SAA-C03 Exam Dumps - AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate (SAA-C03)

The best solution to meet these requirements with the least amount of operational overhead is to enable Amazon DynamoDB Streams on the table and use triggers to write to a single Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic to which the teams can subscribe. This solution requires minimal configuration and infrastructure setup, and Amazon DynamoDB Streams provide a low-latency way to capture changes to the DynamoDB table. The triggers automatically capture the changes and publish them to the SNS topic, which notifies the internal teams.

This option is the most efficient because it uses AWS Storage Gateway, which is a service that connects an on-premises software appliance with cloud-based storage to provide seamless integration with data security features between your on-premises IT environment and the AWS storage infrastructure1. It also uses a stored volume gateway, which is a type of volume gateway that stores your primary data locally and asynchronously backs up point-in-time snapshots of your data to Amazon S32. It also runs the Storage Gateway software application on premises and maps the gateway storage volumes to on-premises storage, which enables you to use your existing storage hardware and network infrastructure. It also mounts the gateway storage volumes to provide local access to the data, which ensures that your data is available for low latency access on premises while also getting backed up to AWS. This solution meets the requirement of maintaining local access to all the data while it is backed up on AWS and ensuring that the data backed up on AWS is automatically and securely transferred. Option A is less efficient because it uses AWS Snowball, which is a physical device that lets you transfer large amounts of data into and out of AWS3. However, this does not provide a periodic backup solution, as it requires manual handling and shipping of the device. It also configures on-premises systems to mount the Snowball S3 endpoint to provide local access to the data, which could introduce additional complexity and latency. Option B is less efficient because it uses AWS Snowball Edge, which is a physical device that has onboard storage and compute capabilities for select AWS capabilities. However, this does not provide a periodic backup solution, as it requires manual handling and shipping of the device. It also uses the Snowball Edge file interface to provide on-premises systems with local access to the data, which could introduce additional complexity and latency. Option C is less efficient because it uses AWS Storage Gateway and configures a cached volume gateway, which is a type of volume gateway that stores your primary data in Amazon S3 and retains a copy of frequently accessed data subsets locally. However, this does not provide local access to all the data, as only some data subsets are cached locally. It also configures a percentage of data to cache locally, which could incur higher costs and complexity than using a stored volume gateway.

 This option is the most efficient because it uses Amazon CloudFront, which is a web service that speeds up distribution of your static and dynamic web content, such as .html, .css, .js, and image files, to your users1. It also uses a CloudFront distribution for the static content, which reduces the load on the EC2 instances and improves the performance and availability of the website. It also uses an Auto Scaling group to launch new instances based on network traffic, which automatically adjusts the compute capacity of your EC2 instances based on load or a schedule2. This solution meets the requirement of ensuring that all the requests are processed successfully during events for the launch of new products. Option A is less efficient because it uses a CloudFront distribution for the dynamic content, which is not necessary as the dynamic content is already handled by the API on the EC2 instances. It also increases the number of EC2 instances to handle the increase in traffic, which could incur higher costs and complexity than using an Auto Scaling group. Option C is less efficient because it uses an Amazon ElastiCache instance in front of the ALB to reduce traffic for the API to handle, which is a way to provide a fully managed in-memory data store service that provides sub-millisecond latency for caching and data processing3. However, this could introduce additional complexity and latency, and does not scale automatically based on network traffic. Option D is less efficient because it uses an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue to receive requests from the website for later processing by the EC2 instances, which is a way to send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume. However, this does not provide a faster response time to the users as they have to wait for their requests to be processed by the EC2 instances.

Amazon Inspector:

• Performs active vulnerability scans of EC2 instances. It looks for software vulnerabilities, unintended network accessibility, and other security issues.

• Requires installing an agent on EC2 instances to perform scans. The agent must be deployed to each instance.

• Provides scheduled scan reports detailing any findings of security risks or vulnerabilities. These reports can be used to patch or remediate issues.

• Is best suited for proactively detecting security weaknesses and misconfigurations in your AWS environment.

https://aws.amazon.com/vi/caching/session-management/

In order to address scalability and to provide a shared data storage for sessions that can be accessible from any individual web server, you can abstract the HTTP sessions from the web servers themselves. A common solution to for this is to leverage an In-Memory Key/Value store such as Redis and Memcached. ElastiCache offerings for In-Memory key/value stores include ElastiCache for Redis, which can support replication, and ElastiCache for Memcached which does not support replication.

This option is the most efficient because it uses Amazon SQS, which is a fully managed message queuing service that lets you send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available1. It also uses an SQS message queue to asynchronously dispatch requests to the different application tiers, which decouples the image upload process from the thumbnail generation process and enables scalability and reliability. It also alerts the user through an application message that the image was received, which provides a faster response time to the user than waiting for the thumbnail generation to complete. Option A is less efficient because it uses a custom AWS Lambda function to generate the thumbnail and alert the user, which is a way to run code without provisioning or managing servers. However, this does not use an asynchronous dispatch mechanism to separate the image upload process from the thumbnail generation process. It also uses the image upload process as an event source to invoke the Lambda function, which could cause concurrency issues if there are many images uploaded at once. Option B is less efficient because it uses AWS Step Functions, which is a fully managed service that provides a graphical console to arrange and visualize the components of your application as a series of steps2. However, this does not use an asynchronous dispatch mechanism to separate the image upload process from the thumbnail generation process. It also uses Step Functions to handle the orchestration between the application tiers and alert the user when thumbnail generation is complete, which could introduce additional complexity and latency. Option D is less efficient because it uses Amazon SNS, which is a fully managed messaging service that enables you to send messages or notifications directly to users with SMS text messages or email3. However, this does not use an asynchronous dispatch mechanism to separate the image upload process from the thumbnail generation process. It also uses SNS notification topics and subscriptions to generate the thumbnail after the image upload is complete and message the user’s mobile app by way of a push notification after thumbnail generation is complete, which could introduce additional complexity and latency.

This answer is correct because it allows the web tier to access the database tier by using security groups as a source, which is a recommended best practice for VPC connectivity. Security groups are stateful and can reference other security groups in the same VPC, which simplifies the configuration and maintenance of the firewall rules. By adding an inbound rule to the database tier’s security group, the web tier’s EC2 instances can connect to the RDS instance on port 3306, regardless of their IP addresses or subnets.

References:

Security groups - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Best practices and reference architectures for VPC design

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to automatically detect and respond to suspicious or unexpected behavior in its AWS environment, beyond the existing AWS WAF setup.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon GuardDuty: Provides continuous monitoring and threat detection across AWS accounts and resources, including integration with AWS WAF for automated response.

AWS Firewall Manager: Manages firewall rules across multiple accounts but is more focused on central management than threat detection.

Amazon Inspector: Focuses on security assessments and vulnerability management rather than real-time threat detection.

Amazon Macie: Primarily used for data security and privacy, not comprehensive threat detection.

Best Solution:

Amazon GuardDuty with EventBridge and Lambda: This combination ensures continuous threat detection and automated response by updating AWS WAF rules based on GuardDuty findings.

References:

Amazon GuardDuty

Amazon EventBridge

AWS Lambda