PT0-002 Exam Dumps - CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam

The communication escalation path is a component of the Rules of Engagement (ROE) that provides a penetration tester with guidance on whom to contact and how to proceed in the event of an emergency or disaster during an engagement. This includes contact information for key individuals and predefined procedures to follow to ensure that any issues are addressed promptly and appropriately.

The engagement scope defines the boundaries and objectives of the test, the SLA (Service Level Agreement) outlines performance and uptime requirements, and the SOW (Statement of Work) details the tasks and deliverables. However, the communication escalation path specifically addresses communication protocols during emergencies.

References:

Explanation of Rules of Engagement components: OWASP Testing Guide

Examples from penetration testing engagements highlighting the importance of communication plans: Anubis​​.

ROE stands for Rules of Engagement, which are the guidelines and limitations that define the scope, objectives, and methods of a penetration testing engagement. ROE should be agreed upon by both the client and the tester before the testing begins, and they should include the authorization to perform certain actions, such as requesting CVE numbers, disclosing vulnerabilities, or exploiting systems. By requesting a CVE number without express authorization, the penetration tester most likely breached the ROE and violated the client’s trust and expectations. References:

•The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002), Chapter 1: Planning and Scoping Penetration Tests, page 23-24.

•CVE - CVE1

•NDA, MSA, SOW and SLA. Confidentiality agreements when you outsource QA

The code sample provided involves LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) query syntax, not SQL or command injection syntax. LDAP injections occur when user-supplied inputs are not properly sanitized before being incorporated into LDAP queries. The given code demonstrates a potential LDAP injection point, where an attacker might manipulate the (userid=*) part to execute unauthorized queries or access unauthorized information within the LDAP directory. Boolean and Blind SQL injections, as well as Command injections, do not apply to LDAP query syntax.

A directory traversal attack, also known as a path traversal attack, is a method used to exploit insufficient security validation or sanitization of user-supplied input file names. The goal of this attack is to access directories and files that are stored outside the web root folder. By manipulating variables that reference files with “../” sequences and its variations, attackers can access restricted directories and execute commands outside of the web server’s root directory.

In the context of an application that allows users to upload documents to a cloud-based file server, an attacker might exploit a directory traversal vulnerability to navigate to directories that contain sensitive documents. If the file upload functionality is not properly secured, an attacker could upload a file with a payload designed to perform directory traversal. This could allow access to confidential files that are otherwise protected by the application's access control mechanisms.

References:

OWASP Directory Traversal Cheat Sheet: OWASP Directory Traversal

Practical example from HTB Writeups like Forge and Anubis which demonstrate similar enumeration techniques leading to sensitive file disclosures​​​​.

The first step that a tester should perform to determine if the new containers are configured correctly against a DDoS attack is to scan the containers for open ports. Open ports are entry points for network communication and can expose services or applications that may be vulnerable to DDoS attacks. Scanning the containers for open ports can help the tester identify which services or applications are running on the containers, and which ones may need to be secured or disabled to prevent DDoS attacks. Scanning the containers for open ports can also help the tester discover any unauthorized or malicious services or applications that may have been installed on the containers by previous attackers or compromised containers. Scanning the containers for open ports can be done by using tools such as Nmap, which can perform network scanning and enumeration by sending packets to hosts and analyzing their responses1. The other options are not the first steps that a tester should perform to determine if the new containers are configured correctly against a DDoS attack. Testing the strength of the encryption settings is not relevant to DDoS attacks, as encryption does not prevent or mitigate DDoS attacks, but rather protects data confidentiality and integrity. Determining if security tokens are easily available is not relevant to DDoS attacks, as security tokens are used for authentication and authorization, not for preventing or mitigating DDoS attacks. Performing a vulnerability check against the hypervisor is not relevant to DDoS attacks, as the hypervisor is not directly exposed to network traffic, but rather manages the virtual machines or containers that run on it.

The presence of files such as mimikatz.exe, mimidrv.sys, and mimilib.dll on a target server indicates prior compromise. Mimikatz is a well-known post-exploitation tool used for extracting plaintext passwords, hash dumps, PIN codes, and Kerberos tickets from memory. These files suggest that an attacker has previously gained access to the system and used Mimikatz for credential harvesting. This is a strong indicator of a prior security breach rather than tools used for password encryption or false positives.

References:

Mimikatz Usage and Detection

Understanding Indicators of Compromise

In the scenario where users are mistyping the name of a fileshare server, leading to broadcast requests, the most effective exploitation strategy would be for the penetration tester to respond to these requests with their own IP address (D) and set up a service to capture authentication credentials. This technique is known as a "Man-in-the-Middle" (MitM) attack, where the attacker intercepts communication between two parties. In this case, the tester can exploit the misdirected requests to potentially capture sensitive information such as usernames and passwords.

The command wmic service get name,pathname,startmode is used by penetration testers to enumerate services and their configurations, specifically looking for services with unquoted paths. If a service's path contains spaces and is not enclosed in quotes, it can be exploited by placing a malicious executable along the path, leading to privilege escalation. For example, if the service path is C:\Program Files\My Service\service.exe and is unquoted, an attacker could place a malicious Program.exe in C:\, which would then be executed with the same privileges as the service when the service starts. Identifying such services allows penetration testers to highlight potential security risks that could be exploited for privilege escalation.