CGEIT Exam Dumps - Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam

According to the ISACA paper on IT Governance Reporting1, the IT strategy committee is a board-level committee that is responsible for overseeing and guiding the IT strategy and governance of the enterprise. The IT strategy committee helps to ensure that IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise’s strategy, objectives and goals, and that IT delivers value, benefits and competitive advantage to the enterprise. One of the decisions that would be made by the IT strategy committee is the composition of the investment portfolio, which is the set of IT projects and programs that are selected, prioritized, funded and monitored by the enterprise. The composition of the investment portfolio reflects the strategic alignment, value proposition and risk profile of IT, as well as the resource allocation and optimization of IT. The other options are not decisions that would be made by the IT strategy committee, but rather by other IT governance bodies or roles, such as the IT steering committee, the IT management team, or the chief information officer (CIO). References: IT Governance Reporting, IT Strategy Committee

A balanced scorecard is a tool that would best demonstrate the current state of strategic alignment, because it is a framework that translates the enterprise’s vision and strategy into a set of performance measures that cover four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business process, and learning and growth12. A balanced scorecard can help to assess how well the IT function is supporting the business objectives, and identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement. A balanced scorecard can also help to communicate and monitor the IT strategy and goals, and align the IT activities and resources with the business needs and expectations1 .

Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that measure the likelihood and impact of potential or actual risks. KRIs related to legal and regulatory compliance are designed to help the enterprise monitor and manage the risk of violating laws, regulations, standards, or ethical practices that apply to its operating environment. The primary governance objective for selecting KRIs related to legal and regulatory compliance should be to identify the risk of noncompliance, which means assessing the probability and severity of compliance breaches, as well as the root causes and consequences of such breaches. By identifying the risk of noncompliance, the enterprise can take proactive measures to prevent, mitigate, or remediate compliance issues, and to ensure that its compliance program is effective, efficient, and aligned with its business objectives and strategies. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Compliance Metrics and KPIs For Measuring Compliance Effectiveness — RiskOptics2, 11 Key Compliance KPIs + Examples (& Why You Should Track Them …3

IT resource planning is the process of identifying, allocating, and managing the IT resources needed to support the enterprise’s objectives and strategies. The primary objective of IT resource planning should be to maximize the value received from IT, which means ensuring that the IT resources are aligned with the business needs, optimized for efficiency and effectiveness, and delivering the expected benefits and outcomes. IT resource planning should also consider the risks, costs, and opportunities associated with IT resources, as well as the service level agreements (SLAs) and outsourcing options that may affect the quality and availability of IT services. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), What are the Objectives of Resource Management? | Kantata2, What Is Resource Planning: A Comprehensive Guide3

 Effective IT governance is the process of ensuring that IT supports the achievement of the organization’s goals and objectives, and delivers value to its stakeholders1. IT governance involves aligning the IT strategy, policies, processes, and resources with the business strategy, needs, and expectations2. Therefore, the BEST evidence of effective IT governance is business value and customer satisfaction. Business value is the measure of the benefits and outcomes that IT provides to the organization, such as increased revenue, reduced costs, improved efficiency, enhanced innovation, or competitive advantage3. Customer satisfaction is the measure of the quality and performance of IT services and products, as perceived by the internal and external customers of the organization, such as employees, partners, suppliers, or end-users. By demonstrating business value and customer satisfaction, IT governance can show that IT is aligned with and supports the business goals and objectives.

The other options are not as good as option B. While cost savings and human resource optimization, IT risk identification and mitigation, and comprehensive IT policies and procedures are important aspects of IT governance, they are not sufficient to demonstrate effective IT governance. They are rather means to achieve the end goal of delivering business value and customer satisfaction. They do not necessarily reflect the extent to which IT supports the achievement of the organization’s goals and objectives. References :=

• What is IT Governance? Definition & Examples | ASQ2
• What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy1
• How to Measure the Value of an IT Investment - TechSoup3
• Measuring Customer Satisfaction in Information Technology Services - ISACA

An enterprise code of ethics is a set of principles and values that guide the behavior and decision-making of the organization and its members. It can help to incorporate desired organizational behaviors into the IT governance framework by establishing a common understanding and expectation of what is acceptable and unacceptable, and by promoting a culture of integrity, accountability, and responsibility. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 17.

When considering an IT change that would enable a potential new line of business, the first strategic step for IT governance would be to ensure agreement among the stakeholders regarding a vision for the future state, because this would provide a clear direction and purpose for the change, and align the IT strategy with the business strategy. A vision statement should describe the desired outcomes and benefits of the change, and reflect the enterprise’s mission, values, and goals12. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 23-24.

According to the ISACA paper on Tactics for Effectively Communicating Cybersecurity Risk to Boards of Directors1, the most effective way to initially address the request of providing periodic updates regarding IT risk to the board is to include key IT risks in a dashboard submitted to the board quarterly. A dashboard is a visual tool that can help the board members quickly understand the current status and trends of IT risk, as well as the actions taken or planned to mitigate them. A dashboard should be concise, clear, consistent and relevant, and should highlight the most significant IT risks that could impact the enterprise’s objectives and performance. A dashboard should also align with the enterprise’s risk appetite and tolerance, and provide recommendations for improvement or escalation. The other options are not as effective as a dashboard, as they may be too detailed, too frequent, too narrow or too reactive for the board’s needs.

 According to the CGEIT exam guide, the success of IT investments is measured by the extent to which they deliver the expected benefits to the enterprise and its stakeholders. Therefore, the percentage of IT investments that meet expected benefits is the best metric to indicate the success of IT investments. This metric reflects the alignment of IT with business objectives and strategies, as well as the effectiveness and efficiency of IT processes and services. The other metrics are not directly related to the success of IT investments, but rather to the management and governance of IT. References: CGEIT Exam Candidate Guide, page 13. CGEIT Certification, Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance

After defining the ethical standards for an ethics program, the next step for the enterprise should be to establish a training and awareness program focused on ethics. A training and awareness program can help to communicate the ethical standards to all employees and stakeholders, and educate them on the importance, benefits, and expectations of ethical behavior. A training and awareness program can also help to foster a culture of ethics within the enterprise, and encourage employees to apply the ethical standards in their daily work and decision making. According to ISACA’s article on Ethics in IT1, “training is essential to ensure that all staff understand what is expected of them and how to apply ethical principles in their work.” Furthermore, according to ISACA’s CGEIT Domain 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT2, “training and awareness are key enablers for embedding an appropriate culture throughout the enterprise.” Therefore, establishing a training and awareness program focused on ethics is the best way to implement the ethical standards defined by the enterprise.

The risk profile of the enterprise is the most important thing to consider first when conducting a risk assessment in support of a new regulatory requirement, as it reflects the overall exposure and tolerance of the enterprise to various types of risks, such as strategic, operational, financial, or compliance risks. The risk profile of the enterprise can help determine the scope, objectives, and criteria of the risk assessment, as well as the prioritization and allocation of resources and efforts for risk identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment. The risk profile of the enterprise can also help align the risk assessment with the enterprise’s strategy, goals, and values, as well as ensure consistency and integration with other risk management activities or processes.

Disruption to normal business operations, readiness of IT systems to address the risk, and cost burden to achieve compliance are also important things to consider when conducting a risk assessment in support of a new regulatory requirement, but they are not the first thing to consider. Disruption to normal business operations is a potential consequence or impact of the risk on the enterprise’s performance, productivity, or continuity. Disruption to normal business operations can be assessed and measured during the risk analysis or evaluation stage of the risk assessment, as well as mitigated or reduced during the risk treatment or response stage. Readiness of IT systems to address the risk is a factor that affects the capability or maturity of the enterprise’s IT infrastructure, applications, or services to comply with or support the new regulatory requirement. Readiness of IT systems to address the risk can be assessed and improved during the risk treatment or response stage of the risk assessment, as well as monitored and reported during the risk communication or review stage. Cost burden to achieve compliance is a factor that affects the feasibility or affordability of the enterprise’s actions or investments to comply with or support the new regulatory requirement. Cost burden to achieve compliance can be estimated and optimized during the risk treatment or response stage of the risk assessment, as well as balanced with the benefits or value of compliance.

The CIO should first establish a business case for the BYOD program, because a business case is a document that outlines the rationale, objectives, benefits, costs, risks, and feasibility of a proposed project or initiative1. A business case can help the CIO to justify the need and value of the BYOD program to the senior management and stakeholders, and to secure the necessary funding and resources for its implementation. A business case can also help the CIO to define the scope, requirements, and success criteria of the BYOD program, and to align it with the enterprise’s strategy, goals, and governance framework2. According to ISACA’s CGEIT Domain 2: IT Resources3, “the enterprise should have a clear business case for each IT investment decision that includes expected benefits, costs, risks and alignment with strategic objectives.” Furthermore, according to ISACA’s article on BYOD, “a business case is essential for any BYOD initiative as it helps to determine whether the benefits outweigh the costs and risks.” Therefore, establishing a business case is the best first step for the CIO who is considering introducing a BYOD program.

According to the CGEIT exam guide, the risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an enterprise is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. It is a key element of the IT governance framework and should be defined by senior management before developing and managing digital applications for a new enterprise. The risk appetite provides the basis for establishing the risk management strategy, policies and processes, as well as the risk culture and awareness of the enterprise. References: CGEIT Exam Candidate Guide, page 15. CGEIT Certification

The CIO should first meet with key stakeholders to understand their concerns about the IT governance reporting transparency. This will help the CIO to identify the root causes of the perception, the expectations and needs of the stakeholders, and the gaps and issues in the current reporting process. Meeting with key stakeholders will also help to build trust and rapport, and to solicit feedback and suggestions for improvement. The CIO can then use this information to develop a communication and awareness strategy, adopt a standard template, and add transparency metrics to the balanced scorecard. These actions will help to enhance the transparency, consistency, and quality of the IT governance reporting, and to address the stakeholder concerns effectively. References := How Boards Realise IT Governance Transparency: A Study Into Current Practice of the COBIT EDM05 Process, Page 1.

According to the ISACA CGEIT Exam Candidate Guide, one of the tasks under the domain of Strategic Alignment is to "understand the current vision and direction of the enterprise and identify how IT can best support it."1 This task should be done first when developing an IT strategic plan that supports an enterprise’s business goals, because it provides the basis for aligning IT with the business strategy and priorities. By understanding the current vision and direction of the enterprise, the IT strategic plan can identify the gaps, opportunities, and challenges that need to be addressed by IT, as well as the expected outcomes and benefits that IT can deliver to the enterprise23. The other options are not the best actions to perform first in this scenario. Ensuring that IT drives business goals, analyzing benchmarking data, and performing a business impact analysis (BIA) are all useful steps or methods for developing an IT strategic plan, but they are not the starting point. They should be done after understanding the current vision and direction of the enterprise, based on the alignment and integration of IT with the business strategy and goals23. References:

• 1: https://www.isaca.org/-/media/info/cgeit/cgeit-exam-candidate-guide.pdf
• 2: https://www.cascade.app/blog/it-strategic-plan
• 3: https://www.projectmanager.com/blog/it-governance-frameworks-definitions

Risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. Risk appetite of the enterprise should be the primary consideration when developing a risk management policy for a portfolio of IT-enabled investments, because it helps to align the risk management strategy with the business strategy and goals. Risk appetite also helps to define the risk tolerance and thresholds for each investment, and to prioritize and allocate resources accordingly. Risk appetite also helps to communicate the expectations and responsibilities of the stakeholders involved in the risk management process, and to foster a risk-aware culture within the organization. References := CGEIT Review Manual, Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.1: IT Risk Management Strategy, Subsection 4.1.1: Establishing IT Risk Appetite, Page 139.

Practical and enforceable policies are the best way to contribute to the successful implementation of a framework to implement IT governance, as they provide clear and consistent guidance and direction for IT activities, processes, and decisions. Practical and enforceable policies are based on the enterprise’s strategy, goals, and values, as well as the relevant regulations and standards. Practical and enforceable policies also define the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the IT stakeholders, as well as the mechanisms for monitoring, measuring, and reporting on IT performance and compliance. Practical and enforceable policies can help ensure that IT governance is effective, efficient, and aligned with the business needs and expectations.

Automated compliance tracking, comprehensive and timely audit reviews, and periodic peer reviews are also useful ways to support the implementation of a framework to implement IT governance, but they are not the best way. Automated compliance tracking is a process that uses software tools or systems to collect, analyze, and report on IT compliance data, such as policies, standards, controls, risks, incidents, or issues. Automated compliance tracking can help reduce the time and effort required for IT compliance management, as well as improve the accuracy and reliability of IT compliance information. Comprehensive and timely audit reviews are assessments that evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of IT governance, management, and operations. Comprehensive and timely audit reviews can help identify and address any weaknesses or gaps in IT governance, as well as provide recommendations for improvement. Periodic peer reviews are evaluations that compare the IT governance practices of an enterprise with those of its peers or competitors. Periodic peer reviews can help benchmark and improve the IT governance performance of an enterprise, as well as identify best practices or opportunities for innovation.

References := IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning - ProjectManager; What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy; What is IT Governance (ITG) and why does it matter? - IFS Blog; IT Governance Framework - CIO Wiki; What is IT Governance? How to Implement | Electric.

A vision statement should be the primary input when developing IT strategy, because it is a concise and clear expression of the enterprise’s desired future state and direction, and it reflects the enterprise’s mission, values, and goals12. A vision statement can help to guide and inspire the IT function to align its activities and resources with the business needs and expectations, and to deliver value and innovation to the enterprise. A vision statement can also help to communicate and monitor the IT strategy and objectives, and measure the IT performance and outcomes12. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 23-24.

Communicating the objectives and responsibilities to staff is the BEST way to demonstrate senior management’s commitment to IT governance. IT governance is the process of ensuring that IT supports the achievement of the organization’s goals and objectives, and delivers value to its stakeholders1. IT governance involves aligning the IT strategy, policies, processes, and resources with the business strategy, needs, and expectations2. However, implementing and sustaining IT governance requires a significant amount of change in the organization, such as introducing new technologies, standards, roles, and responsibilities3. Therefore, communicating the objectives and responsibilities to staff is essential for demonstrating senior management’s commitment to IT governance, as it can:

• Provide the direction and mandate for the IT governance initiative on an ongoing basis
• Communicate the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the IT function to all stakeholders
• Allocate the necessary resources and capabilities to enable the IT governance processes and activities
• Monitor and evaluate the performance and outcomes of the IT function and provide feedback and recognition
• Foster a positive and collaborative culture that values IT as a strategic partner and enabler of the business

The other options are not as good as option C. While it is important to communicate the legal and regulatory requirements, the approved IT investment opportunities, and the need for enterprise architecture (EA), these are not sufficient to demonstrate senior management’s commitment to IT governance. They are rather means to achieve the end goal of implementing and sustaining IT governance. They do not necessarily reflect the level of commitment, involvement, and support from the management toward IT governance. References :=

• What is IT Governance? Definition & Examples | ASQ2
• What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy1
• How to Involve Senior Management in the Information Security Governance …3

According to the CGEIT exam guide, data governance is the set of processes that ensure that important data assets are formally managed throughout the enterprise. Data governance ensures that data can be trusted and that people can be made accountable for any adverse event that happens because of low data quality. It is about putting people in charge of fixing and preventing issues with data so that the enterprise can become more efficient. Data governance also describes an evolutionary process for a company, altering the company’s way of thinking and setting up the processes to handle information so that it may be utilized by the entire organization. When moving infrastructure hosting to an external cloud provider, it is essential to include compliance with the enterprise’s data governance policy in the contract. This will ensure that the cloud provider follows the same standards and practices as the enterprise regarding data quality, security, privacy, availability, integrity and reliability. This will also help to mitigate the risk of data breaches, loss or misuse, and to protect the reputation and trust of the enterprise and its customers. References: CGEIT Exam Candidate Guide, page 16. CGEIT Certification, Building Cloud Governance From the Basics

Data classification is a process of organizing and categorizing data based on its characteristics, confidentiality, and sensitivity. Data classification helps to determine the level of access and protection that data requires. Data classification also makes data easier to understand, compare, and analyze. Data classification is an essential part of information security, as it helps to align the security measures and policies with the data’s value and risk. By incorporating data classification into the information architecture, the IT processes can ensure that information security requirements are taken into consideration from the design stage to the implementation stage. References :=

• What is Data Classification? A Data Classification Definition
• What is Sensitive Data? Definition, Examples, and More

The impact of information exposure is the most important factor for an enterprise to review when classifying information assets, because it helps to determine the level of sensitivity and protection that the information assets require. Information assets are classified according to their confidentiality, integrity, and availability, which reflect the potential harm or loss that could result from unauthorized disclosure, modification, or destruction of the information assets. The impact of information exposure can be assessed in terms of financial, reputational, legal, operational, or strategic consequences for the enterprise and its stakeholders. The impact of information exposure can also vary depending on the context, scope, and duration of the exposure. Therefore, by reviewing the impact of information exposure, an enterprise can assign appropriate labels and controls to its information assets, and ensure that they are handled and stored securely and appropriately. References := Information classification according to ISO 27001, Information Asset and Security Classification Procedure, Information Classification Standard.

Internal audit is an independent and objective function that provides assurance and consulting services to the enterprise on the effectiveness and efficiency of its governance, risk management, and control processes1. By including internal audit as a stakeholder, the enterprise can benefit from its knowledge, expertise, and perspective on IT-related issues and risks, such as IT strategy alignment, IT performance measurement, IT value delivery, IT resource management, IT risk management, and IT compliance2. Internal audit can also provide input on the design, implementation, and evaluation of the IT governance framework, policies, standards, and procedures, as well as recommend improvements and best practices2. Therefore, internal audit provides input on relevant issues and control processes, which is the most important reason to include it as a stakeholder when establishing clear roles for the governance of IT.

The other options are not as important or accurate as option D. Internal audit does not have knowledge and technical expertise to advise on IT infrastructure, as this is not its primary role or responsibility. Internal audit is not accountable for the overall enterprise governance of IT, as this is the responsibility of the board of directors and senior management3. Internal audit does not implement controls over IT risks and security, as this is the responsibility of the IT function and other business units4.

As part of the implementation of IT governance, the board of an enterprise should establish an IT strategy committee to provide input to and ensure alignment of the enterprise and IT strategies, because this would enable the board to oversee and direct the IT function in a way that supports the enterprise’s vision, mission, goals, and objectives. The IT strategy committee should consist of board members and senior executives who have a stake in the IT performance and value delivery, and who can communicate and coordinate with other board committees and business units. The IT strategy committee should also review and approve the IT strategic plan, monitor the IT performance and outcomes, and ensure the alignment of IT resources and capabilities with the enterprise’s needs and expectations1 . References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 19-20.

The BEST time for the enterprise to plan for the event of contract termination is when developing the initial contract. Contract termination is the process of ending a contractual relationship between two parties, either by mutual agreement or by exercising a right to terminate under the contract terms1. Contract termination can have significant impacts and implications for both parties, such as loss of revenue, loss of service, loss of data, legal disputes, reputational damage, etc.2 Therefore, it is important to plan for the event of contract termination in advance, and include appropriate provisions and mechanisms in the contract to ensure a smooth and orderly exit3.

Some of the benefits of planning for contract termination when developing the initial contract are4:

• It clarifies the expectations and obligations of both parties in case of contract termination, such as the notice period, the termination fees, the transition services, the data return or destruction, etc.
• It reduces the risks and costs associated with contract termination, such as service disruption, data loss, litigation, penalties, etc.
• It enables faster and more effective resolution of contract termination issues, such as dispute resolution, arbitration, mediation, etc.
• It fosters a positive and professional relationship between the parties, even in case of contract termination, by avoiding surprises, conflicts, or misunderstandings.

Therefore, planning for contract termination when developing the initial contract is the best time for the enterprise to ensure a successful and beneficial outsourcing engagement.

Negotiating service level agreements (SLAs) is the best way for an organization to minimize the difference between expected and delivered services when acquiring resources, because SLAs define the scope, quality, availability, performance, and security of the services that the provider will deliver to the customer. SLAs also specify the roles and responsibilities, escalation procedures, and penalties for non-compliance of both parties. By negotiating SLAs, the organization can ensure that its expectations and requirements are clearly communicated and agreed upon by the provider, and that there are mechanisms to measure and monitor the service delivery and outcomes. Negotiating SLAs also helps to prevent or resolve any disputes or issues that may arise from the service provision, and to ensure that the organization receives the value and benefits that it expects from the provider. One of the sources that supports this answer is Service-level Agreement: 3 Types And Templates - Contract Lawyers, which states that “A service-level agreement is important because it: Protects both parties: The SLA sets standards for the service, ensuring both the service provider and end user are on the same page with expectations.”

Increasing the maturity of IT process from being ad hoc to being repeatable means that the process is documented and followed consistently, resulting in more predictable and reliable outcomes. According to the capability maturity model for the IT governance process, a repeatable level indicates that “required outcomes are more frequently achieved” 1. References: CGEIT Domain 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT

Total cost of ownership (TCO) is the purchase price of an asset plus the costs of operation over its lifespan1. TCO includes hardware and software acquisition, management and support, communications, end-user expenses and the opportunity cost of downtime, training and other productivity losses2. By considering TCO in investment decisions, an enterprise can avoid unexpected costs and optimize the value of its IT assets3. A policy to consider TCO in investment decisions can help the enterprise to plan ahead for the lease or purchase of IT infrastructure and software licenses, and avoid cost overruns due to lease extensions or other factors. References :=

• CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Value Optimization, Section 4.2: IT Value Delivery, Subsection 4.2.3: IT Resource Management, Page 123
• CGEIT Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 4: Value Optimization, Section 4.2: IT Value Delivery, Subsection 4.2.3: IT Resource Management, Page 123
• How to Calculate Total Cost of Ownership for Software - GetApp4
• Total Cost of Ownership: How It’s Calculated With Example - Investopedia1

 IT goals and objectives are the desired outcomes and targets that IT aims to achieve in support of the business strategy and objectives. IT goals and objectives should be defined first before establishing IT key risk indicators (KRIs), because they provide the direction and scope for the IT risk management process. KRIs are metrics that measure and monitor the level and trend of risk exposure, and help to identify and manage potential threats or opportunities that could affect the achievement of IT goals and objectives1. Therefore, by defining IT goals and objectives first, an enterprise can ensure that its KRIs are relevant, aligned, and consistent with its IT strategy and value delivery2. References := Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) - ISACA, Integrating KRIs and KPIs for Effective Technology Risk Management - ISACA.

A procurement framework is a set of policies, procedures, and guidelines that govern the acquisition of goods and services from external sources. A procurement framework best facilitates the standardization of IT vendor selection, because it helps to ensure that the IT vendor selection process is consistent, transparent, fair, and efficient. A procurement framework also helps to define the roles and responsibilities, criteria and methods, documentation and reporting, and monitoring and evaluation of the IT vendor selection process. A procurement framework can help to reduce the risks, costs, and complexity of IT vendor selection, and to increase the quality, value, and performance of IT vendors. References := Software Selection, Page 2.

 To enable the development of required IT skill sets for the enterprise, it is most important to define skill requirements based on each role within the IT department, because different roles may have different responsibilities, tasks, and expectations that require specific skills and competencies. By defining skill requirements based on each role, the enterprise can ensure that the IT staff have the appropriate knowledge, abilities, and experience to perform their roles effectively and efficiently, and to support the enterprise’s goals and objectives. According to ISACA’s CGEIT Domain 2: IT Resources1, “the enterprise should identify the skills required for each IT role and assess the current and future skill gaps.” Furthermore, according to ISACA’s article on IT Skills Gap2, “the skills gap is not a one-size-fits-all problem. It varies by industry, organization and department/role.” Therefore, defining skill requirements based on each role within the IT department is the best way to enable the development of required IT skill sets for the enterprise. References:

• IT Skills Gap: Trends, Implications and Best Practices - ISACA
• IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning - ProjectManager
• What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy | CIO
• CGEIT Domain 2: IT Resources

An IT balanced scorecard is the best information source to assess the effective alignment of IT investments, because it provides a comprehensive and balanced view of the IT performance and value from four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth1. An IT balanced scorecard helps to translate the IT strategy and objectives into measurable indicators that reflect the contribution of IT to the business strategy and goals2. An IT balanced scorecard also helps to monitor and evaluate the IT investments based on their benefits, costs, and risks, and to identify and address any gaps or issues in the IT alignment2. An IT balanced scorecard also helps to communicate and report the IT value and outcomes to the stakeholders, and to foster a continuous improvement culture within the organization2.

References := Implementing the IT Balanced Scorecard: Aligning IT with … - Routledge, Strategy-Based Balanced Scorecards for Technology.

An independent assessment is a review by a third party of an authorization decision, a product, a service, or a system to verify its quality, functionality, compliance, or performance. An independent assessment can help identify and mitigate potential risks, errors, or defects before they cause problems or failures. An independent assessment can also provide an objective and unbiased opinion on the suitability and effectiveness of a solution for a specific purpose or context.

By requiring an independent assessment of solutions prior to implementation, the enterprise can ensure that the solutions meet the functional requirements and specifications, as well as the security and privacy standards and policies. This can prevent issues such as the malfunctioning of role-based access control, which could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of sensitive data. An independent assessment can also help evaluate the compatibility and interoperability of solutions with existing systems and processes, and provide recommendations for improvement or optimization.

Some examples of independent assessment methods are:

• Independent verification and validation (IV&V): A process that checks whether a system meets its defined requirements and specifications, and whether it fulfills its intended purpose and functions.
• Independent technical review (ITR): A process that evaluates the technical aspects of a system, such as its design, architecture, performance, reliability, security, usability, maintainability, and scalability.
• Independent security assessment (ISA): A process that assesses the security posture of a system, such as its vulnerability to threats, its compliance with security standards and regulations, its implementation of security controls and measures, and its response to security incidents.

 Quantitative analysis is the best method to assess the risk of plausible scenarios that could result in economic loss associated with major IT investments, because it tries to assign objective numerical or measurable values to the components of the risk assessment and to the assessment of potential loss1. Quantitative analysis can help estimate the probability and impact of risk events, calculate the expected monetary value (EMV) of risk, and compare the costs and benefits of different risk responses2. Quantitative analysis can also provide a more accurate and objective basis for decision making than qualitative analysis, which is scenario-based and relies on subjective judgments1. References := 1: Risk Assessment and Analysis Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative - ISACA12: 6 Types of Risk Assessment Methodologies + How to Choose - Drata2

 The best way for the CIO to ensure that the IT objectives are delivered effectively by IT staff is to include the IT objectives in staff performance plans. Staff performance plans are documents that define the expectations, responsibilities, and goals for individual employees, as well as the criteria and methods for evaluating their performance1. By including the IT objectives in staff performance plans, the CIO can align the IT staff’s work with the business objectives, communicate the desired outcomes and behaviors, motivate and empower the IT staff, monitor and measure their progress and achievements, and provide feedback and recognition1. This will help to create a culture of accountability, excellence, and continuous improvement among the IT staff, and ensure that they contribute to the value creation and delivery of IT2. References: Performance Management. What is CGEIT? A certification for seasoned IT governance professionals.

The MOST effective way to ensure that IT supports the agile needs of an enterprise is to develop a robust enterprise architecture (EA). Enterprise architecture is the practice that supports organizations to understand the complexity of their own business components so they can be changed in a consistent way1. Enterprise architecture provides a framework for change, linked to both strategic direction and business value. It provides organization views to manage complexity, support continuous change, and keep the adequate level of balance between risk and innovation1. Enterprise architecture is also key to support strategic decision making, to provide guidance and guardrails to IT teams that are focused on agile delivery solutions2.

Some of the benefits of developing a robust enterprise architecture for an agile enterprise are3:

• It aligns the IT objectives and activities with the business strategy and expectations
• It enables faster and more effective delivery of IT solutions that meet customer needs and expectations
• It reduces waste, duplication, and technical debt by promoting reuse, standardization, and integration of IT assets
• It fosters innovation and experimentation by providing a clear vision, direction, and roadmap for new and emerging technologies
• It enhances collaboration and communication among stakeholders by providing a common language and understanding of the organization’s architecture

Therefore, developing a robust enterprise architecture is the most effective way to ensure that IT supports the agile needs of an enterprise.

A procurement manager should agree to purchase IT equipment from a specific vendor during a sales promotion only if the equipment adds value to the enterprise. This means that the equipment supports the business goals and objectives, meets the current and future needs of the stakeholders, and delivers benefits that outweigh the costs and risks. The procurement manager should also consider the quality, reliability, compatibility, and security of the equipment, as well as the vendor’s reputation, service level, and warranty.

The other options are not the best justification for a procurement manager to agree to purchase IT equipment from a specific vendor during a sales promotion. The IT benefit surpasses the business benefit from the purchase is not a valid justification, as it implies that the IT department’s interests are more important than the enterprise’s interests. The procurement manager should align the IT strategy with the business strategy and ensure that the IT equipment supports the enterprise value creation. The business profit surpasses the IT cost for the equipment is not a sufficient justification, as it does not account for other factors such as quality, performance, functionality, and risk of the equipment. The procurement manager should evaluate the total cost of ownership (TCO) and return on investment (ROI) of the IT equipment, not just the initial purchase price. The product is offered at the lowest price is not a convincing justification, as it does not guarantee that the equipment is suitable for the enterprise’s needs and expectations. The procurement manager should not compromise on quality, functionality, or security for a lower price.

For more information on IT procurement and value creation, you can refer to these web sources:

• IT Procurement Manager Job Description w/ Role & Responsibilities
• IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning
• What is Governance in Procurement? Its Model
• What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy

 When prioritizing IT projects, the primary consideration for an enterprise should be the impact on the business due to expected project outcomes, because this would align the IT investments with the enterprise’s strategic objectives and value creation. The impact on the business can be assessed by using criteria such as return on investment (ROI), net present value (NPV), risk exposure, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage12. References:= ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 31-32.

Data stewards are primarily responsible for applying frameworks for the governance of IT to balance the need for security controls with business requirements, as they are the custodians of the data quality, integrity, and security within an organization. Data stewards define and implement data policies, standards, and procedures, as well as monitor and report on data compliance and performance. Data stewards also collaborate with other stakeholders, such as data owners, data users, and data scientists, to ensure that the data is aligned with the business objectives and meets the regulatory and ethical requirements.

Data scientists, data analysts, and data processors are not primarily responsible for applying frameworks for the governance of IT, as they are more focused on the technical aspects of data collection, analysis, and processing. Data scientists use advanced methods and tools to extract insights and value from data. Data analysts use descriptive and inferential statistics to explore and interpret data. Data processors perform operations on data, such as entry, validation, transformation, storage, and retrieval.

References := What is a Data Steward? | Informatica; Data Governance Roles: The Ultimate Guide | Collibra; Data Governance Roles: Who Does What? | erwin; [What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy].

 IT governance is the process of ensuring that IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise’s goals and objectives, and delivers value to the stakeholders1. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups that have a stake in the success or failure of IT governance, such as board members, senior management, business units, IT function, customers, suppliers, regulators, and society1. By considering stakeholders’ support, an enterprise can ensure that the IT governance framework is aligned with and driven by the stakeholders’ needs, expectations, and interests1. Stakeholders’ support can also help to facilitate the communication, collaboration, and decision-making processes among the IT governance participants, and to gain their commitment and buy-in for the IT governance implementation and improvement1.

The other options are not as important as stakeholders’ support, as they are either specific aspects or outcomes of IT governance, but not comprehensive factors. Information technology risk is the potential for negative consequences due to the use or misuse of IT within an enterprise. Information technology risk can affect the IT governance framework, but it is not the most important factor to consider, as it is only one of the many elements that influence IT governance2. Framework development cost is the amount of money and resources required to design and implement the IT governance framework. Framework development cost can affect the IT governance framework, but it is not the most important factor to consider, as it is only one of the many criteria that evaluate IT governance3. Information technology strategy is the plan that defines how the IT function supports and enables the overall business strategy and objectives of an enterprise. Information technology strategy can affect the IT governance framework, but it is not the most important factor to consider, as it is only one of the many components that constitute IT governance

When preparing a new IT strategic plan for board approval, the MOST important consideration is to ensure the plan identifies roles and responsibilities that link to IT objectives. A well-defined IT strategic plan should clearly articulate the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the IT function, as well as the strategies and actions to achieve them1. However, without assigning roles and responsibilities to the relevant stakeholders, the plan may lack accountability, ownership, and alignment2. Therefore, it is crucial to identify who is responsible for what, how they will collaborate and communicate, and how they will be measured and rewarded3. This can help to ensure the successful execution and monitoring of the IT strategic plan, as well as the alignment with the business strategy and expectations4.

The other options are not as important as option A. While it is useful to have specific resourcing requirements, frameworks, and implications of the strategy on the procurement process, these are more operational and tactical aspects that can be determined later in the implementation phase. They are not essential for the board approval of the IT strategic plan, which should focus more on the strategic direction and value proposition of the IT function. References :=

• How to Write an Information Technology (IT) Business Proposal | Examples1
• The Role of Board Approval in the Strategic Planning Process - Veralon2
• How To Get The Board To Say Yes - Gartner3
• The Board’s Role in Strategy | WATSON4
• Overseeing strategy: A framework for boards of directors - CPA Canada

 Quality of services is the degree to which the IT services meet the expectations and requirements of the customers and stakeholders. Quality of services is usually defined and measured by the service level agreements (SLAs), which are contracts that specify the service level objectives, metrics, targets, and responsibilities of both parties. If the SLAs are not clearly defined in all cases, the business faces the greatest risk of not being able to enforce the quality of services from the third-party providers. This can lead to poor performance, customer dissatisfaction, reputational damage, legal disputes, and financial losses for the business. Therefore, it is essential to have clear and comprehensive SLAs for all IT outsourcing contracts. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Outsourcing IT: What to Expect from Your SLAs | AxiaTP2, What is an SLA? Best practices for service-level agreements | CIO1

Interdependent systems are those that rely on each other for data, functionality, or performance. If the business case for an ERP implementation overlooks the interdependencies among the existing systems, it may underestimate the complexity, cost, and risk of the project. The ERP implementation may also fail to achieve the expected benefits of integration, automation, and optimization if the interdependent systems are not properly aligned and coordinated. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version)2

Portfolio management is the process of selecting, prioritizing, monitoring and controlling the projects, programs and other related work that best align with the enterprise’s strategic objectives and deliver the most value to the stakeholders. The primary strategic goal of implementing portfolio management is to maximize value from the combined investments by ensuring that they are aligned with the enterprise’s vision, mission, goals and values, and that they are optimized in terms of risk, return and resource allocation. References: CGEIT Domain 2: IT Resources

A key governance consideration for the IT steering committee when evaluating vendors to provide mobile device management (MDM) services is to ensure that the service level targets align with the business requirements. Service level targets are the measurable and agreed-upon levels of performance and quality that the vendor is expected to deliver for the MDM services. These targets should reflect the business needs and expectations of the organization, such as availability, reliability, security, scalability, and functionality of the MDM services. Service level targets should also be realistic, achievable, and verifiable, and should be specified in the service level agreements (SLAs) that are part of the contract with the vendor. By ensuring that the service level targets align with the business requirements, the IT steering committee can facilitate the selection of a suitable and reliable vendor that can provide effective and efficient MDM services for the organization. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Mobile Device Management (MDM) - Gartner2, How to Set Service Level Targets for Your IT Support Team

According to the ISACA paper on IT Governance Reporting1, the most important information to include in IT governance reporting to the board of directors is the critical risks that IT faces or poses to the enterprise. Critical risks are those that have a high likelihood and impact, and that could threaten the achievement of the enterprise’s strategy, objectives and goals. Critical risks could include cyberattacks, data breaches, regulatory compliance violations, IT project failures, IT service disruptions, IT resource shortages, etc. The board of directors should be aware of the critical risks, as well as the actions taken or planned to mitigate them. The other options are not as important as critical risks, as they are more related to the operational or tactical aspects of IT, rather than the strategic or governance aspects.

The enterprise data architecture is the blueprint that defines how data is collected, stored, processed, integrated, and distributed within the enterprise. It also specifies the data standards, policies, rules, and models that govern the data lifecycle. Reviewing the enterprise data architecture is the first step when preparing for data migration, as it helps to identify the source and target systems, the data entities and attributes, the relationships and dependencies, the data quality and security requirements, and the potential challenges and risks of the migration. Reviewing the enterprise data architecture also helps to align the data migration with the business objectives and strategies, and to ensure that the migrated data supports the enterprise’s information needs and decision making. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Data Architecture: A Primer for the Data Scientist, Data Migration: A Comprehensive Guide

This action is important because corporate culture is the shared set of norms, beliefs, and values that influence the behavior and attitudes of the organization’s members. Corporate culture can support or hinder IT governance, depending on how well it aligns with the IT governance objectives. IT’s role in providing business value is the extent to which IT contributes to the achievement of the business strategy, goals, and needs. IT’s role in providing business value can vary depending on the industry, market, and competitive environment of the enterprise12.

By understanding corporate culture and IT’s role in providing business value, the new CIO can gain insight into the current state and challenges of IT governance in the enterprise, as well as the expectations and requirements of the stakeholders. The new CIO can also identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement or innovation in IT governance, and develop a vision and strategy for IT governance that is aligned with the corporate culture and business value34.

The other options are not the first action of a new CIO when considering an IT governance framework for an enterprise, but rather subsequent actions that depend on the outcome of understanding corporate culture and IT’s role in providing business value. Understanding critical IT processes to define the scope of the IT governance framework is a step that occurs after the new CIO has established the objectives and priorities for IT governance, and needs to determine which processes are essential for delivering value and managing risk5. Verifying stakeholder sponsorship of the IT governance initiative is a step that occurs after the new CIO has developed a business case and a communication plan for IT governance, and needs to secure the support and commitment of the key decision-makers and influencers6. Developing an IT balanced scorecard to monitor and track IT performance is a step that occurs after the new CIO has implemented and executed the IT governance framework, and needs to measure and report on the outcomes and benefits of IT governance7.

References: 1: Corporate governance of information technology - Wikipedia8 2: What is Business Value? Definition & Examples - Talend 3: How to Create an Effective IT Governance Framework | Smartsheet 4: 7 Rules for Demonstrating the Business Value of IT - Gartner 5: The internal process perspective within the Balanced Scorecard 6: Here’s What You Need in Your Whistleblower Policy (and Why) - Case IQ 7: The Balanced Scorecard Customer Perspective : What is Enterprise Architecture? | Gartner

According to the ISACA paper on IT Governance Reporting1, the most important benefit of effective IT governance reporting is that it helps business executives better understand IT’s value contribution to the enterprise. IT governance reporting is the process of communicating relevant and reliable information about the performance, value and risk of IT to the stakeholders who are responsible for making decisions and taking actions related to IT. Effective IT governance reporting enables business executives to have a clear and comprehensive view of how IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise’s strategy, objectives and goals. It also helps business executives to assess the alignment, efficiency and effectiveness of IT, as well as to identify and address the gaps, issues and opportunities for improvement. Effective IT governance reporting fosters trust, collaboration and accountability between business and IT, and enhances the reputation and credibility of IT within the enterprise. The other options are not as important as business executives better understanding IT’s value contribution to the enterprise, as they are more related to the means or outcomes of effective IT governance reporting, rather than the benefit itself. References: IT Governance Reporting

 A gap analysis is a method of assessing the differences in performance between a business’ information systems or software applications to determine whether business requirements are being met and, if not, what steps should be taken to ensure they are met successfully1. A gap analysis typically involves identifying non-compliant processes or activities; assessing their risk levels; determining potential corrective actions that can be taken to address them; and implementing those corrective measures1. Once completed, organizations can then measure their progress toward achieving full compliance over time1.

A gap analysis should be done first when feedback indicates recently implemented software products are not meeting business unit expectations, as it can help identify the root causes of the dissatisfaction, the gaps between the current and desired state of the software products, and the actions needed to close those gaps. A gap analysis can also help align the software products with the business strategy, goals, and expectations, as well as ensure compliance with regulations and policies.

Reviewing help desk logs, confirming user acceptance testing (UAT) was completed, and instituting a new software training program are also important steps to take when software products are not meeting expectations, but they are not the first step. Reviewing help desk logs can help gather feedback and identify issues or errors with the software products, but it does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the gaps and solutions. Confirming UAT was completed can help verify that the software products were tested by the end users before implementation, but it does not address the reasons why the feedback was negative after implementation. Instituting a new software training program can help improve the user’s skills and knowledge of the software products, but it does not guarantee that the software products will meet their needs and expectations.

References := What is Gap Analysis in Compliance | Scytale; How to Perform an IT Gap Analysis - Systems X; IT Gap Analysis – First Step to ITIL Success | Invensis Learning.

 It addresses key stakeholder requirements. Information architecture (IA) is the process of organizing, structuring, and labeling content in an effective and sustainable way1. A well-defined IA should address the key stakeholder requirements, such as the business goals, user needs, and technical constraints1. By addressing the key stakeholder requirements, a well-defined IA can ensure that the content is relevant, accessible, understandable, and usable for the intended audience1. It can also support the communication, collaboration, and decision-making processes within the enterprise1. The other options are not as important as addressing the key stakeholder requirements, as they are possible outcomes or benefits of a well-defined IA, but not its defining characteristic. Ensuring compliance with regulations, enabling achievement of service level agreements (SLAs), and supporting IT strategic goals are some of the advantages that a well-defined IA can provide, but they are not the primary purpose or criteria of IA1

This should be identified first when creating an inventory of information systems and data related to the mobile app, as they are the individuals or groups who have the authority and responsibility to define, classify, protect, and manage the data assets of the enterprise1. By identifying the application and data owners, the enterprise can ensure that the data is properly accounted for, categorized, and secured according to its value, sensitivity, and risk. Application and data owners can also establish data policies, standards, and procedures, as well as monitor and report on data quality, usage, and compliance1. Identifying the application and data owners is a prerequisite for identifying the other options, such as data maintained by vendors, vendors and outsourced systems, and information classification scheme, as these depend on the accurate identification and assignment of data ownership roles and responsibilities.

This is because senior management is responsible for defining and communicating the IT strategy, objectives, and performance expectations for the organization. Senior management is also responsible for establishing and overseeing the IT governance framework, which includes the performance measurement metrics, processes, and tools. Senior management should ensure that the performance measurement metrics are aligned with the business goals and value creation, as well as the IT governance principles and policies. Senior management should also monitor and evaluate the IT performance results and take corrective actions if needed.

Some of the sources that support this answer are:

• 1: This source explains the roles and responsibilities of senior management in IT governance, and how they can use COBIT 5 to implement effective IT governance practices. It states that senior management should define the IT-related goals and objectives, establish the IT governance structure and processes, assign roles and responsibilities, and ensure adequate resources and capabilities for IT governance.
• 2: This source discusses the importance and benefits of IT performance measurement for IT governance, and provides some tips and tools for conducting it. It suggests that senior management should be involved in setting the IT performance measurement criteria, selecting the key performance indicators (KPIs), defining the targets and thresholds, and reviewing and reporting the IT performance outcomes.
• 3: This source provides a comprehensive guide on how to optimize IT project intake, approval, and prioritization. It mentions that senior management should be responsible for defining the strategic alignment, value delivery, risk optimization, and resource optimization criteria for IT projects, as well as for monitoring and evaluating the IT project portfolio performance.

IT maturity models measure the capabilities of an IT organization, which means the ability to perform certain activities or tasks effectively and efficiently. IT maturity models assess the current state of the IT organization in terms of people, processes, and technology, and compare it with the desired or optimal state. IT maturity models also help to identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement, and to prioritize and plan the actions to achieve higher levels of maturity. IT maturity models can be used for various purposes, such as benchmarking, strategic planning, performance management, risk management, and quality assurance. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Use an IT maturity model - IBM Garage Practices1, IT Maturity Models, Scorecards & Assessments | Smartsheet2

 When updating an IT governance framework to support an outsourcing strategy, the most important aspect is to ensure the effective management of contracts with third-party providers. Contracts are the legal documents that define the scope, terms, conditions, and expectations of the outsourcing relationship, as well as the roles, responsibilities, and obligations of both parties. Contracts also specify the service level agreements (SLAs), key performance indicators (KPIs), and reporting mechanisms that are used to measure and monitor the quality and performance of the outsourced services. Contracts also provide the mechanisms for resolving disputes, enforcing compliance, and managing changes and risks. Therefore, ensuring the effective management of contracts with third-party providers is essential for achieving the desired outcomes and benefits of outsourcing, as well as for mitigating the potential challenges and issues that may arise from outsourcing. References: Outsourcing Governance Framework1, Guidelines on outsourcing arrangements2, IT governance -managing the outsourcing relationship3

This is because enterprise risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing and able to accept in pursuit of its objectives. It reflects the organization’s risk culture, strategy, and values. When implementing an emerging technology with unclear regulatory and compliance requirements, the organization should consider its risk appetite and tolerance, as well as the potential benefits, costs, and impacts of the technology. The organization should also assess the likelihood and severity of the regulatory and compliance risks, and implement appropriate controls and mitigation measures to manage them within acceptable levels.

Some of the sources that support this answer are:

• 1: This source provides a comprehensive guide on how to navigate the hype and risk of emerging technologies. It suggests that organizations should define their risk appetite and tolerance for adopting emerging technologies, and conduct a balanced risk and benefit assessment before making any decisions.
• 2: This source discusses the challenges and best practices for mitigating emerging technology risk. It recommends that organizations should align their emerging technology strategy with their enterprise risk appetite, and establish a governance framework that covers the identification, evaluation, response, and monitoring of emerging technology risks.
• 3: This source defines enterprise risk appetite and explains its importance for effective risk management. It also provides some guidance on how to develop, communicate, and monitor enterprise risk appetite statements.

 A common risk management taxonomy is a set of terms and definitions that are used consistently across the enterprise to describe, measure, and report on risks. A common risk management taxonomy is essential for integrating IT risk with the ERM framework, as it enables a common understanding of risk concepts, categories, and levels among different stakeholders and functions. A common risk management taxonomy also facilitates the aggregation and comparison of risks across the enterprise, and supports the alignment of risk appetite and tolerance with business objectives12. References: 1: Integrated Enterprise IT Risk Management (ERM) Programs - CohnReznick3 2: Introducing Risk Taxonomy - ISACA4

To prevent an IT system from becoming obsolete before achieving its planned return on investment (ROI), it is crucial to manage the benefit realization throughout the entire lifecycle of the system. This approach involves continuously monitoring and adjusting the system to ensure it delivers the expected value and benefits from inception through decommissioning. This proactive management helps in adapting to changes in technology and business environments, thus extending the relevance and utility of the IT system. Obtaining independent assurance, defining IT and business goals, and ordering an external audit are important practices but do not directly address the ongoing management of the system's value delivery and adaptability over time.

To address concerns about staff saving sensitive corporate information on publicly available cloud file storage applications, the first step should be to require staff training on data classification policies. Educating employees about the types of data classified as sensitive and the associated handling requirements helps to raise awareness and change behavior. Training should emphasize the importance of protecting sensitive information and the proper use of approved storage solutions. While creating secure storage solutions, blocking access to certain applications, and revising policies are important measures, education and awareness are fundamental first steps to ensure compliance and mitigate risks.

Key performance indicators (KPIs) are metrics that measure the performance of a project, program, or investment against a set of targets, objectives, or benchmarks. KPIs can help an enterprise to determine whether a current program for IT infrastructure migration to the cloud is continuing to provide benefits by tracking the progress, efficiency, quality, and outcomes of the program. KPIs can also help to identify any gaps, issues, or risks that may affect the program’s success and enable timely corrective actions12.

Total cost of ownership (TCO) is the purchase price of an asset plus the costs of operation over its life span. TCO can help an enterprise to compare the costs and benefits of different IT infrastructure options, such as cloud versus on-premise, but it does not measure the ongoing performance or benefits of a chosen option3.

Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that monitor and predict potential risks that may negatively impact an enterprise’s objectives or operations. KRIs can help an enterprise to identify and mitigate any risks associated with IT infrastructure migration to the cloud, such as security breaches, data loss, or service disruptions, but they do not measure the benefits or value of the program45.

Net present value (NPV) is the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over a period of time. NPV is used to evaluate the profitability or return on investment of a project or investment by discounting the future cash flows to their present value. NPV can help an enterprise to decide whether to undertake an IT infrastructure migration to the cloud based on its expected net value, but it does not measure the actual performance or benefits of the program16. References :=

• 3: Total Cost of Ownership: How It’s Calculated With Example - Investopedia
• 4: Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) - National Treasury
• 2: How to Develop Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to Fortify Your Business | AuditBoard
• 5: How to Develop Effective Key Risk Indicators - Secureframe
• 1: Net Present Value (NPV) - Definition, Examples, How to Do NPV Analysis
• 6: NPV Formula - Learn How Net Present Value Really Works, Examples

An effective information governance model is best indicated when senior management ensures that quality goals are defined for information. This top-down approach demonstrates a commitment to managing information as a strategic asset, with clear quality objectives that align with business goals. It ensures accountability and sets the tone for information governance practices across the organization. While the roles of the CIO, enterprise architects, and process owners are important, the involvement of senior management in defining quality goals is a key indicator of an effective governance model.

 A balanced scorecard (BSC) is a tool that helps measure and communicate the performance of an organization or a function in relation to its strategy and objectives. A BSC typically includes four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. A BSC can help a CIO to make improvements to the enterprise’s IT governance by defining the IT vision, mission, goals, and metrics that align with the business needs and expectations. A BSC can also help demonstrate the expected benefits from proposed changes by showing how they will affect the IT performance indicators and outcomes in each perspective. A BSC can provide a clear and comprehensive picture of the current and desired state of IT governance, as well as the gaps and opportunities for improvement. 

The best way to address the risk associated with new IT investments is to integrate security requirements at the beginning of projects. This means that security is considered as a key factor in the planning, design, development and testing phases of IT projects. By doing so, organizations can ensure that security is built into the IT solutions, rather than added as an afterthought. This can help to prevent or reduce security vulnerabilities, breaches, incidents and costs. Integrating security requirements at the beginning of projects is also consistent with the IT risk management frameworks that recommend a proactive and preventive approach to IT risk management12. References := Proactive IT Risk Management in an Era of Emerging Technologies, IT Risk Management Process & Frameworks

A vendor risk assessment is the most important consideration when integrating a new vendor with an ERP system, because it helps to identify and evaluate the potential risks or hazards associated with the vendor’s operations and products and their impact on the organization. A vendor risk assessment can cover aspects such as security, compliance, quality, reliability, performance, and contingency plans. By conducting a vendor risk assessment, the organization can mitigate the risks and ensure a smooth and secure integration with the ERP system. The other options are not as important as a vendor risk assessment, because they are either dependent on or secondary to it. IT senior management selects the vendor based on the results of the vendor risk assessment and other criteria. ERP data mapping is approved by the enterprise architect after the vendor risk assessment confirms that the vendor’s data is compatible and consistent with the ERP system. Procurement provides the terms of the contract after the vendor risk assessment validates that the vendor meets the organizational standards and obligations. References := Guide to Vendor Risk Assessment, 10 Risk Assessment Factors for ERP System Integration Projects, Ensuring Vendor Compliance and Third-Party Risk Mitigation

• This is because performance metrics are measurable values that indicate how well the IT assets are performing in terms of functionality, quality, efficiency, and effectiveness1. By implementing performance metrics for key IT assets, the organization can:

Implementing performance metrics for key IT assets can help the organization determine the contribution of IT assets in achievement of IT goals, and ensure that they deliver value to the business.

The other options, establishing the span of control during the life cycle of IT assets, determining the average cost of controls for protection of IT assets, and comparing the performance of IT assets against industry best practices are not as beneficial as determining the contribution of IT assets in achievement of IT goals for implementing performance metrics for key IT assets. They are more related to specific aspects or outcomes of IT asset management, rather than a holistic and strategic benefit. They may also not be relevant or applicable to all types or categories of IT assets. They may not address the full scope or potential of IT asset improvement and optimization. References := What Is an IT Asset Management KPI? | Filewave, Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance - ISACA

According to the web search results, the CEO is accountable for providing sponsorship for the IT-enabled change across the enterprise. The CEO is the highest-ranking executive in the organization, and has the authority and responsibility to lead the strategic direction and vision of the enterprise. The CEO also has the power and influence to allocate resources, prioritize initiatives, resolve conflicts, and communicate with stakeholders. Therefore, the CEO is the best person to provide sponsorship for the ERP implementation, which is a major and complex IT-enabled change that affects the entire enterprise12.

The other options are not as accountable as the CEO for providing sponsorship for the IT-enabled change across the enterprise. The HR director is responsible for managing the human resources functions of the organization, such as recruitment, training, compensation, and performance management. The HR director may support the ERP implementation by facilitating change management, employee engagement, and organizational development, but does not have the same level of authority and accountability as the CEO3. The IT strategy committee is a group of senior executives from different business units that provide guidance and oversight for the IT strategy and governance of the organization. The IT strategy committee may advise and approve the ERP implementation, but does not have the same level of leadership and visibility as the CEO4. The CIO is responsible for managing the IT functions of the organization, such as planning, implementing, and operating the IT systems and services. The CIO may lead and execute the ERP implementation, but does not have the same level of responsibility and influence as the CEO.

References: 1: What Is A Project Sponsor & Do You Need One When Implementing ERP?1 2: Building a Successful ERP Implementation Team | NetSuite2 3: What Does an HR Director Do? | Indeed.com 4: What Is an IT Strategy Committee? | Bizfluent : What is a CIO? Everything you need to know about the Chief Information Officer explained | ZDNet

The best way for IT to achieve compliance with regulatory requirements is to enforce IT policies and procedures that align with the compliance standards and guidelines. IT policies and procedures are the documents that define the roles, responsibilities, rules, and expectations for the IT function and its activities. They help to ensure that the IT systems and processes are secure, reliable, efficient, and consistent with the business objectives and legal obligations. By enforcing IT policies and procedures, IT can demonstrate its compliance with regulatory requirements and avoid violations, penalties, or reputational damage. The other options are not as effective as enforcing IT policies and procedures for achieving compliance with regulatory requirements. Creating an IT project portfolio is a good practice for managing IT investments and resources, but it does not guarantee compliance with regulatory requirements. Reviewing an IT performance dashboard is a useful technique for monitoring and measuring IT performance and value delivery, but it does not ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Reporting on IT audit findings and action plans is a necessary step for improving IT governance and control processes, but it does not achieve compliance with regulatory requirements. References := What is IT Compliance? - Checklist, Guidelines & More | Proofpoint US, 6 Common IT Compliance Standards (A Guide to the Basics), Here’s Why Regulatory Compliance is Important - Reciprocity

Business risk has the greatest impact on the design of an IT governance framework, as it determines the level of control, oversight, and alignment that is required for the IT function to support the business objectives and mitigate the potential threats and vulnerabilities. Business risk is influenced by various factors, such as the industry, market, customer, competitor, regulatory, and environmental context of the enterprise. Therefore, the IT governance framework should be tailored to suit the specific risk profile and appetite of the enterprise, and to address the key risk areas and scenarios that could affect the business performance and value. According to COBIT 2019, one of the design factors that can influence the design of an enterprise’s governance system is the risk profile1. This design factor reflects the degree of risk exposure and tolerance that the enterprise has in relation to its use of information and technology1. The risk profile can be assessed by considering various aspects, such as the likelihood and impact of risk events, the sources and types of risks, the risk appetite and thresholds, the risk management capabilities and maturity, and the risk culture and awareness1. Based on the risk profile, the enterprise can decide on the appropriate governance objectives, components, enablers, practices, and activities that are needed to manage and mitigate the risks effectively1. The other options, IT performance metrics, resource allocation, and business leadership, are also important for the design of an IT governance framework, but they are not as impactful as business risk. IT performance metrics are used to measure and monitor the effectiveness and efficiency of the IT function in delivering value to the business2. Resource allocation is a process that optimizes the use of IT resources across multiple programs and projects in alignment with the business goals and priorities3. Business leadership is a role that provides strategic direction, guidance, and support for the IT function in achieving its objectives4. However, these factors are more related to the implementation and execution of the IT governance framework, rather than its design. They are also influenced by the business risk factor, as they depend on the level of risk exposure and tolerance that the enterprise has. References := IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning - ProjectManager, Resource Allocation Done Right: Best Practices for 2022 & Beyond, The Role of Business Leadership in Effective IT Governance, COBIT Design Factors: A Dynamic Approach to Tailoring Governance in … - ISACA

The best way for a CIO to justify maintaining and supporting social media platforms is by demonstrating the value derived from investment in social media technologies. Social media platforms are not just tools for communication and entertainment, but also strategic assets that can create and deliver value to the organization and its stakeholders. Some of the potential benefits of social media platforms are:

• Enhancing customer engagement, loyalty, and satisfaction by providing timely, personalized, and interactive content and feedback
• Increasing brand awareness, reputation, and trust by showcasing the organization’s values, achievements, and social responsibility
• Improving innovation and collaboration by facilitating the exchange of ideas, knowledge, and feedback among employees, customers, partners, and experts
• Supporting decision making and problem solving by providing access to relevant data, insights, and analytics
• Reducing costs and increasing efficiency by streamlining processes, automating tasks, and optimizing resources

Within a governance structure for risk management, the second line of defense is primarily responsible for monitoring risk and controls. This function involves overseeing the effectiveness of the first line of defense (operational management and control implementation) and ensuring that risk management practices are properly integrated into business processes. It serves as a check on the adequacy and effectiveness of risk management across the organization. While conducting audits is a function of the third line of defense (internal audit), and identifying and assessing risk is often a shared responsibility, the distinct role of the second line is to provide ongoing monitoring and oversight of risk management and control processes.

Upon learning that business units have been independently procuring cloud services, the IT steering committee's best course of action is to define a procurement strategy based on business unit needs. This approach ensures that cloud service procurement aligns with the enterprise's overall IT strategy and governance policies while still addressing the specific requirements of individual business units. It fosters collaboration between IT and business units, ensuring that cloud services are vetted for compliance, security, and interoperability. Requiring cancellation, including business unit leadership in the EA review board, or limiting usage to open-source solutions may address aspects of the issue but do not provide a comprehensive strategy that aligns business needs with IT governance.

Integrating IT security policies into individual performance objectives is the best way to support the objective of driving a cultural shift to enhance compliance with IT security policies. This is because performance objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals that define what each employee is expected to accomplish and how they will be evaluated1. By integrating IT security policies into performance objectives, the enterprise can:

• Communicate the importance and value of IT security policies to each employee2
• Motivate and incentivize employees to comply with IT security policies2
• Monitor and measure employees’ compliance with IT security policies2
• Provide feedback and recognition to employees who comply with IT security policies2
• Identify and address any gaps or issues in employees’ compliance with IT security policies2

Integrating IT security policies into performance objectives can help to create a culture of accountability, responsibility, and awareness for IT security within the enterprise. It can also help to align the individual goals of employees with the organizational goals of IT governance.

The other options, communicating IT security policies on a regular basis, acknowledging and signing IT security policies by each employee, and centrally posting IT security policies with detailed instructions are not as effective as integrating IT security policies into performance objectives for supporting the objective of driving a cultural shift to enhance compliance with IT security policies. They are more related to the dissemination and implementation of IT security policies, rather than their integration and evaluation. They may not have a significant impact on the behavior and attitude of employees towards IT security policies, as they may not provide sufficient motivation, feedback, or recognition for compliance. They may also be perceived as passive, formal, or coercive methods of enforcing IT security policies, rather than active, informal, or collaborative methods of engaging employees in IT security policies. References := Performance Objectives - SMART Goals - BusinessBalls, How to Integrate Security Into Employee Performance Objectives, IT Security Policy: Key Components & Best Practices for Every Business …

According to the CGEIT exam content outline1, one of the subtopics under the domain of Risk Optimization is “Risk Ownership and Accountability”. This subtopic covers the process of assigning and communicating the roles and responsibilities for risk management to the appropriate stakeholders, such as business owners, process owners, or risk owners. Risk ownership is the best way to enable effective enterprise risk management (ERM), as it ensures that the risks are identified, assessed, treated, monitored, and reported by the people who have the authority, knowledge, and interest to manage them. Risk ownership also fosters a risk-aware culture and promotes accountability and transparency for risk management23.

The other options are not as effective as risk ownership to enable ERM. A risk register is a tool that records and tracks the information about the risks, such as their description, category, impact, likelihood, status, and action plan. A risk register is useful for documenting and communicating the risks, but it does not ensure that the risks are managed properly by the responsible parties4. A risk tolerance is a measure that defines the acceptable level of variation from the expected outcome or objective. A risk tolerance is important for setting the boundaries and criteria for risk management, but it does not guarantee that the risks are aligned with the business strategy and objectives5. A risk training is a program that provides education and awareness on risk management concepts, methods, and tools. A risk training is beneficial for enhancing the skills and competencies of the risk management staff and stakeholders, but it does not ensure that they perform their roles and responsibilities effectively6.

References: 1: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1 2: Risk Ownership - ISACA2 3: Risk Ownership: The First Step in Enterprise Risk Management - ERM3 4: What Is a Risk Register? Explanation & Free Template - ProjectManager.com 5: What Is Risk Tolerance? Definition & Examples - Talend 6: IT Risk Management Training | ISACA

The primary role of the governance function in enabling an enterprise to achieve its business objectives is to provide a means to effectively manage stakeholders. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups that have an interest or stake in the enterprise’s activities, outcomes, and performance. They include shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, regulators, and society at large. Effective stakeholder management involves identifying, engaging, communicating, and satisfying the needs and expectations of the stakeholders in a transparent and ethical manner. By providing a means to effectively manage stakeholders, the governance function can help the enterprise to align its vision, mission, strategy, and values with the stakeholder interests, foster trust and collaboration among the stakeholder groups, balance the economic and social goals and the individual and communal goals of the enterprise, and enhance the reputation and legitimacy of the enterprise in the market and society.

The other options are not as primary as providing a means to effectively manage stakeholders for the governance function. Determining risk thresholds that the enterprise can sustain is an important aspect of the governance function, but it is not the primary role. Risk thresholds are the levels of risk exposure that the enterprise is willing to accept or tolerate in pursuit of its business objectives. They are derived from the enterprise’s risk appetite and risk tolerance statements, which reflect the enterprise’s culture, values, and strategy. The governance function can help to define, communicate, and monitor the risk thresholds that the enterprise can sustain, but this is not its primary role. Preparing business continuity and resiliency plans is a vital responsibility of the management function, not the governance function. Business continuity and resiliency plans are the documents that outline the processes and procedures for ensuring the continuity of critical business functions and operations in the event of a disruption or crisis. They also describe how the enterprise can recover from the disruption or crisis and resume normal operations as soon as possible. The governance function can oversee and approve the business continuity and resiliency plans prepared by the management function, but this is not its primary role. Monitoring strategic plans to reach the desired target state is a key activity of both the governance function and the management function, but it is not their primary role. Strategic plans are the documents that define the long-term goals and objectives of the enterprise and how they will be achieved. They also specify the resources, actions, measures, and timelines for implementing the strategy. The governance function can set the direction and scope of the strategic plans, while the management function can execute and report on them. Both functions can monitor the progress and performance of the strategic plans to reach the desired target state, but this is not their primary role. References := The five functions of governance – Project Manager, What is a Governance Structure? - ESG | The Report, Develop an effective governance structure | Australian Public Service …

Reviewing the information governance framework should be the CIO’s primary focus before the migration, because it will help the CIO to ensure that the enterprise’s data and applications are secure, compliant, and aligned with the business objectives and policies in the cloud environment. The information governance framework defines the roles, responsibilities, processes, standards, and metrics for managing information assets across the enterprise. It also covers aspects such as data classification, data quality, data protection, data retention, data sovereignty, and data privacy. By reviewing the information governance framework, the CIO can identify the requirements, risks, and gaps that need to be addressed before moving to the cloud. The other options are not as important as reviewing the information governance framework, because they are either dependent on or secondary to it. Selecting best-of-breed cloud offerings is a tactical decision that should be based on the information governance framework and the enterprise architecture. Updating the enterprise architecture repository is a good practice, but not a primary focus before the migration. It can be done after the migration to reflect the changes in the IT landscape. Conducting IT staff training to manage cloud workloads is a necessary step, but not a primary focus before the migration. It can be done in parallel with or after the migration to ensure that the IT staff have the skills and knowledge to operate and optimize the cloud environment. References := Migration environment planning checklist, Practical Guide to Cloud Governance, Governance or compliance strategy

 A root cause analysis is the first step to identify the factors that are causing the loss of top talent and to devise appropriate solutions. A SWOT analysis, an incentive and retention program, and an aggressive talent acquisition program are possible outcomes of a root cause analysis, but they are not the first action to take. References := CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, page 103.

According to the CGEIT exam content outline1, one of the subtopics under the domain of Governance of Enterprise IT is “Governance Strategy Alignment with Enterprise Objectives”. This subtopic covers the process of ensuring that the IT strategy is aligned with the business strategy and supports the achievement of enterprise goals and objectives. Therefore, the best course of action for the CIO in this situation is to align the business strategy with the IT strategy, which would help the IT team to meet the new demands and deliver value to the enterprise. References: 1: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA

The CIO’s first step in deciding the appropriate response to the new regulatory requirement should be to consult with legal and risk experts to understand the requirements. This step is important because the legal and risk experts can provide the CIO with the relevant and accurate information about the new regulation, such as its scope, objectives, implications, and deadlines. The legal and risk experts can also advise the CIO on the potential risks and impacts of non-compliance, as well as the best practices and strategies for compliance .

The other options are not the first step in deciding the appropriate response to the new regulatory requirement, but rather subsequent steps that depend on the outcome of the consultation with the legal and risk experts. Revising initiatives that are active to reflect the new requirements is a step that occurs after the CIO has understood the requirements and assessed their impact on the current IT-enabled business activities. Confirming there are adequate resources to mitigate compliance requirements is a step that occurs after the CIO has identified and prioritized the actions and tasks needed to achieve compliance. Consulting with the board for guidance on the new requirements is a step that occurs after the CIO has developed and proposed a feasible and effective compliance plan.

References: : How to Respond to Regulatory Changes - Smartsheet : Regulatory Change Management: A Guide for Compliance Teams | LogicGate

The most efficient approach for using risk scenarios to evaluate a new business opportunity is to identify risk events from both bottom-up and top-down perspectives. This means that the risk identification process should consider both the specific details of the opportunity, such as the market, customer, product, service, technology, and resources involved, as well as the broader context of the opportunity, such as the strategic objectives, vision, mission, values, and culture of the organization. By using both bottom-up and top-down approaches, the risk identification process can capture a comprehensive and balanced view of the potential risks that could affect the success of the opportunity. This will help to create realistic and relevant risk scenarios that can be analyzed and evaluated for decision-making purposes. A bottom-up approach alone may miss some important risks that are related to the organization’s strategy, governance, or environment, while a top-down approach alone may overlook some specific risks that are unique to the opportunity or its implementation. Therefore, a combination of both approaches is the most efficient way to use risk scenarios for evaluating a new business opportunity. References := What is business risk? | McKinsey, How to Write Strong Risk Scenarios and Statements - ISACA, Finding your blind spots: Recognising emerging risks and opportunities

The chief information officer (CIO) is the senior executive who is responsible for the achievement of IT strategic objectives. The IT strategic objectives are the high-level goals and priorities that guide the IT vision, mission, and value creation for the organization. The CIO is responsible for:

• Developing and communicating the IT strategy and aligning it with the business strategy and objectives
• Managing and delivering the IT solutions, services, and projects that support and enable the business needs, requirements, and value drivers
• Leading and overseeing the IT functions, resources, and capabilities, and ensuring their quality, efficiency, and effectiveness
• Monitoring and reporting the IT performance and outcomes, and ensuring their alignment with the IT strategic objectives and value drivers
• Implementing and maintaining the IT governance framework, policies, standards, and practices

The other options are not correct. The IT steering committee is a group of senior executives and stakeholders who provide guidance, direction, and oversight for the IT strategy and initiatives, but not responsible for their achievement. The business process owners are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the business processes that are supported or enabled by IT, but not responsible for the achievement of IT strategic objectives. The board of directors is the highest governing body of the organization that sets the vision, mission, strategy, and objectives of the organization, as well as oversees its performance and value creation, but not responsible for the achievement of IT strategic objectives.

References:

• According to the CGEIT Review Manual 20221, “The CIO is responsible for ensuring that IT strategic objectives are achieved. The CIO should develop an IT strategy that is aligned with enterprise strategy; manage IT resources to deliver value; monitor IT performance; implement IT governance; etc.”
• According to the CIO article on What is a CIO? Everything you need to know about the Chief Information Officer role2, “The chief information officer (CIO) oversees an organization’s technology strategy, as well as the hardware, software and data that helps other departments do their jobs.”
• According to the ISACA article on The Role of CIO in Enterprise Governance of Information Technology3, “The CIO plays a key role in EGIT by translating business strategy into IT strategy; managing IT resources; delivering IT solutions; measuring IT performance; ensuring compliance; etc.”

The best group to evaluate recommendations to address the use of antiquated technologies throughout the enterprise is the Enterprise Architecture (EA) review board. This group is responsible for overseeing the architectural framework and ensuring that IT systems and technologies align with the enterprise's strategic objectives. The EA review board has the expertise to assess the impact of current technologies on the business and recommend modernization strategies that align with the enterprise architecture. While business process improvement workgroups, audit committees, and risk management committees play important roles, the EA review board is specifically equipped to address technological shortcomings and alignment with business goals.

The executive team consists of the senior leaders of the enterprise, such as the CEO, CFO, COO, etc. They are responsible for setting the vision, mission, goals, and strategy of the enterprise, and for overseeing its performance and governance. The CIO is part of the executive team and should align the IT strategic plan with the enterprise business objectives. Therefore, the CIO would be most effective by starting the interview process with the executive team, as they can provide the most relevant and authoritative input on the enterprise’s direction, priorities, challenges, and expectations. The executive team can also help the CIO gain support and approval for the IT strategic plan from other stakeholders, such as the internal auditors, senior IT managers, and business process owners. References: ISACA, Reporting Cybersecurity Risk to the Board of Directors, page 81. ISACA, Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance, page 1

Facilitating the adoption of an IT governance program in an enterprise requires addressing the behavioral and cultural aspects of change. This approach recognizes that the success of such a program depends not only on the structural and strategic elements but also on how well the people within the organization accept and adapt to the changes. Addressing cultural aspects involves engaging stakeholders, fostering a governance mindset, and overcoming resistance to change, thereby ensuring a smoother and more effective implementation. While defining roles, building business cases, and communicating strategies are critical, they must be complemented by efforts to manage the human side of change.

• This is because enterprise architecture (EA) is a practice that helps organizations align their IT systems and processes with their business objectives. EA provides a holistic and integrated view of the current and future state of the organization’s IT infrastructure, as well as the gaps, issues, and opportunities for improvement1. By using EA, the organization can:

EA can help the organization plan for the necessary IT investments in a systematic and structured way, and ensure that they are aligned with the business vision and value.

The other options, risk assessment report, business user satisfaction metrics, and audit findings are not as useful as enterprise architecture (EA) for planning for the necessary IT investments. They are more related to the evaluation and monitoring of the IT performance, rather than the planning and alignment of the IT strategy. They may also provide limited or partial information about the IT infrastructure, rather than a comprehensive and integrated view. They may also depend on external factors or standards that may not be relevant or applicable to the organization’s specific context and needs.

Enterprise architecture (EA) is the most useful in developing IT strategic plans aligned with technological needs because it provides a holistic view of the current and desired state of the organization, including its business processes, information systems, data, applications, infrastructure, and security. EA helps to align the organization’s vision, strategy, and goals with its IT capabilities and resources. EA also helps to identify the gaps, risks, and opportunities for improvement in the existing IT environment and to design and implement the optimal IT solutions that can support the business needs and objectives. EA can help to ensure that the IT strategic plans are consistent, coherent, and feasible12.

A business impact analysis (BIA) is a tool that helps to assess the potential impact of a disruption or change on the business objectives, processes, and functions. A BIA can help to prioritize the criticality of the IT resources and determine the acceptable level of risk and recovery time. A BIA can provide a basis for deciding how to allocate the budget, reduce the requirements, or contract external resources3. However, a BIA is not sufficient for developing IT strategic plans aligned with technological needs because it does not provide a comprehensive view of the current and future IT architecture and its alignment with the business strategy.

A business case is a document that describes the rationale and justification for initiating a project or investment. A business case can help to evaluate the costs, benefits, risks, and alternatives of different IT options and to communicate the value proposition to the stakeholders4. However, a business case is not enough for developing IT strategic plans aligned with technological needs because it does not provide a holistic view of the current and future IT architecture and its alignment with the business strategy.

A benchmark analysis is a process of comparing the performance, quality, or practices of an organization with those of its peers or competitors. A benchmark analysis can help to identify the best practices, standards, or trends in the industry and to measure the gap between the current and desired state of an organization. However, a benchmark analysis is not adequate for developing IT strategic plans aligned with technological needs because it does not provide a holistic view of the current and future IT architecture and its alignment with the business strategy.

References := Implement Agile IT Strategic Planning with Enterprise Architecture, The Benefits of Enterprise Architecture in Organizational Transformation, Business Impact Analysis, Business Case, [Benchmark Analysis]

When an enterprise is considering establishing a virtual reality store to sell its products, the IT steering committee's first course of action should be to request a cost-benefit analysis. This analysis will evaluate the financial implications, potential returns, and strategic value of the investment, providing a basis for informed decision-making. While resource gap analysis, development of key risk indicators (KRIs), and threat assessment are important considerations, understanding the economic viability through a cost-benefit analysis is fundamental before proceeding with such strategic initiatives.

• This is because KPIs are measurable values that indicate how well the IT governance framework is achieving its objectives and delivering value to the business1. By evaluating KPI results, the organization can:

Evaluating KPI results can provide a comprehensive and objective overview of the IT governance framework’s effectiveness and impact.

The other options, developing a business case for the program portfolio, benchmarking the IT governance framework to industry best practice, and reviewing results of IT audit reports are not as effective as evaluating KPI results for assessing the effectiveness of a newly established IT governance framework. They are more related to the design and implementation of the IT governance framework, rather than its evaluation. They may also be too narrow or subjective for assessing the IT governance framework’s effectiveness, as they may not cover all aspects or perspectives of the IT governance framework. They may also depend on external factors or standards that may not be relevant or applicable to the organization’s specific context and needs.

• This is because calibrating and scaling delivery of IT services means adjusting and optimizing the IT service portfolio, processes, and resources to meet the changing and diverse needs and expectations of the business1. By following this approach, the large enterprise can:

Calibrating and scaling delivery of IT services can help the large enterprise revamp its IT services in a way that supports and enables the business success.

The other options, addressing gaps within the management of IT-related risk, focusing on business innovation through knowledge, expertise, and initiatives, and adhering to on-time and on-budget IT service delivery are not as appropriate as calibrating and scaling delivery of IT services for a large enterprise to follow when revamping its IT services. They are more related to specific aspects or outcomes of IT service management, rather than a holistic and strategic approach. They may also be too narrow or rigid for a large enterprise that needs to adapt and evolve its IT services to the dynamic and complex business environment. They may not address the full scope or potential of IT service improvement and transformation.

The accountability for a business continuity program for business-critical systems is best assigned to the CIO, because the CIO is responsible for the IT strategy, operations, and resources that support the business objectives and continuity. The other options are not as suitable as the CIO, because they do not have the same level of authority, expertise, or involvement in the IT function. The enterprise risk manager oversees the overall risk management process, but does not have direct control over the IT resources and activities. The CEO is ultimately accountable for the entire organization, but delegates the responsibility for IT to the CIO. The director of internal audit provides assurance and consulting services on the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and control processes, but does not have operational responsibility for IT or business continuity. References := Business Continuity Program Roles & Responsibilities, Who Should Manage the Business Continuity Program?

According to the web search results, IT change management is the process of tracking and managing a change throughout its entire life cycle, from start to closure, with the aim to minimize risk1. One of the steps in the IT change management process is to collect and analyze data, quantify gaps and understand resistance, and modify the plan as needed2. The final step in completing the changes to IT processes is to ensure a return to stabilized business operations, which means that the change has been successfully implemented and the expected benefits have been realized3. This step also involves closing the change request, documenting the lessons learned, and celebrating the achievements4.

The other options are not the final step in completing the changes to IT processes, but rather intermediate steps that occur before or during the change implementation. Updating the configuration management database (CMDB) is a step that occurs during the change implementation, as it involves recording and tracking the changes made to the IT assets and services. Empowering the business to embrace the changes is a step that occurs before and during the change implementation, as it involves providing communication, training, and support to help the stakeholders adopt and adapt to the changes. Updating the enterprise architecture (EA) is a step that occurs before or during the change implementation, as it involves aligning the IT strategy, processes, and systems with the business goals and requirements.

References: 1: IT change management: A comprehensive guide - ManageEngine1 2: What is Change Management? Organizational, Process, Definition … - ASQ3 3: The Evolution of IT Change Management | Atlassian2 4: What is IT Change Management? - ServiceNow4 : What is Configuration Management Database (CMDB)? | ServiceNow : What is Organizational Change Management? | Prosci : What is Enterprise Architecture? | Gartner

To measure the value of IT-enabled investments, an enterprise needs to identify its drivers as defined by its business strategy. The business strategy is the document that defines the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the enterprise and how they will be achieved. It also specifies the value proposition, competitive advantage, and target market of the enterprise. The drivers of value are the factors that influence or determine the value creation and delivery of the enterprise. They can include aspects such as customer satisfaction, revenue growth, cost reduction, innovation, quality, and efficiency. By identifying its drivers as defined by its business strategy, the enterprise can align its IT-enabled investments with its strategic priorities and expectations. It can also establish the criteria, metrics, and indicators for measuring and evaluating the value of IT-enabled investments in terms of their contribution to the business outcomes and performance.

Operational processes are the routine and repetitive tasks that support the day-to-day operations of an enterprise, such as data entry, payroll, customer service, etc. These processes are usually well-defined, standardized, and measurable, which makes them easier to outsource to a third-party provider who can perform them more efficiently and cost-effectively. Outsourcing operational processes can also free up internal resources and capabilities for more strategic and innovative activities that add value to the enterprise. Therefore, operational processes that are well-defined are a good candidate for outsourcing.

References: ISACA, The Outsourcing Handbook A guide to outsourcing1. Time Doctor, The clear & complete guide to IT outsourcing (2023)2. Tutorial-Reports.com, Criteria for selecting an outsourcing vendor3

 Enterprise architecture (EA) is the best way to enable an enterprise to achieve the benefits of implementing new Internet of Things (IoT) technology because it provides a holistic view of the current and desired state of the enterprise, including its business processes, information systems, data, applications, infrastructure, and security. EA helps to align the enterprise’s vision, strategy, and goals with its IT capabilities and resources. EA also helps to identify the gaps, risks, and opportunities for improvement in the existing IT environment and to design and implement the optimal IT solutions that can support the business needs and objectives. EA can help to ensure that the new IoT technology is integrated seamlessly with the existing IT systems and that it delivers value to the stakeholders and customers. EA can also help to monitor and evaluate the performance and outcomes of the IoT technology and to ensure its compliance with the relevant standards, policies, and regulations12. References := Enterprise Architecture: A Framework for Driving Business Value from IoT, Enterprise Architecture for IoT

Effective culture change is the process of transforming the values, beliefs, behaviors, and norms of the organization and its stakeholders to support the strategic alignment of business and IT goals. Effective culture change can enable the implementation of IT governance by:

• Creating a shared vision and understanding of the purpose, benefits, and expectations of IT governance
• Engaging and empowering the stakeholders to participate and collaborate in IT governance activities and decisions
• Fostering a culture of trust, transparency, accountability, and responsibility for IT governance outcomes
• Encouraging a culture of innovation, learning, and improvement for IT governance processes and practices
• Aligning the incentives and rewards with the IT governance objectives and performance

References:

• According to the CGEIT Review Manual 2022, "Culture is a key enabler for effective IT governance. Culture influences how people behave, communicate, collaborate, and make decisions. Culture also affects how people perceive, value, and use IT. Therefore, culture change is often necessary to implement IT governance successfully."1
• According to the ISACA article on Culture Change: A Critical Success Factor for Effective IT Governance2, “Culture change is not an easy task; it requires strong leadership, clear communication, stakeholder involvement, and continuous monitoring and feedback. However, culture change can also bring significant benefits for IT governance, such as improved alignment, engagement, performance, and value creation.”
• According to the CIO article on How to create a culture of innovation in IT3, “Creating a culture of innovation in IT requires more than hiring talented people and acquiring the latest technologies. It also requires a shift in mindset, behavior, and structure that fosters creativity, collaboration, experimentation, and learning.”

•  This is because the CEO is the highest-ranking executive in the organization, responsible for setting the vision, mission, values, and objectives of the enterprise1. The CEO also oversees the alignment of the IT strategy with the business strategy, ensuring that IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise goals2. The CEO plays a key role in IT governance, as they communicate and demonstrate the importance and value of IT to the board of directors, shareholders, customers, and other stakeholders2. The CEO also provides leadership, guidance, and support for the IT function, and holds it accountable for its performance and outcomes2.
• A. Evaluating return on investment (ROI) is not the primary role of the CEO in IT governance, as it is more related to the financial management and evaluation of IT projects and programs. The CEO may be involved in approving or reviewing the ROI of major IT investments, but they are not directly responsible for calculating or analyzing it3.
• B. Nominating IT steering committee membership is not the primary role of the CEO in IT governance, as it is more related to the governance structure and process of IT decision-making. The CEO may be a member or a chairperson of the IT steering committee, or they may delegate this role to another senior executive such as the CIO4. The CEO may also have some influence or input on the nomination of IT steering committee members, but they are not solely responsible for it4.
• D. Managing the risk governance process is not the primary role of the CEO in IT governance, as it is more related to the identification, assessment, mitigation, and monitoring of IT risks. The CEO may be involved in setting the risk appetite and tolerance for IT, or in overseeing or escalating major IT risks, but they are not directly responsible for managing the risk governance process

• This is because moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider means that the organization is outsourcing the development, deployment, maintenance, and operation of its IT applications to a third-party vendor. This implies that the organization is relinquishing some control and ownership over its IT applications, and relying on the vendor to provide the required functionality, performance, quality, and security1. Therefore, the organization needs to shift its focus from delivering IT services internally to managing IT services externally. This involves the following activities2:

The shift from service delivery to service management can have a significant impact on the IT governance framework, processes, policies, and practices of the organization. It can also affect the IT skills, roles, and responsibilities of the IT staff and stakeholders. Therefore, the organization needs to adapt and adjust its IT governance approach accordingly to ensure that it can effectively oversee and optimize its IT services in a SaaS environment3.

The other options, the integration of the IT department with business lines, the improvement of IT service alignment with business, and the necessity to update key risk indicators (KRIs) are not as significant as the shift from service delivery to service management for moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider from an IT governance perspective. They are more related to the outcomes or consequences of moving to a SaaS environment, rather than the impact or change itself. They may also not be unique or specific to a SaaS environment, as they may apply to other types or models of IT service delivery as well.

A third-party audit report is the most comprehensive source of information regarding the current status and effectiveness of a cloud provider’s controls. A third-party audit report is an independent and objective assessment of the cloud provider’s security, compliance, and performance by a qualified and reputable auditor. A third-party audit report can provide assurance to the cloud customers that the cloud provider has implemented adequate and effective controls to meet the industry standards and best practices, as well as the contractual obligations and customer expectations12.

A globally recognized certification is a credential that demonstrates that a cloud provider has met certain criteria or standards for security, quality, or performance. A globally recognized certification can provide some level of confidence to the cloud customers that the cloud provider has achieved a minimum level of compliance or competence, but it may not provide enough details or evidence about the current status and effectiveness of the cloud provider’s controls3.

A control self-assessment (CSA) is a process that enables a cloud provider to evaluate its own controls internally, without involving an external auditor. A CSA can help a cloud provider to identify and address any gaps or weaknesses in its controls, as well as to monitor and improve its performance. However, a CSA may not provide sufficient assurance to the cloud customers, as it may lack objectivity, transparency, and validity4.

A maturity assessment is a process that measures the level of maturity or capability of a cloud provider’s processes or practices. A maturity assessment can help a cloud provider to benchmark its performance against industry standards or best practices, as well as to identify areas for improvement or innovation. However, a maturity assessment may not provide enough information about the current status and effectiveness of the cloud provider’s controls, as it may focus more on the process rather than the outcome5.

References: 1: Cloud Security Auditing: Challenges and Emerging Approaches - IEEE Journals & Magazine1 2: Cloud Security Audit: What You Need to Know | CloudHealth by VMware2 3: Cloud Security Certifications: What You Need to Know | CloudHealth by VMware3 4: Control Self-Assessment - ISACA4 5: Maturity Assessment - ISACA

• This is because continuous testing of disaster recovery capabilities can help to evaluate and validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the disaster recovery plan, identify and address any gaps or issues, and implement any improvements or adjustments based on the lessons learned1. Continuous testing can also help to ensure that the disaster recovery plan is aligned with the current and future business needs and expectations, and that the disaster recovery team and stakeholders are familiar and prepared with their roles and responsibilities1.
• B. Increased training and monitoring for disaster recovery personnel who perform below expectations. This is not the best way to enable the enterprise to accomplish the objective of improving its disaster recovery capabilities, as it only focuses on one aspect of the disaster recovery plan, which is the human factor. While training and monitoring are important for enhancing the skills and performance of the disaster recovery personnel, they are not sufficient to address the other aspects of the disaster recovery plan, such as the technology, process, and communication factors2. Moreover, increased training and monitoring may not be effective if they are not based on a clear and comprehensive assessment of the disaster recovery capabilities and outcomes.
• C. Annual review and updates to the disaster recovery plan (DRP). This is not the best way to enable the enterprise to accomplish the objective of improving its disaster recovery capabilities, as it may not be frequent or timely enough to capture and respond to the changing business environment and requirements. An annual review and update may also be insufficient to test and validate the disaster recovery plan, as it may not cover all possible scenarios or situations that could occur in a real disaster3. A more agile and adaptive approach to reviewing and updating the disaster recovery plan is recommended, such as using a continuous improvement cycle or a stage-gate process4.
• D. Increased outsourcing of disaster recovery capabilities to ensure reliability. This is not the best way to enable the enterprise to accomplish the objective of improving its disaster recovery capabilities, as it may introduce new risks and challenges for the enterprise, such as loss of control, dependency, compatibility, security, compliance, and cost issues5. Outsourcing some or all of the disaster recovery capabilities may also reduce the involvement and ownership of the enterprise’s internal staff and stakeholders in the disaster recovery planning process, which could affect their commitment and readiness in case of a disaster5. Outsourcing should be carefully considered and evaluated based on the specific needs and circumstances of the enterprise, and should be complemented by a robust governance and management framework5.

Risk management is the process of identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating the uncertainties that may affect the achievement of objectives. Risk management helps to ensure that decisions are made with an awareness of probability and impact, which means that the likelihood and consequences of potential events are considered and weighed against the benefits and costs of the actions. This can help to optimize the risk-reward balance, enhance the quality and consistency of decision-making, and support the achievement of desired outcomes. References:

• CGEIT Review Manual 2021, Chapter 2: IT Risk Management, Section 2.1: Risk Management Overview, page 551
• CGEIT Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2021, Question 1, page 152
• The Benefits of Risk Management - PMI3

• This is because employee engagement is a key factor for the success of any change initiative, especially one that involves governance. Employee engagement refers to the degree of commitment, involvement, and ownership that employees have toward the organization and its goals1. By designing the implementation plan to engage employees across the enterprise, the organization can:

Designing the implementation plan to engage employees across the enterprise can help to ensure that the new governance initiative is understood, accepted, and adopted by all stakeholders, and that it delivers the desired outcomes and value.

The other options, staff have been trained on the new initiative, external consultants created the plan, and the plan assigns responsibility for completing milestones are not as indicative as the plan is designed to engage employees across the enterprise for the success of the implementation plan for a new governance initiative. They are more related to the execution and management of the implementation plan, rather than its design and alignment. They may also not be sufficient or effective for ensuring the success of the implementation plan, as they may not address the human and behavioral aspects of change, such as awareness, understanding, involvement, commitment, and ownership3. References := Employee Engagement: What Is It? | SHRM, How To Engage Employees In Organizational Change | Forbes, Change Management Best Practices: A Comprehensive Guide | Smartsheet

When an IT governance committee is reviewing its current risk management policy due to increased usage of social media within an enterprise, the first task should be to initiate an assessment of the impact on the business. This assessment will provide a comprehensive understanding of how social media usage affects various aspects of the business, including productivity, security, data privacy, and compliance with existing policies and regulations. Understanding the business impact will inform the committee's decisions on any necessary policy adjustments or controls to mitigate potential risks associated with social media usage. While reviewing current usage levels, blocking access, and reassessing BYOD policies are relevant considerations, they should be informed by an initial assessment of the business impact to ensure that any actions taken are aligned with the enterprise's strategic objectives and risk tolerance.

The first consideration with regard to the IT service desk that will remain centralized is the effect of regional differences on service delivery. This is because regional differences can pose various challenges and opportunities for the IT service desk, such as:

• Language and cultural barriers: The IT service desk staff should be able to communicate effectively and respectfully with customers from different countries and backgrounds, and understand their needs, preferences, and expectations. This may require hiring multilingual staff, providing language training, using translation tools, or outsourcing some services to local providers1.
• Time zone differences: The IT service desk should be able to provide timely and consistent support to customers across different time zones, and avoid delays or disruptions in service delivery. This may require extending the service hours, implementing shift work, using automation tools, or outsourcing some services to local providers2.
• Legal and regulatory differences: The IT service desk should be aware of and comply with the local laws and regulations that apply to the IT services they provide, such as data protection, privacy, security, taxation, and consumer rights. This may require conducting a risk assessment, obtaining legal advice, implementing policies and procedures, or outsourcing some services to local providers3.
• Technical and operational differences: The IT service desk should be able to adapt to the technical and operational requirements and challenges of the different regions they serve, such as network connectivity, bandwidth, infrastructure, devices, software, standards, and best practices. This may require conducting a feasibility study, investing in technology upgrades, implementing quality assurance measures, or outsourcing some services to local providers4.

The other options, identification of IT service desk functions that can be outsourced, enforcement of a standardized policy across all regions, and availability of adequate resources to provide support for new users are also important considerations for the IT service desk that will remain centralized, but they are not the first one. They are more related to the implementation and execution of the IT service desk strategy, rather than its design. They are also influenced by the regional differences factor, as they depend on the level of variation and complexity that the IT service desk faces in different regions. References := Five Ways to Provide a World Class Service Desk Experience, How to Run an IT Service Desk in a Hybrid or Remote World - Gartner, Best Practices for Building a Service Desk | Atlassian, The Top 18 Help Desk Metrics and Best Practices - HubSpot Blog

A due diligence process is the best way to enable a clear understanding of the vendor’s capabilities that will be critical to the enterprise’s strategy. A due diligence process is a systematic and comprehensive investigation and evaluation of the vendor’s background, reputation, performance, quality, reliability, security, compliance, and suitability for the enterprise’s needs and expectations. A due diligence process can help the enterprise:

• Verify the vendor’s claims and credentials, and validate the vendor’s references and testimonials
• Assess the vendor’s financial stability, legal status, and ethical standards
• Identify the vendor’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
• Compare the vendor’s offerings, capabilities, and prices with other vendors and market benchmarks
• Determine the risks and benefits of engaging with the vendor, and the mitigation and contingency plans
• Negotiate the terms and conditions of the contract, service level agreement (SLA), and key performance indicators (KPIs)

References:

• According to the CGEIT Review Manual 2022, "Due diligence is a comprehensive appraisal of a business undertaken by a prospective buyer or partner to establish its assets and liabilities and evaluate its commercial potential."1
• According to the ISACA article on Third-Party Vendor Selection: If Done Right, It’s a Win-Win2, “Once you have identified which processes can be outsourced as well as their inherent risks, you can begin performing due diligence on potential vendors. The level of due diligence should be tailored to the significance of the relationship as well as the potential risks it poses.”
• According to the Gartner article on How to Evaluate Technology Vendors in 4 Rigorous Steps1, “Evaluating vendors requires detailed objectives, criteria, prioritization and monitoring. Here’s help. When it comes to choosing a vendor, enterprise tech buyer teams can easily become bogged down in the details and documentation provided by sales teams.”

A balanced scorecard is a tool that helps to measure and communicate the value of IT initiatives to the board of directors. It aligns IT objectives with business goals, tracks performance indicators, and shows the contribution of IT to the enterprise value. A balanced scorecard can also help to identify gaps and areas for improvement in IT governance. References := CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.3: Value Delivery Frameworks and Mechanisms, pp. 103-105.

A periodic service provider audit is a process of conducting an independent and objective assessment of the service provider’s performance, quality, compliance, and security in relation to the agreed service level agreement (SLA) and the enterprise’s expectations and requirements. A periodic service provider audit can help provide quality of service oversight by:

• Verifying and validating the service provider’s claims and credentials, and ensuring that they meet the contractual obligations and standards
• Identifying and evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the service provider’s services, processes, and controls
• Detecting and reporting any issues, gaps, or risks that may affect the quality of service delivery or the enterprise’s objectives and value
• Recommending and implementing corrective and preventive actions to address and resolve the issues, gaps, or risks
• Monitoring and measuring the outcomes and effectiveness of the corrective and preventive actions, and ensuring their alignment with the SLA

References:

• According to the CGEIT Review Manual 20221, “Service provider audits are a key mechanism for ensuring that service providers are meeting their contractual obligations and delivering value to the enterprise. Service provider audits should be conducted periodically or as needed to assess the performance, quality, compliance, and security of the service provider’s services, processes, and controls.”
• According to the ISACA article on IT Outsourcing: Audit Considerations2, “IT outsourcing audit is a process of examining and evaluating the IT outsourcing arrangements between an enterprise and its service providers. IT outsourcing audit aims to provide assurance that the IT outsourcing arrangements are aligned with the enterprise’s strategy, objectives, and risk appetite; that the service providers are delivering the expected services in accordance with the SLAs; that the service providers are complying with the applicable laws, regulations, and standards; and that the service providers are managing and mitigating the IT outsourcing risks effectively.”
• According to the PwC article on Service Provider Audits3, “Service provider audits are an essential tool for organizations to gain insight into their service providers’ operations, controls, risks, and compliance status. Service provider audits can help organizations ensure that their service providers are meeting their expectations and obligations; identify any areas of improvement or concern; enhance their relationship and communication with their service providers; and optimize their IT outsourcing strategy.”

• This is because training metrics are measurable values that indicate the effectiveness and impact of the training programs on the IT staff’s knowledge, skills, and performance1. By embedding training metrics into the annual performance appraisal process, the CIO can:

Embedding training metrics into the annual performance appraisal process can help to create a culture of learning, development, and accountability for IT-related training within the organization. It can also help to align the individual goals of the IT management team and direct employees with the organizational goals of IT governance.

The other options, developing training programs based on results of an IT staff survey of preferences, promoting IT-specific training awareness program, and researching and identifying training needs based on industry trends are not as effective as embedding training metrics into the annual performance appraisal process for ensuring that IT-related training is taken seriously by the IT management team and direct employees. They are more related to the design and delivery of the IT-related training, rather than its integration and evaluation. They may also not have a significant impact on the behavior and attitude of the IT management team and direct employees towards IT-related training, as they may not provide sufficient motivation, feedback, or recognition for participation or completion.

To reduce the complexity of its data assets while minimizing impact to the business during the transition, an enterprise should first review the information architecture. This review will provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of data assets, their interdependencies, and how they are managed and utilized within the organization. It forms the basis for identifying redundancies, inefficiencies, and opportunities for simplification. While removing misaligned applications, reviewing classification and retention policies, and assessing information ownership are important, they should be guided by a thorough review of the information architecture to ensure a strategic and effective approach to simplification.

Establishing a data governance framework is the first strategic action in addressing the situation where financial data is being managed in a way that will negatively impact the enterprise’s ability to support regulatory reporting. This is because a data governance framework is a structured approach to managing and utilizing data in an organization. It includes policies, procedures, and standards that guide how data is collected, stored, managed, and used1. A data governance framework can help to:

• Improve data quality, accuracy, consistency, and completeness1
• Ensure data privacy, security, and compliance with regulatory requirements1
• Align data with business strategy, objectives, and priorities1
• Enhance data integration, accessibility, and usability1
• Define data roles and responsibilities and assign accountability1

By establishing a data governance framework, the enterprise can address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of control and oversight over the financial data. A data governance framework can help to ensure that the financial data is properly managed and utilized to support regulatory reporting and other business needs.

The other options, assigning data responsibilities through a RACI chart, reviewing key risk indicators (KRIs) related to data management, and updating data management policies are not as effective as establishing a data governance framework for addressing the situation. They are more related to the implementation and execution of the data governance framework, rather than its design. They are also dependent on the existence of a data governance framework, as they require a clear understanding of the data landscape, goals, and standards of the organization.

 Including the update of documentation within the change management framework is the best way to prevent the recurrence of similar findings in the future. This is because the change management framework is a systematic and structured approach to managing changes in IT systems, applications, processes, and procedures. By incorporating the update of documentation as part of the change management process, the IT department can ensure that any changes are properly documented and communicated to the relevant stakeholders, and that the documentation is always aligned with the actual practices. This will help to avoid any discrepancies or inconsistencies between the procedures and what is actually done by system administrators, and thus reduce the risk of audit findings or non-compliance issues. Assigning the responsibility for periodic revisions and changes to process owners, requiring each IT employee to confirm compliance with IT procedures on an annual basis, and establishing high-level procedures to minimize process changes are all possible measures to improve the documentation quality, but they are not as effective or efficient as including the update of documentation within the change management framework. They may not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of coordination and integration between the documentation and the change management activities. References := Change Management Best Practices for IT Teams - Smartsheet, IT Documentation: Purpose and Best Practices - Helpjuice, IT Documentation Best Practices | IT Glue

To help ensure that IT projects related to a new business opportunity deliver the required business outcomes, the best approach is to implement stage-gate reviews that require business sign-off at each critical phase of the project. This process provides structured checkpoints where project progress, alignment with business requirements, and expected outcomes can be evaluated and validated by business stakeholders. This ensures ongoing alignment between IT project execution and business objectives, allowing for timely adjustments as needed. Hiring consultants, developing policies, and focusing on process maturity are supportive actions, but stage-gate reviews with business sign-off directly link project progression to business expectations.

Performing a business impact analysis (BIA) is the first course of action when a shortfall of IT resources is identified because it helps to assess the potential impact of the resource gap on the business processes, objectives, and goals. A BIA can also help to prioritize the criticality of the IT resources, identify the minimum acceptable levels of service, and determine the recovery strategies and resource requirements. A BIA can provide a basis for making informed decisions on how to allocate the available IT resources or acquire additional resources to close the gap.

References:

• According to ISACA’s CGEIT Review Manual 2021, one of the key activities for ensuring effective IT resource management is to "perform a business impact analysis (BIA) to identify and prioritize critical IT resources."1
• According to ISACA’s COBIT 2019 Framework, one of the governance objectives for managing IT resources is to "ensure that a BIA is performed to determine the required level of availability, continuity and security of IT services and data."2
• According to ISACA’s Business Continuity Management guide, one of the steps for developing a business continuity plan is to "conduct a BIA to identify the critical business processes and IT resources that support them."3

Data classification is a process that involves users assigning labels or tags to data based on its sensitivity, value, and protection requirements. Users are the ones who know the data best and are responsible for handling it appropriately. Therefore, users should be provided with clear instructions that are easy to follow and understand, so they can classify data correctly and consistently. This will also help users comply with the data security policies and regulations that apply to the data they work with. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Subtopic B: IT Resources, Task 3: Ensure that processes are in place to maintain the integrity, availability, reliability, performance, scalability and security of IT resources. What is Data Classification? | Best Practices & Data Types | Imperva, User-based classification section. Best practices for data classification - ManageEngine, 6 best practices for data classification section.

 According to the web search results, the best way to ensure an IT steering committee meets enterprise objectives is to have key business stakeholders represented on the committee. This is because business stakeholders are the ones who define and own the enterprise objectives, and who can provide the strategic direction, guidance, and support for IT initiatives that align with these objectives. Having key business stakeholders represented on the committee can help to ensure that IT decisions are made in the best interest of the enterprise, and that IT projects deliver value and benefits to the business12. The other options are less effective than option D, as they do not address the alignment and integration of IT and business objectives. Requiring a member of the committee to have IT governance expertise may be helpful, but not sufficient, to ensure that the committee meets enterprise objectives. IT governance expertise is not a substitute for business knowledge and involvement. Benchmarking against industry best practices may be useful, but not necessary, to ensure that the committee meets enterprise objectives. Industry best practices may not always suit the specific needs and context of the enterprise. Establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) may be important, but not enough, to ensure that the committee meets enterprise objectives. KPIs are metrics that measure the performance and outcomes of IT projects and processes, but they do not guarantee that these projects and processes are aligned with the enterprise objectives.

References :=

• What is an IT Steering Committee? – BMC Software | Blogs
• IT Governance Committee - The Role and Importance of … - Exceeders

 A business risk profile is a document that identifies and evaluates the potential risks that can affect the performance, objectives, and strategy of an organization. A business risk profile can help to prioritize and mitigate the risks, as well as to align the risk management activities with the business goals and needs12.

If an enterprise has made the strategic decision to reduce operating costs for the next year and is taking advantage of cost reductions offered by an external cloud service provider, the IT steering committee’s primary concern should be updating the business risk profile. This is because using an external cloud service provider may introduce new or increased risks for the enterprise, such as security, privacy, compliance, availability, performance, or vendor lock-in risks3 . Updating the business risk profile can help the IT steering committee to assess the impact and likelihood of these risks, to evaluate the effectiveness and adequacy of the existing controls and safeguards, to identify and implement any additional measures or actions to address the gaps or issues, and to monitor and report the risk status and outcomes12. References: Business Risk Profile: Definition & Examples. How to Create a Business Risk Profile. A risk assessment model for selecting cloud service providers. Cloud Computing Security for Cloud Service Providers.

The first course of action for the CIO of a financial services company to ensure IT processes are in compliance with recently instituted regulatory changes should be to perform a current state assessment. This is because a current state assessment can help to evaluate the existing IT processes, policies, controls, and performance against the new regulatory requirements and identify any gaps, issues, or risks that need to be addressed. A current state assessment can also help to establish a baseline and a benchmark for measuring the progress and effectiveness of the compliance initiatives.

Aligning IT project portfolio with regulatory requirements is not the first course of action, as it is a subsequent step after performing a current state assessment. Aligning IT project portfolio with regulatory requirements can help to prioritize and allocate resources for the IT projects that support the compliance objectives and deliver value to the business. However, aligning IT project portfolio with regulatory requirements requires a clear understanding of the current state and the desired state of the IT processes and compliance.

Creating an IT balanced scorecard is not the first course of action, as it is a tool for monitoring and reporting the compliance outcomes and impacts. An IT balanced scorecard is a framework that measures and communicates the performance of the IT function in terms of financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth perspectives. An IT balanced scorecard can help to align the IT strategy with the business strategy, track the progress and results of the IT initiatives, and demonstrate the value and contribution of IT to the business. However, creating an IT balanced scorecard does not provide a comprehensive analysis or improvement plan for the IT processes and compliance.

Identifying the penalties for noncompliance is not the first course of action, as it is only a motivation factor for compliance. Identifying the penalties for noncompliance can help to raise awareness and urgency of the compliance issues and risks, as well as deter or prevent violations or breaches. However, identifying the penalties for noncompliance does not provide a detailed assessment or guidance for achieving compliance.

References := IT Compliance: What You Need to Know | Smartsheet, How to Achieve Compliance section. IT Compliance Management Best Practices: 5 Tips from Experts - MetricStream, Tip 1: Assess your current state section. IT Compliance Checklist: How to Ensure Your Business Is Compliant - Blissfully, Step 1: Assess Your Current State section. IT Compliance Management - Definition & Overview | OpsCompass, How Do You Manage IT Compliance? section.

A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process of predicting the organizational and financial impact of business disruptions, such as vendor system failures. A BIA can help the CIO to prepare for this concern by identifying the critical business processes, the potential effects of disruption, and the recovery requirements and strategies. A BIA can also help the CIO to prioritize the resources and actions needed to restore the normal operations as quickly as possible1. A BIA is an essential component of business continuity planning (BCP) and disaster recovery planning (DRP)2.

An IT balanced scorecard is a tool that measures and monitors the performance of IT in relation to the strategic goals and objectives of the organization. An IT balanced scorecard can help the CIO to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of IT, but it does not address the impact of business disruptions or the recovery plans.

Service-level metrics are indicators that measure and report the quality and availability of IT services delivered to the customers or users. Service-level metrics can help the CIO to track and improve the service delivery, but they do not assess the impact of business disruptions or the recovery plans.

An IT procurement policy is a document that defines the rules and procedures for acquiring IT products and services from external vendors. An IT procurement policy can help the CIO to manage the vendor relationships, contracts, and risks, but it does not analyze the impact of business disruptions or the recovery plans. References: How To Conduct Business Impact Analysis in 8 Easy Steps. The Top 10 Vendor Risks & How to Manage Them. What is FMEA? Failure Mode & Effects Analysis. Definition of Business Impact Analysis (BIA). [IT Balanced Scorecard: Definition, Frameworks, Examples]. [Service Level Metrics: Definition, Types, Examples]. [IT Procurement Policy: Definition, Components, Examples].

 Exercising the right to perform an audit is the best way to assess compliance and avoid reputational damage when outsourcing key IT services to third-party providers, especially in a highly regulated industry like healthcare. An audit is a systematic and independent examination of the provider’s policies, procedures, controls, and performance related to the outsourced IT services, and it can help to verify that the provider is complying with the contractual obligations, service level agreements, and regulatory requirements. An audit can also help to identify and address any gaps, issues, or risks that may affect the quality, security, or reliability of the outsourced IT services, and to ensure that the provider is delivering value and meeting the expectations of the enterprise. An audit can also provide assurance and confidence to the enterprise’s senior management, board, and stakeholders that the outsourcing arrangement is effective, efficient, and compliant. According to Outsourcing Compliance: What You Need to Know, “The right to audit clause should be included in every contract with a third-party service provider. It allows the organization to conduct an independent review of the provider’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, contractual terms and conditions, and industry standards and best practices.”

An information governance framework is the structure that provides a holistic overview of the influences that inform how an organisation creates and manages its enterprise-wide information assets (records, information and data)1. It defines the roles, responsibilities, policies, standards, and processes for ensuring effective and secure information management. If a new and expanding enterprise has collected a large amount of data in a short period of time, it may face data breach and privacy risks if it does not have a robust and comprehensive information governance framework in place. Therefore, the IT steering committee’s first course of action should be to assess the current state of the information governance framework, identify any gaps or weaknesses, and implement improvements or changes as needed. This will help the enterprise to protect and preserve its information assets, comply with legal and regulatory requirements, and enable ethical and efficient use of information. Mitigating and tracking data-related issues and risks, modifying legal and regulatory data requirements, and defining data protection and privacy practices are important actions, but they are not the first course of action. They are more likely to be part of the implementation or improvement of the information governance framework after it has been assessed. References := Establishing an information governance framework

 Ensuring that the system is maintained in compliance with enterprise architecture (EA) standards is the most effective way to prevent an IT system from becoming technologically obsolete before its planned return on investment (ROI), because it ensures that the system is aligned with the current and future business needs, goals, and strategies of the organization. Enterprise architecture (EA) standards define the principles, guidelines, and best practices for designing, developing, and managing IT systems in a consistent, coherent, and integrated manner across the organization. By following EA standards, IT leaders can ensure that the system is compatible with the existing and emerging technologies, platforms, and frameworks that support the business processes and functions. EA standards also help IT leaders to monitor and evaluate the performance, quality, security, and reliability of the system, and to identify and address any gaps, issues, or risks that may affect its functionality or value. EA standards also facilitate the communication and collaboration among different stakeholders involved in the system lifecycle, such as business users, IT staff, vendors, and auditors. By maintaining the system in compliance with EA standards, IT leaders can ensure that the system delivers the expected benefits and value to the organization and achieves its planned ROI. References := ISO/IEC/IEEE 42020:2019(en), Software, systems and enterprise ? Architecture processes, Sample: Enterprise Architecture Standards - CIO Portal, Obsolescence management for IT leaders - Information Age

A business impact analysis (BIA) report is the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. A BIA report is a document that identifies and evaluates the potential effects of disruptions to critical business functions and processes. A BIA report can help estimate the financial, operational, reputational, and legal impacts of a risk event, as well as the recovery time and resources needed to resume normal operations. A BIA report can also help prioritize the recovery strategies and objectives based on the criticality and urgency of the business functions and processes.

The other options are not the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that provide an early warning of potential threats to the organization’s objectives and performance. KRIs can help monitor and measure the risk exposure and effectiveness of risk management activities, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. IT environment threat modeling is a technique that identifies and analyzes the possible vulnerabilities and attack vectors in an IT system or network. Threat modeling can help improve the security and resilience of IT assets and services, but it does not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) are the maximum acceptable time frames for restoring business functions and processes after a disruption. RTOs can help determine the recovery priorities and strategies, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event.

For more information on BIA and quantifying loss, you can refer to these web sources:

• What is Business Impact Analysis? Definition, Benefits & Examples
• Quantifying Loss Associated with Major Risk Event - Exam-Answer
• Quantifying the Qualitative Technology Risk Assessment - ISACA

Data classification is the process of categorizing data according to its sensitivity, such as public, confidential, or restricted. Data classification helps ensure that data privacy is maintained by applying appropriate controls and policies to different types of data. By standardizing data classification processes throughout the enterprise, IT governance can ensure consistent and effective data privacy practices across all systems and departments. Incorporating enterprise privacy categorizations into contracts, requiring business impact analyses for enterprise systems, and reassessing the data governance policy are not long-term strategic responses, but rather tactical or operational actions that may support data privacy. References := What is Data Classification?, Data Governance Policy: Examples & Templates, What is data governance?

 The best reference for the IT steering committee as they evaluate the level of success of a strategic systems project that was implemented several months ago is the project’s business case. The business case is the document that outlines the rationale, objectives, benefits, costs, risks, and assumptions of the project. It also defines the expected outcomes and performance indicators that can be used to measure the project’s success. By comparing the actual results of the project with the business case, the IT steering committee can determine if the project has met its intended goals, delivered its expected value, and justified its investment

Prior to setting IT objectives, an enterprise must have established its strategies. Strategies are the high-level plans that define the direction and goals of the enterprise and how it will achieve them. Strategies provide the context and guidance for setting IT objectives, which are the specific and measurable outcomes that IT will deliver to support the strategies. IT objectives should be aligned with and derived from the enterprise strategies, as well as the enterprise vision, mission, and values

 Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that predict potential risks that can negatively impact businesses. They provide a way to quantify and monitor each risk. Think of them as change-related metrics that act as an early warning risk detection system to help companies effectively monitor, manage and mitigate risks1. By monitoring KRIs, the board of directors can ensure the enterprise is responsive to changes in its environment that would directly impact critical business processes, such as market fluctuations, customer preferences, regulatory compliance, operational efficiency, or cyber threats. Monitoring KRIs can help the board of directors to identify and assess the current and emerging risks, to evaluate the effectiveness and performance of the risk management strategies and controls, to communicate and report the risk status and issues, and to take timely and appropriate actions to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks234. References: How to Develop Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to Fortify Your Business. The Power of KRIs in Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). KRI (Key Risk Indicator): Understanding KRI and why is it important?. Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).

The first thing the CIO should do to ensure the IT organization is capable of supporting the CEO’s mandate of rolling out several new mobile services within the next 12 months is to request an assessment of current in-house mobile technology skills. This is because an assessment of current in-house mobile technology skills can help to evaluate the existing level of knowledge, experience, and competence of the IT staff in developing, deploying, and maintaining mobile applications and services. An assessment of current in-house mobile technology skills can also help to identify any gaps, needs, or opportunities for improvement or enhancement of the IT staff’s mobile technology skills.

Creating a sense of urgency with the IT team that mobile knowledge is mandatory is not the first thing the CIO should do, as it is a motivational factor rather than a governance factor. Creating a sense of urgency with the IT team can help to communicate the importance and priority of the CEO’s mandate, as well as inspire and encourage the IT staff to learn and adopt mobile technology skills. However, creating a sense of urgency with the IT team does not provide a comprehensive analysis or improvement plan for the IT organization’s mobile technology capabilities.

Procuring contractors with experience in mobile application development is not the first thing the CIO should do, as it is an implementation factor rather than a governance factor. Procuring contractors with experience in mobile application development can help to supplement or complement the in-house IT staff’s mobile technology skills, as well as accelerate or facilitate the delivery and quality of the new mobile services. However, procuring contractors with experience in mobile application development does not address the long-term sustainability or scalability of the IT organization’s mobile technology capabilities.

Tasking direct reports with creating training plans for their teams is not the first thing the CIO should do, as it is a subsequent step after requesting an assessment of current in-house mobile technology skills. Tasking direct reports with creating training plans for their teams can help to design and implement effective and customized learning programs and activities for the IT staff to acquire or enhance their mobile technology skills. However, tasking direct reports with creating training plans for their teams requires a clear understanding of the current state and the desired state of the IT staff’s mobile technology skills.

References := Top 15 In-Demand Technology Skills (Plus Definition), Mobile Development section. How to Develop Mobile Technology Skills | Career Trend, Step 1 section. How To Build A Mobile App Development Team - Forbes, Introduction section.

The best course of action for the CIO is to develop and communicate an accountability matrix. An accountability matrix, also known as a responsibility assignment matrix, is a project management tool that defines the roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders in a project or process1 An accountability matrix can help to clarify who is responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed (RACI) for each task or deliverable, and avoid confusion and ambiguity in the decision-making process2 By developing and communicating an accountability matrix, the CIO can ensure that the IT portfolio management policies and processes are understood and followed by all the relevant parties, and that the IT projects are aligned with the enterprise goals. References: RACI Matrix: Responsibility Assignment Matrix Guide 20233, Responsibility assignment matrix - Wikipedia2, Accountability Matrix - Explained - The Business Professor, LLC1

 The most important benefit of developing an information architecture model consistent with enterprise strategy is that it supports and facilitates decision making. Information architecture is the part of the enterprise architecture process that describes the current state, future state, and guidance necessary to flexibly share and exchange information assets to achieve effective enterprise change1. Information architecture is an aspect of enterprise architecture that enables an information strategy or business solution through the definition of the company’s business information assets, their sources, structure, classification and associations2. By developing an information architecture model that aligns with the enterprise strategy, the organization can ensure that the information assets are relevant, accurate, timely, and accessible for the decision makers. An information architecture model can also help the organization to identify information gaps, redundancies, and opportunities, and to prioritize information initiatives and investments. Moreover, an information architecture model can enable the organization to leverage its data and analytics capabilities to generate insights and value from the information assets. Therefore, developing an information architecture model consistent with enterprise strategy is crucial for supporting and facilitating decision making at all levels of the organization. References: Enterprise Business Strategy and Architecture | Deloitte US3, Business strategy modelling based on enterprise architecture: a state of the art review | Emerald Insight4, Enterprise Information Architecture (EIA) - CIO Wiki1, Data Architecture and Information Architecture: What’s … - DATAVERSITY2

 According to the CGEIT certification guide, the business sponsor is primarily accountable for delivering the benefits of an IT-enabled investment program to the enterprise. The business sponsor is the person who has the authority and responsibility to initiate, influence and approve the business objectives and requirements of the program. The business sponsor also ensures that the program aligns with the enterprise strategy and delivers value to the enterprise1. The program manager, the IT steering committee chair and the CIO are responsible for supporting the business sponsor in delivering the benefits, but they are not primarily accountable for them2. References :=

• CGEIT certification guide, domain 4: Benefits Realization, section 4.1: Benefits Governance, page 137.
• CGEIT certification guide, domain 4: Benefits Realization, section 4.2: Benefits Delivery Life Cycle, page 140.

Standards-based reference architecture and design specifications. A reference architecture is a set of principles, patterns, standards, and best practices that guide the design and implementation of IT solutions. A design specification is a detailed document that describes the technical requirements, features, and functionalities of an IT solution. By using standards-based reference architecture and design specifications, an enterprise can ensure that its IT infrastructure is aligned with its business needs and goals, and that it can support the integration, compatibility, and scalability of its IT systems and services. Some examples of standards-based reference architectures are: The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) 1, The Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF) 2, and The Cloud Computing Reference Architecture (CCRA) 3.

Revalidating the organization’s risk tolerance and re-aligning the retention policy is the best option to ensure the optimization of retention costs, because it can help the organization balance the trade-off between the benefits and costs of data retention. By revalidating the risk tolerance, the organization can identify the optimal level of data retention that minimizes the exposure to legal, regulatory, and operational risks, while also reducing the storage and management costs. By re-aligning the retention policy, the organization can ensure that the data retention practices are consistent with the risk tolerance and reflect the current business needs and objectives. A re-aligned retention policy can also help the organization comply with data retention laws and regulations, avoid unnecessary data hoarding, and improve data quality and accessibility. References := Data Retention Policy 101: Best Practices, Examples & More - Intradyn, Data Retention 101: Policies and Best Practices | Egnyte, Best Practices for Data Retention and Policy Creation Will Optimize Storage Management, Data Retention Policy: Crafting Strategy for Compliance and Access

The CIO communicating why IT governance is important to the enterprise is the best way to increase the likelihood of its success, as it helps to create awareness, understanding, and buy-in from the stakeholders and staff involved in the IT governance program. The CIO can also communicate the benefits, objectives, and expectations of the IT governance program, and how it aligns with the enterprise strategy and vision123. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 3: Ensure that stakeholder needs, conditions and options are evaluated to determine balanced, agreed-on enterprise objectives to be achieved; setting direction through prioritization and decision making; and monitoring performance and compliance against agreed-on direction and objectives.

Enterprise architecture (EA) is a discipline that defines and organizes the components, relationships, principles, and standards of an organization’s IT environment. EA can help to align IT with business strategy and objectives, optimize IT performance and value, and manage IT complexity and change12.

One of the benefits of EA is that it can help to address the concern of duplicate IT applications and services across an enterprise. EA can help to identify and eliminate the redundancies, inconsistencies, and inefficiencies in the IT landscape, by providing a holistic and integrated view of the current and future state of IT. EA can also help to rationalize and consolidate the IT applications and services, by establishing a common framework, taxonomy, and governance for IT decision making. EA can also help to improve the integration and interoperability of IT applications and services, by defining the interfaces, protocols, and standards for data exchange123.

Some examples of how EA can help to address the concern of duplicate IT applications and services are:

• EA can help to conduct an inventory and assessment of the existing IT applications and services, to determine their purpose, scope, functionality, quality, cost, and value. EA can also help to compare and contrast the IT applications and services across different business units, to identify the overlaps, gaps, or conflicts among them4.
• EA can help to define and prioritize the business needs and requirements for IT applications and services, to ensure that they support the business goals and processes. EA can also help to evaluate and select the best IT solutions for each business need, based on criteria such as feasibility, suitability, scalability, security, compliance, etc5.
• EA can help to design and implement a target IT architecture that eliminates or minimizes the duplicate IT applications and services, by using approaches such as application portfolio management (APM), service-oriented architecture (SOA), or cloud computing. EA can also help to plan and execute a migration strategy that ensures a smooth transition from the current to the target state .
• EA can help to monitor and control the IT applications and services, by using metrics, indicators, and reports to measure their performance, availability, reliability, quality, and value. EA can also help to review and update the IT applications and services regularly, by using feedback mechanisms and continuous improvement practices .

References:

What is Enterprise Architecture? Definition & Frameworks. Enterprise Architecture: Definition & Best Practices. How Enterprise Architecture Can Help You Eliminate Technical Debt. Application Inventory: Definition & Best Practices. Business Requirements: Definition & Best Practices. [Application Portfolio Management: Definition & Best Practices]. [Service-Oriented Architecture: Definition & Benefits]. [IT Performance Management: Definition & Best Practices]. [Continuous Improvement: Definition & Best Practices].

Implementing an IT portfolio management policy would best enable remediation of this situation because it would help the organization to establish and adopt a process for measuring and monitoring the value of IT investments. This process would let the organization manage IT investments similarly to a financial portfolio by balancing potential returns, determining if an investment fits the business objectives, and performing a risk assessment. An IT portfolio management policy would also help to avoid overlap and duplication of IT projects by providing a clear and consistent way of prioritizing, categorizing, and aligning them with the enterprise strategy and goals. An IT portfolio management policy would also facilitate the evaluation and reporting of IT performance and benefits realization

 Objectives and metrics are the most critical for the successful implementation of an IT process, as they define the purpose, scope, and expected outcomes of the process. Objectives and metrics also help to measure and monitor the performance, efficiency, and effectiveness of the process, and to identify and implement improvement opportunities12. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic C: Technology Governance, Task 2: Ensure that IT processes are defined, implemented, monitored and continually improved in alignment with the enterprise governance framework.

Requesting a meeting with the board is the most ethical course of action for the CIO who believes that a recent mission-critical IT decision by the board of directors is not in the best financial interest of all stakeholders, as it allows the CIO to express their concerns and opinions in a respectful and professional manner, and to provide relevant information and evidence to support their views. Requesting a meeting with the board also demonstrates the CIO’s commitment and accountability to the enterprise’s goals and values, and their willingness to collaborate and communicate with the board on IT governance matters123. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 3: Ensure that stakeholder needs, conditions and options are evaluated to determine balanced, agreed-on enterprise objectives to be achieved; setting direction through prioritization and decision making; and monitoring performance and compliance against agreed-on direction and objectives.

An exception management process is a method for documenting and approving an exception to compliance with established IT governance policies, standards, and practices. An exception management process can accommodate the need for autonomy over technology choices by allowing a functional group to request and justify a deviation from the IT governance requirements, based on the business needs, risks, costs, and benefits. An exception management process can also help to ensure that the exceptions are reviewed and approved by the appropriate authorities, that the exceptions are monitored and reported, and that the exceptions are aligned with the IT strategy and objectives123. References: Exception Management Process Flow. IT/Information Security Exception Request Process. Strategies, Governance, Policies, Standards and Resources.

 According to the CGEIT certification guide, key risk indicators (KRIs) are the best way to provide ongoing assurance that significant IT risk is being proactively monitored and does not exceed agreed risk tolerance levels. KRIs are metrics that measure the likelihood or impact of potential or actual risks, and provide early warning signals of increasing risk exposures1. KRIs can help IT management to track and report the status and trends of IT risks, and to trigger timely responses and actions when the risk levels approach or exceed the predefined thresholds2. The other options are less suitable than option C, as they do not provide ongoing assurance or proactive monitoring of IT risk. An IT risk appetite statement is a document that expresses the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to take in order to meet their strategic objectives3. A risk management policy is a document that defines the principles, framework, and processes for managing risks in an organization. A risk register is a tool that records and tracks the identified risks, their causes, impacts, likelihood, responses, and owners.

References :=

• CGEIT certification guide, domain 3: Risk Optimization, section 3.4: Risk Monitoring and Assurance, page 98.
• Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) - Definition from KWHS
• Risk Appetite - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
• Risk Management Policy - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
• Risk Register - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

The board of directors’ first course of action when a strategic IT-enabled investment is failing due to unforeseen technology problems should be to assess the business risk and options. This means that the board should evaluate the impact of the technology problems on the business objectives, benefits, costs, and risks of the investment, as well as the feasibility and desirability of alternative courses of action, such as continuing, modifying, suspending, or terminating the investment. This will help the board to make an informed and rational decision based on the best available information and evidence.

 A change management program is the best option to prevent the problem of a lack of stakeholder buy-in to the innovation improvement initiatives, because it is a systematic and structured approach to managing the human side of change and ensuring that the stakeholders are engaged, informed, and committed to the change process. A change management program can help to identify and analyze the stakeholders, their needs, expectations, and concerns, and develop appropriate strategies and actions to communicate, educate, involve, and support them throughout the change journey. A change management program can also help to assess and address the potential risks, barriers, and resistance to change, and monitor and measure the effectiveness and outcomes of the change initiatives. According to Making Change Happen: 5 Keys to Driving Successful Change Initiatives, “Stakeholders are all the people who affect or are affected by the change initiative. Project participants can’t make the change happen by themselves. They need champions and supporters. It’s important to align stakeholders around the overall vision and then actively engage them throughout the process.”

To generate value for the enterprise, it is most important that IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. This means that IT investments should support and enable the achievement of the enterprise’s vision, mission, goals, and strategies. IT investments should also align with the enterprise’s values, culture, risk appetite, and stakeholder expectations. By ensuring that IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives, the enterprise can maximize the benefits and value that IT can deliver, and avoid wasting resources on IT projects or initiatives that are not relevant, necessary, or effective. According to one source1, “Driving value creation with technology investments requires a clear understanding of how technology can enable business strategy and create value for the organization.” The other options are not the most important factor for generating value for the enterprise, but rather some of the steps or outcomes that can support or result from IT investments. Aligning IT investments with the IT strategic objectives is important, but not sufficient, as the IT strategic objectives should also be aligned with the enterprise’s business objectives. Approving IT investments by the CFO is a part of the financial governance process, but it does not guarantee that the IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. Including IT investments in the balanced scorecard is a way of measuring and reporting on the performance and value of IT investments, but it does not ensure that the IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. References := Driving value creation with technology investments

Ensuring the commitment of stakeholders is the most important consideration to effectively influence organizational and process change, as it involves engaging and communicating with the key parties who have an interest or influence in the IT governance structure. Stakeholder commitment can help to overcome resistance, gain support, and ensure alignment and collaboration among the enterprise units1. Stakeholder commitment can also facilitate the adoption and implementation of the IT governance framework, policies, and standards . References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 3: Ensure that stakeholder needs, conditions and options are evaluated to determine balanced, agreed-on enterprise objectives to be achieved; setting direction through prioritization and decision making; and monitoring performance and compliance against agreed-on direction and objectives.

 Gap analysis results will provide the most useful information for the CIO to determine if IT staff have adequate skills to deliver on key strategic objectives, as they compare the current state of the IT staff skills with the desired or required state. Gap analysis results also help to identify the gaps or deficiencies in the IT staff skills, and to plan and implement the actions and strategies to close or reduce the gaps1. A gap analysis can be performed using various methods and tools, such as SWOT analysis, skill matrix, competency framework, etc.

 Quality management is the most important aspect of an IT governance framework to ensure that IT supports repeatable business processes, as it involves defining, implementing, and monitoring quality standards, policies, and procedures for IT products and services. Quality management also ensures that IT processes are aligned with the enterprise requirements, objectives, and expectations, and that they deliver consistent and reliable outcomes12. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic C: Technology Governance, Task 2: Ensure that IT processes are defined, implemented, monitored and continually improved in alignment with the enterprise governance framework.

 Process owners are responsible for ensuring the regular review of quality management performance against defined quality metrics, as they are accountable for the design, implementation and improvement of the processes they own. Risk management team, internal auditors and executive management have other roles and responsibilities in relation to quality management, such as providing assurance, oversight and direction. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.2: IT Investment Management, Subsection 3.2.4: IT Investment Management Process, Page 104 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.4: Quality Management, Subsection 3.4.1: Quality Management Overview, Page 120

The first strategic action to address the report is to authorize a risk analysis of the practice. A risk analysis is a systematic process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing the potential threats and vulnerabilities that may arise from the use of an offsite cloud for analyzing sensitive “big data” files. A risk analysis can help to determine the level of exposure and impact of the practice on the organization’s data security, privacy, compliance, and performance. A risk analysis can also provide recommendations for mitigating or avoiding the risks, such as implementing appropriate controls, policies, and procedures.

Updating data governance practices, revising the information security policy, and recommending the use of a private cloud are possible actions that may result from the risk analysis, but they are not the first step. Data governance practices are the rules and processes that define how data is created, stored, accessed, used, and disposed of within an organization. Data governance practices should align with the organization’s data strategy, objectives, and values. Information security policy is a document that outlines the principles, guidelines, and responsibilities for protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. Information security policy should reflect the organization’s risk appetite, legal obligations, and industry standards. A private cloud is a cloud computing model that provides dedicated resources and services to a single organization. A private cloud may offer more control, security, and customization than an offsite cloud, but it may also require more investment, maintenance, and expertise.

Therefore, before updating data governance practices, revising the information security policy, or recommending the use of a private cloud, it is important to conduct a risk analysis of the current practice of using an offsite cloud for analyzing sensitive “big data” files. This will help to ensure that the organization makes informed and strategic decisions that balance the benefits and risks of using cloud computing for big data analytics.

 One of the main benefits of ERP systems is that they can integrate and streamline various business processes across an enterprise, such as accounting, inventory, sales, human resources, etc. However, this also means that different regions or departments may have to adopt common or standardized processes that are supported by the ERP system, rather than using their own customized or localized ones. This can reduce the complexity and cost of implementing and maintaining the ERP system, as well as improve data quality and consistency. According to one of the web search results1, “it’s important to always keep those processes at the core of your implementation plan” and “an ERP implementation is an opportunity to introduce a better process, not simply to automate an existing inefficient one.” Another web search result2 states that “standardizing ERP processes across regions” is one of the best practices for a successful ERP implementation. Therefore, the best approach in the planning phase of the project is to minimize customization by standardizing ERP processes across regions. References := 9 Key ERP Implementation Best Practices | NetSuite, 6 Best Practices for a Successful ERP Implementation

 A RACI chart is a tool that defines the roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders in a project or a process. RACI stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed. A RACI chart can help to clarify who is responsible for performing the tasks, who is accountable for the outcomes, who is consulted for input or feedback, and who is informed of the progress or results. A RACI chart can help to improve communication, collaboration, and coordination among the stakeholders, as well as to avoid confusion, duplication, or conflict of work12.

If an enterprise has established a new department to oversee the life cycle of activities that support data management objectives, the next step should be to establish a RACI chart for the data management process. This can help to define the roles and responsibilities of the new department and other existing departments or units that are involved in the data management process, such as IT, business, security, compliance, etc. A RACI chart can also help to align the data management process with the enterprise’s strategy and goals, and to ensure that the data management objectives are met effectively and efficiently34. References: What is a RACI Chart? Definition & Example. How to Use a RACI Matrix: Everything You Need to Know. Data Management Process: Definition & Best Practices. Data Lifecycle Management: A 2023 Guide for Your Business.

A business case is the best method for making a strategic decision to invest in cloud services, as it provides a structured and comprehensive analysis of the costs, benefits, risks, and value proposition of the proposed investment. A business case can help justify the need for cloud services, compare different options and alternatives, and align the investment with the enterprise’s strategy and objectives. A request for information (RFI) is a document that solicits information from potential vendors or suppliers, but it does not provide a decision-making framework. Benchmarking is a process of comparing the performance or practices of an enterprise with those of others, but it does not evaluate the feasibility or desirability of cloud services. A balanced scorecard is a tool that measures and monitors the performance of an enterprise or a business unit against strategic goals and objectives, but it does not assess the viability or suitability of cloud services. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.2: IT Investment Management, Subsection 3.2.1: IT Investment Management Overview, Page 97 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.2: IT Investment Management, Subsection 3.2.4: IT Investment Management Process, Page 104 : How to Write a Business Case: Template & Examples1

Implementing a review and approval process for each phase would best help to improve an enterprise’s ability to manage large IT investment projects. This is because a review and approval process can help to ensure that the project is aligned with the business objectives, scope, budget, schedule, quality, and risk criteria at each stage of the project life cycle. A review and approval process can also help to monitor the project progress, performance, and deliverables, as well as identify and resolve any issues or changes that may arise. A review and approval process can also provide transparency, accountability, and governance for the project stakeholders and decision-makers.

Creating a change management board is not the best answer, as it is only one aspect of a review and approval process. A change management board is a group of people who are responsible for reviewing, approving, or rejecting change requests that affect the project scope, schedule, cost, or quality. A change management board is important for managing changes in a project, but it is not sufficient or comprehensive for managing large IT investment projects.

Reviewing and evaluating existing business cases is not the best answer, as it is only a preliminary step in a review and approval process. A business case is a document that provides the justification and rationale for initiating a project, based on the expected costs, benefits, risks, and value of the project. Reviewing and evaluating existing business cases can help to select and prioritize the most viable and valuable projects for the enterprise, but it is not enough or relevant for managing large IT investment projects.

Publishing the IT approval process online for wider scrutiny is not the best answer, as it is only a communication method for a review and approval process. Publishing the IT approval process online can help to increase the visibility, awareness, and understanding of the project requirements, criteria, and procedures among the project stakeholders and participants. Publishing the IT approval process online can also help to solicit feedback, suggestions, or concerns from the wider audience. However, publishing the IT approval process online does not necessarily improve the enterprise’s ability to manage large IT investment projects.

References := IT Portfolio Management Strategies | Smartsheet, Managing an IT portfolio requires four steps section. Best Practices in Project Management | Smartsheet, Establish ground rules for how the project will move forward section. Government of Canada project management - Canada.ca, These practices include establishing clear accountabilities section. IT Project Management: Concepts, Solutions & Best Practices, What is Integrated Project Management (IPM)? section. 16 Industry Experts Share Best Practices For IT Project Management - Forbes, 1. Limit Work In Progress section.

The best way to ensure new systems can be adequately supported once in production is to require operational management be identified in the business case. This means that the business case should include the costs, benefits, risks and resources associated with the operation and maintenance of the new system, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the operational staff. By doing so, the business case can ensure that the new system is aligned with the business objectives and can deliver value to the stakeholders. Additionally, the business case can help to secure the commitment and support of the operational management for the new system. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 3: Benefits Realization1; COBIT 5: Enabling Processes, chapter 4, section 4.2.22; Building A Governance System: A Review of Information Flow and Items Component

A policy is a document that defines the rules and guidelines for how an organization conducts its activities and operations. A policy can help to ensure the compliance, consistency, and quality of the organization’s performance and outcomes1. A policy typically consists of several components, such as purpose, scope, terms and definitions, roles and responsibilities, procedures, compliance, and review2.

From a governance perspective, one of the most important components of a policy is roles and responsibilities, because it clarifies who is accountable and responsible for implementing, enforcing, monitoring, and improving the policy. Roles and responsibilities can help to establish the authority, accountability, and communication among different stakeholders involved in the policy, such as the board of directors, senior management, business units, IT staff, customers, regulators, etc. Roles and responsibilities can also help to avoid confusion, duplication, or conflict of work among the stakeholders3 .

The governance of enterprise IT (GEIT) is the system by which the current and future use of IT is directed and controlled by an organization. GEIT aims to ensure that IT supports the organization’s strategy and objectives, delivers value and benefits, manages risks and resources, and measures performance and outcomes. GEIT requires a clear definition of roles and responsibilities for the IT governance policies, processes, structures, and relationships. Some of the common roles and responsibilities involved in GEIT are:

• The board of directors: provides strategic direction, oversight, and approval for IT governance
• The senior management: provides leadership, support, and guidance for IT governance
• The business units: provide input, feedback, and collaboration for IT governance
• The IT function: provides execution, delivery, and improvement for IT governance
• The audit function: provides assurance, evaluation, and recommendation for IT governance
• The external stakeholders: provide requirements, expectations, and compliance for IT governance References: What is a Policy? Definition & Examples. Policy Components: Definition & Examples. Roles & Responsibilities in Policy Development. [Policy Development: Roles & Responsibilities]. [What is IT Governance? Definition & Frameworks]. [IT Governance Roles & Responsibilities]. [Roles & Responsibilities in IT Governance].

Establishing the objectives and expected benefits is the most important step when developing effective metrics for the measurement of solution delivery, because it defines the purpose, scope, and value of the solution and how it aligns with the business goals and needs. By establishing the objectives and expected benefits, IT leaders can identify the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will measure the progress, quality, and outcomes of the solution delivery. KPIs are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound metrics that track and evaluate the performance of the solution delivery against the objectives and expected benefits. KPIs can also help IT leaders to communicate the value proposition of the solution to the stakeholders, monitor and manage the risks and issues that may affect the solution delivery, and ensure that the solution meets or exceeds the expectations of the customers and users. References := Automation: metrics that measure success, 4 Types of Key Performance Metrics To Track (With Examples), A guide to measuring benefits effectively

 Portfolio management is the process of selecting, prioritizing, and managing a collection of projects, programs, and initiatives that align with the strategic goals and objectives of an organization. Portfolio management can help to ensure that the IT initiatives meet their goals, by providing a holistic and integrated view of the IT investments, resources, and outcomes. Portfolio management can also help to optimize the value and benefits of the IT initiatives, by balancing the risks, costs, and dependencies among them. Portfolio management can also help to monitor and control the performance and progress of the IT initiatives, by using metrics, indicators, and reports123. References: What is Portfolio Management? Definition & Examples. A Guide to IT Portfolio Management | Adobe Workfront. IT Portfolio Management: Importance, How-To Steps and Tips.

Understanding the enterprise’s risk tolerance is the most important step for the CTO to create the appropriate risk policies for IT, as it would help to define the acceptable level of risk exposure and the risk appetite for mobile applications. Risk tolerance is the degree of uncertainty that an enterprise is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives, and it reflects the enterprise’s culture, strategy, and stakeholder expectations. Risk policies for IT should be aligned with the enterprise’s risk tolerance, as well as its mission, vision, and goals. The other options are not as important, as they are more related to the implementation or measurement of risk management, rather than the establishment of risk policies. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.1: IT Risk Management Overview, Page 153 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.2: IT Risk Management Process, Page 156 : Proactive IT Risk Management in an Era of Emerging Technologies

 Goals-based performance appraisals are a method of evaluating employees based on their achievement of specific and measurable objectives that are aligned with the organization’s strategy and vision. Goals-based performance appraisals can help to identify the most capable staff who have contributed to the organization’s success, demonstrated high performance and potential, and shown commitment and engagement. Reviewing current goals-based performance appraisals across the enterprise can help management to retain the most capable staff regardless of their location, compensation, or length of service12. References: Performance Appraisal Methods: Traditional and Modern Methods (with example). How to Conduct a Performance Appraisal.

A data governance framework is a set of policies, standards, roles, and processes that define how data is collected, stored, accessed, and used within an enterprise. A data governance framework can help address data protection and least privilege issues by establishing clear rules and responsibilities for data owners, custodians, and users. A data governance framework can also enable data encryption as a key control to protect sensitive data from unauthorized access or disclosure. Therefore, mandating the creation of a data governance framework is the best approach to ensure all business units work toward remediating these issues. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.2: IT Risk Management Process, Page 156 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5: Resource Optimization, Section 5.2: Information Resource Management, Subsection 5.2.1: Information Resource Management Overview, Page 183 : A Guide to Selecting and Adopting a Privacy Framework1

 A new privacy regulation is a legal requirement that aims to protect the rights and interests of customers in relation to their personal data, especially in the event of a breach involving personally identifiable information (PII). A breach is an unauthorized or unlawful access, disclosure, alteration, or destruction of personal data that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the data1. A new privacy regulation may introduce new risk for an enterprise that collects, processes, stores, or transfers personal data of customers, such as legal, financial, reputational, or operational risk. Therefore, the IT risk management team’s first course of action should be to determine if the new regulation introduces new risk for the enterprise, by assessing the scope, applicability, and impact of the regulation on the enterprise’s data activities and practices. This can help the IT risk management team to identify and prioritize the gaps or issues that need to be addressed to comply with the regulation and to mitigate the potential risk23. References: What is a Data Breach? Definition & Examples. How to Manage Data Privacy Risks. Data Privacy Risk Management: A Guide for Businesses.

 Integrating IT resource planning into enterprise strategic planning enables the enterprise to allocate resources efficiently to achieve desired goals, as it ensures that IT resources are aligned with the enterprise vision, mission, and objectives. IT resource planning also helps to identify and prioritize the IT needs and demands of the enterprise, and to allocate the appropriate resources (such as people, processes, technology, and information) to meet them123. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 2, Subtopic A: IT Resource Planning, Task 1: Ensure that IT resource planning is aligned with the enterprise strategic planning process.

 A balanced scorecard is a strategic management tool that measures and monitors the performance of an organization against its vision, mission, goals, and objectives. It uses four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. A balanced scorecard can help evaluate the effectiveness of IT governance by aligning IT activities with business strategies, assessing IT value delivery, identifying IT strengths and weaknesses, and facilitating continuous improvement. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Subdomain B: Strategic Management, Task 3: Establish and maintain a framework for the governance of enterprise IT to enable the achievement of enterprise objectives.

The role that has primary accountability for the security related to data assets is the data owner. A data owner is a person who is generally in a senior company position, responsible for the categorization, protection, usage, and quality of one or more data sets1. The data owner must ensure that the information within their domain is correctly maintained across various platforms and business processes, and that it is secured from unauthorized access and misuse2. The data owner also has the authority to grant or revoke access rights to the data, and to define and enforce data security policies and standards3. Therefore, the data owner is the primary accountable role for the security related to data assets. References: Data Owners vs. Data Stewards vs. Data Custodians - CPO Magazine2, CISSP domain 2: Asset security - Infosec Resources

The best way to address the issue of duplicate purchases caused by different acquisition methods of business and IT is to establish a centralized procurement approval process. A centralized procurement approval process is a process that organizations use to obtain approval for purchases that they intend to make. The process typically involves several steps, such as identifying a need, requesting a quote, obtaining quotes, and obtaining approval from a designated authority. By centralizing the procurement approval process, the organization can avoid duplication, inconsistency, and inefficiency in purchasing decisions. A centralized procurement approval process can also help the organization to achieve the following benefits :

• Visibility and control: The organization can have a clear view of all purchase requests and transactions, and can monitor and manage the budgets, requesters, and suppliers.
• Better purchasing power: The organization can leverage its volume and history to negotiate better prices and discounts with vendors, and can establish long-term relationships with preferred suppliers.
• Standardization: The organization can implement and enforce policies and standards for data quality, security, privacy, and usage, and can create a single source of truth for purchasing information.
• Eliminates maverick spending: The organization can identify and prevent individual spending that goes against the purchasing policies or that results in duplicate or unnecessary purchases.

Therefore, establishing a centralized procurement approval process is the best way to address the issue of duplicate purchases caused by different acquisition methods of business and IT. References: Centralized vs. Decentralized Purchasing: Key Differences | Pipefy, Centralizing Procurement: What Companies Need to Consider, What is the Procurement Approval Process: Detailed Guide

 Transparency is primarily achieved through performance measurement, as it involves providing clear, accurate, and timely information about the performance of IT processes, services, and projects to the relevant stakeholders. Performance measurement can help to increase the visibility, accountability, and trustworthiness of IT activities and outcomes, and to enable informed decision-making and feedback. The other options are not as primary, as they are more related to the results or consequences of performance measurement, rather than the purpose or intention of it. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.3: Performance Measurement and Reporting, Subsection 3.3.1: Performance Measurement and Reporting Overview, Page 112 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.3: Performance Measurement and Reporting, Subsection 3.3.2: Performance Measurement and Reporting Process, Page 113 : Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance1

 This is because a risk program is a strategic initiative that requires the support and involvement of the top leaders of the enterprise. Senior management can demonstrate their commitment to the risk program by:

• Providing clear direction and guidance on the objectives, scope, and approach of the risk program
• Allocating sufficient resources, budget, and authority to the risk program team
• Communicating the importance and benefits of the risk program to all stakeholders
• Encouraging a culture of risk awareness and accountability across the enterprise
• Reviewing and approving the risk program deliverables and outcomes
• Rewarding and recognizing the achievements and contributions of the risk program team and participants

A risk management framework (A) is a tool that helps to define and implement the risk program, but it does not ensure its success without senior management commitment. Mandatory risk awareness courses for staff (B) are a way to increase the knowledge and skills of the staff regarding risk management, but they do not guarantee their engagement and participation in the risk program without senior management endorsement. A risk recognition and reporting policy © is a document that establishes the rules and procedures for identifying and communicating risks, but it does not ensure its compliance and effectiveness without senior management oversight.

The primary objective for performing an IT due diligence review prior to the acquisition of a competitor is to assess the status of the risk profile of the competitor. IT due diligence is a process that evaluates the technology assets, capabilities, processes, and security of a target company. It helps to identify any potential risks, liabilities, gaps, or issues that could affect the value, integration, or performance of the acquisition. IT due diligence also helps to determine the synergies, opportunities, and costs of combining or separating the IT systems and resources of both companies. By conducting an IT due diligence review, the acquirer can gain a comprehensive understanding of the competitor’s IT environment and make informed decisions about the deal.

Documenting the competitor’s governance structure, ensuring that the competitor understands significant IT risks, and determining whether the competitor is using industry-accepted practices are not the primary objectives for performing an IT due diligence review. These are possible outcomes or benefits of the review, but they are not the main purpose or goal. The primary objective is to assess the risk profile of the competitor and its impact on the acquisition.

References := IT Due Diligence Checklist: Must-Assess Technology Elements Prior to Any Acquisition - Performance Improvement Partners Blog, Introduction section. IT Due Diligence: How to Do It Right (+ Checklist) - DealRoom, What is IT due diligence? section. IT Due Diligence | Optimising IT, Introduction section. Reviewing It In Due Diligence, Overview section.

IT governance must be a component of enterprise governance, as it ensures that IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise goals and objectives. IT governance is the responsibility of the board of directors and executive management, and it is an integral part of enterprise governance123. IT governance also aligns IT with the enterprise strategy, delivers value from IT investments, manages IT risks and resources, and measures IT performance3. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 1: Ensure the definition, establishment, and management of a framework for the governance of enterprise IT in alignment with the mission, vision and values of the enterprise.

Delaying the control review of a payroll system project until after its implementation increases the risk of discovering control weaknesses or errors that could have been prevented or corrected earlier. This would result in increased cost to mitigate the deficiencies and ensure the system’s reliability and compliance. References: CGEIT Domain 4: Risk Optimization

Strategy mapping is an advantage of using strategy mapping, as it helps to visualize and communicate how the enterprise can create value by achieving its strategic objectives. Strategy mapping also helps to align the IT goals and activities with the enterprise strategy, and to measure and monitor the IT performance and outcomes123. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 3, Subtopic A: Performance Management, Task 2: Ensure that IT performance measurement supports IT performance management by providing relevant, complete, reliable, timely and consistent information.

Data definition and mapping sources from applications is the greatest challenge to implementing a business intelligence (BI) tool with data sources from various enterprise applications because it involves ensuring the consistency, accuracy, and quality of data across different systems and formats. Data definition and mapping requires defining common data elements, identifying data sources and targets, establishing data transformation rules, and resolving data conflicts and discrepancies. This is a complex and time-consuming process that requires a high level of coordination and collaboration among different stakeholders and data owners.

References:

• According to ISACA’s CGEIT Review Manual 2021, one of the key activities for ensuring effective IT-enabled business innovation is to "define and map data sources from various enterprise applications to the BI tool."1
• According to ISACA’s COBIT 2019 Framework, one of the governance objectives for managing data is to "ensure that data are defined consistently across the enterprise and that data quality issues are identified and resolved."2
• According to ISACA’s Business Intelligence: Governance and Analytics guide, one of the challenges for BI governance is to "ensure that data are properly defined, mapped, transformed, integrated, and validated across different sources and systems."3