COBIT-2019 Exam Dumps - COBIT 2019 Foundation

 As explained in the previous question, the success metrics for the EGIT continual improvement program are identified and defined in the third stage of the EGIT implementation life cycle, which is developing the EGIT implementation program plan. Therefore, the correct answer is D. The other options are incorrect because they refer to different stages of the EGIT implementation life cycle that do not involve defining the success metrics. Option A refers to the second stage, which is defining the EGIT implementation road map. This stage involves identifying and prioritizing the improvement opportunities based on a gap analysis between the current and desired states of EGIT. Option B refers to the fourth stage, which is executing the EGIT implementation program plan. This stage involves implementing the improvement actions according to the plan, monitoring and controlling the progress and outcomes, and reporting on the results. Option C refers to the first stage, which is initiating an EGIT program. This stage involves establishing a clear vision and scope for the EGIT program, obtaining senior management commitment and sponsorship, and setting up a governance structure for the program. References: : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 28 1 : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 43 1 : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 24 

The capability levels are a measure of how well an enterprise performs its information and technology governance and management processes in terms of process attributes such as process performance, process definition, process deployment, process measurement, process control, process optimization etc. The capability levels range from 0 (incomplete) to 5 (optimizing), indicating the degree of maturity and effectiveness of an enterprise’s information and technology governance and management processes. The targeted capability levels are the desired levels of performance that an enterprise wants to achieve for its information and technology governance and management processes, based on its strategy, objectives, needs, and expectations. The targeted capability levels provide a basis for defining the improvement goals and objectives for the processes. The capability-level gap analysis is a process that involves comparing the current capability levels of an enterprise’s information and technology governance and management processes with the targeted capability levels, and identifying the gaps or differences between them. The capability-level gap analysis helps to determine the improvement actions and initiatives that are required to close the gaps and achieve the targeted capability levels. The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is identification of process improvement opportunities. This means that by setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes, an enterprise can identify the areas of weakness or inefficiency in its information and technology governance and management processes, and determine the potential solutions or enhancements that can improve its process performance, quality, value, etc. This will also help to align the information and technology governance system with the enterprise’s strategy and objectives.References: : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: page 53-54 : COBIT 2019 Process Assessment Model: page 11-13

 The number of confidentiality incidents causing financial loss, business disruption or public embarrassment would be the best metric to enable an enterprise to evaluate an alignment goal specifically related to security of information and privacy. A metric is a quantifiable measure that is used to track and assess the status of a specific process or activity. An alignment goal is an intermediate goal that links the enterprise goals with the governance and management objectives. Security of information and privacy is one of the 17 generic alignment goals defined by COBIT that describes how information and technology can support the protection of sensitive information and personal data. The number of confidentiality incidents causing financial loss, business disruption or public embarrassment is a metric that reflects how well this alignment goal is achieved.12 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

 A due diligence review is a process that involves conducting a comprehensive analysis and assessment of an enterprise’s information and technology assets, capabilities, risks, issues, opportunities, etc., before making a significant decision or transaction. A due diligence review helps to ensure that an enterprise has a clear understanding of the current state and potential impacts of its information and technology activities on its strategy, objectives, performance, value, etc., as well as on its compliance with relevant laws, regulations, standards, guidelines, contracts, or agreements. It is critical to perform a due diligence review following a merger, acquisition, or divestiture event. A merger is an event that involves combining two or more enterprises into one entity. An acquisition is an event that involves one enterprise purchasing another enterprise or its assets. A divestiture is an event that involves one enterprise selling or transferring part of its business or assets to another enterprise. By performing a due diligence review following a merger acquisition or divestiture event an enterprise can ensure that it has identified and addressed any information and technology related risks issues gaps etc., that may arise from the integration or separation of information and technology assets capabilities processes systems structures culture etc., that it has aligned its information and technology governance and management with its new strategy objectives needs expectations etc., that it has optimized its information and technology performance and value delivery etc34 References: 3: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: page 20-21 4: COBIT 2019 Design Guide: page 47-48

 The COBIT performance model is integrated into the COBIT core model. The COBIT core model consists of two main elements: the governance and management objectives (which define what needs to be achieved) and the performance model (which defines how well it needs to be achieved). The performance model is based on existing maturity and capability models (such as ISO/IEC 15504) and provides a common language to measure and communicate performance. The performance model consists of six levels (from 0 to 5) that describe the increasing degree of capability for each governance or management objective.15 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System