The CEO has asked the IT Director to create a SIAM strategy for ZYX that aligns with the mandate for change and the corporate strategy The CEO wants it as soon as possible.
What should the IT Director do?
One year ago. OUTSCO was appointed as the service integrator for ZYX. ZYXH provides the retained capabilities.
After a year of operating the SIAM model, OUTSCO has noticed that the 99 5% availability service level target for NEWBNK has been consistently overachieved by 0.4% every month.
In order to provide better value to ZYX and to challenge the service providers in their delivery, ZYXH would like to increase the availability target to 99 9% as soon as possible.
What is the best way of doing this?
The ZYX Board of Directors decided that the proposal from SIAMRUS for ZYXUK was not suitable to be used for the whole of the group, and asked the ZYXS IT Director to lead the creation of a new SIAM strategy. This new SIAM strategy has now been approved by the NEWGEN Executive Steering Board.
What is the best approach to ensure that the ZYXUK Management Board supports the implementation of this SIAM Strategy?
The SIAM strategy for ZYX has been agreed:
-There will be a mix of new service providers and continuing existing service providers
-An external service integrator will be appointed
-ZYXS will provide the service desk.
-An agreement has been reached with OUTSCO to extend their contract to provide services to ZYXUK by two years
As key activities for the critical path to implement the SIAM model for ZYX, three parties must be transitioned into the SIAM model (listed in random order):
-continuing service providers
-the service integrator
-new service providers
In this instance, which sequence of activities offers the least risk to continuity of service for all ZYX companies'?
The ZYXS IT Director has proposed to the CIO that ZYXS should be the service integrator in the new SIAM model. The CIO wants to validate if the necessary capabilities exist in ZYXS. The CIO has asked SIAMRUS to perform the assessment.
What is the first activity that SIAMRUS should carry out?
ZYXS has been appointed as the service integrator ZYXH will provide the retained capabilities The CEO has asked the ZYXS IT Director to prepare a governance approach for monitoring and measuring service performance that will support the achievement of the strategic objective to ensure delivery against contracts.
What is the best approach?
ZYX has decided to appoint ZYXS as service integrator using the lead supplier structure ZYXS will need to fill new roles with additional skilled resources The contract with OUTSCO will be terminated, and all the component services will be transitioned to FIELD$CO: MAILSCO. NETSCO. ZYXD and ZYXS
The SIAM Project Board has just agreed that after the transition there will no longer be a requirement for service delivery managers in ZYXUK to manage the outsourced contract with OUTSCO
What is the best way to deal with this situation?
Project NEWGEN was completed against demanding timescales Because of time pressures, ZYX reduced the scope for testing of the end-to-end processes.
-SIAMRUS is the service integrator and also provider of the service desk for the SIAM ecosystem
-ZYXS is the internal service provider for NEWBNK, which is hosted by OUTSCO
-NETSCO provides the wide area network connecting the OUTSCO data center to the banks using NEWBNK.
Since the transition to SIAM, users of NEWBNK have experienced a significant increase in the time taken to fix incidents The ZYX sales team is now experiencing resistance from customers who were expected to migrate to NEWBNK This is affecting the planned rollout of the new application The ZYX sales team has told the customers that the issues were caused by the providers to ZYX not working together, and not the NEWBNK application itself.
What is the best approach for SIAMRUS to improve the situation?