SC-300 Exam Dumps - Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

In Azure AD Identity Governance, application access granted through Entitlement management is organized around catalogs and access packages. The SC-300 study materials explain that “a catalog is a container for resources and access packages” and that you must add your enterprise applications (or the groups tied to those apps) to a catalog before you can build access packages that users can request. Creating the catalog first enables you to place only the required resources in scope and to delegate day-to-day ownership: “catalog owners can manage the resources and access packages within their catalog without being tenant-wide admins,” satisfying the delegation requirement to use custom catalogs and least privilege. After the catalog exists, you create one or more access packages that include the application (or groups) and policies that control who can request, how they are approved, and for how long. Identity Governance then lets you track access package assignments and review who has the app over time. By contrast, programs are used to group and report on governance initiatives (for example, collections of access reviews) rather than to onboard application resources; and modifying user/admin consent settings affects app consent behavior, not the lifecycle tracking of assignments. Therefore, the correct first step to track application access assignments while meeting the delegation requirements is to create a catalog.

According to the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator Study Guide and the Microsoft Learn module “Implement and manage Azure AD Identity Protection,” Azure AD Identity Protection is the service responsible for detecting risky behaviors such as leaked credentials, suspicious sign-ins, and compromised accounts in a Microsoft 365 or Azure AD environment.

Identity Protection automatically flags leaked or compromised credentials detected through Microsoft’s threat intelligence signals and dark web monitoring. It classifies these users with a high user risk level.

“Identity Protection detects leaked credentials and marks the user risk as high when evidence of compromise is found.”

Thus, the feature used for this classification is Azure AD Identity Protection.

Remediation for leaked credentials is driven by User Risk policies. The User risk policy in Identity Protection can automatically respond to users identified as high-risk. This triggers actions such as forcing a password reset.

“User risk policy can be configured to respond to risky users by requiring password change or blocking access.”

Hence, User risk is the correct trigger.

To allow users to continue accessing applications after remediation, the proper action is Grant access but require password change. This enforces an immediate credential reset to mitigate the compromise but still allows access once the user remediates their risk.

“To automatically remediate high user risk while maintaining access, configure the policy to grant access but require a password change.”

<ï‚· User1 syncs to the Microsoft Entra tenant: Yes

ï‚· User2 syncs to the Microsoft Entra tenant: No

ï‚· Group2 syncs to the Microsoft Entra tenant: Yes

Before you can create a session policy in Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (MCAS), you must enable real-time session control integration through Conditional Access. This is achieved by creating a Conditional Access policy that uses the “Use Conditional Access App Control” session control option.

As explained in SC-300’s “Manage Cloud App Security integration” module, Conditional Access policies are the gateway for routing session traffic through Defender for Cloud Apps for monitoring or control.

Options A, C, and D in the question represent post-deployment or reporting tasks, not the initial configuration step needed to enable session control.

✅ Correct Answer: B. From the Microsoft Entra admin center, create a Conditional Access policy.

No

Yes

Yes

In Microsoft Entra/Azure RBAC, permissions are granted by role + scope and inherit down the hierarchy (subscription → resource group → resource). The SC-300 materials clarify that the Reader role is “a management-plane role that permits viewing resources but not modifying them or accessing data contents.” Therefore, although Group1 has Reader at Sub1, User1 (Group1, Group2) cannot read Key Vault secrets in Vault1 because Reader does not grant data-plane access. The study guide also notes for Azure Key Vault with RBAC: “Key Vault Secrets User can read secret contents (get/list) for vaults in the assigned scope.” Since Group2 holds Key Vault Secrets User at RG2, any member of Group2 (including User2) can read secrets in Vault2 (which is in RG2). However, that assignment does not extend to RG1, so it doesn’t help User1 with Vault1. Finally, SC-300 coverage of built-in roles states: “Owner grants full access to all resources within the scope, including the ability to modify settings and delegate access.” Because Group3 is Owner at RG1, User3 can manage resources in RG1, including updating the configuration of VM1 located there.

Result: User1 → No, User2 → Yes, User3 → Yes.

According to the official Microsoft SC-300: Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator Study Guide and Exam Ref SC-300 textbook, when configuring Entitlement Management in Azure AD Identity Governance, connected organizations are used to define which external directories or domains are allowed to request access to specific access packages. A connected organization represents a single external organization whose users can be invited as guests (B2B collaboration users) or allowed to request access packages.

Each connected organization is identified by its verified domain names. For example, if you have two separate companies, Fabrikam, Inc. and Litware, Inc., and they each have distinct verified domains — fabrikam.com, adatum.com (for Fabrikam), and litwareinc.com, contoso.com (for Litware) — they must each be configured as separate connected organizations because connected organizations are defined at the organization level, not per domain.

Even though each organization may have multiple verified domains, the configuration treats all of an organization’s verified domains as part of the same connected organization. Therefore, to allow users from both Fabrikam and Litware to request access to Package1, you must create two connected organizations — one for Fabrikam and one for Litware.

This behavior is confirmed in Microsoft documentation and training modules under “Manage connected organizations” in Azure AD Entitlement Management, which states that “each external organization that requires access must have its own connected organization entry, regardless of how many domains it owns.”

To answer this question correctly, we must reference the supported cloud platforms for Microsoft Entra Permissions Management (formerly known as CloudKnox).

1. What is Microsoft Entra Permissions Management? Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is a Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) solution. Its primary purpose is to discover, remediate, and monitor permission risks for any identity and any resource across your multi-cloud infrastructure.

2. Supported Cloud Platforms: According to the official Microsoft Entra Permissions Management documentation, the service provides comprehensive visibility and control over permissions for the following specific cloud providers:

Microsoft Azure

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google Cloud Platform (GCP)

3. Analysis of the Options:

Alibaba Cloud: While Microsoft Defender for Cloud (CSPM) and Azure AD (for SSO) have integrations with Alibaba Cloud, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management explicitly supports only the three major public clouds listed above (Azure, AWS, and GCP). It does not currently support Alibaba Cloud for entitlement and permission management.

The Scenario: You have already configured it for Azure. You need to identify which additional platforms from the list (Alibaba, AWS, GCP) can be managed.

Conclusion: Since Alibaba Cloud is not supported, the only remaining valid platforms from your list are AWS and GCP.

Reference Extract:

"Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is a cloud infrastructure entitlement management (CIEM) solution that provides comprehensive visibility into permissions assigned to all identities... across cloud infrastructures Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Google Cloud Platform (GCP)."