SAA-C03 Exam Dumps - AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate (SAA-C03)

S3 Intelligent-Tiering is a storage class that automatically reduces storage costs by moving data to the most cost-effective access tier based on access frequency. It has two access tiers: frequent access and infrequent access. Data is stored in the frequent access tier by default, and moved to the infrequent access tier after 30 consecutive days of no access. If the data is accessed again, it is moved back to the frequent access tier1. By using S3 Lifecycle rules to transition objects from S3 Standard to S3 Intelligent-Tiering, the solution can reduce S3 costs for data with unknown or changing access patterns.

A. Use S3 replication to transition infrequently accessed objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA). This solution will not meet the requirement of reducing S3 costs for data with unknown or changing access patterns, as S3 replication is a feature that copies objects across buckets or Regions for redundancy or compliance purposes. It does not automatically move objects to a different storage class based on access frequency2.

B. Use S3 Lifecycle rules to transition objects from S3 Standard to Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA). This solution will not meet the requirement of reducing S3 costs for data with unknown or changing access patterns, as S3 Standard-IA is a storage class that offers lower storage costs than S3 Standard, but charges a retrieval fee for accessing the data. It is suitable for long-lived and infrequently accessed data, not for data with changing access patterns1.

D. Use S3 Inventory to identify and transition objects that have not been accessed from S3 Stand-ard to S3 Intelligent-Tiering. This solution will not meet the requirement of reducing S3 costs for data with unknown or changing access patterns, as S3 Inventory is a feature that provides a report of the objects in a bucket and their metadata on a daily or weekly basis. It does not automatically move objects to a different storage class based on access frequency3.

Reference URL: https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/intelligent-tiering/

S3 Intelligent-Tiering is the best solution for reducing S3 costs when the access pattern is unpredictable or changing. S3 Intelligent-Tiering automatically moves objects between two access tiers (frequent and infrequent) based on the access frequency, without any performance impact or retrieval fees. S3 Intelligent-Tiering also has an optional archive tier for objects that are rarely accessed. S3 Lifecycle rules can be used to transition objects from S3 Standard to S3 Intelligent-Tiering.

Reference URLs:

1 https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/intelligent-tiering/

2 https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/using-intelligent-tiering.html

3 https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/intelligent-tiering-overview.html

The S3 Block Public Access feature allows you to restrict public access to S3 buckets and objects within the account. You can enable this feature at the account level to prevent any S3 bucket from being made public, regardless of the bucket policy settings. AWS Organizations can be used to apply a Service Control Policy (SCP) to the account to prevent IAM users from changing this setting, ensuring that all S3 objects remain private. This is a straightforward and effective solution that requires minimal operational overhead.

This option is the most operationally efficient because it uses AWS Transfer Family to create an FTP server that can store incoming files in Amazon S3 Standard12, which is a low-cost and highly available storage service. It also uses AWS Lambda to process the files and delete them after they are processed, which is a serverless and scalable solution that does not require any batch scheduling or infrastructure management. It also uses S3 event notifications to invoke the Lambda function when the files arrive, which enables near real-time processing of the incoming data files3. Option A is less efficient because it uses Amazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval, which is a cold storage class that has higher retrieval costs and longer retrieval times than Amazon S3 Standard. It also uses EventBridge rules to invoke the job nightly, which does not meet the requirement of processing incoming data files as soon as possible. Option B is less efficient because it uses an EBS volume to store incoming files, which is a block storage service that has higher costs and lower durability than Amazon S3. It also uses EventBridge rules to invoke the job nightly, which does not meet the requirement of processing incoming data files as soon as possible. Option C is less efficient because it uses an EBS volume to store incoming files, which is a block storage service that has higher costs and lower durability than Amazon S3. It also uses AWS Batch to process the files, which requires managing compute resources and job queues.

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-to-replicate-secrets-aws-secrets-m anager-multiple-regions/

Reserved is cheaper than on demand the company has. And it's meet the availabilty (HA) requirement as to spot instance that can be disrupted at any time. PRICING BELOW. On-Demand: 0% There’s no commitment from you. You pay the most with this option. Reserved : 40%-60%1-year or 3-year commitment from you. You save money from that commitment. Spot 50%-90% Ridiculously inexpensive because there’s no commitment from the AWS side.

In Static Websites, Web pages are returned by the server which are prebuilt.

They use simple languages such as HTML, CSS, or JavaScript.

There is no processing of content on the server (according to the user) in Static Websites. Web pages are returned by the server with no change therefore, static Websites are fast.

There is no interaction with databases.

Also, they are less costly as the host does not need to support server-side processing with different languages.

============

In Dynamic Websites, Web pages are returned by the server which are processed during runtime means they are not prebuilt web pages but they are built during runtime according to the user’s demand.

These use server-side scripting languages such as PHP, Node.js, ASP.NET and many more supported by the server.

So, they are slower than static websites but updates and interaction with databases are possible.

The solution that meets the requirements is to develop an on-premises custom identity broker application or process that uses AWS Security Token Service (AWS STS) to get short-lived credentials. This solution allows the company to use its existing LDAP directory service to authenticate its users to the AWS Management Console, without requiring SAML compatibility. The custom identity broker application or process can act as a proxy between the LDAP directory service and AWS STS, and can request temporary security credentials for the users based on their LDAP attributes and roles. The users can then use these credentials to access the AWS Management Console via a sign-in URL generated by the identity broker. This solution also enhances security by using short-lived credentials that expire after a specified duration.

The other solutions do not meet the requirements because they either require SAML compatibility or do not provide access to the AWS Management Console. Enabling AWS IAM Identity Center (AWS Single Sign-On) between AWS and the on-premises LDAP would require the LDAP directory service to support SAML 2.0, which is not the case for this scenario. Creating an IAM policy that uses AWS credentials and integrating the policy into LDAP would not provide access to the AWS Management Console, but only to the AWS APIs. Setting up a process that rotates the IAM credentials whenever LDAP credentials are updated would also not provide access to the AWS Management Console, but only to the AWS CLI. Therefore, these solutions are not suitable for the given requirements.

These options are the most suitable ways to design a shared storage solution for a web application that is deployed across multiple Availability Zones and requires strong consistency. Option B uses Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) as a shared file system that can be mounted on multiple EC2 instances in different Availability Zones. Amazon EFS provides high availability, durability, scalability, and performance for file-based workloads. It also supports strong consistency, which means that any changes made to the file system are immediately visible to all clients. Option E uses Amazon S3 as a shared object store that can store the web content and serve it through Amazon CloudFront, a content delivery network (CDN). Amazon S3 provides high availability, durability, scalability, and performance for object-based workloads. It also supports strong consistency for read-after-write and list operations, which means that any changes made to the objects are immediately visible to all clients. By setting the metadata for the Cache-Control header to no-cache, the web content can be prevented from being cached by the browsers or the CDN edge locations, ensuring that the latest content is always delivered to the users.

Option A is not suitable because using AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway as a shared storage solution for a web application is not efficient or scalable. AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides block storage volumes that can be mounted on-premises or on EC2 instances as iSCSI devices. It is useful for migrating or backing up data to AWS, but it is not designed for serving web content or providing strong consistency. Moreover, using Volume Gateway would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the native AWS storage services.

Option C is not suitable because creating a shared Amazon EBS volume and mounting it on multiple EC2 instances is not possible or reliable. Amazon EBS is a block storage service that provides persistent and high-performance volumes for EC2 instances. However, EBS volumes can only be attached to one EC2 instance at a time, and they are constrained to a single Availability Zone. Therefore, creating a shared EBS volume for a web application that is deployed across multiple Availability Zones is not feasible. Moreover, EBS volumes do not support strong consistency, which means that any changes made to the volume may not be immediately visible to other clients.

Option D is not suitable because using AWS DataSync to perform continuous synchronization of data between EC2 hosts in the Auto Scaling group is not efficient or scalable. AWS DataSync is a data transfer service that helps you move large amounts of data to and from AWS storage services. It is useful for migrating or archiving data, but it is not designed for serving web content or providing strong consistency. Moreover, using DataSync would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the native AWS storage services. References:

What Is Amazon Elastic File System?

What Is Amazon Simple Storage Service?

What Is Amazon CloudFront?

What Is AWS Storage Gateway?

What Is Amazon Elastic Block Store?

What Is AWS DataSync?