LLQP Exam Dumps - Life License Qualification Program (LLQP)

Beneficiary changes in insurance contracts generally become effective once the insurer receives and processes the signed change form. This is supported by LLQP material, which specifies that changes to beneficiary designations must be documented and received by the insurer for the new designation to take effect. Since Linda is a revocable beneficiary, Luisa can make this change without requiring Linda's consent​​.

Option B is incorrect as revocable beneficiaries do not require consent for changes. Option C is too general, and D is incorrect because a formal written change form is typically required.

Mohammed’s plan allows him to make contributions that are not tax-deductible, and he is also not taxed on withdrawals, indicating that his employer’s plan is a group TFSA. In a TFSA, contributions are made with after-tax dollars, and withdrawals (including any growth) are tax-free, consistent with the LLQP outline on TFSAs. This is distinct from other retirement accounts, such as RRSPs, which provide tax deductions on contributions but tax the withdrawals as income​​.

Options A, B, and D are incorrect because these plans involve different tax treatments where contributions may be tax-deductible, and withdrawals are generally taxable.

Kadiha’s investment in a segregated fund with a 75% maturity guarantee means that upon maturity, she is guaranteed to receive 75% of her original investment, which would be $7,500 (75% of $10,000). The payment is considered part of the maturity guarantee under segregated fund contracts, and the difference paid out by the insurer to meet the guarantee ($2,500 in this case) is not subject to capital gains or interest income tax as it’s part of the guaranteed benefit. According to LLQP guidelines, segregated funds with such guarantees only tax the difference as capital gains if the payout exceeds the original investment, which is not applicable here​​.

Rachel should inform Owen that some segregated funds offer an automatic reset feature, which adjusts the guaranteed value periodically based on the fund’s market performance. This can lock in gains during rising markets without requiring manual intervention. According to LLQP resources, automatic resets can occur on specific anniversaries or under certain conditions specified in the contract​.

Option A is incorrect as not all segregated funds offer a reset feature. Option C is incorrect as there may be costs associated with funds that provide reset options. Option D is incorrect because resets typically lock in gains, not losses.

Since Caleb is looking for a fund that mirrors the S&P/TSX Composite index, an index fund would be the best choice. Index funds are specifically designed to track the performance of a specific index, providing broad market exposure at a low cost. This aligns with Caleb’s objectives of long-term investment with a strategy that matches a known market benchmark, as emphasized in LLQP’s sections on investment options​.

Other options like equity, dividend, and target date funds do not directly track an index in the way that an index fund does, making them less suitable for Caleb’s stated preference.

In cases where multiple insurers are involved in covering a large sum assured, it is common practice for each insurer to pay their respective portion of the death benefit directly to the beneficiary. Here, United Life insures $3 million and Extra Life insures the remaining $7 million. Upon Maxine’s death, each company is responsible for paying out their portion, meaning United Life will pay $3 million and Extra Life will pay $7 million directly to the beneficiary. Assuris, mentioned in Option D, is an industry-backed entity that provides protection in case of an insurer’s insolvency but does not issue death benefits​​​.

When Coraline assigns her whole life insurance policy to a charitable organization, she can claim the entire policy’s fair market value as a charitable donation for tax credit purposes, which is generally the death benefit if there is no significant accumulated cash value. Since Coraline continues to pay the premiums, the policy remains in force. Thus, she can claim the$250,000face value of the policy as her charitable donation, which is eligible for a tax credit. Monthly premium amounts (Options B and C) or a lack of CSV (Option A) do not limit her eligibility for the credit based on the policy’s value.Therefore,Option Dis correct​.

When Larissa passes away, her RRSP will be fully taxable on her final income tax return, as it is considered income in the year of death unless rolled over to a qualified beneficiary, such as a spouse. Her TFSA, on the other hand, is not taxable upon death as it passes tax-free to the beneficiary or estate. The principal residence (condo) and cottage may incur capital gains tax, but they are not fully taxable as income.Therefore,Option D, the RRSP, is correct​.