PSM-I Exam Dumps - Professional Scrum Master I

According to the Scrum Guide, multiple Scrum Teams working on the same product do not have to have the same Sprint start date. They may start their Sprints at different times, as long as they synchronize their work and integrate their Increments at least by the end of each Sprint. The other option is not valid, as it implies that having the same Sprint start date is mandatory for multiple Scrum Teams.

The correct answer is C because the Product Owner is a full member of the Scrum Team and participates in the Sprint Retrospective along with the Developers and Scrum Master. The Sprint Retrospective is not a meeting only for Developers or only for process specialists. It is an event for the Scrum Team to inspect how the last Sprint went with regard to individuals, interactions, processes, tools, and their Definition of Done, and then identify improvements for the future.

The Product Owner’s role in this event is not to act as an external observer or a stakeholder representative. Instead, the Product Owner contributes as a Scrum Team member by sharing observations, listening to concerns, and collaborating on ways to improve effectiveness and value delivery. This shared participation supports transparency and continuous improvement.

Option A is incorrect because the Retrospective is an internal Scrum Team event, not a stakeholder reporting session. Option B is incorrect because the Product Owner absolutely should participate. Option D is incorrect because capturing backlog requirements is not the purpose of the Retrospective. The main purpose is improvement of how the team works together.

The correct answer is B, because the Scrum Guide states that “the Sprint Goal is an objective set for the Sprint that can be met through the implementation of Product Backlog. It provides guidance to the Development Team on why it is building the Increment.” Therefore, the Sprint Goal provides the Development Team with a target and overarching direction for the Sprint.

During the Sprint Retrospective, the Scrum Team may add items to the Sprint Backlog for the next Sprint, as stated in [5] : “The purpose of each Sprint Retrospective is to plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness. The Scrum Team plans ways to implement improvements identified during this meeting into its way of working. By doing this it reinforces empiricism throughout its work. Improvements may be implemented at any time during a Sprint or they may be planned for subsequent Sprints.”

According to the Scrum Guide 1 , an Increment is a concrete stepping stone toward the Product Goal. Each Increment is additive to all prior Increments and thoroughly verified, ensuring that all Increments work together. In order to provide value, an Increment must be usable. Multiple Increments may be created within a Sprint. The sum of the Increments is presented at the Sprint Review thus supporting empiricism. However, an Increment may be delivered to stakeholders prior to the end of the Sprint. The Sprint Review should never be considered a gate to releasing value. For the purpose of transparency, when does Scrum say a new increment of working software must be available? At the end of every Sprint.

The correct answer is A, because if two Scrum Teams are added to the development of a product that previously had only one Scrum Team, the immediate impact on the productivity of the original Scrum Team is likely to decrease. This is because adding more teams may introduce some challenges and trade-offs, such as increased communication and coordination overhead, reduced alignment and cohesion, and potential conflicts or dependencies.

The correct answer is D. 10 or fewer. According to the Scrum Guide 2020 1 , “The Scrum Team is small enough to remain nimble and large enough to complete significant work within a Sprint, typically 10 or fewer people.” The other options are outdated or incorrect. Option A was based on the previous version of the Scrum Guide, which suggested a range of 3 to 9 developers 2 . Option B is too vague and does not account for the upper limit of team size. Option C is too specific and does not allow for flexibility.