QSDA2024 Exam Dumps - Qlik Sense Data Architect Certification Exam – 2024

When developing multiple Qlik Sense applications (Sales, Finance, Operations) that share numerous identical calculation expressions, it is crucial to have a centralized, reusable script to avoid redundancy, save time on modifications, and increase the reusability of the assets.

The best approach in Qlik Sense to achieve these goals is to use theIncludescript function. This function allows the data architect to reference a script file that is stored on a file server. The Include function willinject the contents of the external script file into the Qlik Sense script at the point where the Include statement is called. This means that all three apps (Sales, Finance, Operations) can include this common script, and any updates made to the script will automatically apply to all apps that include it.

This method provides a highly maintainable solution because:

No Duplicate Script:The shared logic is maintained in a single file, eliminating redundancy.

Ease of Modifications:Any changes made to the script are propagated to all applications that include it.

Reusable Assets:The script can be reused across different applications, enhancing efficiency and consistency.

In the provided data model, both the CurrentOffice and Transaction tables contain the fields SalesID and Office. This leads to the creation of a synthetic key in Qlik Sense because of the two common fields between the two tables. A synthetic key is created automatically by Qlik Sense when two or more tables have two or more fields in common. While synthetic keys can be useful in some scenarios, they often lead to unwanted and unexpected results, so it’s generally advisable to resolve them.

In this case, the goal is to have both the current office of the salesperson and the office where the transaction occurred visible in the data model. Here’s how each option compares:

Option A: Comment out the Office in the Transaction table:This would remove the Office field from the Transaction table, which would prevent you from seeing which office the salesperson was in when the transaction occurred. This option does not meet the requirement.

Option B: Inner Join the Transaction table to the CurrentOffice table:Performing an inner join would merge the two tables based on the common SalesID and Office fields. However, this might result in a loss of data if there are sales records in the Transaction table that don’t have a corresponding record in the CurrentOffice table or vice versa. This approach might also lead to unexpected results in your analysis.

Option C: Alias Office to CurrentOffice In the CurrentOffice table:By renaming the Office field in the CurrentOffice table to CurrentOffice, you prevent the synthetic key from being created. This allows you to differentiate between the salesperson’s current office and the office where the transaction occurred. This approach maintains the integrity of your data and allows for clear analysis.

Option D: Force concatenation between the tables:Forcing concatenation would combine the rows of both tables into a single table. This would not solve the issue of distinguishing between the current office and the office at the time of the transaction, and it could lead to incorrect data associations.

Given these considerations, the best approach to resolve the synthetic key while fulfilling the requirement of having both the current office and the office at the time of the transaction visible is toAlias Office to CurrentOffice in the CurrentOffice table. This ensures that the data model will accurately represent both pieces of information without causing synthetic key issues.

In this scenario, the data architect needs to load Table_A from an Excel file and ensure that the data is sorted by Field_2. The key here is to correctly load and sort the data in the script.

Understanding the Options:

Option A:

First, it loads the data into a temporary table (Temp) from the Excel file.

Then, it loads the data from the temporary table (Temp) into Table_A, using the ORDER BY Field_2 ASC clause to sort the data by Field_2.

Finally, it drops the temporary table (Temp), leaving the sorted data in Table_A.

Option B:

Directly loads the data from the Excel file into Table_A and applies the ORDER BY Field_2 ASC clause in the same step.

However, the ORDER BY clause in a direct load from an external source like Excel might not work as expected because Qlik Sense does not support ORDER BY when loading directly from a file.

Option C:

Similar to Option A but uses the NoConcatenate keyword to prevent concatenation, which is unnecessary since Temp and Table_A have different names.

While this script works, the NoConcatenate keyword is redundant in this context.

Option D:

The ORDER BY Field_2 ASC is placed before the LOAD statement, which is not a correct usage in Qlik Sense script syntax.

Correct Script Choice:

Option Ais the correct script because it correctly sorts the data after loading it into a temporary table and then loads the sorted data into Table_A. This method ensures that the data is sorted by Field_2 and avoids any issues related to sorting during the initial data load.

References:

Qlik Sense Scripting Best Practices: When sorting data in Qlik Sense, the correct approach is to use a RESIDENT LOAD with an ORDER BY clause after loading the data into a temporary table.

In the provided data model, there is an issue where certain types of analysis over time are not showing the expected data. This problem is often caused by a mismatch in the data formats of the OrderDate field between the Orders and MasterCalendar tables.

Option A:DatefFloor(OrderDate)) would round down to the nearest date boundary, which might not address the root cause if the issue is related to different date and time formats.

Option B:TimeStamp#(OrderDate, 'M/D/YYYY hh.mm.ff') ensures that the date is interpreted correctly as a timestamp, but this does not resolve potential mismatches in date format directly.

Option C:TimeStamp(OrderDate) will keep both date and time, which may still cause mismatches if the MasterCalendar is dealing purely with dates.

Option D:Date(OrderDate) formats the OrderDate to show only the date portion (removing the time part). This function will ensure that the date values are consistent across the Orders and MasterCalendar tables by converting the timestamps to just dates. This is the most straightforward and effective way to ensure consistency in date-based analysis.

In Qlik Sense, dates and timestamps are stored as dual values (both text and numeric), and mismatches can lead to incomplete or incorrect analyses. By using Date(OrderDate) in both the Orders and MasterCalendar tables, you ensure that the analysis will have consistent date values, resolving the issue described.

In the scenario provided, the data architect needs to load two tables (Budget and Sales) without creating a synthetic key, while ensuring that expressions like Sum([Budgeted Sales]) are calculated correctly.

Here is a breakdown of the options:

Option A (Outer Join):This option uses an outer join between the Sales table and the Budget table. While this approach will combine the tables based on the common fields (Year and Region), it will result in a single table that contains all fields from both tables. This approach prevents the creation of a synthetic key and retains all records from both tables, ensuring that all budgeted and actual sales data is available. As a result, calculations like Sum([Budgeted Sales]) will work correctly.This is the correct solution.

Option B (Concatenate):This option uses concatenate, which combines the tables by stacking them on top of each other as if they were one table. This approach will not prevent synthetic keys and could cause issues with calculations since Budgeted Sales and Actual Sales would be in the same column, leading to incorrect aggregation results.

Option C (Separate Load):This option simply loads the tables separately without any join or concatenation. While this will not create a synthetic key, it will result in two separate tables in the data model. Without any connection between these tables, calculations involving both Budgeted Sales and Actual Sales will not work correctly.

Option D (Inner Join):This option uses an inner join, which will combine only the records that match in both tables based on Year and Region. While this approach avoids synthetic keys, it may exclude records that do not have a corresponding match in both tables, potentially leading to incomplete data.

Given the requirements to avoid synthetic keys and ensure correct calculations,Option A (Outer Join)is the most appropriate approach. It ensures all relevant data is included and that the data model remains free from synthetic keys, while also allowing accurate calculations.