CGEIT Exam Dumps - Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam

 A data steward is a functional role in data management and governance, with responsibility for ensuring that data policies and standards turn into practice within the steward’s domain. Data stewards assist the enterprise in leveraging domain data assets to full capacity1. One of the primary responsibilities of a data steward is to establish data quality requirements and metrics, which define the criteria and measures for assessing the fitness of data for its intended use. Data quality requirements and metrics are based on the business needs and expectations of the data consumers, and they cover various dimensions of data quality, such as accuracy, completeness, consistency, timeliness, validity, and reliability23. Data stewards also monitor and report on the data quality performance, identify and resolve data quality issues, and implement continuous improvement initiatives to enhance the data quality4.

The other options are not the primary responsibility of a data steward, especially at an enterprise with mature data management programs. Implementing processes for data collection and use is a responsibility of a data engineer or a data analyst, who design and execute the technical aspects of data acquisition, transformation, storage, and analysis5. Ensuring compliance with data privacy laws and regulations is a responsibility of a data protection officer or a data privacy officer, who oversee the legal and ethical aspects of data processing, security, and consent. Developing data-related policies and procedures is a responsibility of a data governance committee or a data governance officer, who set the strategic direction and objectives for data management and governance across the enterprise.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, in its Governance of Enterprise IT domain, addresses vendor management in regulated environments. Third-party audit reports provide independent verification that cloud vendors comply with stringent regulatory requirements (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA), offering evidence of controls and certifications (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001). These reports are critical for due diligence. The manual likely references COBIT 2019’s APO10-Managed Vendors, which emphasizes third-party assurance for compliance.

Option A: Stage gate reviews are project management checkpoints, not vendor compliance tools.

Option B: Risk assessment evaluates risks but lacks independent verification.

Option C: Internal audit report assesses internal controls, not vendor compliance.

Double Verification: The answer aligns with COBIT’s APO10 and the CGEIT domain’s focus on vendor governance. Third-party audits are a standard ISACA requirement for vendor compliance.

ISACA CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT (focus on vendor management).

COBIT 2019, APO10-Managed Vendors.

ISACA Glossary (for definitions of third-party audit), available at https://www.isaca.org/resources/glossary.

 Engaging stakeholders to identify and validate business requirements is the best way to improve the success rate of future IT initiatives. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the IT initiatives, such as business users, customers, managers, sponsors, etc. Engaging stakeholders can help:

Understand the needs, expectations, and priorities of the stakeholders, and ensure that they are aligned with the business objectives and strategy

Define and document the business requirements that specify what the IT initiatives should deliver in terms of functionality, quality, performance, and value

Validate and verify that the business requirements are clear, complete, consistent, feasible, and testable

Communicate and manage any changes or issues that may affect the business requirements or the IT initiatives

Engaging stakeholders to identify and validate business requirements can help avoid missing key functionality in the corporate applications, and ensure that they meet the stakeholder’s needs and expectations. This can also reduce the reliance on spreadsheets and databases as alternative software solutions, and increase the user satisfaction and adoption of the enterprise applications.

The other options are not the best way to improve the success rate of future IT initiatives. Engaging the business user community in acceptance testing of acquired applications is a good practice, but it is not sufficient to ensure that the applications have the key functionality that meets the business requirements. Acceptance testing is done at the end of the IT initiative lifecycle, after the applications have been developed or acquired. If the business requirements were not properly identified and validated at the beginning of the IT initiative lifecycle, acceptance testing may reveal significant gaps or defects that may be costly or difficult to fix. Establishing a process for risk and value management is a useful technique, but it does not directly address the issue of missing key functionality in the corporate applications. Risk and value management involves identifying, assessing, prioritizing, and treating the risks and benefits associated with IT initiatives. However, without clear and valid business requirements, risk and value management may not be effective or accurate. Prohibiting the use of non-approved alternate software solutions is a restrictive measure, but it does not solve the problem of missing key functionality in the corporate applications. Prohibiting the use of spreadsheets and databases may force the users to use the enterprise applications, but it may also create dissatisfaction, frustration, or resistance among them. Moreover, it may prevent them from performing their tasks efficiently or effectively if the enterprise applications do not meet their needs.

For more information on engaging stakeholders to identify and validate business requirements, you can refer to these web sources:

Stakeholder Engagement - ISACA

Business Requirements - ISACA

Requirements Validation - ISACA

A maturity assessment evaluates the current state of IT governance processes to identify gaps in capability that need improvement. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition states that the primary purpose of a maturity assessment is to identify capability gaps to guide governance framework enhancements.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT):"The primary purpose of a maturity assessment is to identify gaps in IT governance capabilities, such as processes, skills, or controls, relative to desired maturity levels. This enables the enterprise to prioritize improvements and enhance governance effectiveness." (Approximate reference: Domain 1, Section on Maturity Assessment)

Identifying gaps in capability (option D) focuses on assessing the maturity of governance processes and determining where enhancements are needed to achieve desired outcomes.

Why not the other options?

A. Benchmark IT performance: Benchmarking compares performance, not capability maturity.

B. Identify gaps in performance: Performance gaps are a secondary outcome, while capability gaps are the primary focus.

C. Support impact analysis: Impact analysis is not the primary purpose of maturity assessments.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, in its Risk Optimization domain, addresses the need for proactive detection and response to security incidents to minimize risks. The undetected breach attempt highlights a gap in real-time monitoring and alerting.

Option D: The implementation of an intrusion detection and reporting process is the most important. An intrusion detection system (IDS) monitors network and system activities for unauthorized access, generating alerts for immediate response. This would have ensured the breach attempt was detected and reported in real-time, preventing potential data loss. The manual likely references COBIT 2019’s DSS05-Managed Security Services, which emphasizes intrusion detection as a critical security control.

Option A: Periodic analyses of logs and databases is reactive and may not detect breaches in time, unlike real-time IDS.

Option B: A review of security and risk frameworks is broad and long-term, not addressing the immediate detection gap.

Option C: A comprehensive data management policy focuses on data governance, not real-time breach detection.

Double Verification: The answer aligns with COBIT’s DSS05 and the CGEIT domain’s focus on security incident detection. Intrusion detection is a standard ISACA recommendation for preventing undetected breaches.

ISACA CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, Domain 4: Risk Optimization (focus on security incident detection).

COBIT 2019, DSS05-Managed Security Services.

ISACA Glossary (for definitions of intrusion detection), available at https://www.isaca.org/resources/glossary.

The primary role of the CEO in IT governance is establishing enterprise strategic goals. The CEO is responsible for setting the vision and strategic direction of the organization, which includes ensuring that IT governance aligns with and supports these broader objectives. While managing the risk governance process, evaluating ROI, and nominating IT steering committee membership are important, these are typically shared responsibilities or delegated to other roleswithin the organization. The CEO's leadership in defining the strategic goals is fundamental to guiding all aspects of IT governance and ensuring alignment with the business strategy.

The most efficient approach for using risk scenarios to evaluate a new business opportunity is to identify risk events from both bottom-up and top-down perspectives. This means that the risk identification process should consider both the specific details of the opportunity, such as the market, customer, product, service, technology, and resources involved, as well as the broader context of the opportunity, such as the strategic objectives, vision, mission, values, and culture of the organization. By using both bottom-up and top-down approaches, the risk identification process can capture a comprehensive and balanced view of the potential risks that could affect the success of the opportunity. This will help to create realistic and relevant risk scenarios that can be analyzed and evaluated for decision-making purposes. A bottom-up approach alone may miss some important risks that are related to the organization’s strategy, governance, or environment, while a top-down approach alone may overlook some specific risks that are unique to the opportunity or its implementation. Therefore, a combination of both approaches is the most efficient way to use risk scenarios for evaluating a new business opportunity. References := What is business risk? | McKinsey, How to Write Strong Risk Scenarios and Statements - ISACA, Finding your blind spots: Recognising emerging risks and opportunities

When determining the process for meeting an internal health organization's legal and regulatory obligations following a data breach, the most important consideration is the context of the breach, including data ownership and location. Understanding who owns the breached data and where it was stored or processed is crucial for determining jurisdictional and regulatory requirements. This context informs the organization's legal obligations, such as notification requirements and potential liabilities. While organizational structure, data classification, security policy, and details of the breach and incident response efforts are relevant, the context of the breach is paramount in guiding the legal and regulatory response.