PMI-PBA Exam Dumps - PMI Professional in Business Analysis

 Documenting the source of each requirement in the requirements traceability matrix allows for easy identification of the requestor and facilitates communication with stakeholders. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

 A user survey is a technique that can be used to determine how well the solution meets the business case. A user survey is a method of collecting feedback from the end users of the solution about their satisfaction, preferences, expectations, needs, problems, or suggestions. A user survey can help to measure the performance, quality, usability, and value of the solution and compare it with the expected benefits and outcomes defined in the business case. A user survey can also help to identify areas for improvement or enhancement of the solution. Asking the sponsor for feedback is not sufficient to determine how well the solution meets the business case, as it does not capture the perspective of the end users who are directly affected by the solution. Surveying the project is not relevant to this scenario, as it does not focus on the solution but rather on the project management processes and practices. Comparing the results of day-in-the-life (DITL) testing and integration testing is not effective, as it does not reflect the actual usage and experience of the solution by the end users after deployment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

 Operational feasibility is the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking to understand how well a potential solution fits into the organization. Operational feasibility evaluates how the solution will affect the current operations, processes, culture, and people of the organization. It also considers how the solution will be accepted, adopted, and used by the stakeholders. Technical feasibility is not the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking, as it evaluates how the solution can be implemented using the available technology, infrastructure, and resources. Cost-effectiveness feasibility is not the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking, as it evaluates how the solution will provide benefits that outweigh its costs. Time feasibility is not the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking, as it evaluates how long it will take to implement the solution and whether it can meet the desired schedule. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 41-42 1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 14 

The business analyst could use the expected vs. actual results technique to iteratively validate the solution. This technique involves comparing the expected results or outcomes of the solution with the actual results or outcomes that are observed or measured after the solution is implemented. This technique helps to verify that the solution meets the requirements and the acceptance criteria, and to identify any gaps, issues, or defects that need to be resolved or corrected. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 25; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 141.

 The change control process is a set of procedures and tools that are used to manage changes to the requirements and the solution throughout the project life cycle. The change control process is defined in the business analysis plan, which is a document that describes how the business analysis activities will be performed, monitored, and controlled. The business analysis plan also specifies the roles and responsibilities of the business analyst and other stakeholders involved in the change control process. The business analyst should follow the change control process as defined in the business analysis plan to ensure that any changes to the requirements are properly documented, analyzed, approved, communicated, and implemented. By following the change control process, the business analyst can avoid scope creep, maintain the quality and integrity of the requirements, and align the solution with the business needs and objectives. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

Requirements are statements of the needs, expectations, or conditions that must be met by a solution. Requirements should be clear, complete, consistent, and testable, so that they can be understood, verified, and validated by the stakeholders. If the requirements are not ready for peer review, it means that they have not met these quality criteria, and that they need to be refined or revised. One possible cause of this situation is that the requirements do not provide all of the information needed to define the work, such as the scope, objectives, deliverables, assumptions, constraints, risks, dependencies, etc. This would make it difficult for the peer reviewers to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and alignment of the requirements with the business needs and goals. The other options are not likely to cause this problem. Some requirements having not yet been discussed in a work group session is not a reason to delay the peer review, as long as the requirements have been elicited from the relevant sources and documented properly. The requirements’ reference codes not tracing to the attribute numbers in the work breakdown structure is a minor issue that can be easily fixed by updating the reference codes or the work breakdown structure. The requirements documents having not yet received sign-off from the sponsor is not a prerequisite for peer review, as sign-off is usually obtained after the peer review and validation process. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

 A capability table is a tool that lists the current capabilities of an application and compares them with the desired capabilities identified by the end users. A capability table can help the business analyst to analyze this information and determine project scope by showing the gaps between the current and future states of the application, and prioritizing the new features that will address those gaps. A capability table can also help to define the high-level requirements and objectives of the project. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 67.

 Interface analysis is a technique that should be used to analyze input to and output from the product for a large, highly complex project with significant risk. Interface analysis is a technique that involves identifying and specifying how different components of a product interact with each other or with external systems or users. Interface analysis can help to define and document the data flows, formats, protocols, rules, and behaviors of each interface. Interface analysis can also help to identify and mitigate any risks or issues related to compatibility, integration, interoperability, or usability of the product. System analysis is not a technique that should be used to analyze input to and output from the product for a large, highly complex project with significant risk. System analysis is a broad term that refers to various activities and techniques for studying, designing, developing, testing, or maintaining a system. System analysis can include interface analysis as one of its aspects, but it is not a specific technique for analyzing input to and output from the product. Dependency analysis is not a technique that should be used to analyze input to and output from the product for a large, highly complex project with significant risk. Dependency analysis is a technique that involves identifying and evaluating how different elements of a project or a product depend on each other or on external factors. Dependency analysis can help to determine the impact of changes, prioritize tasks, allocate resources, or manage risks. Dependency analysis can include interface analysis as one of its aspects, but it is not a specific technique for analyzing input to and output from the product. Risk analysis is not a technique that should be used to analyze input to and output from the product for a large, highly complex project with significant risk. Risk analysis is a technique that involves identifying and assessing potential threats or uncertainties that may affect a project or a product. Risk analysis can help to quantify or qualify risks, prioritize risks, plan responses, or monitor risks. Risk analysis can include interface analysis as one of its aspects, but it is not a specific technique for analyzing input to and output from the product. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 78-79; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 16-17.