ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps - QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam

The Stage 1 audit is a readiness review that verifies the organization’s ability to conduct the Stage 2 audit. It involves reviewing the documented information, evaluating the site-specific conditions, and having discussions with personnel. The auditor does not verify the degrees of customer satisfaction, the compliance with legal requirements, or the results of the last management review during the Stage 1 audit. These are done during the Stage 2 audit or later in the certification process. References:

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Candidate Handbook

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course IRCA Certified

A first-party audit is an internal audit conducted by auditors who are employed by the organization being audited but who have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited1. The purpose of a first-party audit is to assess the conformity of the organization’s quality management system to the requirements of ISO 9001 and to identify opportunities for improvement2. Therefore, the two auditors who would not participate in a first-party audit are:

•A. An auditor employed by an external consultancy organization: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a customer or supplier of the organization being audited) or a third-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a certification body or registrar).

•F. An auditor from a customer: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit, as a customer is an interested party that has specific requirements for the organization being audited.

The other options are not correct, as they could participate in a first-party audit, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited:

•B. An auditor from an interested party: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as the interested party is within the organization being audited. For example, an auditor from the finance department could audit the production department, as long as they are not involved in the production process or affected by its outcomes.

•C. An auditor trained in-house: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The source of the auditor’s training is not relevant for determining the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

•D. An auditor trained in the IRCA scheme: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The IRCA scheme is a professional certification scheme for auditors of management systems, which provides recognition of the auditor’s competence and credibility3. However, being trained in the IRCA scheme does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

•E. An auditor certified by IRCA: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. Being certified by IRCA means that the auditor has met the requirements of the IRCA scheme and has demonstrated their competence and credibility as an auditor of management systems3. However, being certified by IRCA does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

References: First Party Audits: The 5 Steps to Success - Sync Resource Inc, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group, IRCA - International Register of Certificated Auditors

Effectiveness and efficiency are two of the seven quality management principles that form the basis of ISO 9001. According to ISO 9000:2015, clause 3.2.14, effectiveness is the “extent to which planned activities are realized and planned results achieved”. According to clause 3.2.15, efficiency is the “relationship between the result achieved and the resources used”. In other words, effectiveness is about doing the right things, and efficiency is about doing things right. ISO 9001:2015, clause 10.3, requires the organisation to continually improve the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the quality management system. This implies that the organisation should also improve the efficiency of its processes, products, and services, as efficiency is a key factor in achieving customer satisfaction, reducing costs, and increasing profitability. Some of the ways that the organisation can improve its effectiveness and efficiency are: - Establishing SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound) objectives and monitoring their progress - Implementing the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle to plan, execute, evaluate, and improve its activities - Applying the process approach to manage its interrelated processes as a coherent system - Using evidence-based decision making to analyse data and information and take appropriate actions - Seeking feedback from customers and other interested parties and addressing their needs and expectations - Identifying and addressing risks and opportunities that can affect its performance and conformity - Encouraging innovation and creativity to find new and better ways of doing things - Benchmarking its performance against best practices and industry standards - Providing training and development opportunities for its personnel to enhance their competence and motivation 12345 References:

1: ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary

2: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems — Requirements

3: ISO 9001 Explained: A Comprehensive Guide to Quality Management Systems - ISMS.online

4: The 7 Principles of ISO 9001 | ISO Standards Explained

5: Key Elements of an ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System

B. Applicable procedure: SP-701

D. Identification number of the washing machine

H. The concentration of the cleaning liquid used vs the concentration fixed in SP-701

I. The planned duration of the process vs the minimum time required in SP-701

J. Weight of linen being washed vs the maximum weight required in SP-701

C. Competence record of the machine operator

 Clause Reference – ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.6 (Release of Products and Services):ISO 9001 requires that products and services are not released to the customer until:

All planned verification activities have been completed.

Acceptance criteria have been met.

Any necessary approvals have been obtained.

In this scenario:

The sacrificial anodes for Project DK were shipped before the galvanic efficiency test results were analyzed.

This constitutes a nonconformity against Clause 8.6 because the products were released without completing the required tests.

ï‚· Option Analysis:

A. A retrospective concession was not sought from the customer once the test results had been approved by the Quality Manager:Incorrect. While obtaining a concession might mitigate the situation, the nonconformity pertains to the process failure of releasing the products without completing required tests, not the absence of a concession.

B. Release of the product without acceptable test results has been accepted by the customer for Project DK:Incorrect. The customer was not informed before the release, and there is no indication that this was accepted beforehand. Furthermore, ISO 9001 requires planned processes to be followed, regardless of later acceptance.

C. Products for Project DK have been released before product approval through the quality control process:Correct. This description accurately reflects the nonconformity. The quality control process required test results to be analyzed and verified before release, which did not happen.

D. The untested product was not recalled until the galvanic efficiency of the anodes was verified:Incorrect. The issue is not about recalling the product but about releasing it without completing the required tests. Recalling the product is not mentioned in the scenario.

ï‚· Why C is Correct:

The nonconformity is a clear breach of Clause 8.6, where the products were released without meeting the planned verification requirements.

This demonstrates a failure in adhering to quality control processes, which is a critical aspect of ISO 9001 compliance.

ï‚· Key ISO 9001 Reference:

Clause 8.6: Products and services shall not be released to the customer until all planned activities (e.g., testing) have been satisfactorily completed, or the customer has approved the release with knowledge of deviations.