SAA-C03 Exam Dumps - AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate (SAA-C03)

A because Elasticache, despite being ideal for leaderboards per Amazon, doesn't cache at edge locations. D because FSx has higher performance for low latency needs. https://www.techtarget.com/searchaws/tip/Amazon-FSx-vs-EFS-Compare-the-AWS-file-services "FSx is built for high performance and submillisecond latency using solid-state drive storage volumes. This design enables users to select storage capacity and latency independently. Thus, even a subterabyte file system can have 256 Mbps or higher throughput and support volumes up to 64 TB."

Amazon S3 is an object storage service that can store static files such as images, videos, documents, etc. Amazon EFS is a file storage service that can store files in a hierarchical structure and supports NFS protocol. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is a file storage service that can store files in a hierarchical structure and supports SMB protocol. Amazon EBS is a block storage service that can store data in fixed-size blocks and attach to EC2 instances.

Based on these definitions, the combination of steps that should be taken to meet the requirements are:

A. Store the static files on Amazon S3. Use Amazon CloudFront to cache objects at the edge. D. Store the server-side code on Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. Mount the FSx for Windows File Server volume on each EC2 instance to share the files.

This option is the most efficient because it uses API usage plans and API keys, which are features of Amazon API Gateway that allow you to control who can access your API and how much and how fast they can access it1. It also implements API usage plans and API keys to limit the access of users who do not have a subscription, which enables you to create different tiers of access for your API and charge users accordingly. This solution meets the requirement of updating the application so that only users who have a subscription can access premium content. Option A is less efficient because it uses API caching and throttling on the API Gateway API, which are features of Amazon API Gateway that allow you to improve the performance and availability of your API and protect your backend systems from traffic spikes2. However, this does not provide a way to limit the access of users who do not have a subscription. Option B is less efficient because it uses AWS WAF on the API Gateway API, which is a web application firewall service that helps protect your web applications or APIs against common web exploits that may affect availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources3. However, this does not provide a way to limit the access of users who do not have a subscription. Option C is less efficient because it uses fine-grained IAM permissions to the premium content in the DynamoDB table, which are permissions that allow you to control access to specific items or attributes within a table4. However, this does not provide a way to limit the access of users who do not have a subscription at the API level.

This solution meets the requirements of implementing a solution so that the COTS application can use the data that the legacy application produces with the least operational overhead. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless ETL platform to prepare and load data for analytics. AWS Glue can process data in various formats, including .csv files, and store the processed data in Amazon Redshift, which is a fully managed data warehouse service that supports complex SQL queries. AWS Glue can run ETL jobs on a schedule, which can automate the data processing and loading process.

Option B is incorrect because developing a Python script that runs on Amazon EC2 instances to convert the .csv files to sql files can increase the operational overhead and complexity, and it may not provide consistent data processing and loading for the COTS application. Option C is incorrect because creating an AWS Lambda function and an Amazon DynamoDB table to process the .csv files and store the processed data in the DynamoDB table does not meet the requirement of using Amazon Redshift as the data source for the COTS application. Option D is incorrect because using Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events) to launch an Amazon EMR cluster on a weekly schedule to process the .csv files and store the processed data in an Amazon Redshift table can increase the operational overhead and complexity, and it may not provide timely data processing and loading for the COTS application.

References:

https://aws.amazon.com/glue/

https://aws.amazon.com/redshift/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/disaster-recovery-workloads-on-aws/disaster-recovery-options-in-the-cloud.html

A gateway endpoint is a gateway that is a target for a specified route in your route table, used for traffic destined to a supported AWS service1. Amazon S3 does not support gateway endpoints, only interface endpoints2. Therefore, option A is incorrect.

An interface endpoint is an elastic network interface with a private IP address that serves as an entry point for traffic destined to a supported service1. An interface endpoint can provide secure access to Amazon S3 from within the Region, but not from the on-premises location. Therefore, option C is incorrect.

AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) is a service that allows you to create and manage encryption keys to protect your data3. AWS KMS does not provide a way to access data on Amazon S3 without traversing the internet. Therefore, option D is incorrect.

AWS Transit Gateway is a service that enables you to connect your Amazon Virtual Private Clouds (VPCs) and your on-premises networks to a single gateway. You can create a gateway in AWS Transit Gateway to access Amazon S3 securely from both the Region and the on-premises location using AWS Direct Connect. Therefore, option B is correct.

AWS Fargate is a serverless experience for user applications, allowing the user to concentrate on building applications instead of configuring and managing servers. Fargate also automates resource management, allowing users to easily scale their applications in response to demand.

This option is the most efficient because it uses Cost Explorer, which is a tool that allows you to visualize, understand, and manage your AWS costs and usage over time1. You can create a report in Cost Explorer that lists AWS billed items by user, using the user name tag as a filter2. You can then download the report as a CSV file and use it for budget planning. Option A is less efficient because it uses Amazon Athena, which is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL3. You would need to set up an Athena table that points to your AWS Cost and Usage Report data in S3, and then run a query to generate the report. This would incur additional costs and complexity. Option C is less efficient because it uses the billing dashboard, which provides a high-level summary of your AWS costs and usage. You can access the bill details from the billing dashboard and download them via bill, but this would not list the billed items by user. You would need to use tags to group your costs by user name, which would require additional steps. Option D is less efficient because it uses AWS Budgets, which is a tool that allows you to plan your service usage, service costs, and instance reservations. You can modify a cost budget in AWS Budgets to alert with Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES), but this would not generate a report of AWS billed items by user. This would only notify you when your actual or forecasted costs exceed or are expected to exceed your budgeted amount.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/kinesisanalytics/l atest/dev/what-is.html