JN0-683 Exam Dumps - Data Center Professional (JNCIP-DC) Exam

Scenario Overview:

Converting an MX Series router from a VXLAN Layer 2 gateway to a VXLAN Layer 3 gateway involves transitioning the router's functionality from simply bridging traffic within a VXLAN segment to routing traffic between different segments.

Key Configuration Requirement:

IRB (Integrated Routing and Bridging) Interface:An IRB interface allows for both Layer 2 switching and Layer 3 routing. To enable routing for a specific VNI (VXLAN Network Identifier), the IRB interface must be associated with the routing function in the corresponding bridge domain.

Correct Command:

C. set bridge-domains VLAN-100 routing-interface irb.100:This command correctly binds the IRB interface to the bridge domain, enabling Layer 3 routing functionality within the VXLAN for VNI 100. This effectively transitions the device from operating solely as a Layer 2 gateway to a Layer 3 gateway.

Data Center References:

This configuration step is essential when converting a Layer 2 VXLAN gateway to a Layer 3 gateway, enabling the MX Series router to route between VXLAN segments.

Load Balancing in VXLAN:

VXLAN uses UDP encapsulation to transport Layer 2 frames over an IP network. For load balancing across Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) links, various fields in the packet can be used to ensure even distribution of traffic.

Key Load Balancing Fields:

C. The source port in the UDP header is used to load balance VXLAN traffic:This is correct. The source UDP port in the VXLAN packet is typically calculated based on a hash of the inner packet's fields. This makes the source port vary between packets, enabling effective load balancing across multiple paths.

D. The inner packet fields are used in the hash for load balancing:This is also correct. Fields such as the source and destination IP addresses, source and destination MACaddresses, and possibly even higher-layer protocol information from the inner packet can be used to generate the hash that determines the ECMP path.

Incorrect Statements:

A. The inner packet fields are not used in the hash for load balancing:This is incorrect as the inner packet fields are indeed critical for generating the hash used in load balancing.

B. The destination port in the UDP header is used to load balance VXLAN traffic:This is incorrect because the destination UDP port in VXLAN packets is typically fixed (e.g., port 4789 for VXLAN), and therefore cannot be used for effective load balancing.

Data Center References:

Effective load balancing in VXLAN is crucial for ensuring high throughput and avoiding congestion on specific links. By using a combination of the source UDP port and inner packet fields, the network can distribute traffic evenly across available paths.

MAC Move Limiting:

MAC move limiting is a security feature used in network switches to detect and mitigate rapid changes in MAC address locations, which could indicate a network issue or an attack such as MAC flapping or spoofing.

When a MAC address is learned on a different interface than it was previously learned, the switch can take various actions to prevent potential issues.

Available Actions:

A. drop:This action drops packets from the MAC address if it violates the move limit, effectively blocking communication from the offending MAC address.

D. log:This action logs the MAC move event without disrupting traffic, allowing network administrators to monitor and investigate the event.

E. shutdown:This action shuts down the interface on which the MAC address violation occurred, effectively stopping all traffic on that interface to prevent further issues.

Other Actions (Not Correct):

B. filter:Filtering is not typically associated with MAC move limiting; it generally refers to applying ACLs or other mechanisms to filter traffic.

C. enable:This is not an action related to MAC move limiting, as it does not represent a specific reaction to a MAC move event.

Data Center References:

MAC move limiting is crucial for maintaining network stability and security, particularly in environments with dynamic or large-scale Layer 2 networks where MAC addresses might frequently change locations.

ï‚· Understanding the Problem:

Host1 (10.1.1.1) is failing to communicate with Host2 (10.1.2.1) within an EVPN-VXLAN environment using ERB architecture.

ï‚· Analysis of the Exhibit:

The provided output includes information from the show route forwarding-table matching command for IP 10.1.2.1. The next hop is shown as vtep.32769, which indicates that the traffic destined for 10.1.2.1 is being forwarded into the VXLAN tunnel with the correct VTEP (VXLAN Tunnel Endpoint).

ï‚· Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—The traffic from Host1 is entering the VXLAN tunnel, as evidenced by the next hop pointing to a VTEP. However, the issue could lie elsewhere, possibly with the remote VTEP, routing configurations, or the receiving leaf/spine devices.

Controlling Traffic Within a Tenant's Network:

The requirement is to limit access to specific traffic types within a tenant’s network without routing all tenant traffic through a firewall. This requires a selective method that can direct specific types of traffic to different paths based on the nature of the traffic.

Filter-Based Forwarding (FBF):

FBF is a technique that allows for routing decisions based on filters applied to the traffic, such as matching on source IP addresses, destination IP addresses, or even specific application types (like HTTP or FTP). This allows specific types of traffic to be forwardedto a specific next hop (e.g., a firewall) without affecting the entire traffic flow within the tenant's network.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Filter-based forwarding allows for granular control of traffic, ensuring that only specific types of traffic within the tenant's network are redirected through a firewall, satisfying the requirement.

Understanding EBGP in an IP Fabric:

EBGP (External Border Gateway Protocol) is commonly used in IP fabrics to establish peering between routers, such as leaf and spine nodes, without relying on an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) like OSPF or IS-IS.

IGP Requirement for EBGP:

Option B:EBGP peering does not require an IGP for adjacency establishment. This is because EBGP peers are typically directly connected, and BGP establishes its own sessions without needing an underlying IGP.

Leaf-to-Spine Peering:

Option C:In a typical IP fabric, each leaf node establishes an EBGP session with every spine node. This ensures full connectivity between leaves and spines, facilitating efficient routing and forwarding within the fabric.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—EBGP does not require an IGP for establishing peering sessions.

Option C:Correct—Each leaf node peers with every spine node, which is a standard practice in IP fabrics to ensure connectivity and redundancy.

Review of the Exhibit:

The exhibit shows the switch configuration for Leaf-1 and Leaf-2. The configurations include route distinguishers, VRF targets, and service IDs, all of which are crucial for ensuring proper operation in an EVPN-VXLAN environment.

Service-ID Consistency:

The service ID must be consistent across all participating leaf devices in the same EVPN instance to ensure that they are part of the same VXLAN overlay network.

VRF Target Consistency:

The vrf-target parameter must also be consistent across devices to ensure that VRFs (Virtual Routing and Forwarding instances) are correctly imported and exported between leaf nodes.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Setting the same service-id on Leaf-2 ensures that it is part of the same VXLAN overlay as Leaf-1.

Option D:Correct—The vrf-target on Leaf-2 should match Leaf-1 to ensure consistent routing policies and proper route exchange.

Understanding Bridged Overlay Architecture:

In a single-tenant data center using a bridged overlay architecture, virtual networks (VLANs) are typically isolated within the fabric, with traffic between these VLANs handled outside the fabric.

Communication Between Different Virtual Networks:

A. off-fabric using an external device:This is correct. In many bridged overlay architectures, communication between different virtual networks is handled off-fabric, often using an external router or firewall that connects the different VLANs. The fabric itself primarily provides Layer 2 connectivity within each VLAN, leaving inter-VLAN routing to be handled externally.

Data Center References:

This design is common in smaller or simpler data center environments where a single tenant does not require complex on-fabric routing and prefers to handle inter-VLAN routing through dedicated devices.

VXLAN Traffic Verification:

To ensure VXLAN traffic from the xe-0/0/12 interface is correctly encapsulated by the logical vtep.32770 and sent to a remote leaf device, it is essential to monitor the relevant interface statistics.

The command show interfaces terse vtep.32770 statistics provides a concise overview of the traffic statistics for the specific VTEP interface, which can help verify whether traffic is being correctly encapsulated and transmitted.

Explanation:

This command is particularly useful for quickly checking the traffic counters and identifying any potential issues with VXLAN encapsulation or transmission.

It allows you to confirm that traffic is flowing as expected, by checking the transmitted and received packet counters.

Data Center References:

Monitoring interface statistics is a crucial step in troubleshooting and validating network traffic, particularly in complex overlay environments like EVPN-VXLAN.

Telemetry Methods in Junos:

Telemetry is used to collect and report data from network devices. For high-frequency statistics reporting, such as every five seconds, you need a telemetry method that supports this level of granularity and real-time monitoring.

Junos Native Sensors:

Option C:Native Sensors in Junos provide detailed, high-frequency telemetry data, including TX and RX traffic statistics for interfaces. They are designed to offer real-time monitoring with customizable sampling intervals, making them ideal for the five-second reporting requirement.

Conclusion:

Option C:Correct—Native Sensors in Junos are capable of providing the required high-frequency telemetry data every five seconds.

Understanding the Configuration:

The exhibit shows configurations for two VRFs (Customer_A and Customer_B) with specific VLANs and VNIs assigned. Each VRF has interfaces (IRBs) associated with particular VLANs.

Communication Between VLANs and Routing Instances:

Option B:VLAN 400 (irb.400) is part of Customer_B, and there is no direct connection or routing between Customer_A and Customer_B in the configuration provided. Therefore, devices in irb.400 cannot communicate directly with devices in the Customer_A routing instance.

Option D:Since irb.400 (VLAN 400) and irb.800 (VLAN 800) are part of the same routing instance (Customer_B), they can communicate over the fabric using VXLAN encapsulation.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—There is no direct communication between devices in irb.400 (Customer_B) and routing instance Customer_A.

Option D:Correct—Devices in VLAN 400 and VLAN 800 can communicate within the Customer_B routing instance over the fabric.

Understanding BGP Configuration in the Exhibit:

The exhibit shows a BGP configuration on spine1 with a group named underlay, configured to peer with directly connected interfaces of other devices in the network.

Multipath multiple-as:This statement allows the router to install multiple paths in the routing table for routes learned from different ASes, facilitating load balancing.

Key Statements:

A. The multihop statement is not required to establish the underlay BGP sessions:In this case, the BGP peers are directly connected (as indicated by their neighbor IP addresses), so the multihop statement is unnecessary. Multihop is typically used when BGP peers are not directly connected and packets need to traverse multiple hops.

D. Load balancing for the underlay is configured correctly:The multipath { multiple-as; } statement in the configuration enables load balancing across multiple paths from different autonomous systems, which is appropriate for underlay networks in data center fabrics.

Incorrect Statements:

C. The multihop statement is required to establish the underlay BGP sessions:This is incorrect because the peers are directly connected, making the multihop statement unnecessary.

B. Load balancing for the underlay is not configured correctly:This is incorrect because the configuration includes the necessary multipath settings for load balancing.

Data Center References:

BGP configurations in EVPN-VXLAN underlay networks are crucial for ensuring redundancy, load balancing, and efficient route propagation across the data center fabric.

Understanding Seamless Stitching:

Seamless stitching is used in EVPN to interconnect two data centers, allowing for consistent Layer 2 and Layer 3 connectivity across them. This is often achieved by translating VNIs (Virtual Network Identifiers) between the data centers.

Translation-VNI:

Option B:The translation VNI must be different in each data center to ensure that traffic can be correctly routed and distinguished as it crosses between the data centers. This differentiation helps to maintain the integrity of the traffic flows and prevents any potential overlap or conflict in VNIs.

Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI):

Option D:The ESI must match in both data centers to ensure that the same Ethernet segment (which could be multihomed) is recognized consistently across the data centers. Matching ESIs are crucial for maintaining a unified view of the Ethernet segment across the interconnected fabric.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Translation VNIs must be unique to each data center for proper traffic distinction.

Option D:Correct—Matching ESIs are necessary to maintain consistent Ethernet segment identification across both data centers.

Understanding the Configuration:

The configuration shown in the exhibit involves an EVPN (Ethernet VPN) setup using BGP as the routing protocol. The export policy named CHANGE_NH is applied to the BGP group evpn-peer, which includes a rule to change the next hop for routes that match the policy.

Issue with Next Hop Not Changing:

The policy CHANGE_NH is correctly configured to change the next hop to 203.0.113.10 for the matching routes. However, the next hop remains unchanged when advertising EVPN routes to the peer 203.0.113.2.

Reason for the Issue:

In Junos OS, when exporting routes for VPNs (including EVPN), the next-hop change defined in a policy will not take effect unless the vpn-apply-export parameter is used inthe BGP configuration. This parameter ensures that the export policy is applied specifically to VPN routes.

The vpn-apply-export parameter must be included to apply the next-hop change to EVPN routes.

Correct Answer Explanation:

D. The vpn-apply-export parameter must be applied to this peer:This is the correct solution because the next hop in EVPN routes won't be altered without this parameter in the BGP configuration. It instructs the BGP process to apply the export policy to the EVPN routes.

Data Center References:

This behavior is standard in EVPN deployments with Juniper Networks devices, where the export policies applied to VPN routes require explicit invocation using vpn-apply-export to take effect.

Understanding Oversubscription in a Clos Fabric:

The oversubscription ratio in a Clos IP fabric measures the ratio of the amount of edge (leaf) bandwidth to the core (spine) bandwidth. An oversubscription ratio of 3:1 means that there is three times more edge bandwidth compared to core bandwidth.

Impact of Adding/Removing Spine Devices:

Option C:If youremove spine devices, the total available core bandwidth decreases, while the edge bandwidth remains the same. This results in anincrease in the oversubscription ratiobecause there is now less core bandwidth to handle the same amount of edge traffic.

Option B:Conversely, if youadd spine devices, the total core bandwidth increases. This decreases the oversubscription ratio because more core bandwidth is available to handle the edge traffic.

Conclusion:

Option C:Correct—Removing spine devices increases the oversubscription ratio.

Option B:Correct—Adding spine devices decreases the oversubscription ratio.

Understanding Multihomed CE-to-PE VXLAN Environment:

In a VXLAN environment using EVPN signaling, multiple PEs (Provider Edge devices) can be connected to the same CE (Customer Edge device). This setup is referred to as multihoming, where a CE device has multiple connections to the network to ensure redundancy and load balancing.

Role of the Designated Forwarder:

The designated forwarder (DF) is a mechanism used in EVPN to manage the forwarding of broadcast, unknown unicast, and multicast (BUM) traffic in a multihomed environment. The DF is selected to ensure that only one of the PEs forwards this type of traffic to the CE, preventing loops and unnecessary duplicate packets.

Avoiding Duplicate Packets:

Without a designated forwarder, all PEs connected to a multihomed CE could potentially forward the same packet to the CE, resulting in duplicate packets. This duplication can cause issues with packet processing on the CE, leading to inefficiencies and potential network problems.

Conclusion:

Option D:Correct—The designated forwarder is essential to prevent duplicate packets from being received on multihomed hosts, ensuring that only one PE forwards BUM traffic to the CE.