CGEIT Exam Dumps - Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam

Effective culture change is the process of transforming the values, beliefs, behaviors, and norms of the organization and its stakeholders to support the strategic alignment of business and IT goals. Effective culture change can enable the implementation of IT governance by:

• Creating a shared vision and understanding of the purpose, benefits, and expectations of IT governance
• Engaging and empowering the stakeholders to participate and collaborate in IT governance activities and decisions
• Fostering a culture of trust, transparency, accountability, and responsibility for IT governance outcomes
• Encouraging a culture of innovation, learning, and improvement for IT governance processes and practices
• Aligning the incentives and rewards with the IT governance objectives and performance

References:

• According to the CGEIT Review Manual 2022, "Culture is a key enabler for effective IT governance. Culture influences how people behave, communicate, collaborate, and make decisions. Culture also affects how people perceive, value, and use IT. Therefore, culture change is often necessary to implement IT governance successfully."1
• According to the ISACA article on Culture Change: A Critical Success Factor for Effective IT Governance2, “Culture change is not an easy task; it requires strong leadership, clear communication, stakeholder involvement, and continuous monitoring and feedback. However, culture change can also bring significant benefits for IT governance, such as improved alignment, engagement, performance, and value creation.”
• According to the CIO article on How to create a culture of innovation in IT3, “Creating a culture of innovation in IT requires more than hiring talented people and acquiring the latest technologies. It also requires a shift in mindset, behavior, and structure that fosters creativity, collaboration, experimentation, and learning.”

•  This is because the CEO is the highest-ranking executive in the organization, responsible for setting the vision, mission, values, and objectives of the enterprise1. The CEO also oversees the alignment of the IT strategy with the business strategy, ensuring that IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise goals2. The CEO plays a key role in IT governance, as they communicate and demonstrate the importance and value of IT to the board of directors, shareholders, customers, and other stakeholders2. The CEO also provides leadership, guidance, and support for the IT function, and holds it accountable for its performance and outcomes2.
• A. Evaluating return on investment (ROI) is not the primary role of the CEO in IT governance, as it is more related to the financial management and evaluation of IT projects and programs. The CEO may be involved in approving or reviewing the ROI of major IT investments, but they are not directly responsible for calculating or analyzing it3.
• B. Nominating IT steering committee membership is not the primary role of the CEO in IT governance, as it is more related to the governance structure and process of IT decision-making. The CEO may be a member or a chairperson of the IT steering committee, or they may delegate this role to another senior executive such as the CIO4. The CEO may also have some influence or input on the nomination of IT steering committee members, but they are not solely responsible for it4.
• D. Managing the risk governance process is not the primary role of the CEO in IT governance, as it is more related to the identification, assessment, mitigation, and monitoring of IT risks. The CEO may be involved in setting the risk appetite and tolerance for IT, or in overseeing or escalating major IT risks, but they are not directly responsible for managing the risk governance process

• This is because moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider means that the organization is outsourcing the development, deployment, maintenance, and operation of its IT applications to a third-party vendor. This implies that the organization is relinquishing some control and ownership over its IT applications, and relying on the vendor to provide the required functionality, performance, quality, and security1. Therefore, the organization needs to shift its focus from delivering IT services internally to managing IT services externally. This involves the following activities2:

The shift from service delivery to service management can have a significant impact on the IT governance framework, processes, policies, and practices of the organization. It can also affect the IT skills, roles, and responsibilities of the IT staff and stakeholders. Therefore, the organization needs to adapt and adjust its IT governance approach accordingly to ensure that it can effectively oversee and optimize its IT services in a SaaS environment3.

The other options, the integration of the IT department with business lines, the improvement of IT service alignment with business, and the necessity to update key risk indicators (KRIs) are not as significant as the shift from service delivery to service management for moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider from an IT governance perspective. They are more related to the outcomes or consequences of moving to a SaaS environment, rather than the impact or change itself. They may also not be unique or specific to a SaaS environment, as they may apply to other types or models of IT service delivery as well.

A third-party audit report is the most comprehensive source of information regarding the current status and effectiveness of a cloud provider’s controls. A third-party audit report is an independent and objective assessment of the cloud provider’s security, compliance, and performance by a qualified and reputable auditor. A third-party audit report can provide assurance to the cloud customers that the cloud provider has implemented adequate and effective controls to meet the industry standards and best practices, as well as the contractual obligations and customer expectations12.

A globally recognized certification is a credential that demonstrates that a cloud provider has met certain criteria or standards for security, quality, or performance. A globally recognized certification can provide some level of confidence to the cloud customers that the cloud provider has achieved a minimum level of compliance or competence, but it may not provide enough details or evidence about the current status and effectiveness of the cloud provider’s controls3.

A control self-assessment (CSA) is a process that enables a cloud provider to evaluate its own controls internally, without involving an external auditor. A CSA can help a cloud provider to identify and address any gaps or weaknesses in its controls, as well as to monitor and improve its performance. However, a CSA may not provide sufficient assurance to the cloud customers, as it may lack objectivity, transparency, and validity4.

A maturity assessment is a process that measures the level of maturity or capability of a cloud provider’s processes or practices. A maturity assessment can help a cloud provider to benchmark its performance against industry standards or best practices, as well as to identify areas for improvement or innovation. However, a maturity assessment may not provide enough information about the current status and effectiveness of the cloud provider’s controls, as it may focus more on the process rather than the outcome5.

References: 1: Cloud Security Auditing: Challenges and Emerging Approaches - IEEE Journals & Magazine1 2: Cloud Security Audit: What You Need to Know | CloudHealth by VMware2 3: Cloud Security Certifications: What You Need to Know | CloudHealth by VMware3 4: Control Self-Assessment - ISACA4 5: Maturity Assessment - ISACA

• This is because continuous testing of disaster recovery capabilities can help to evaluate and validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the disaster recovery plan, identify and address any gaps or issues, and implement any improvements or adjustments based on the lessons learned1. Continuous testing can also help to ensure that the disaster recovery plan is aligned with the current and future business needs and expectations, and that the disaster recovery team and stakeholders are familiar and prepared with their roles and responsibilities1.
• B. Increased training and monitoring for disaster recovery personnel who perform below expectations. This is not the best way to enable the enterprise to accomplish the objective of improving its disaster recovery capabilities, as it only focuses on one aspect of the disaster recovery plan, which is the human factor. While training and monitoring are important for enhancing the skills and performance of the disaster recovery personnel, they are not sufficient to address the other aspects of the disaster recovery plan, such as the technology, process, and communication factors2. Moreover, increased training and monitoring may not be effective if they are not based on a clear and comprehensive assessment of the disaster recovery capabilities and outcomes.
• C. Annual review and updates to the disaster recovery plan (DRP). This is not the best way to enable the enterprise to accomplish the objective of improving its disaster recovery capabilities, as it may not be frequent or timely enough to capture and respond to the changing business environment and requirements. An annual review and update may also be insufficient to test and validate the disaster recovery plan, as it may not cover all possible scenarios or situations that could occur in a real disaster3. A more agile and adaptive approach to reviewing and updating the disaster recovery plan is recommended, such as using a continuous improvement cycle or a stage-gate process4.
• D. Increased outsourcing of disaster recovery capabilities to ensure reliability. This is not the best way to enable the enterprise to accomplish the objective of improving its disaster recovery capabilities, as it may introduce new risks and challenges for the enterprise, such as loss of control, dependency, compatibility, security, compliance, and cost issues5. Outsourcing some or all of the disaster recovery capabilities may also reduce the involvement and ownership of the enterprise’s internal staff and stakeholders in the disaster recovery planning process, which could affect their commitment and readiness in case of a disaster5. Outsourcing should be carefully considered and evaluated based on the specific needs and circumstances of the enterprise, and should be complemented by a robust governance and management framework5.

Risk management is the process of identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating the uncertainties that may affect the achievement of objectives. Risk management helps to ensure that decisions are made with an awareness of probability and impact, which means that the likelihood and consequences of potential events are considered and weighed against the benefits and costs of the actions. This can help to optimize the risk-reward balance, enhance the quality and consistency of decision-making, and support the achievement of desired outcomes. References:

• CGEIT Review Manual 2021, Chapter 2: IT Risk Management, Section 2.1: Risk Management Overview, page 551
• CGEIT Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2021, Question 1, page 152
• The Benefits of Risk Management - PMI3

• This is because employee engagement is a key factor for the success of any change initiative, especially one that involves governance. Employee engagement refers to the degree of commitment, involvement, and ownership that employees have toward the organization and its goals1. By designing the implementation plan to engage employees across the enterprise, the organization can:

Designing the implementation plan to engage employees across the enterprise can help to ensure that the new governance initiative is understood, accepted, and adopted by all stakeholders, and that it delivers the desired outcomes and value.

The other options, staff have been trained on the new initiative, external consultants created the plan, and the plan assigns responsibility for completing milestones are not as indicative as the plan is designed to engage employees across the enterprise for the success of the implementation plan for a new governance initiative. They are more related to the execution and management of the implementation plan, rather than its design and alignment. They may also not be sufficient or effective for ensuring the success of the implementation plan, as they may not address the human and behavioral aspects of change, such as awareness, understanding, involvement, commitment, and ownership3. References := Employee Engagement: What Is It? | SHRM, How To Engage Employees In Organizational Change | Forbes, Change Management Best Practices: A Comprehensive Guide | Smartsheet

When an IT governance committee is reviewing its current risk management policy due to increased usage of social media within an enterprise, the first task should be to initiate an assessment of the impact on the business. This assessment will provide a comprehensive understanding of how social media usage affects various aspects of the business, including productivity, security, data privacy, and compliance with existing policies and regulations. Understanding the business impact will inform the committee's decisions on any necessary policy adjustments or controls to mitigate potential risks associated with social media usage. While reviewing current usage levels, blocking access, and reassessing BYOD policies are relevant considerations, they should be informed by an initial assessment of the business impact to ensure that any actions taken are aligned with the enterprise's strategic objectives and risk tolerance.