PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

When a company is undergoing structural changes, it is crucial for the project manager to maintain open communication with the team. Organizing a team meeting to discuss the changes and their importance for the company is aligned with the best practices in change management and project management. This approach allows for transparency, provides a platform for addressing concerns, and helps in aligning the team with the company’s vision and strategy. It is essential to ensure that the team understands the reasons behind the changes and how these changes can potentially benefit the company and their own work in the long run.

The answer is verified based on the principles of change management and team communication as outlined in the Project Management Professional (PMP) and Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) reference materials. These materials emphasize the importance of stakeholder engagement and effective communication during times of change to ensure project success and team alignment.

The project manager should support the decision made by the management and assist engineer A in transitioning into the new role. This includes providing the necessary training and resources to ensure engineer A is successful. Additionally, it’s important to keep engineer B motivated and engaged, as their contributions are still valuable to the project. This approach aligns with the PMP objectives of promoting collaboration, supporting team development, and maintaining a productive team environment.

= This answer is verified by the principles outlined in the PMBOK® Guide, which emphasizes the importance of team development and management’s role in project success1. Furthermore, the Professional in Business Analysis materials support the idea of fostering team skills and maintaining team morale2.

The project manager should initiate the change request to modify the scope and adjust the timelines. This is because the project manager is responsible for managing the project scope and ensuring that the project delivers the agreed outcomes within the approved budget and schedule. When the project manager encounters scope changes and a delay in the delivery of critical tasks, they should follow the change management process as defined in the project management plan. This process involves initiating a change request that describes the proposed changes, their impact, and their justification. The change request should then be submitted to the appropriate authority, such as the change control board or the steering committee, for review and approval. The project manager should also update the project documents, such as the scope baseline, the schedule baseline, and the cost baseline, to reflect the approved changes. The project manager should communicate the changes and their implications to the relevant stakeholders, such as the project team, the PMO, the sponsor, and the customer. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 4.6, page 115, PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 180

The project manager should review the communications management plan and submit a change request if required. The communications management plan is a document that describes how the project information will be communicated to the stakeholders. It defines the communication requirements, methods, formats, frequency, and responsibilities for each stakeholder group. The project manager should review the communications management plan to understand the current communication expectations and agreements, and to identify any gaps or conflicts between the sponsor’s request and the key team members’ preferences. If the communications management plan needs to be updated to accommodate the sponsor’s request, the project manager should submit a change request and follow the change control process. Negotiating with the key team members to send a daily report and letting the sponsor know that the project cost will increase (option A) may be a possible solution, but it should be done after reviewing the communications management plan and submitting a change request if required. Recommending to the sponsor that performance of the project be reviewed once per week (option B) may not satisfy the sponsor’s needs and expectations, and may also contradict the communications management plan. Evaluating the capacity of each team member to attend daily meetings in person or virtually and reducing the time of each meeting (option D) may be a good practice, but it should also be done after reviewing the communications management plan and submitting a change request if required. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 377-378, section 10.1 Plan Communications Management

PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 474, question 474, answer and explanation

In the context of PMP objectives and the PMBOK guide, the first action in response to an identified risk, such as the sale of duplicate lottery numbers, is to review the project’s risk management plan. This plan should include previously identified risks and their corresponding response strategies. If the issue of duplicate numbers was anticipated, the project manager should follow the established action plan to address it. This aligns with the PMBOK’s emphasis on proactive risk management, which includes planning for risks and having response strategies ready to implement when needed123.

 When faced with a potential delay due to a vendor’s resource shortage, the project manager should engage the project team to explore alternative options to adhere to the schedule. This aligns with the principles of project management, which emphasize proactive problem-solving and collaboration to maintain project momentum. The PMBOK® Guide highlights the importance of communication and stakeholder engagement in managing project risks, including those associated with vendor deliverables. By discussing alternative options, the project manager can facilitate a solution-oriented approach that may involve re-allocating resources, adjusting work priorities, or finding other ways to mitigate the delay without compromising the project’s objectives or quality standards.

PMBOK® Guide and the Project Management Institute’s (PMI) resources on project risk management and stakeholder engagement12.

When facing delays in procurement, especially in government settings where processes are often strict and lengthy, the most constructive and collaborative action is for the project manager to work directly with the procurement team to develop a high-level timeline. This promotes alignment and visibility into expectations without immediately escalating or assigning blame.

According to the PMBOK® Guide (Seventh Edition), the project manager plays a facilitative role in procurement, especially in coordinating with procurement specialists and aligning expectations with stakeholders.

Option B avoids the issue and offers no corrective action.

Option C offloads responsibility inappropriately; the project manager should lead coordination.

Option D should be used only after collaborative options are exhausted.

The project manager should ensure that relevant stakeholders and expectations are identified and assess the component delay. This is because the project manager needs to communicate with the stakeholders about the impact of the delay on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, and quality, and seek their feedback and support. The project manager also needs to evaluate the component delay and its root cause, and determine the best course of action to address the issue. Asking for expedited delivery, performing a detailed analysis, or proposing a new design are possible actions that the project manager may take after ensuring stakeholder identification and assessment, depending on the outcome of the evaluation. However, they are not the best actions to take in this situation, as they may not address the stakeholder needs and expectations, or may introduce unnecessary changes or risks to the project. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 513, section 10.1.1.1 (Stakeholder Identification); page 518, section 10.1.3.1 (Stakeholder Register); page 520, section 10.2.1.1 (Stakeholder Analysis); page 524, section 10.2.3.1 (Stakeholder Engagement Assessment Matrix); page 526, section 10.3.1.1 (Communication Requirements Analysis)