution that meets the requirements in the most cost-effective way is to use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times. This solution has the following advantages:

It allows you to optimize the cost and performance of your DynamoDB table by adjusting the provisioned capacity according to your predictable workload patterns. You can use scheduled scaling to specify the date and time for the scaling actions, and the new minimum and maximum capacity limits. For example, you can schedule higher capacity for every Monday morning and lower capacity for weekends2.

It enables you to take advantage of the lower cost per unit of provisioned capacity mode compared to on-demand capacity mode. Provisioned capacity mode charges a flat hourly rate for the capacity you reserve, regardless of how much you use. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode1.

It ensures that your application performs consistently during peak usage times by having enough capacity to handle the increased load. You can also use auto scaling to automatically adjust the provisioned capacity based on the actual utilization of your table, and set a target utilization percentage for your table or global secondary index. This way, you can avoid under-provisioning or over-provisioning your table2.

Option A is incorrect because it suggests increasing the provisioned capacity to the maximum capacity that is currently present during peak load times. This solution has the following disadvantages:

It wastes money by paying for unused capacity during off-peak times. If you provision the same high capacity for all times, regardless of the actual workload, you are over-provisioning your table and paying for resources that you don’t need1.

It does not account for possible changes in the workload patterns over time. If your peak load times increase or decrease in the future, you may need to manually adjust the provisioned capacity to match the new demand. This adds operational overhead and complexity to your application2.

Option B is incorrect because it suggests dividing the table into two tables and provisioning each table with half of the provisioned capacity of the original table. This solution has the following disadvantages:

It complicates the data model and the application logic by splitting the data into two separate tables. You need to ensure that the queries are evenly distributed across both tables, and that the data is consistent and synchronized between them. This adds extra development and maintenance effort to your application3.

It does not solve the problem of adjusting the provisioned capacity according to the workload patterns. You still need to manually or automatically scale the capacity of each table based on the actual utilization and demand. This may result in under-provisioning or over-provisioning your tables2.

Option D is incorrect because it suggests changing the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand. This solution has the following disadvantages:

It may incur higher costs than provisioned capacity mode for predictable workloads. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode, as you can reserve the capacity you need at a lower rate1.

It may not provide consistent performance during peak usage times, as on-demand capacity mode may take some time to scale up the resources to meet the sudden increase in demand. On-demand capacity mode uses adaptive capacity to handle bursts of traffic, but it may not be able to handle very large spikes or sustained high throughput. In such cases, you may experience throttling or increased latency.

1: Choosing the right DynamoDB capacity mode - Amazon DynamoDB

2: Managing throughput capacity automatically with DynamoDB auto scaling - Amazon DynamoDB

3: Best practices for designing and using partition keys effectively - Amazon DynamoDB

[4]: On-demand mode guidelines - Amazon DynamoDB

[5]: How to optimize Amazon DynamoDB costs - AWS Database Blog

[6]: DynamoDB adaptive capacity: How it works and how it helps - AWS Database Blog

[7]: Amazon DynamoDB pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Publishing AWS Glue data quality scores to Amazon DataZone requires creating a DQDL ruleset, scheduling it to run regularly, and then linking the corresponding AWS Glue table as a data source in the DataZone project. The setup ensures that data quality scores from Glue are correctly published and accessible within Amazon DataZone:

“You can define DQDL rulesets for Glue tables and publish the data quality results to DataZone when the project is configured with an AWS Glue data source and the rulesets are scheduled.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

Option C follows the expected flow without unnecessary complexity and aligns perfectly with the integration flow supported by AWS.

Option C is correct because AWS Glue workflows are designed to orchestrate multiple ETL jobs, crawlers, and triggers with dependency management and a visual workflow graph. AWS documentation states that Glue workflows can create and visualize complex ETL activities involving multiple jobs and triggers, and that triggers can be configured so that a job starts only when multiple watched jobs satisfy specified completion conditions. AWS also states that a conditional trigger can fire when any or all watched jobs complete with the desired status. That directly matches the requirement to run the first two processes concurrently and begin the third process only after both finish.

This is also the least operational overhead option because the whole workflow stays inside AWS Glue, which already fits the ETL conversion use case from CSV to Parquet on S3 with catalog integration. Option A would work but adds MWAA operational complexity. Option B is more custom and infrastructure-heavy. Option D using Lambda is not ideal for long-running, memory-intensive ETL steps. Therefore, AWS Glue workflows is the most direct and exam-aligned answer.

The DatasetMatch rule in DQDL checks for full value equivalence between mapped fields. A value of 1.0 indicates a 100% match. The correct syntax and metric for an exact match scenario are:

“Use DatasetMatch when comparing mapped fields between two datasets. The comparison score of 1.0 confirms a perfect match.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

Options with “100” use incorrect syntax since DQDL uses floating-point scores (e.g., 1.0, 0.95), not percentages.

 AWS Glue is a fully managed serverless ETL service that can handle data deduplication with minimal operational overhead. AWS Glue provides a built-in ML transform called FindMatches, which can automatically identify and group similar records in a dataset. FindMatches can also generate a primary key for each group of records and remove duplicates. FindMatches does not require any coding or prior ML experience, as it can learn from a sample of labeled data provided by the user. FindMatches can also scale to handle large datasets and optimize the cost and performance of the ETL job. References:

AWS Glue

FindMatches ML Transform

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

Problem Analysis:

The company uses DynamoDB for gaming data storage and needs to ingest data into Amazon OpenSearch Service in near real time.

Data updates must propagate quickly to OpenSearch for analytics or search purposes.

Key Considerations:

DynamoDB Streams provide near-real-time capture of table changes (inserts, updates, and deletes).

Integration with AWS Lambda allows seamless processing of these changes.

OpenSearch offers APIs for indexing and updating documents, which Lambda can invoke.

Solution Analysis:

Option A: Step Functions with Periodic Export

Not suitable for near-real-time updates; introduces significant latency.

Operationally complex to manage periodic exports and S3 data ingestion.

Option B: AWS Glue Job

AWS Glue is designed for ETL workloads but lacks real-time processing capabilities.

Option C: DynamoDB Streams + Lambda

DynamoDB Streams capture changes in near real time.

Lambda can process these streams and use the OpenSearch API to update the index.

This approach provides low latency and seamless integration with minimal operational overhead.

Option D: Custom OpenSearch Plugin

Writing a custom plugin adds complexity and is unnecessary with existing AWS integrations.

Implementation Steps:

Enable DynamoDB Streams for the relevant DynamoDB tables.

Create a Lambda function to process stream records:

Parse insert, update, and delete events.

Use OpenSearch APIs to index or update documents based on the event type.

Set up a trigger to invoke the Lambda function whenever there are changes in the DynamoDB Stream.

Monitor and log errors for debugging and operational health.

Amazon DynamoDB Streams Documentation

AWS Lambda and DynamoDB Integration

Amazon OpenSearch Service APIs