PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 5.6.2, the project manager should perform an impact analysis when a change request is received, to assess the potential effects on the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, risk, and other aspects.3

The project manager should also communicate the impact analysis to the relevant stakeholders, such as the project sponsor, the product owner, the customer, and the team, to facilitate the decision making process and obtain their agreement on the change.3

The project manager should not accept or reject the change request without performing an impact analysis, as this may lead to unrealistic expectations, missed deadlines, scope creep, or stakeholder dissatisfaction.3

The project manager should not ask the product owner to prioritize the new request without performing an impact analysis, as this may disrupt the agile team’s work and compromise the quality of the deliverables.4

The project manager should not call the stakeholder to tell them that the final product schedule must be extended without performing an impact analysis, as this may damage the trust and relationship with the stakeholder and cause them to lose confidence in the project.

The references for this answer are:

1: Discuss Exam PMP Topic 2 Question 499 Discussion | Actual4test 2: Free PMP Practice Exam Questions - 120 Sample Test Questions 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Project Management Institute, 2017, pp. 149-152. 4: Agile Practice Guide, Project Management Institute, 2017, pp. 37-38. : [Managing Stakeholder Expectations for Project Success: A Knowledge Integration Framework and Value Focused Approach, Ori Schibi, 2013, pp. 97-98.](https://www.pmi.org/learning

Reasoning: According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the tools and techniques for the Develop Project Management Plan process is expert judgment, which involves seeking the opinions and advice of knowledgeable and experienced individuals or groups. The project manager should ensure that the stakeholders are adequately informed and engaged in the project management plan approval process, and that they understand the implications and assumptions of the plan. The other options, such as stopping the meeting, getting approval without clarification, or obtaining approval as fast as possible, may not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of stakeholder involvement and commitment. Therefore, option B is the most likely answer to the question12

 According to the PMBOK Guide, quantitative risk analysis is a process that numerically analyzes the effect of identified risks on overall project objectives. It is usually performed on risks that have been prioritized by the qualitative risk analysis process. Quantitative risk analysis requires specialized skills and tools, such as statistical analysis, simulation, and modeling. Therefore, not every project team member may have the knowledge or experience to perform this task. If the project manager encounters such a situation, the best option is to help the team member to perform the quantitative risk analysis through coaching, mentoring and training. This way, the project manager can ensure that the team member learns the necessary skills and techniques, and can contribute to the risk management process. This also aligns with the project manager’s responsibility to develop the project team and enhance their competencies. Option A is not the best answer because contacting the PMO and requesting another team member may cause delays and disruptions in the project schedule and team dynamics. Option B is not the best answer because escalating the issue to the functional manager may not solve the problem, and may create conflict between the project manager and the functional manager. Option D is not the best answer because performing the quantitative risk analysis for the team member may not be feasible or efficient, and may deprive the team member of the opportunity to learn and grow. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 431-432, 440-441.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.4.2.3, the project manager should use conflict management techniques to resolve conflicts among team members and stakeholders.3

Some of the conflict management techniques are: problem solving, compromising, smoothing, forcing, and withdrawing.3

In this scenario, the project manager has tried problem solving (holding a meeting to work out a permanent solution) and compromising (asking them to find a way to resolve the issues), but these techniques were unsuccessful.4

The project manager should not use smoothing (emphasizing areas of agreement and avoiding areas of disagreement), forcing (imposing a solution), or withdrawing (avoiding or postponing the conflict), as these techniques may not address the root cause of the conflict or may worsen the situation.4

Therefore, the project manager should escalate the issue to a higher authority, such as the functional manager, the sponsor, or the steering committee, who have more power and influence in a weak matrix environment.4

Escalating the issue to a higher authority may help to resolve the conflict, protect the project objectives, and maintain the team performance and morale.4

The references for this answer are:

1: PMP Exam Questions | 100% Free PMP Example Questions 2: PMP Practice Exam 1 | Free PMP Exam Questions 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Project Management Institute, 2017, pp. 349-350. 4: [Conflict Management Techniques for the PMP Exam - PM Study Circle] : [PMP Exam Prep: Project Human Resource Management - Simplilearn]

The project manager should organize the WBS in a deliverable oriented way, which means that the WBS is structured according to the project’s outputs, products, or results. A deliverable oriented WBS is also known as a product breakdown structure (PBS) or a scope breakdown structure (SBS). A deliverable oriented WBS helps the project manager to define, decompose, and manage the project scope, as well as to align the project deliverables with the customer’s needs and expectations. A deliverable oriented WBS also facilitates the estimation of the project’s cost, time, and resources, as well as the identification and allocation of the project’s work packages and activities.

The other options are not the best ways to organize the WBS. A cost oriented WBS is a WBS that is structured according to the project’s budget or cost accounts. A cost oriented WBS is not suitable for defining and managing the project scope, as it does not reflect the project’s deliverables or value. A cost oriented WBS is more useful for tracking and controlling the project’s cost performance and variance. A customer oriented WBS is a WBS that is structured according to the project’s stakeholders or customers. A customer oriented WBS is not appropriate for defining and managing the project scope, as it does not represent the project’s outputs or products. A customer oriented WBS is more useful for planning and executing the project’s stakeholder engagement and communication. A team oriented WBS is a WBS that is structured according to the project’s team members or roles. A team oriented WBS is not effective for defining and managing the project scope, as it does not indicate the project’s results or outcomes. A team oriented WBS is more useful for planning and managing the project’s human resources and team development. References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.4, “Create WBS”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.4.3.1, “Scope Baseline”

PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide: 2021 Exam Update, 10th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.4, “Creating the WBS” 1

The project manager should review the resources required for the tasks on the critical path because these are the tasks that determine the project duration and have the highest risk of causing delays. By reviewing the resources, the project manager can identify any resource shortages, conflicts, or overallocation, and take corrective actions to optimize the resource utilization and avoid penalties. The other options are not the best choices because they do not directly address the root cause of the delay, which is the resource allocation. Discussing the issue with the project sponsor (option A) may help to escalate the problem, but it does not solve it. Reviewing and updating the risk management plan (option C) may help to identify and mitigate any potential risks, but it does not address the current situation. Allocating resources to develop the competencies of the other team members (option D) may help to improve the team performance in the long run, but it does not help to complete the critical project on time. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 215-216, 258-259, 333-334. How To Find The Correct Answer On PMP Exam Questions. Free PMP Questions and Answers – Are You Ready for PMP Exam?.

Retrospective results are the outputs of the retrospective meeting, which is a ceremony that is performed at the end of every sprint or iteration in an agile project. The retrospective meeting is an opportunity for the team to reflect on what went well, what could be improved, and how to implement the improvement actions in the next sprint or iteration. The retrospective results can help the project manager to identify the risks and opportunities for the event planning, and to update the risk register accordingly. 12345 References:

1: ProjectManagement.com - Retrospectives

2: A Guide To Effective Retrospectives By Project Managers

3: Retrospective - BrainBOK

4: Retrospective - Lovepmp

5: Retrospective - InLoox

When a project’s technical design is found to impact the company’s production system, it is crucial to address the issue immediately to prevent further complications. The project manager should first seek the approval of a new technical design from the steering committee. This aligns with the PMBOK® Guide’s emphasis on engaging stakeholders and performing integrated change control processes when project changes occur1. Additionally, the PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® highlights the importance of reassessing and realigning the technical aspects of a project when significant issues are identified that could impact the project’s outcome2.