CISM Exam Dumps - Certified Information Security Manager

An anomaly-based intrusion detection system (IDS) operates by gathering data on normal network behavior and using it as a baseline for measuring abnormal activity. This is important because it allows the IDS to detect any activity that is outside of the normal range of usage for the network, which can help to identify potential malicious activity or security threats. Additionally, the IDS will monitor for any changes in the baseline behavior and alert the administrator if any irregularities are detected. By contrast, signature-based IDSs operate by gathering attack pattern signatures from historical data and comparing them against incoming traffic in order to identify malicious activity.

 A business-aligned information security program is one that supports the organization’s business objectives and aligns the information security strategy with the business functions. A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process that identifies the critical business processes, assets, and functions of an organization, and assesses their potential impact in the event of a disruption or loss. A BIA helps to prioritize the information security requirements and controls that are needed to protect the organization’s critical assets and functions from various threats and risks. Therefore, a BIA is one of the most useful sources when planning a business-aligned information security program. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 254; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, QID 229.The most useful source when planning a business-aligned information security program is a Business Impact Analysis (BIA). A BIA is a process of identifying and evaluating the potential effects of disruptions to an organization's operations, and helps to identify the security controls and measures that should be implemented to reduce the impact of those disruptions. The BIA should include an assessment of the organization's information security posture, including its security policies, risk register, and enterprise architecture. With this information, organizations can develop an information security program that is aligned to the organization's business objectives.

The first step in developing an information security strategy is to identify key stakeholders who can provide support, guidance and resources for information security initiatives. These stakeholders may include senior management, business unit leaders, legal counsel, audit and compliance officers and other relevant parties. By engaging these stakeholders early on, an information security manager can ensure that the strategy aligns with business objectives and expectations, as well as gain buy-in and commitment from them. Determining acceptable levels of risk, creating a roadmap and performing a gap analysis are all important steps in developing an information security strategy, but they should follow after identifying key stakeholders.

 Increasing accountability is the primary reason for ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities are communicated to users who have been granted administrative privileges due to specific application requirements. Administrative privileges grant users the ability to perform actions that can affect the security, availability and integrity of the application or system, such as installing software, modifying configurations, accessing sensitive data or granting access to other users. Therefore, users who have administrative privileges must be aware of their roles and responsibilities and the consequences of their actions. Communicating clearly defined roles and responsibilities to these users helps to establish accountability by setting expectations, defining boundaries, assigning ownership and enabling monitoring and reporting. Accountability also helps to deter misuse or abuse of privileges, ensure compliance with policies and standards, and facilitate incident response and investigation.

Clearer segregation of duties is a benefit of ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities, but it is not the primary reason. Segregation of duties is a control that aims to prevent or detect conflicts of interest, errors, fraud or unauthorized activities by separating different functions or tasks among different users or groups. For example, a user who can create a purchase order should not be able to approve it. Segregation of duties helps to reduce the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate actions by requiring more than one person to complete a critical or sensitive process. However, segregation of duties alone does not ensure accountability, as users may still act in collusion or circumvent the control.

Increased user productivity is a possible outcome of ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities, but it is not the primary reason. User productivity refers to the efficiency and effectiveness of users in performing their tasks and achieving their goals. By communicating clearly defined roles and responsibilities, users may have a better understanding of their tasks, expectations and performance indicators, which may help them to work faster, smarter and better. However, user productivity is not directly related to the security risk of granting administrative privileges, and it may also depend on other factors, such as user skills, motivation, tools and resources.

Fewer security incidents is a desired result of ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities, but it is not the primary reason. Security incidents are events or situations that compromise the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information assets or systems. By communicating clearly defined roles and responsibilities, users may be more aware of the security implications of their actions and the potential threats and vulnerabilities they may face, which may help them to avoid or prevent security incidents. However, fewer security incidents is not a guarantee or a measure of accountability, as users may still cause or experience security incidents due to human error, negligence, malicious intent or external factors. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 144

Effective User Access Reviews - ISACA1

CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE - ISACA2

Chain of custody is the MOST important requirement when collecting admissible evidence, because it ensures the integrity and authenticity of the evidence by documenting its history, handling, and storage. Chain of custody records who, what, when, where, why, and how the evidence was collected, analyzed, and preserved. Without a proper chain of custody, the evidence may be challenged or rejected in a court of law. Need to know, preserving audit logs, and due diligence are important aspects of evidence collection, but they are not as critical as chain of custody. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 3031; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 1492The most important requirement when collecting admissible evidence is the chain of custody. The chain of custody is a documented record of who had control of the evidence at any given time, from the point of collection until the evidence is presented in court. This is important in order to ensure the evidence can be authenticated and is not subject to tampering or any other form of interference. Other important considerations include need to know, preserving audit logs, and due diligence.

The primary benefit of establishing a clear definition of a security incident is that it helps to develop effective escalation and response procedures. A security incident is an event or an attempt that disrupts or threatens the normal operations, security, or privacy of an organization’s information or systems1. A clear definition of a security in-cident helps to:

•Distinguish between normal and abnormal events, and between security-relevant and non-security-relevant events

•Determine the severity and impact of an incident, and the appropriate level of response

•Assign roles and responsibilities for incident detection, reporting, analysis, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident activities

•Establish criteria and thresholds for escalating incidents to higher authorities or external parties

•Define the communication channels and protocols for incident notification and coordina-tion

•Document the incident response process and procedures in a formal plan

According to NIST, a clear definition of a security incident is one of the key compo-nents of an effective incident response capability2. The other options are not the prima-ry benefits of establishing a clear definition of a security incident. Communicating the incident response process to stakeholders is important, but it is not the main purpose of defining a security incident. Adequately staffing and training incident response teams is essential, but it depends on other factors besides defining a security inci-dent. Making tabletop testing more effective is a possible outcome, but not a direct benefit of defining a security incident. References: 2: NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 Computer Security Incident Handling Guide 1: NIST Glossary - Security Incident : What is a securi-ty incident? - TechTarget : 10 types of security incidents and how to handle them - TechTarget : 45 CFR § 164.304 - Definitions - Electronic Code of Federal Regulations

A balanced scorecard most effectively enables information security govern-ance. Information security governance is the process of establishing and maintaining a framework to provide assurance that information security strategies are aligned with and support business objectives, are consistent with applicable laws and regulations, and are managed effectively and efficiently1. A balanced scorecard is a tool for meas-uring and communicating the performance and progress of an organization toward its strategic goals. It typically includes four perspectives: financial, customer, internal pro-cess, and learning and growth2. A balanced scorecard can help information security managers to:

•Align information security objectives with business objectives and communicate them to senior management and other stakeholders

•Monitor and report on the effectiveness and efficiency of information security processes and controls

•Identify and prioritize improvement opportunities and corrective actions

•Demonstrate the value and benefits of information security investments

•Foster a culture of security awareness and continuous learning

Several sources have proposed models or frameworks for applying the balanced scorecard approach to information security governance34 . The other options are not the most effective applications of a balanced scorecard for information security. Pro-ject management is the process of planning, executing, monitoring, and closing pro-jects to achieve specific objectives within constraints such as time, budget, scope, and quality. A balanced scorecard can be used to measure the performance of individual projects or project portfolios, but it is not specific to information security projects. Per-formance is the degree to which an organization or a process achieves its objectives or meets its standards. A balanced scorecard can be used to measure the performance of information security processes or functions, but it is not limited to performance measurement. Risk management is the process of identifying, analyzing, evaluating, treating, monitoring, and communicating risks that affect an organization’s objec-tives. A balanced scorecard can be used to measure the risk exposure and risk appetite of an organization, but it is not a tool for risk assessment or treatment. References: 1: Information Security Governance - ISACA 2: Balanced scorecard - Wikipedia 3: Key Per-formance Indicators for Security Governance Part 1 - ISACA 4: A Strategy Map for Se-curity Leaders: Applying the Balanced Scorecard Framework to Information Security - Security Intelligence : How to Measure Security From a Governance Perspective - ISA-CA : Project management - Wikipedia : Performance measurement - Wikipedia : Risk management - Wikipedia

A disaster recovery plan (DRP) test is a simulation of a disaster scenario to evaluate the effectiveness and readiness of the DRP. The greatest inherent risk when performing a DRP test is the disruption to the production environment, which could cause operational issues, data loss, or system damage. Therefore, it is essential to plan and execute the DRP test carefully, with proper backup, isolation, and rollback procedures. Poor documentation, lack of communication, and lack of coordination are also potential risks, but they are not as severe as disrupting the production environment. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 253; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, QID 224.

The greatest inherent risk when performing a disaster recovery plan (DRP) test is disruption to the production environment. A DRP test involves simulating a disaster scenario to ensure that the organization's plans are effective and that it is able to recover from an incident. However, this involves running tests on the production environment, which has the potential to disrupt the normal operations of the organization. This inherent risk can be mitigated by running tests on a non-production environment or by running tests at times when disruption will be minimized.