PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2024 Version)

 Schedule crashing is a technique to shorten the project schedule by adding more resources or working overtime, without changing the project scope1. This can help improve the Schedule Performance Index (SPI) and Cost Performance Index (CPI) by completing more work in less time and within budget. The other options are not relevant to the question. Fast tracking is a technique to overlap project phases or activities to reduce the project duration, but it may increase risks and costs2. Earned schedule and earned value are methods to measure project performance, not techniques to improve it3 . References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 215 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 216 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 267 : PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 260

A change request is a formal proposal to modify any document, deliverable, or baseline of a project. A change request should be submitted when a change is needed due to an external or internal factor, such as a new regulation, a stakeholder request, or an error correction. The Integrated change control process is the process of reviewing and approving all change requests, and managing the changes to the project management plan, project documents, and project baselines. The project manager should submit a change request through the Integrated change control process as the next step after receiving the announcement from the municipality, as this will ensure that the change is properly evaluated, approved, and communicated to the relevant stakeholders. Performing a qualitative risk analysis, updating the issue log, or estimating the associated costs are not the next steps that the project manager should take, as they do not address the need for a change request or the approval of the change. References: [PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition], page 115; Project Management Professional (PMP) Exam Questions for 2022, question 23.

According to the PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition, the project manager should provide the failed test results along with the agreed-upon acceptance criteria to support their claim to the vendor. This is because the acceptance criteria are the measurable and verifiable standards that define the quality requirements of the project deliverables. The project manager and the vendor should have agreed on the acceptance criteria before signing the contract. Therefore, providing the failed test results along with the acceptance criteria will show the vendor that they have not met their contractual obligations and that they need to take corrective actions to improve the system quality. References: PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition, page 161, section 5.5.2.1; page 287, section 8.2.2.1; page 375, section 12.1.2.1.

In agile projects, risks are assessed and managed continuously through regular feedback loops, such as daily standups, iteration demos, and retrospectives. These feedback loops allow the team to identify, analyze, prioritize, and respond to risks in a timely and collaborative manner. They also help the team to monitor and control the project performance and deliver value to the customer. Identifying and escalating risks to the facilitator is not an effective way of managing risks, as it does not involve the whole team or the customer. Updating the risk register during every iteration is a good practice, but it is not enough to assess and manage risks regularly. Focusing on developing a working deliverable instead of documenting risks is not a good option, as it ignores the potential impact of risks on the project outcome and quality. References: = PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 97; PMI, Project Management Professional (PMP) Examination Content Outline, 2021, page 8.

In an agile project, the project manager does not assign tasks to the team members, but rather facilitates the team’s self-organization and empowerment. The team decides how to plan, execute, monitor, and control the work within the sprint, based on the agreed-upon requirements and priorities. The project manager supports the team by removing impediments, providing feedback, and ensuring alignment with the project vision and goals. The daily standup is a short meeting where the team members share their progress, challenges, and plans for the next 24 hours, not a place where the project manager instructs the team what to do. References:

• Agile Practice Guide, page 37
• PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 97

The project manager should try to resolve the conflict between the supervisor and the workers by communicating the company culture and values, and how they affect the project objectives and stakeholder satisfaction. The project manager should also seek to understand the supervisor’s perspective and goals, and find a way to align them with the project team’s needs and expectations. This approach is consistent with the PMBOK Guide’s recommendations on managing stakeholder engagement, conflict management, and leadership skills12. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 13: Stakeholder Management 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Appendix X3: Interpersonal and Team Skills

According to the PMBOK Guide, a retrospective meeting is a process of reviewing and analyzing the past performance of a project team, especially in an agile or hybrid environment. The purpose of the retrospective meeting is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the team, the lessons learned, and the improvement actions for the future. The project manager should facilitate the retrospective meeting and encourage the team to share their feedback, opinions, and suggestions. If the project team’s performance has declined for the last three iterations, the project manager should focus on remediation not merely on correcting symptoms. This means that the project manager should help the team to find the root causes of the performance issues, and implement effective solutions that address the underlying problems, not just the superficial symptoms. For example, if the team is facing communication challenges, the project manager should not just provide more communication tools, but also improve the communication processes, protocols, and skills of the team. Focusing on remediation not merely on correcting symptoms will help the team to improve their performance and prevent recurrence of the same issues. Comparing the team’s performance against other project teams is not a good option, as it may demoralize the team, create unhealthy competition, and ignore the unique context and challenges of each project. Identifying potential failure points based on the iteration workload is a useful technique, but it is not enough to improve the team’s performance. The project manager should also analyze the actual failure points and the reasons behind them, and take corrective and preventive actions accordingly. Motivating the team to perform better is a desirable outcome, but it is not a specific action that the project manager should do. The project manager should use various motivational techniques, such as recognition, rewards, empowerment, and feedback, to inspire the team and enhance their morale and engagement. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18-19, 686-687, 723-724.

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager should analyze the impact of the developers’ resignation on the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk, and inform the relevant stakeholders about the situation and the possible options to address it. This is part of the Manage Team process, which involves tracking team member performance, providing feedback, resolving issues, and managing changes to optimize project performance. By analyzing the impact and informing the stakeholders, the project manager can facilitate collaborative decision making and ensure alignment of expectations and objectives. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

• PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.4, Manage Team
• PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, Rita Mulcahy, Page 357, Manage Team