PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2024 Version)

According to the Agile Testing: A Practical Guide For Testers And Agile Teams1, security and performance testing are two types of nonfunctional testing that are important for agile teams. Security testing ensures that the system is protected from unauthorized access, data loss, or corruption. Performance testing measures how the system responds to different levels of load, stress, and concurrency. These types of testing can be done at different levels of granularity, from unit testing to system testing, and can use tools such as JMeter, LoadRunner, or Selenium.

Story testing is a type of functional testing that verifies that the system meets the acceptance criteria of each user story. User stories are short descriptions of the features or functionalities that the customer wants from the system. Story testing can be done by the developers, testers, or customers, and can use tools such as FitNesse, Cucumber, or SpecFlow.

Tests based on behavior and test-driven development are two approaches that support agile testing practices. Behavior-driven development (BDD) is a technique that uses natural language to describe the expected behavior of the system in different scenarios. Test-driven development (TDD) is a technique that involves writing the tests before the code, and then refactoring the code to make the tests pass. Both BDD and TDD help to clarify the requirements, design the system, and ensure the quality of the code. They can use tools such as JUnit, NUnit, or RSpec.

References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

• Agile Testing: A Practical Guide For Testers And Agile Teams, Lisa Crispin and Janet Gregory, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2009
• Scrum Testing: A Detailed Guide to Testing on an Agile Team, Testim, Accessed on January 29, 2024
• Agile Testing Best Practices & Why They Matter, Atlassian, Accessed on January 29, 2024

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the key activities of the project manager is to engage stakeholders and manage their expectations throughout the project. This includes discussing the options with the client as part of the change control process, which is a formal and documented procedure that defines how changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or any other aspect of the project will be requested, evaluated, approved, rejected, or implemented. In this scenario, the client’s request to use a new workaround instead of the approved contingency plan is a change request that may affect the project objectives and outcomes. Therefore, the project manager should discuss the options with the client as part of the change control process, and evaluate the impact, feasibility, and benefits of the proposed workaround, as well as the implications of not following the contingency plan. Option D is the best answer for this question.

Option A is not the best answer because requesting to use the management reserve to keep the schedule is not the next thing that the project manager should do. It is a possible action that the project manager may take if the change request is approved and the project budget is insufficient to cover the additional costs of the workaround, but it is not a necessary or immediate action. Moreover, requesting to use the management reserve may not always be feasible or desirable, as it may increase the project costs and risks, and may require the approval of senior management or the project sponsor.

Option B is not the best answer because mitigating risks associated with the workaround to avoid project delays is not the next thing that the project manager should do. It is a possible action that the project manager may take if the change request is approved and the workaround introduces new or increased risks to the project, but it is not a proactive or effective action to resolve the current issue. Moreover, mitigating risks may not always be possible or sufficient, as some risks may be unavoidable or unpredictable, and may require other risk response strategies, such as avoidance, transfer, or acceptance.

Option C is not the best answer because proceeding with the approved risk response plan is not the next thing that the project manager should do. It is a possible action that the project manager may take if the change request is rejected and the contingency plan is still valid and applicable, but it is not a respectful or collaborative action to deal with the client’s request. Moreover, proceeding with the approved risk response plan may not always be appropriate or acceptable, as the client may have valid reasons or new information to suggest a different workaround, and may escalate the issue or withdraw their support if their request is ignored or dismissed. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 9-10, 15-16, 25-26, 35-36, 49-50, 59-60, 69-70.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should develop the project management plan by integrating the subsidiary plans and baselines from the different knowledge areas. The project management plan defines how the project will be executed, monitored, controlled, and closed. However, before developing the project management plan, the project manager should first establish the project’s business value and scope, which are the key inputs for the project charter. The business case and scope document are two essential documents that provide the justification and description of the project, its objectives, deliverables, assumptions, constraints, and success criteria. By developing these documents first, the project manager can align the project with the organizational strategy, secure the project authorization, and guide the subsequent planning processes. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 89-90, section 4.1 Develop Project Charter; page 95-96, section 4.2 Develop Project Management Plan.

According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, the project manager should perform a stakeholder evaluation in order to realign the project with the sponsor’s expectations. A stakeholder evaluation is a process of identifying and analyzing the needs, interests, expectations, and influence of the project stakeholders, especially the key ones such as the project sponsor1. By performing a stakeholder evaluation, the project manager can understand the root cause of the sponsor’s dissatisfaction, communicate effectively with the sponsor, and address any gaps or issues in the project requirements2. The project manager can also use various tools and techniques, such as interviews, surveys, focus groups, and stakeholder analysis matrices, to gather and document the stakeholder information3. The other options, A, C, and D, are not the best actions that the project manager should take to realign the project with the sponsor’s expectations. Reviewing the project goal diagram with the team may not help to resolve the sponsor’s concerns, and may not reflect the current state of the project requirements. Confirming which templates the team should be using may not improve the quality or clarity of the project requirements, and may not address the sponsor’s needs or expectations. Reviewing the risk management plan may not be relevant or helpful for the project requirements development, and may not involve the sponsor’s feedback or input. References: 1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 13.1, "Identify Stakeholders". 2: How to Work Effectively with Your Project Sponsor - BrightWork.com, Section "Understanding the Sponsor’s Strategic Role". 3: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 13.1.2, "Identify Stakeholders: Tools and Techniques".

Expert judgment is a technique that uses the knowledge and experience of experts to identify risks in a project. Experts can be internal or external to the project team, and they can provide insights on the sources, causes, and effects of potential risks. Expert judgment can also help to assess the probability and impact of risks, as well as the appropriate responses to them. According to the PMBOK Guide, expert judgment is one of the tools and techniques for the Identify Risks process, which is part of the Project Risk Management knowledge area. The other tools and techniques are data gathering, data analysis, interpersonal and team skills, and prompt lists. The other options are not tools and techniques for the Identify Risks process, although they may be used in other risk management processes or activities. An analysis of shared risks between parties is a way of identifying common risks that affect multiple stakeholders or projects. A SWOT analysis is a strategic planning tool that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a project or organization. A risk value assessment is a method of prioritizing risks based on their expected value, which is the product of their probability and impact. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 397-398, 419-420
• Project Management Professional (PMP) Certification Handbook, page 9
• Risk Identification in Project Management, section “PMP® Risk Identification Lifecycle”

The project manager should prioritize and estimate the milestones for the high-level requirements based on historical data, as this is a way to initiate the project planning process and align the project with the program objectives. The project manager should also use progressive elaboration and rolling wave planning techniques to refine the project scope, schedule, and cost as more information becomes available from the other projects within the program. The project manager should not escalate to the management team to increase the timeline (choice A), as this would imply that the project manager is not able to manage the project uncertainty and complexity. The project manager should not wait for the other project estimates before planning the schedule (choice B), as this would delay the project initiation and execution, and create dependencies on external factors. The project manager should not ask the PMO to estimate the tasks for all the projects and share the project management plan (choice D), as this would undermine the project manager’s authority and responsibility, and create confusion and inconsistency among the project teams and stakeholders. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 17: “Projects within a program are related through the common outcome or collective capability. If the projects are not interdependent or mutually supportive, they may not belong in the program.”
• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 18: “Program management focuses on the project interdependencies and helps to determine the optimal approach for managing them.”
• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 176: “Progressive elaboration involves continuously improving and detailing a plan as more detailed and specific information and more accurate estimates become available.”
• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 177: “Rolling wave planning is an iterative planning technique in which the work to be accomplished in the near term is planned in detail, while the work in the future is planned at a higher level.”

The project manager should first check if the sprint size is appropriate for the iteration duration, meaning that the team can realistically complete the user stories within the timebox. This is a way of applying the agile principle of delivering working software frequently and satisfying the customer. If the sprint size is too large or too small, the project manager should work with the team and the product owner to adjust it accordingly, based on the team’s velocity and capacity. This is also a part of the agile practice of adaptive planning and continuous improvement. The other options are not the best choices, as they do not address the root cause of the issue and may introduce more problems. Changing the iteration duration may disrupt the team’s rhythm and alignment with other teams or stakeholders. Recruiting a highly skilled resource may increase the cost and complexity of the project, and may not guarantee the improvement of the team’s performance. Using a reward system may create a competitive or extrinsic motivation that may undermine the team’s collaboration and intrinsic motivation. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 2: Value Delivery System, Section 2.3.2: Iterative and Incremental Development
• Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 6: Requirements Life Cycle Management, Section 6.3.1: Prioritization
• Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 3: Implementing Agile: Creating an Agile Environment, Section 3.3: Team Composition, Roles, and Responsibilities

 According to the PMBOK Guide, iterative tools are techniques that enable project managers to plan and execute projects in an iterative and flexible way. Iterative tools are part of an adaptive or agile approach, where the project scope, schedule, and cost are responsive to changes and uncertainties. Iterative tools allow project managers to deliver value incrementally, rather than in one go, by breaking down the project into smaller cycles or iterations. Each iteration produces a deliverable or output that can be tested, reviewed, and improved. By using iterative tools, project managers can reduce risks, increase quality, and enhance customer satisfaction. To determine the benefits of using iterative tools in a project, the project manager should conduct reviews with stakeholders to discuss the potential benefits the approach may have to the project. Stakeholders are individuals or groups who can affect or be affected by the project outcomes. By conducting reviews with stakeholders, the project manager can solicit their feedback, address their concerns, and align their expectations. The reviews can also help the project manager to communicate the value and benefits of using iterative tools, such as faster delivery, higher quality, lower costs, and better customer satisfaction. The reviews can also help the project manager to identify the challenges and lessons learned from using iterative tools, such as managing changes, ensuring collaboration, and maintaining documentation. By conducting reviews with stakeholders, the project manager can evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of using iterative tools, and report the results to the PMO and the steering committee. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 2: Project Performance Domains, Section 2.1: Project Delivery Approach, pp. 23-251
• PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 3: Project Management Principles, Section 3.5: Engage Stakeholders, pp. 41-421
• PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 4: Tailoring, Section 4.2: Tailoring Considerations, pp. 51-531
• PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 9: Stakeholders, Section 9.3: Engage Stakeholders, pp. 144-1451
• Iterative Process in Development & Design | project-management.com2