IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Dumps - Business Knowledge for Internal Auditing

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In the context of in-house application system development, establishing a robust development process is crucial. Such a process is designed to prevent, detect, and correct errors that may occur during development and implementation. This includes implementing coding standards, conducting regular code reviews, and performing comprehensive testing phases (unit, integration, system, and user acceptance testing) to identify and rectify errors promptly. While logical access controls (option A) and maintaining records of data processing (option C) are essential, they pertain more to operational controls post-development. Documenting business users' requirements (option D) is a critical initial step; however, without a development process focused on error management, merely documenting requirements doesn't ensure error prevention or correction. Therefore, option B best exemplifies a key systems development control in this context.

In organizations, authority types define how power and influence are exercised. Since the technician is prioritizing projects, their authority comes from their specialized knowledge or expertise, making this an example of expert authority.

Why Option D (Expert Authority) is Correct:

Expert authority is based on specialized knowledge, skills, or expertise rather than formal position or hierarchical power.

The technician is trusted to prioritize projects because of their technical knowledge and understanding of project impact.

Expert authority is commonly seen in IT specialists, consultants, and industry professionals who guide decision-making based on expertise.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Legitimate Authority):

Incorrect because legitimate authority is derived from a formal position or title within an organizational hierarchy (e.g., CEO, manager).

Option B (Coercive Authority):

Incorrect because coercive authority relies on threats, punishment, or force, which is not applicable in this scenario.

Option C (Referent Authority):

Incorrect because referent authority is based on personal influence, charisma, or relationships, rather than expertise.

IIA Practice Guide – "Auditing Organizational Governance": Discusses different types of authority in decision-making.

COSO ERM Framework – "Risk Governance & Decision-Making": Recognizes expert authority as a key factor in risk-based project prioritization.

IIA’s GTAG – "Auditing IT Governance": Highlights the role of expert authority in IT project prioritization and governance.

IIA References:

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Job rotation involves periodically moving employees between different tasks, roles, or departments to increase engagement, reduce boredom, and enhance skill development.

Option A (Job specification) – Defines job responsibilities but does not address boredom.

Option B (Job objectives) – Focuses on performance goals rather than task variety.

Option D (Job description) – Simply documents job roles without changing daily tasks.

Thus, job rotation (Option C) is the most effective strategy for overcoming monotony and job-related boredom.