CGEIT Exam Dumps - Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam

An information governance framework is the structure that provides a holistic overview of the influences that inform how an organisation creates and manages its enterprise-wide information assets (records, information and data)1. It defines the roles, responsibilities, policies, standards, and processes for ensuring effective and secure information management. If a new and expanding enterprise has collected a large amount of data in a short period of time, it may face data breach and privacy risks if it does not have a robust and comprehensive information governance framework in place. Therefore, the IT steering committee’s first course of action should be to assess the current state of the information governance framework, identify any gaps or weaknesses, and implement improvements or changes as needed. This will help the enterprise to protect and preserve its information assets, comply with legal and regulatory requirements, and enable ethical and efficient use of information. Mitigating and tracking data-related issues and risks, modifying legal and regulatory data requirements, and defining data protection and privacy practices are important actions, but they are not the first course of action. They are more likely to be part of the implementation or improvement of the information governance framework after it has been assessed. References := Establishing an information governance framework

 Ensuring that the system is maintained in compliance with enterprise architecture (EA) standards is the most effective way to prevent an IT system from becoming technologically obsolete before its planned return on investment (ROI), because it ensures that the system is aligned with the current and future business needs, goals, and strategies of the organization. Enterprise architecture (EA) standards define the principles, guidelines, and best practices for designing, developing, and managing IT systems in a consistent, coherent, and integrated manner across the organization. By following EA standards, IT leaders can ensure that the system is compatible with the existing and emerging technologies, platforms, and frameworks that support the business processes and functions. EA standards also help IT leaders to monitor and evaluate the performance, quality, security, and reliability of the system, and to identify and address any gaps, issues, or risks that may affect its functionality or value. EA standards also facilitate the communication and collaboration among different stakeholders involved in the system lifecycle, such as business users, IT staff, vendors, and auditors. By maintaining the system in compliance with EA standards, IT leaders can ensure that the system delivers the expected benefits and value to the organization and achieves its planned ROI. References := ISO/IEC/IEEE 42020:2019(en), Software, systems and enterprise ? Architecture processes, Sample: Enterprise Architecture Standards - CIO Portal, Obsolescence management for IT leaders - Information Age

A business impact analysis (BIA) report is the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. A BIA report is a document that identifies and evaluates the potential effects of disruptions to critical business functions and processes. A BIA report can help estimate the financial, operational, reputational, and legal impacts of a risk event, as well as the recovery time and resources needed to resume normal operations. A BIA report can also help prioritize the recovery strategies and objectives based on the criticality and urgency of the business functions and processes.

The other options are not the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that provide an early warning of potential threats to the organization’s objectives and performance. KRIs can help monitor and measure the risk exposure and effectiveness of risk management activities, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. IT environment threat modeling is a technique that identifies and analyzes the possible vulnerabilities and attack vectors in an IT system or network. Threat modeling can help improve the security and resilience of IT assets and services, but it does not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) are the maximum acceptable time frames for restoring business functions and processes after a disruption. RTOs can help determine the recovery priorities and strategies, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event.

For more information on BIA and quantifying loss, you can refer to these web sources:

• What is Business Impact Analysis? Definition, Benefits & Examples
• Quantifying Loss Associated with Major Risk Event - Exam-Answer
• Quantifying the Qualitative Technology Risk Assessment - ISACA

Data classification is the process of categorizing data according to its sensitivity, such as public, confidential, or restricted. Data classification helps ensure that data privacy is maintained by applying appropriate controls and policies to different types of data. By standardizing data classification processes throughout the enterprise, IT governance can ensure consistent and effective data privacy practices across all systems and departments. Incorporating enterprise privacy categorizations into contracts, requiring business impact analyses for enterprise systems, and reassessing the data governance policy are not long-term strategic responses, but rather tactical or operational actions that may support data privacy. References := What is Data Classification?, Data Governance Policy: Examples & Templates, What is data governance?

 The best reference for the IT steering committee as they evaluate the level of success of a strategic systems project that was implemented several months ago is the project’s business case. The business case is the document that outlines the rationale, objectives, benefits, costs, risks, and assumptions of the project. It also defines the expected outcomes and performance indicators that can be used to measure the project’s success. By comparing the actual results of the project with the business case, the IT steering committee can determine if the project has met its intended goals, delivered its expected value, and justified its investment

Prior to setting IT objectives, an enterprise must have established its strategies. Strategies are the high-level plans that define the direction and goals of the enterprise and how it will achieve them. Strategies provide the context and guidance for setting IT objectives, which are the specific and measurable outcomes that IT will deliver to support the strategies. IT objectives should be aligned with and derived from the enterprise strategies, as well as the enterprise vision, mission, and values

 Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that predict potential risks that can negatively impact businesses. They provide a way to quantify and monitor each risk. Think of them as change-related metrics that act as an early warning risk detection system to help companies effectively monitor, manage and mitigate risks1. By monitoring KRIs, the board of directors can ensure the enterprise is responsive to changes in its environment that would directly impact critical business processes, such as market fluctuations, customer preferences, regulatory compliance, operational efficiency, or cyber threats. Monitoring KRIs can help the board of directors to identify and assess the current and emerging risks, to evaluate the effectiveness and performance of the risk management strategies and controls, to communicate and report the risk status and issues, and to take timely and appropriate actions to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks234. References: How to Develop Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to Fortify Your Business. The Power of KRIs in Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). KRI (Key Risk Indicator): Understanding KRI and why is it important?. Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).

The first thing the CIO should do to ensure the IT organization is capable of supporting the CEO’s mandate of rolling out several new mobile services within the next 12 months is to request an assessment of current in-house mobile technology skills. This is because an assessment of current in-house mobile technology skills can help to evaluate the existing level of knowledge, experience, and competence of the IT staff in developing, deploying, and maintaining mobile applications and services. An assessment of current in-house mobile technology skills can also help to identify any gaps, needs, or opportunities for improvement or enhancement of the IT staff’s mobile technology skills.

Creating a sense of urgency with the IT team that mobile knowledge is mandatory is not the first thing the CIO should do, as it is a motivational factor rather than a governance factor. Creating a sense of urgency with the IT team can help to communicate the importance and priority of the CEO’s mandate, as well as inspire and encourage the IT staff to learn and adopt mobile technology skills. However, creating a sense of urgency with the IT team does not provide a comprehensive analysis or improvement plan for the IT organization’s mobile technology capabilities.

Procuring contractors with experience in mobile application development is not the first thing the CIO should do, as it is an implementation factor rather than a governance factor. Procuring contractors with experience in mobile application development can help to supplement or complement the in-house IT staff’s mobile technology skills, as well as accelerate or facilitate the delivery and quality of the new mobile services. However, procuring contractors with experience in mobile application development does not address the long-term sustainability or scalability of the IT organization’s mobile technology capabilities.

Tasking direct reports with creating training plans for their teams is not the first thing the CIO should do, as it is a subsequent step after requesting an assessment of current in-house mobile technology skills. Tasking direct reports with creating training plans for their teams can help to design and implement effective and customized learning programs and activities for the IT staff to acquire or enhance their mobile technology skills. However, tasking direct reports with creating training plans for their teams requires a clear understanding of the current state and the desired state of the IT staff’s mobile technology skills.

References := Top 15 In-Demand Technology Skills (Plus Definition), Mobile Development section. How to Develop Mobile Technology Skills | Career Trend, Step 1 section. How To Build A Mobile App Development Team - Forbes, Introduction section.