CCBA Exam Dumps - Certification of Capability in Business Analysis (CCBA)

The scenario describes a task that involves presenting a requirements package to the stakeholders. The requirements package is a document that contains the requirements and related information for the project and the solution. The purpose of presenting the package is to ensure a shared understanding of the information among the stakeholders, which is essential for achieving stakeholder alignment, agreement, and commitment. Presenting the package also provides an opportunity for the BA to elicit feedback, validate requirements, and resolve any issues or conflicts.

References: The answer and explanation are consistent with the CCBA® Handbook and the IIBA® website, which provide the details and best practices for the communicate business analysis information task as part of the solution evaluation knowledge area12. The CCBA® resources also describe the types and formats of documents that can be used to communicate business analysis information, such as requirements packages1

 The scenario describes a project that aims at improving an organization’s Net Promoter Score (NPS), which is a measure of customer loyalty and satisfaction. The BA and stakeholders are looking for ways to measure the performance of the solution and its impact on the NPS. One of the techniques that may be employed for this purpose is focus groups, which involve gathering feedback from a representative sample of customers who have used the solution. Focus groups can help to evaluate the value, usability, and quality of the solution, as well as the customers’ likelihood to recommend it to others.

References: The answer and explanation are consistent with the CCBA® Handbook and the IIBA® website, which provide the details and best practices for the solution evaluation knowledge area, including the task of measure solution performance12. The CCBA® resources also describe the techniques and tools that can be used to perform each task in the business analysis process, such as focus groups12. Additionally, the web search results provide more information about the Net Promoter Score and how it can be measured and improved using focus groups34.

 This is because classifying requirements helps to ensure that they are fully understood and traceable by grouping them into categories based on their type, source, priority, or other criteria. Classifying requirements also helps to avoid duplication, ambiguity, and inconsistency among the requirements. Extracting requirements for review (A) is not a valid option, as it implies that the requirements are already documented and ready for approval. Validating requirements © is a good practice, but it does not ensure traceability, which is the ability to link the requirements to the business needs, solution components, and test cases. Meeting regulatory standards (D) is a quality criterion, but it does not ensure that the requirements are fully understood and traceable. References: CCBA Practice Test, CCBA Mock Test

According to the BABOK® Guide, traceability is the ability to track the life of a requirement in both a forward and backward direction. Traceability helps to manage the impact of changes, assess the quality of the solution, and ensure that the solution meets the business needs. However, traceability also has a cost in terms of time and effort, and the business analyst (BA) should balance the benefits and costs of traceability for each project. For a temporary solution that will last for two months, the value of creating a huge number of links to provide full traceability from solution requirements to design may not be high, compared to the cost and complexity involved. Therefore, the BA can justify omitting all possible links by considering the value and cost of traceability for this project. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 3: Business Analysis Planning and Monitoring, Section 3.5: Plan Requirements Management Process, Page 42; Chapter 6: Requirements Life Cycle Management, Section 6.1: Traceability and Monitoring, Page 140.

According to the Capability in Business Analysis™ (CCBA®) guidelines, one of the tasks that business analysts perform in the requirement management and communication activity is to maintain the requirements, which includes tracking and documenting the changes and updates to the requirements12. An audit history of changes is a tool that helps the business analysts to record and review the changes that have been made to the requirements, including the date, time, author, and reason for each change34. An audit history of changes can help the project team to investigate the issue when a system owner calls to inquire about a recent change in one of the requirements, as it can show who requested the change, when it was approved, and how it was communicated to the stakeholders.

References: The CCBA® learning documents, which can be found on the IIBA website12, describe the various tasks and techniques that a business analyst can use to manage and communicate the requirements, including the maintenance of requirements and the use of audit history of changes. Additionally, the IIBA Bookstore offers resources that provide further insights into the objectives and best practices for business analysis, including the use of audit history of changes345.

This option directly addresses the Product Manager’s need to differentiate and review sales performance specifically for general insurance, which is essential for tracking against set targets. The other options do not specifically relate to reviewing general insurance sales or tracking performance against annual targets.

According to the BABOK® Guide, one of the tasks of the business analyst (BA) during requirements lifecycle management is to validate requirements. This involves ensuring that the requirements and designs support the delivery of value to stakeholders, fulfill the goal or objectives, and meet the quality standards. One of the techniques that can be used for this task is assumption and constraint analysis, which is the process of identifying, documenting, validating, and managing the assumptions and constraints that affect the requirements and designs. Incorrect assumptions are statements that are believed to be true without sufficient evidence or validation. They can create a situation where the design cannot be validated to support the requirements, as they may introduce errors, risks, or inconsistencies in the solution. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 7, Section 7.2; Business Analysis Expert Certification, CCBA® | IIBA®, Section “What Should I know to be CCBA Certified?”.

Based on the stakeholder matrix, suppliers are categorized as having high impact but low influence. This suggests that while they are significantly affected by the project, they do not have much control over it. Therefore, the best approach is to keep them well-informed and show interest in their needs to maintain a positive relationship and ensure their requirements are met.

References: The answer aligns with the best practices in stakeholder engagement as per the Capability in Business Analysis™ (CCBA®) guidelines, which recommend tailoring communication strategies to the stakeholders’ level of impact and influence to effectively manage their expectations and contributions to the project. The CCBA® resources available on the IIBA website provide further insights into effective stakeholder engagement strategies.