PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2024 Version)

The project manager plays the role of a mediator in this situation, as this is part of managing stakeholder engagement. Managing stakeholder engagement involves communicating and working with stakeholders to meet their needs and expectations, address issues, and foster appropriate stakeholder involvement. By scheduling a meeting with the two stakeholders, the project manager acts as a neutral third party who facilitates the discussion and helps them reach a mutually acceptable solution. The other options are not the best ways to describe the project manager’s role, as they either imply a biased, authoritative, or passive approach to conflict resolution. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 13, Section 13.3.2.4
• PMP Exam Content Outline, June 2019, Domain II, Task 9
• PMP Sample Test Questions, Question 393

 Diversity and inclusion are important for project effectiveness, as they enable diverse perspectives, ideas, and experiences to be shared and valued among the project team and stakeholders. However, diversity and inclusion are not just about demographics, but also about creating a culture of respect, belonging, and empowerment for everyone. To achieve this, the organization needs to provide training and education to the entire workforce, not just to specific teams or departments, to raise awareness, foster understanding, and promote positive behaviors. By doing so, the organization can prevent or reduce potential conflicts, misunderstandings, or biases that may arise from different backgrounds, views, or preferences. Furthermore, the organization can leverage the benefits of diversity and inclusion, such as improved innovation, collaboration, and customer satisfaction. References:

• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Project Management
• Diversity and Inclusion Are Important for Project Effectiveness
• Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion | PMI

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, one of the key processes of the Project Communications Management knowledge area is Plan Communications Management, which involves determining the information and communication needs of the project stakeholders. One of the tools and techniques for this process is communication requirements analysis, which considers factors such as the availability, frequency, format, and level of detail of the information. By asking the project sponsor what sort of information is needed and agreeing on a frequency for the communication, the project manager is performing communication requirements analysis, which will help to tailor the communications management plan to the specific needs and preferences of the project sponsor. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 361-362, 367.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, emotional intelligence is the ability to perceive, understand, and manage one’s own and others’ emotions. It is an essential skill for agile teams, as it helps to foster collaboration, trust, communication, and feedback. A project leader who invests in developing the team’s emotional intelligence can help to motivate the team members, resolve conflicts, and improve performance. Asking the unmotivated team member to take a short leave, reducing the number of meetings, or sending the team member to another team are not effective solutions, as they do not address the root cause of the problem or help the team member to improve their motivation and engagement. References:

• PMI Guide to Business Analysis, pages 38-39, 2.4.3 Emotional Intelligence
• PMI-PBA Sample Questions, question 10, answer A

According to the PMBOK Guide, an impediment board is a visual tool that tracks the impediments or blockers that prevent the team from completing their work1. The project manager should create an entry in the impediment board and assign it to the person or team responsible for resolving it. This will help the project manager monitor the progress of the impediment resolution and communicate it to the stakeholders. The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to do. Inviting the project team to a swarming session to define a solution is a technique that can be used to address complex or urgent problems, but it is not appropriate for an issue that is outside the project team’s control2. Leveraging the network of the former department and asking for help is a possible way to expedite the completion of the task, but it is not a formal or transparent way to manage the impediment. Escalating the issue to the product owner to define the next steps is not the project manager’s responsibility, as the product owner is mainly concerned with the product vision and value, not the project execution3. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 570
• 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 571
• 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 49

The project manager should review the team culture and the personality traits of the individual to address status update gaps. This will help to understand the root cause of the problem and find ways to improve the communication and collaboration within the team. The project manager should also foster a trusting and respectful environment where team members feel comfortable to share their challenges and feedback. Creating a safe space for status updates, reviewing the team status updates more thoroughly, or supporting team inclusion and changing the format of status updates are all possible actions that the project manager can take after reviewing the team culture and the personality traits of the individual, but they are not the first action that the project manager should take to rectify this situation. References: Agile Practice Guide, page 27; PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 95.

 The project manager should request an architecture review as the first step to address the design flaw that may potentially impact the final quality. An architecture review is a process of evaluating the design of a system or a product against a set of criteria, such as requirements, standards, best practices, and quality attributes. An architecture review can help to identify and resolve design issues, risks, and gaps, as well as to ensure alignment with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. By requesting an architecture review, the project manager can involve the relevant experts, such as the new architect, the previous architect (if possible), the quality assurance team, and the customer, to assess the impact of the design flaw and to propose and agree on the necessary changes. This will also help to update the project scope, schedule, cost, and quality baselines accordingly. References:

• Architecture Reviews - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
• Architecture Review Process - SEBoK
• Architecture Review - The Open Group
• Design Flaw Attacks - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
• DESIGN FLAWS: FLAWS BY DESIGN? / The Design Society

 According to the PMI, a hybrid approach is a combination of two or more project methodologies, such as waterfall and agile, to suit the needs of the project. A hybrid approach can offer flexibility, adaptability, and customer focus, while also maintaining some level of predictability, structure, and control. However, a hybrid approach can also pose some challenges, such as stakeholder resistance, misalignment, or confusion. Therefore, the project manager needs to address and remove any obstacles and blockers that may prevent the team from achieving their goals. Obstacles and blockers are issues or impediments that hinder or stop the team’s progress, such as lack of resources, unclear requirements, technical debt, conflicts, communication gaps, etc. The project manager should follow these steps to address and remove obstacles and blockers for the team:

• Identify the obstacles and blockers by using various techniques, such as daily stand-up meetings, retrospectives, feedback sessions, surveys, etc.
• Analyze the impact, root cause, and priority of the obstacles and blockers by using tools, such as issue logs, risk registers, impact analysis, root cause analysis, prioritization matrix, etc.
• Develop and implement solutions to remove the obstacles and blockers by using methods, such as problem-solving, negotiation, escalation, delegation, collaboration, etc.
• Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the solutions by using measures, such as team velocity, customer satisfaction, quality metrics, etc.
• Communicate and report the status and results of the solutions to the relevant stakeholders, such as the team, the sponsor, the customer, etc.

By addressing and removing obstacles and blockers for the team, the project manager can improve the project performance, as well as the team’s productivity, quality, morale, and collaboration.

The other options are not the best choices, because:

• Asking stakeholders to communicate with the project manager and not directly with the team would create a communication bottleneck, reduce transparency, and increase the risk of misunderstanding or miscommunication.
• Empowering the team members to remove obstacles and blockers would be a good practice, but it would not be sufficient without the project manager’s support, guidance, and intervention, especially if the obstacles and blockers are beyond the team’s authority or capability.
• Adding blockers to the issue log and risk management plan would be a necessary step, but it would not be enough without taking action to resolve them. Simply documenting the blockers would not help the team to overcome them or improve their performance. References:
• Hybrid Project Management: What is it, Methodology & Software - Teamhood
• Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success
• Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers: How to Address and Remove Them
• 1.7. Address and remove impediments, obstacles, and blockers for the team - KnowledgeMap
• 1.7 Address and Remove Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers … - BrainBOK