PMI-RMP Exam Dumps - PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP) Exam

The process of assessing the likelihood and impact of each identified risk is part of the Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis process. This process helps prioritize risks based on their probability and impact, allowing the project team to focus on the most significant risks. By doing so, the project manager and team can allocate resources and effort to address the risks that pose the greatest threat or opportunity to the project.

The process of assessing the likelihood and impact of each risk is part of the Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis process, which is the process of prioritizing individual project risks for further analysis or action by assessing their probability of occurrence and impact as well as other characteristics. This process helps the project manager and the team to focus on the high-priority risks that have the most influence on achieving the project objectives. The other processes are not relevant to the question scenario. Plan Risk Management is the process of defining how to conduct risk management activities for a project. Perform Quantitative Risk Analysis is the process of numerically analyzing the effect of identified risks on overall project objectives. Monitor and Control Risk is the process of implementing risk response plans, tracking identified risks, monitoring residual risks, identifying new risks, and evaluating riskprocess effectiveness throughout the project. References: PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP) Examination Content Outline and Specifications, page 71. A Guide to the ProjectManagement Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, pages 397-3982.

According to the PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)® Examination Content Outline1, one of the tasks in the domain of Risk Response is to execute the approved risk response plan in accordance with project guidelines and procedures1. A risk response plan is acomponent of the project management plan that describes the agreed-upon and funded actions to address the project risks, both positive and negative2. In this scenario, the risk manager should execute the approved risk response plan to deal with the new risk that appears when requesting fuel from another supplier, which will cause delays with several other projects. The risk response plan should have been developed and approved during the riskresponse planning process, which involves selecting and prioritizing the appropriate risk strategies and actions for each risk3. The risk response plan should also be aligned with the project guidelines and procedures, which are the rules and directions that define the project’s scope, schedule, cost, quality,and other aspects4. The risk manager should not escalate the problem to the project sponsors, because that is not a risk response strategy, but rather a way to seek higher-level authority or support for a risk that is outside the project’s scope or influence5. The risk manager should not negotiate with the supplier to resolve the problem, because that is not a risk response strategy, but rather a procurement management techniquethat involves reaching a mutually acceptable agreement with the supplier on the terms and conditions of the contract6. The risk manager should not assign a team member to update the issue log, because that is not a risk response strategy, but rather a risk monitoring and reporting technique that involves tracking and documenting the issues that have occurred or are currently affecting the project7. References: 1: PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)® Examination Content Outline, page 102: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, page 4143: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, page 4404:A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, page 385: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, page 4376: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, page 4717: What Is an Issue Log? Templates & Tips7.

The risk manager should review the feature with the project team to determine the cause and impact of the untestability, and to identify possible solutions or alternatives. The risk manager should also update the risk register and the risk response plan accordingly. This is the best option among the given choices, as it involves the relevant stakeholders and follows the risk management process. Confirming the risk triggers are still valid is not sufficient, as it does not address the problem or its consequences. Asking the architect to develop acceptance criteria is not appropriate, as it may not be feasible or effective to test the feature with new criteria. Escalating the issue to the project board is premature, as it may not be necessary or desirable to involve the senior management without first analyzing the situation and proposing a course of action. References: PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition. Chapter 11: Project Risk Management, pp. 414-415. 5

When a key feature may not be testable due to changes in the environment, the risk manager should review the feature with the project team to understand the issue, assess its impact, and determine the appropriate risk response. This collaborative approach ensures that the team has a clear understanding of the situation and can work together to address the risk.

Increasing variances during the execution phase imply that the uncertainty and risk are increasing, as the project performance is deviating from the planned values.

According to the PMBOK® Guide – Sixth Edition1, variance analysis is a technique used to compare the actual performance of the project against the planned or expected performance. It can be applied to various aspects of the project, such as scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk. Variance analysis can help identify deviations from the baseline and determine the causes and impacts of those deviations. If the variances are shown as increasing, it means that the actual performance is deviating more and more from the planned performance, which impliesthat the uncertainty and risk are increasing. This could affect the project objectives and deliverables, and require corrective or preventive actions to bring the project back on track. The other options are not correct, as they are either too specific (B and D) or contradictory © to the result of the variance analysis. References: PMBOK® Guide – Sixth Edition, pages 262-263.

Variance analysis is a technique used to compare actual project performance against plannedperformance. In this scenario, the risk manager is comparing planned enablement sessions with actual sessions to identify discrepancies that could indicate potential risks. This approach allows the project team to monitor performance closely and take corrective actions as needed to keep the project on track, which is crucial for projects with strict timelines​.

 

The risk manager should include an escalation process in the risk management plan to address risks that may impact other projects. This ensures that any identified risks that could affect multiple projects are communicated and managed appropriately across the organization.

The risk manager should include an escalation process in the risk management plan to deal with risks that may affect other projects or the organization as a whole. An escalation process is a set of procedures that defines how and when risks should be communicated to higher levels of authority or responsibility for decision making or resolution. The escalation process should specify the criteria, roles, responsibilities, and communication channels for escalating risks. The risk manager should follow the escalation process when identifying risks that may have extensive impacts beyond the scope of the project. The other options are not appropriate actions for the risk manager to take. Contacting the risk managers of the other projects and informing them is not sufficient, as it does not ensure that the risks are properly addressed or resolved. Taking note of the extensive impact of these risks in the risk register is not enough, as it does not involve the necessary stakeholders or decision makers. Addressing the unique characteristics of these risks on a case-by-case basis is not consistent, as it does not follow a standard process or protocol. References: 2, 3, 4

The risk identification technique that the risk manager should use is the nominal group technique. This technique involves bringing stakeholders together to brainstorm potential risks and then ranking them based on their importance. This allows for interaction and collaboration among stakeholders, which can help ensure that an exhaustive list of risks is created.

The nominal group technique is a risk identification technique that involves the interaction and collaboration of stakeholders to generate an exhaustive list of risks. It is a structured process that allows each participant to share their ideas independently, then rank and prioritize them as a group. This technique ensures that all opinions are considered and reduces the influence ofdominant or biased individuals12

References: 1: PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)® Handbook, page 10 2: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, page 11.2.2.1

In qualitative risk analysis, in addition to probability and impact, other factors can be used to refine the risk prioritization. Three valid factors to consider are:

1. Urgency: This refers to the timeframe within which a risk is likely to occur or the speed at which it might impact the project. High urgency risks require quicker responses, making them more critical in prioritization.

2. Proximity: This factor considers the time until the risk might affect the project. Risks that are likely to occur sooner may be given higher priority because they may require immediate attention.

3. Detectability: This assesses how easily the presence or impact of a risk can be identified. Risks that are hard to detect might be more dangerous and may require more resources to monitor and manage.

These factors are mentioned in PMI's guidelines for qualitative risk analysis as they provide a more nuanced view of risks beyond just probability and impact, allowing for more targeted and effective risk management strategies​.