CISA Exam Dumps - Certified Information Systems Auditor

The type of risk that would most influence the selection of a sampling methodology is detection risk (option D). This is because:

Detection risk is the risk that the auditor will not detect a material misstatement that exists in an assertion1. Detection risk depends on the effectiveness of the audit procedures and how well they are applied by the auditor1.

The selection of a sampling methodology is part of the design of audit procedures, which aims to reduce detection risk to an acceptable level1. The auditor should consider the following factors when selecting a sampling methodology23:

The objectives of the audit procedure and the related assertions.

The characteristics of the population from which the sample will be drawn, such as its size, homogeneity, and structure.

The sampling technique to be used, such as random, systematic, haphazard, or judgmental.

The sample size and the method of selecting sample items.

The evaluation of the sample results and the projection of errors to the population.

The auditor should also consider the advantages and disadvantages of different sampling methodologies, such as statistical and non-statistical sampling23. Statistical sampling is a sampling technique that uses random selection and probability theory to evaluate sample results. Non-statistical sampling is a sampling technique that does not use random selection or probability theory to evaluate sample results. Some of the advantages and disadvantages are as follows23:

Statistical sampling allows the auditor to measure and control sampling risk, which is the risk that the sample is not representative of the population. Statistical sampling also allows the auditor to quantify the precision and reliability of the sample results. However, statistical sampling requires more technical knowledge and skills, as well as more time and cost, than non-statistical sampling.

Non-statistical sampling relies on the auditor’s professional judgment and experience to select and evaluate sample items. Non-statistical sampling is more flexible and less complex than statistical sampling. However, non-statistical sampling does not provide an objective basis for measuring and controlling sampling risk, nor does it allow the auditor to quantify the precision and reliability of the sample results.

Therefore, the type of risk that would most influence the selection of a sampling methodology is detection risk (option D), as it determines how effective and efficient the audit procedures should be in order to provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence.

References: 1: Audit Sampling - Overview, Purpose, Importance, and Types 2: Audit Sampling | Auditing and Attestation | CPA Exam FAR 3: Audit Sampling | ACCA Qualification | Students | ACCA Global

Automated version control systems are the best method to maintain an audit trail of changes made to the source code of a program. They automatically track and manage changes to the source code over time, allowing you to see what changes were made, when they were made, and who made them1. This provides a clear and detailed audit trail that can be invaluable for debugging, understanding the evolution of the code, and ensuring accountability23.

A top-down approach in the development of IT policies means that the policies are derived from the strategic objectives and goals of the organization, and are aligned with the business needs and expectations. This should result in greater consistency across the organization, as the policies will be coherent, integrated and applicable to all levels and functions of the organization. A bottom-up approach, on the other hand, means that the policies are developed by individual units or departments based on their operational needs and preferences, which may lead to inconsistency, duplication orconflict among different policies. References: ISACA Frameworks: Blueprints for Success, IT Governance and Process Maturity

The best course of action for a security administrator who is called in the middle of the night by the on-call programmer who needs access to the live system is to give the programmer an emergency ID for temporary access and review the activity. This is because:

Requiring that a change request be completed and approved may delay the resolution of the problem and cause further damage or disruption to the system or business operations. A change request is a formal document that describes the proposed change, its rationale, impact, benefits, risks, costs, and approval process. A change request is usually required for planned or scheduled changes, not for emergency or urgent changes.

Giving the programmer read-only access to investigate the problem may not be sufficient or effective, as the programmer may need to perform actions or tests that require write or execute permissions. Read-only access means that the user can only view or copy data or files, but cannot modify or delete them.

Reviewing activity logs the following day and investigating any suspicious activity may not prevent or detect any unauthorized or malicious actions by the programmer in real time. Activity logs are records of events and actions that occur within a system or network. Activity logs can provide evidence and accountability for system activities, but they are not proactive or preventive controls.

Therefore, giving the programmer an emergency ID for temporary access and reviewing the activity is the best course of action, as it allows the programmer to access the live system and resolve the problem quickly, while also ensuring that the security administrator can monitor and verify the programmer’s activity and revoke the access when it is no longer needed. An emergency ID is a temporary account that grants a user elevated privileges or access to a system or resource for a specific purpose and duration. An emergency ID should be:

Created and authorized by a security administrator or manager

Assigned to a specific user and purpose

Limited in scope and time

Logged and audited

Revoked and deleted after use

Some of the best practices for emergency access to live systems are12:

Establish clear policies and procedures for requesting, approving, granting, monitoring, reviewing, and revoking emergency access

Define criteria and scenarios for emergency access, such as severity, impact, urgency, and risk

Implement controls to prevent unauthorized or unnecessary use of emergency access, such as multifactor authentication, approval workflows, alerts, notifications, and time restrictions

Implement controls to track and audit emergency access activities, such as logging, reporting, analysis, and investigation

Implement controls to ensure accountability and responsibility for emergency access users, such as attestation, justification, documentation, and feedback

The IS audit standard for proficiency states that the IS auditor must have the knowledge, skills and experience needed to perform the audit work. This implies that the IS auditor must be competent in both the technical and business aspects of the audit subject matter. Therefore, team member assignments must be based on individual competencies, so that each auditor can perform the tasks that match their qualifications and expertise. This will also ensure that the audit objectives are met and the audit quality is maintained.

Option B is incorrect because technical co-sourcing is not a requirement to meet the IS audit standard for proficiency. Co-sourcing is an option that may be used when the internal audit function lacks the necessary resources or skills to perform the audit work. However, co-sourcing does not guarantee that the new staff will acquire the proficiency needed for the audit. Moreover, co-sourcing may introduce additional risks and challenges, such as confidentiality, independence, communication and coordination issues.

Option C is incorrect because having a globally recognized audit certification does not necessarily mean that the standard for proficiency is met. A certification is an indication of the auditor’s knowledge and competence in a specific domain, but it does not cover all aspects of IS auditing. The auditor must also have relevant experience and continuous learning to maintain and enhance their proficiency. Furthermore, having one certified member does not ensure that the other members are also proficient.

Option D is incorrect because having a supervisor review the new auditors’ work is not sufficient to meet the IS audit standard for proficiency. A supervisor review is a quality assurance measure that helps to ensure that the audit work is performed in accordance with the standards and policies.However, a supervisor review does not substitute for the proficiency of the auditors who perform the work. The auditors must still have the necessary knowledge, skills and experience to conduct the audit tasks effectively and efficiently.

References:

CISA Online Review Course1, Module 1: The Process of Auditing Information Systems, Lesson 2: Mandatory Guidance, slide 8-9.

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)2, Chapter 1: The Process of Auditing Information Systems, Section 1.3: Mandatory Guidance, p. 24-25.

CISA Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 1: The Process of Auditing Information Systems, Section 1.3: Mandatory Guidance, p. 24-25.

CISA Questions, Answers & Explanations Database3, Question ID: QAE_CISA_711.

 The rules of engagement define the scope, objectives, methodology, deliverables, and limitations of the penetration testing. They also specify the legal and ethical boundaries, communication channels, and escalation procedures. Establishing the rules of engagement is the first step when planning to conduct penetration testing for a client, as it ensures that both parties agree on the expectations and outcomes of the testing. The other options are important steps, but they should be done after the rules of engagement are established. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) 1, page 381.

The best way to provide assurance that a project is adhering to the project plan is to conduct compliance audits at major system milestones. A compliance audit is a systematic and independent examination of the project’s activities, documents, and deliverables to determine whether they conform to the project plan and its specifications, standards, and requirements1. A major system milestone is a significant point or event in the project’s life cycle that marks the completion of a phase, stage, or deliverable2.

By conducting compliance audits at major system milestones, the auditor can provide assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan by:

Verifying that the project’s scope, schedule, budget, quality, and risks are aligned with the project plan and its objectives1

Identifying any deviations, discrepancies, or non-compliances that may affect the project’s performance or outcome1

Recommending and monitoring corrective and preventive actions to address the identified issues and improve the project’s compliance1

Reporting and communicating the audit findings, conclusions, and recommendations to the relevant stakeholders1

The other options are not as effective as conducting compliance audits at major system milestones for providing assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan. Requiring design reviews at appropriate points in the life cycle is a useful technique for ensuring that the project’s design meets the user and business requirements and follows the design standards and best practices3. However, design reviews are not sufficient for providing assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan, as they do not cover other aspects of the project such as schedule, budget, quality, or risks. Having an IS auditor participate on the steering committee is a possible way for providing assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan, as the auditor can provide independent advice and oversight to the steering committee on quality management issues and remediation efforts4. However, this may not be feasible or appropriate for every project, as it may create a conflict of interest or compromise the auditor’s objectivity and independence. Having an IS auditor participate on the quality assurance (QA) team is another possible way for providing assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan, as the auditor can assist the QA team in implementing procedures to facilitate adoption of quality management best practices5. However, this may also not be feasible or appropriate for every project, as it may create a conflict of interest or compromise the auditor’s objectivity and independence. Therefore, option D is the correct answer.

References:

What Is Compliance Audit? Definition & Process | ASQ

What Is A Project Milestone? - The Basics

Design Review - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Project success through project assurance - Project Management Institute

Quality Assurance Team: Roles & Responsibilities

The primary purpose of creating a simulated production environment with multiple vulnerable applications is D. To attract attackers in order to study their behavior. This is also known as a honeypot, which is a decoy system that mimics a real target and lures attackers into revealing their techniques, tools, and motives1. A honeypot can help the organization’s security team to improve their defense strategies, identify new threats, and collect digital evidence of cyberattacks1.