FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 Exam Dumps - FCP - FortiAnalyzer 7.4 Analyst

In FortiOS and FortiAnalyzer logging systems, when an event has a status of"Mitigated"in theEvent Statuscolumn, it typically indicates that the system took action to address the identified threat. In this case, theWeb Filterblocked the web request to a suspicious destination, and the event status "Mitigated" confirms that the action was successfully implemented to neutralize or block the security risk.

Let's review the answer options:

Option A: The risk source is isolated.

This is incorrect because "isolated" would imply that FortiGate took further steps to prevent the source device from communicating with the network. There is no indication of isolation in this event status.

Option B: The security risk was blocked or dropped.

This is correct. The"Mitigated"status, along with theWeb Filterevent type and the accompanying description, implies that the FortiGate or FortiAnalyzer successfully blocked or dropped the suspicious web request, which corresponds to the term "mitigated."

Option C: The security event risk is considered open.

This is incorrect because an open status would indicate that no action was taken, or the threat is still present. The "Mitigated" status indicates that the threat has been addressed.

Option D: An incident was created from this event.

This option is not correct or evident based on the given display. Although FortiAnalyzer or FortiGate could escalate certain events to incidents, this is not indicated here.

References:

The FortiOS 7.4.1 and FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation specify that"Mitigated"status in logs means the identified threat was handled, usually by blocking or dropping the action associated with the event, particularly with Web Filter and Security Policy logs​.

FortiAnalyzer offers several features for monitoring, alerting, and incident management, each serving different purposes. Let's examine each option to determine which one best supports a proactive security approach.

Option A - FortiView Monitor:

FortiView is a visualization tool that provides real-time and historical insights into network traffic, threats, and logs. While it gives visibility into network activity, it is generally more reactive than proactive, as it relies on existing log data and incidents.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option B - Outbreak Alert Services:

Outbreak Alert Services in FortiAnalyzer notify administrators of emerging threats and outbreaks based on FortiGuard intelligence. This is beneficial for awareness of potential threats but does not offer a hands-on, investigative approach. It’s more of a notification service rather than an active, proactive investigation tool.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option C - Incidents Dashboard:

The Incidents Dashboard provides a summary of incidents and current security statuses within the network. While it assists with ongoing incident response, it is used to manage and track existing incidents rather than proactively identifying new threats.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option D - Threat Hunting:

Threat Hunting in FortiAnalyzer enables security analysts to actively search for hidden threats or malicious activities within the network by leveraging historical data, analytics, and intelligence. This is a proactive approach as it allows analysts to seek out threats before they escalate into incidents.

Conclusion:Correct.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:D. Threat hunting

Threat hunting is the most proactive feature among the options, as it involves actively searching for threats within the network rather than reacting to already detected incidents.

References:

FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on Threat Hunting and proactive security measures.

The topology shows a Security Fabric setup involving FortiGate devices (FGT-A and FGT-B) and a FortiAnalyzer for centralized logging. Let’s break down the logging and traffic flow behavior:

Traffic Flow Analysis:

Client-1initiates web traffic directed to the internet, which is routed throughFGT-Band thenFGT-Abefore reaching the internet. This is indicated by the direction of the red-dashed arrow from Client-1 through FGT-B to FGT-A.

Policy and NAT Settings:

OnFGT-B, NAT is disabled, meaning it will pass the traffic through without altering the source IP. This device has a Web Filter enabled with a policy to log violations only.

OnFGT-A, NAT is enabled, and a Web Filter profile is also applied. Like FGT-B, it logs only violations for web filtering.

Logging Behavior:

Since both FortiGate devices have logging enabled for traffic and web filtering, they can create logs if conditions are met.

FGT-Bwill log all traffic, as per its configuration, and will also create web filter logs if it detects a violation, as the web filter profile is applied. Because NAT is disabled on FGT-B, it processes the traffic but doesn’t perform any address translation, allowing it to see the original source IP of Client-1.

FGT-A, as the Security Fabric root, will handle NAT and forward the traffic to the internet. However, in this case, the question is focused on where the traffic and web filter logs would be generated first, particularly by FGT-B.

Option Analysis:

Option A - Only FGT-B will create traffic logs: This is incorrect because FGT-B can create both traffic logs and web filter logs if it detects a violation.

Option B - FGT-B will see the MAC address of FGT-A and notify FGT-A to log: This is not how logging works in this setup. Each FortiGate logs independently based on configured policies.

Option C - FGT-B will create traffic logs and will create web filter logs if it detects a violation: This is correct, as FGT-B has logging enabled and will log traffic and web filter violations.

Option D - Only FGT-A will create web filter logs if it detects a violation: This is incorrect, as FGT-B can also log web filter violations independently.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:C. FGT-B will create traffic logs and will create web filter logs if it detects a violation.

FGT-B is responsible for logging the traffic from Client-1 and will generate web filter logs if there is a policy violation, as configured.

References:

FortiOS 7.4.1 documentation on Security Fabric logging behavior and FortiAnalyzer log integration.

FortiAnalyzer has two primary operating modes:Analyzer modeandCollector mode. Each mode serves specific purposes and has distinct capabilities.

Option A - Forwarding Logs to a Syslog Server in Collector Mode:

In Collector mode, FortiAnalyzer collects logs from Fortinet devices but does not process or analyze them. Instead, it forwards the logs to other FortiAnalyzer units in Analyzer mode or to specific storage locations. However, forwarding logs to a syslog server is not a function of Collector mode. Logs are generally stored or sent to other FortiAnalyzer devices.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option B - Default Mode is Collector Mode Unless Configured for HA:

When a FortiAnalyzer is initially set up, it runs in Collector mode by default unless it is configured as part of a High Availability (HA) setup, which would set it to Analyzer mode. Collector mode prioritizes log collection and storage rather than analysis, offloading analysis to other devices in the network.

Conclusion:Correct.

Option C - Report Creation and Editing in Collector Mode:

In Collector mode, FortiAnalyzer does not have the capability to create or edit reports. This mode is focused solely on log collection and forwarding, with analysis and report generation left to FortiAnalyzer units operating in Analyzer mode.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option D - Performance Improvement with Both Modes in Topology:

Deploying FortiAnalyzer devices in both Collector and Analyzer modes in a network topology can enhance performance. Collector mode devices handle log collection, reducing the workload on Analyzer mode devices, which focus on log processing, analysis, and reporting. This separation of tasks can optimize resource usage and improve the overall efficiency of log management.

Conclusion:Correct.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:B. FortiAnalyzer runs in collector mode by default unless it is configured for HAandD. A topology with FortiAnalyzer devices running in both modes can improve their performance.

These answers correctly describe the functionality and default configuration of FortiAnalyzer operating modes, along with how a mixed-mode topology can enhance performance.

References:

FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on operating modes (Collector and Analyzer) and their respective capabilities.

In this exhibit, we observe a search query on the FortiAnalyzer interface displaying log data with details about the connection events, including fields like date, srcip, dstip, service, and dstintf. This setup allows for several functionalities within FortiAnalyzer.

Option A - Download Capability:

FortiAnalyzer provides the option to download search results and reports to a file in multiple formats, such as CSV or PDF, allowing for further offline analysis or archival. This makes it possible to save the search results shown in the exhibit to a file.

Conclusion:Correct.

Option B - Sorting and Customization:

The FortiAnalyzer interface allows users to sort and customize columns for search results. This helps in organizing and viewing the logs in a manner that fits the analyst's needs, such as ordering logs by time, srcip, dstip, or other fields.

Conclusion:Correct.

Option C - Availability in FortiView:

FortiView is a tool within FortiAnalyzer that visualizes data and provides analysis capabilities, including traffic and security event logs. Since these are traffic logs, they are typically available for visualization and analysis within FortiView.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option D - Text Mode Search:

The search displayed here appears to be in a structured format, which implies it might be utilizing filters rather than a free-text search. FortiAnalyzer allows both structured searches and text searches, but there's no indication here that text mode was used.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:A. They can be downloaded to a file.andB. They are sortable by columns and customizable.

These options are consistent with FortiAnalyzer's capabilities for managing, exporting, and customizing log data.

References:

FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on search, export functionalities, and customizable views.

The FortiSOAR management extension is designed as an independent security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) solution that integrates with other Fortinet products but requires its own dedicated device or virtual machine (VM) environment. FortiSOAR is not natively integrated as a container or service within FortiAnalyzer or FortiManager, and it operates separately to manage complex security workflows and incident responses across various platforms.

Let’s examine each option to determine the correct answer:

Option A: It requires a FortiManager configured to manage FortiGate

This is incorrect. FortiSOAR operates independently of FortiManager. While FortiSOAR can receive input or data from FortiGate (often managed by FortiManager), it does not require FortiManager to be part of its setup.

Option B: It runs as a docker container on FortiAnalyzer

This is incorrect. FortiSOAR does not run as a container within FortiAnalyzer. It requires its own dedicated environment, either as a physical device or a virtual machine, due to the resource requirements and specialized functions it performs.

Option C: It requires a dedicated FortiSOAR device or VM

This is correct. FortiSOAR is deployed as a standalone device or VM, which enables it to handle the intensive processing needed for orchestrating security operations, integrating with third-party tools, and automating responses across an organization’s security infrastructure.

Option D: It does not include a limited trial by default

This is incorrect. FortiSOAR installations may come with trial options or demos in specific scenarios, especially for evaluation purposes. This depends on licensing and deployment policies.

References: The FortiSOAR platform, as outlined in Fortinet product documentation, is a standalone SOAR solution that requires a dedicated device or VM for deployment. It integrates with Fortinet’s Security Fabric but operates separately from FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, and FortiGate, focusing on advanced incident management and security automation​.

The exhibit displays a diagnose log device output on a FortiAnalyzer, showing details about disk space usage and quotas for different FortiGate devices and ADOMs (Administrative Domains). Here’s a breakdown of key details:

Disk Quota for Quarantined Files:

The output includes columns labeled for used space in categories such as "logs," "quarantine," "content," and "DB." For each device, the quarantine column consistently shows 0.0KB used, indicating that there is no disk quota allocated or utilized for quarantining files.

Conclusion:Correct.

FGT_B as Security Fabric Root:

There is no direct indication from this output that specifies FGT_B is the root of the Security Fabric. Information on Security Fabric topology or root designation would typically come from a Security Fabric configuration command rather than a disk usage summary.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Allocated Disk Quota for ADOM1:

The output shows the quota for ADOM1 is "unlimited," not a fixed 3 GB quota. Therefore, there is no set 3 GB limit for ADOM1.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Comparison of Archive Logs and Analytic Logs:

The output does not differentiate between archive logs and analytic logs; it only shows overall disk usage by type (e.g., logs, quarantine). Therefore, no conclusion can be made about which type of logs (archive or analytic) is using more space.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:A. There is no disk quota allocated to quarantining files.

This answer aligns with the observed data, where no disk space is used or allocated for quarantine files.

References:

FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on diagnose log device command usage and disk quota settings.