H12-821_V1.0 Exam Dumps - HCIP-Datacom-Core Technology V1.0

ï‚· pat

ï‚· trust

ï‚· 12.1.1.0

ï‚· inner

Comprehensive and Detailed in-depth Step-by-Step Explanation:To establish an OSPF neighbor relationship, the following conditions must be met:

The routers must share a common network segment.

Their Hello and Dead intervals must match.

Their OSPF network types must be compatible.

The IP subnet masks must match.

If two OSPF routers are on different network segments and have different subnet masks, one solution is to change the OSPF network type to Point-to-Point (P2P) on both interfaces.

Point-to-Point (P2P):

In a P2P network type, OSPF ignores the subnet mask mismatch and establishes the neighbor relationship regardless of the network mask.

This is ideal for directly connected links between two routers.

NBMA (Non-Broadcast Multi-Access):

This network type is used for networks like Frame Relay or ATM, where a single physical interface connects to multiple neighbors.

It is not applicable to solving subnet mask mismatches for a single link.

P2MP (Point-to-Multipoint):

This type treats the link as multiple P2P links. It is mainly used in hub-and-spoke topologies.

While it can be configured to solve subnet mask mismatches, it is more complex and less commonly used compared to the P2P type.

Broadcast:

This type requires all routers on the same segment to agree on subnet masks, so it cannot resolve the subnet mask mismatch issue.

Therefore, the correct answer is A. Point-to-point.

References:

Huawei HCIA-Datacom Study Guide, Chapter on "OSPF Neighbor Relationships".

RFC 2328 – OSPF Version 2, Section 10.

 R1 is a Level-1 router in Area 49.0001, while R4 is in Area 49.0004. Level-1 routers only maintain LSDBs for their own area and do not contain LSPs from other areas, such as R4’s LSP.

ï‚· R2 is a Level-1-2 router, so it maintains LSDBs for both Area 49.0001 (Level-1) and Level-2 domains, which include LSPs from R4.

ï‚· R3 and R4, as Level-2 routers, exchange LSPs with each other within the Level-2 domain.

 Thus, the LSDB of R1 does not include R4’s LSP ​.

The traffic limiting policy feature supports not only limiting the number of connections initiated by or received by an IP address but can also apply other traffic metrics such as bandwidth or packet rates. This expanded capability makes the statement false ​.

ï‚· OSPF Area Design and Loop Prevention:OSPF uses a hierarchical structure with areas to improve scalability and efficiency. Area 0, the backbone area, plays a crucial role in ensuring loop-free route distribution between areas. The following mechanisms are key to preventing routing loops:

Strict adherence to hierarchical area design.

Prohibition of direct inter-area route exchanges between non-backbone areas.

BGP, IS-IS, and OSPF support the configuration of default routes through specific command configurations. For example, BGP uses the default-originate command, IS-IS uses a default-route-advertise method, and OSPF can advertise default routes using default-information originate. ICMP, however, is not a routing protocol and does not support this functionality ​.

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

Definition of the Origin Attribute:

The Origin attribute is a well-known mandatory attribute used to indicate the source of a route. It has three possible values:

i (IGP): The route was injected into BGP using the network command.

e (EGP): The route was learned from an EGP protocol (not commonly used now).

? (Incomplete): The route was redistributed into BGP from another routing protocol.

Analysis of Each Option:

Option A: Correct. When the network command is used, the Origin is set to i (IGP).

Option B: Incorrect. Routes learned from EGP have the Origin attribute set to e (EGP), not ? (Incomplete).

Option C: Correct. BGP prefers routes with the Origin attribute in the order: IGP > EGP > Incomplete.

Option D: Correct. The Origin attribute is a well-known mandatory attribute.

References:

HCIA-Datacom Study Guide, Chapter: BGP Attributes

Huawei BGP Attribute Comparison

ï‚· BGP Route Flapping and Mitigation

While route flapping is a concern in large-scale networks, BGP employs mechanisms such as Route Dampening to mitigate its impact. Route dampening suppresses frequently flapping routes for a period of time to reduce resource consumption and network instability.

Therefore, it is incorrect to state that the issue cannot be resolved in BGP.

ï‚· HCIP-Datacom-Core Reference

The mechanism of route dampening is detailed in the BGP optimization chapters​​.