CISM Exam Dumps - Certified Information Security Manager

= Standardization of compliance requirements is the best approach to reduce unnecessary duplication of compliance activities, as it allows for a common understanding of the objectives and expectations of various stakeholders, such as regulators, auditors, customers, and business partners. Standardization also facilitates the alignment of compliance activities with the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance, and enables the identification and elimination of redundant or conflicting controls. References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 721; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, question 952

Learn more:

A reduction in annualized loss expectancy (ALE) demonstrates that implemented controls have effectively reduced the organization’s exposure to risk.

“ALE reduction is a key indicator of the cost-effectiveness of security investments and the improvement of the risk posture.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Cost-Benefit Analysis*

The strongest justification for granting an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage devices on laptops and desktops is that the benefit is greater than the potential risk. A security policy is a document that defines the goals, objec-tives, principles, roles, responsibilities, and requirements for protecting information and systems in an organization. A security policy should be based on a risk assessment that identifies and evaluates the threats and vulnerabilities that affect the organiza-tion’s assets, as well as the potential impact and likelihood of incidents. A security pol-icy should also be aligned with the organization’s business objectives and risk appe-tite1. However, there may be situations where a security policy cannot be fully enforced or complied with due to technical, operational, or business reasons. In such cases, an exception to the policy may be requested and granted by an authorized person or body, such as a security manager or a policy committee. An exception to a security policy should be justified by a clear and compelling reason that outweighs the risk of non-compliance. An exception to a security policy should also be documented, approved, monitored, reviewed, and revoked as necessary2. The strongest justification for grant-ing an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage devices on laptops and desktops is that the benefit is greater than the potential risk. USB storage devices are portable devices that can store large amounts of data and can be easily connected to laptops and desktops via USB ports. They can provide several benefits for users and organizations, such as:

•Enhancing data mobility and accessibility

•Improving data backup and recovery

•Supporting data sharing and collaboration

•Enabling data encryption and authentication

However, USB storage devices also pose significant security risks for users and organi-zations, such as:

•Introducing malware or viruses to laptops and desktops

•Exposing sensitive data to unauthorized access or disclosure

•Losing or stealing data due to device loss or theft

•Violating security policies or regulations

Therefore, an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage de-vices on laptops and desktops should only be granted if the benefit of using them is greater than the potential risk of compromising them. For example, if a user needs to transfer a large amount of data from one laptop to another in a remote location where there is no network connection available, and the data is encrypted and protected by a strong password on the USB device, then the benefit of using the USB device may be greater than the risk of losing or exposing it. The other options are not the strongest justifications for granting an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage devices on laptops and desktops. Enabling USB storage devices based on user roles is not a justification, but rather a possible way of implementing a more gran-ular or flexible security policy that allows different levels of access for different types of users3. Users accepting the risk of noncompliance is not a justification, but rather a requirement for requesting an exception to a security policy that acknowledges their responsibility and accountability for any consequences of noncompliance4. Accessing being restricted to read-only is not a justification, but rather a possible control that can reduce the risk of introducing malware or viruses from USB devices to laptops and desktops5. References: 1: Information Security Policy - NIST 2: Policy Exception Man-agement - ISACA 3: Deploy and manage Removable Storage Access Control using In-tune - Microsoft Learn 4: Policy Exception Request Form - University of California 5: Re-movable Media Policy Writing Tips - CurrentWare

The explanation given is: “A BIA is a process that identifies and evaluates the potential effects of natural and man-made events on business operations. It helps to understand how critical systems are interrelated and what their dependencies are. A BIA also helps to determine the RTOs for each system. The other options are not directly related to understanding the relationships between critical systems.”

 Before relying on a vendor’s certification for international security standards, such as ISO/IEC 27001, it is most important that the information security manager confirms that the certification scope is relevant to the service being offered. The certification scope defines the boundaries and applicability of the information security management system (ISMS) that the vendor has implemented and audited. The scope should cover the processes, activities, assets, and locations that are involved in delivering the service to the client. If the scope is too narrow, too broad, or not aligned with the service, the certification may not provide sufficient assurance of the vendor’s security capability and performance.

The current international standard was used to assess security processes (A) is an important factor, but not the most important one. The information security manager should verify that the vendor’s certification is based on the latest version of the standard, which reflects the current best practices and requirements for information security. However, the standard itself is generic and adaptable, and does not prescribe specific security controls or solutions. Therefore, the certification does not guarantee that the vendor has implemented the most appropriate or effective security processes for the service being offered.

The certification will remain current through the life of the contract (B) is also an important factor, but not the most important one. The information security manager should ensure that the vendor’s certification is valid and up to date, and that the vendor maintains its compliance with the standard throughout the contract period. However, the certification is not a one-time event, but a continuous process that requires periodic surveillance audits and recertification every three years. Therefore, the certification does not ensure that the vendor’s security capability and performance will remain consistent or satisfactory for the duration of the contract.

The certification can be extended to cover the client’s business (D) is not a relevant factor, as the certification is specific to the vendor’s ISMS and does not apply to the client’s business. The information security manager should not rely on the vendor’s certification to substitute or supplement the client’s own security policies, standards, or controls. The information security manager should conduct a due diligence and risk assessment of the vendor, and establish a clear and comprehensive service level agreement (SLA) that defines the security roles, responsibilities, expectations, and metrics for both parties.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Information Security Program Management, Subsection: Procurement and Vendor Management, page 142-1431

The data owner is the most appropriate role to determine access rights for specific users of an application because they have legal rights and complete control over data elements4. They are also responsible for approving data glossaries and definitions, ensuring the accuracy of information, and supervising operations related to data quality5. The data custodian is responsible for the safe custody, transport, and storage of the data and implementation of business rules, but not for determining access rights4. The system administrator is responsible for managing the security and storage infrastructure of data sets according to the organization’s data governance policies, but not for determining access rights5. Senior management is responsible for setting the strategic direction and priorities for data governance, but not for determining access rights5. References: 5 https://www.cpomagazine.com/cyber-security/data-owners-vs-data-stewards-vs-data-custodians-the-3-types-of-data-masters-and-why-you-should-employ-them/ 4 https://cloudgal42.com/data-privacy-difference-between-data-owner-controller-and-data-custodian-processor/

Security metrics are the best way to determine the maturity of an information security program because they are quantifiable indicators of the performance and effectiveness of the security controls and processes. Security metrics help to evaluate the current state of security, identify gaps and weaknesses, measure progress and improvement, and communicate the value and impact of security to stakeholders. Therefore, security metrics are the correct answer.