OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Exam Dumps - OMG Certified UML Professional 2 (OCUP 2) - Advanced Level

When a template classifier is used to specify the type of a typed element, the actual parameters for the template classifier's formal parameters must be provided by a set of bound elements. This means that for a template classifier to be used as a type, there must be a corresponding binding that specifies what elements are used as arguments for its template parameters. This allows the typed element to have a concrete type that is a specific instantiation of the template classifier with particular values for its template parameters. This use of template classifiers is described in the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification, which details how template binding works to create specific instances of template classifiers.

A FunctionBehavior in UML is a specialized form of behavior that specifies a function that, when executed, yields results influenced only by its input arguments and its internal attributes, without any side effects (e.g., altering global variables or I/O operations). This makes it stateless. Among the options provided:

• Ainvolves I/O operations which are not covered under FunctionBehavior as it implies side effects.
• Bdeals with environmental inputs and actuator control, not just function computation.
• Ccould be considered but implies a state change which again might involve side effects, depending on the implementation.
• Dpurely involves calculation based on input parameters, which fits the definition of FunctionBehavior perfectly, as it is a stateless computation.
• Eis incorrect because UML indeed includes the concept of FunctionBehavior.

References:

• UML Specification, Section on Behaviors
• Further details on FunctionBehaviors can be found in the UML 2.5 Documentation under the Classification and Behaviors sections.

fUML (Foundational UML) is a subset of the standard Unified Modeling Language (UML) that includes standard, precise execution semantics. This subset encompasses typical structural modeling constructs of UML such as classes, associations, data types, and enumerations, as well as the ability to model behavior using UML activities composed from a set of primitive actions. Therefore, a model constructed in fUML is executable in the same sense as a program in a traditional programming language, but with the level of abstraction and richness of expression of a modeling language2.

A stereotype in UML is a powerful extension mechanism that allows developers to tailor UML models for particular domains or platforms. Stereotypes can adapt UML model elements by adding constraints, changing notation, and adding attributes and operations. However, they cannot remove existing constraints from a model element12.

• Notation Change (A): Stereotypes can indeed change the notation of a model element to make it more expressive or domain-specific. For example, a stereotype could be used to visually distinguish between different kinds of classes in a class diagram1.
• Adding Constraints (B): Stereotypes can add new constraints to a model element to specify additional rules or requirements that are not defined by the standard UML1.
• Removing Constraints ©: This is not a capability of stereotypes. Constraints define rules that must be followed, and once they are part of a model element, they cannot be removed by a stereotype. Instead, they are an intrinsic part of the model’s definition1.
• Adding Attributes and Operations (D): Stereotypes can be used to add attributes and operations to a model element, which allows for the specification of additional properties or behaviors that are not part of the standard UML metamodel1.

In summary, while stereotypes are versatile and can extend the capabilities of UML model elements in various ways, they do not have the ability to remove constraints that are already applied to those elements. This is because constraints are consideredfundamental rules that govern the integrity of the model, and removing them would potentially violate the model’s correctness or completeness1.

Protocol Conformance in UML is a relationship between protocol state machines that ensures consistency in behavior inheritance:

• A.Incorrect as it describes a general-to-inherited relationship, which is not the focus of protocol conformance.
• B.Incorrect, as it describes a relationship the wrong way around (general to nested).
• C.Correct. Protocol Conformance ensures that a specific Protocol State Machine conforms to the rules and constraints specified by a redefined, more general Protocol State Machine.
• D.Incorrect, because it generally describes conformance but does not specifically focus on the relationship between specific and general state machines in the context of protocols.

References:

• UML Specification: Protocol State Machines section.
• Specifics of protocol conformance are detailed under state machine and classifier behaviors in the UML 2.5 Documentation.

In UML, a template is a parameterizable element, and the parameters for a template are typically classes or other classifiers. According to the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification, all subclasses of Classifier can potentially be used as template parameters. This includes classes, components, datatypes, interfaces, signals, and more. The specification provides the flexibility to define template parameters that are specialized types, allowing for powerful and reusable designs. The ability to parameterize these elements is foundational to creating generic and reusable model elements, which is a core capability of the UML's templating mechanism.

In UML 2.5, a NamedElement can have anameattribute, which is a string representing the element's name, and anameExpressionattribute, which is a ValueSpecification used to specify the element's name in a more dynamic way. The presentation of the name of a NamedElement in a tool that conforms to the OMG specification could either be the literal name (as specified in thenameattribute) or the evaluated expression from thenameExpressionproperty. Therefore, a tool may choose to present either the simple name or the evaluated expression or allow toggling between the two. The specification does not mandate a single fixed presentation, allowing for flexibility in how tools display the name. This conforms to the OMG's UML 2.5 specification, which describes the properties of NamedElement and their presentations within tools.

A MOF (Meta Object Facility) 2.x Model is not always a valid UML (Unified Modeling Language) 2.x Model. The MOF 2.x and UML 2.x serve different purposes and have different scopes of application. While UML is a general-purpose modeling language used to define software systems, MOF is a language for defining metamodels, which can include UML itself1.

The MOF 2.x specification provides the basis for metamodel definition in OMG’s (Object Management Group’s) family of modeling languages, which includes UML. However, it is based on a simplification of UML 2’s class modeling capabilities1. MOF is designed to be simpler, directly implementable, and provides a set of CORBA interfaces for manipulating meta objects2. In contrast, UML is used as a general-purpose modeling language with potentially many implementation targets2.

Therefore, a MOF 2.x Model can be a valid UML 2.x Model when certain limitations are observed, such as adhering to the simplified class modeling capabilities that MOF is based on. This means that while a MOF model can resemble a UML model in terms of visual representation, it is fundamentally a MOF model, and its validity as a UML model depends on the extent to which it conforms to the UML specifications