PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2024 Version)

In a fixed time and budget project, the project manager needs to balance the customer’s expectations and the project’s profitability. If the customer wants the development of a core component to be based on agile practices, the project manager should use a hybrid contract that combines both fixed and agile elements. This way, the project manager can accommodate the customer’s changing requirements while maintaining control over the project scope, schedule, and cost. A tiered contract for fixed and agile components allows the project manager to define the fixed deliverables and the agile deliverables separately, and assign different payment terms and conditions for each. For example, the fixed deliverables can be paid based on milestones, while the agile deliverables can be paid based on iterations or value delivered. This also helps the project manager to manage the risks and uncertainties associated with the agile component. Providing alternatives to scope change at specific project phases within the contract is another way to control the development costs and ensure the profitability of the project. The project manager can specify the criteria and process for requesting and approving scope changes, and offer different options for the customer to choose from, such as adding or removing features, adjusting the quality standards, or modifying the schedule or budget. This way, the project manager can negotiate with the customer and reach a mutually beneficial agreement that satisfies both parties’ needs and expectations. Limiting the number of iterations for development in the contract is not a good control, as it may compromise the quality and value of the agile component. Establishing a governance committee to review the contract delivery is not a specific control for the development of the core component, but a general practice for any project. Requiring that only internal resources be utilized for this project is not a relevant control, as it does not address the customer’s requirement or the project’s profitability. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 704-705, 718-719.

According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the tools and techniques for developing the project management plan is expert judgement1. This involves obtaining guidance and advice from knowledgeable and experienced individuals or groups, such as subject matter experts, consultants, industry associations, or professional and technical organizations. By consulting a senior project manager within the organization, the project manager can leverage their expert judgement to understand the interdependencies of the work items, the industry standards and best practices, and the organizational processes and policies that may affect the project planning. The other options are not appropriate, as they do not address the issue of the project manager’s lack of familiarity with the industry and the work items. Consulting the project sponsor, the product owner, or the senior developer may provide some useful information, but they are not the best sources of expert judgement for the project manager in this situation. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 89

The project manager should implement a project management information system (PMIS) to avoid this situation in the future. A PMIS is a system that provides the tools and techniques to gather, integrate, and disseminate the outputs of project management processes. A PMIS can help the project manager and the team to manage the project documents, such as the requirements document, and ensure that they are updated, controlled, and shared in a timely and consistent manner. A PMIS can also facilitate collaboration and communication among the project team and other stakeholders, and reduce the risk of errors, conflicts, and rework. Encouraging better team communication by positioning team members closer together may not be enough, as it does not address the issue of document management and version control. Updating the communications management plan to ensure correct delivery of the latest version may not be effective, as it does not provide the tools and techniques to implement the plan. Restricting team members from sending the requirements documents via email may not be feasible or appropriate, as it may limit the flexibility and accessibility of the project information. References:

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 4: Integration, Section 4.4: Manage Project Knowledge, Section 4.5: Monitor and Control Project Work
• Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, Section 2.3: Domains and Tasks, Domain 2: Planning, Task 6: Plan Business Analysis Information Management
• Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain 2: Planning, Task 6: Plan Business Analysis Information Management

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 6.2.2.4, the project manager should use agile practices such as sprint reviews and retrospectives to ensure that the product backlog items are delivered according to the product owner’s expectations and that the team continuously improves its performance. Sprint reviews are meetings where the team demonstrates the product increment to the product owner and other stakeholders and collects feedback for future iterations. Retrospectives are meetings where the team reflects on its processes, tools, interactions, and outcomes and identifies areas for improvement. These practices help to align the team and the product owner on the project vision, scope, and quality, and to prevent or resolve any issues or conflicts that may arise during the project. The PMI-PBA Guide, section 5.2.3.1, also supports this approach, as it states that the business analyst should participate in sprint reviews and retrospectives to validate the requirements and to ensure that the product meets the business needs and stakeholder expectations. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 6.2.2.4
• PMI-PBA Guide, section 5.2.3.1

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should use a collaborative or problem-solving approach to handle conflicts, as it results in a win-win situation and enhances the project performance1. The project manager should also communicate with the team members and involve them in the decision-making process, as it fosters trust and commitment2. Therefore, the best option is to meet the team member and try to plan a course of action together. Option A is incorrect because guiding the team member on how to resolve the conflict may not address the root cause of the conflict or the impact on the project schedule. Option B is incorrect because analyzing the project schedule and looking for alternatives may not consider the team member’s perspective or input. Option C is incorrect because performing crashing and/or fast tracking of the schedule may not resolve the conflict or may introduce new risks or issues to the project. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.5.2.1, p. 363 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.4.2.3, p. 356

The project manager should address this concern with the functional managers to ensure there will be no further delays in the project. The functional managers are the managers who have authority over the team members in their respective functional areas, such as engineering, marketing, finance, etc. The functional managers are responsible for assigning and releasing the team members to the project, as well as providing them with the necessary training, support, and feedback. The project manager should communicate and coordinate with the functional managers to ensure that the team members are available and committed to the project, and that they are not distracted or overloaded by other nonproject-related tasks. The project manager should also explain to the functional managers the impact of their emails on the team’s productivity and morale, and request them to respect the team’s priorities and schedules. The project manager should also seek the support and intervention of the project sponsor or the senior management, if needed, to resolve any resource conflicts or issues.

The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to take in this situation. Asking the product owner to speak with the functional managers to ensure future requirements come through the product owner is not relevant or effective, as it does not address the current problem of the team members receiving emails from their functional managers to support other nonproject-related tasks. The product owner is the person who represents the customer’s voice and defines and prioritizes the product backlog, which is a list of features and requirements that the customer wants to have in the product. The product owner is not involved in the resource management or allocation of the project, and may not have the authority or influence to negotiate with the functional managers. Logging this as a risk in the risk register and continuing to monitor the issue at subsequent meetings is not proactive or sufficient, as it does not prevent or mitigate the negative impact of the team members receiving emails from their functional managers to support other nonproject-related tasks. The risk register is a document that records the identified risks, their causes, impacts, probabilities, responses, and owners. The project manager should not just document and monitor the issue, but also take action to resolve it as soon as possible. Scheduling a meeting with all of the functional managers to resolve the resource conflicts may be too time-consuming and complicated, as it may involve multiple parties and perspectives. The project manager should not wait for a meeting to address the issue, but rather contact the functional managers individually and directly, and seek their cooperation and understanding. References:

• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.2, “Plan Resource Management”
• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.3, “Acquire Resources”
• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.5, “Control Resources”
• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 11, Section 11.4, “Plan Risk Responses”
• PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide: 2021 Exam Update, 10th Edition, Chapter 8, Section 8.2, “Planning Resources” 1

The project manager should use Monitor Communications techniques to ensure that the communication needs of the project and its stakeholders are met. This involves collecting and analyzing feedback from stakeholders, reviewing the effectiveness and quality of the communication activities, and identifying and resolving communication issues. By doing so, the project manager may discover the reasons why some stakeholders are not fully comprehending the status of the project based on the reports that are being circulated, and may initiate changes to the communications management plan to address them. For example, the project manager may decide to use a different report format, frequency, or distribution method that suits the needs and preferences of the new stakeholders. Adding the issue to the issue log and determining the corrective action (option A) is a possible outcome of Monitor Communications, but not the best answer. Creating a fishbone diagram to determine the root cause for the misunderstanding (option B) is a tool that can be used in Monitor Communications, but not the only one. Sharing the communications management plan and reminding all stakeholders of the agreed-upon reporting templates (option D) is not likely to solve the problem, as it may imply that the new stakeholders are at fault for not understanding the reports, rather than acknowledging that the communication needs may have changed. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 386-387, section 10.2 Manage Communications
• PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 415, question 415, answer and explanation

The project manager should set clear expectations with the new team member and explain the differences between the agile and predictive approaches, as well as the benefits and challenges of working in a hybrid environment. The project manager should also encourage the new team member to share their agile experience and best practices with the existing team members, and foster a collaborative and learning culture among the team. Training the new team member in the predictive approach (A) is not enough, as it does not address the potential gaps and conflicts that may arise from working in a hybrid environment. Acknowledging that hiring the new employee is a risk (B) is not helpful, as it may create a negative impression and undermine the trust and respect among the team members. Meeting with all team members and explaining the new employee’s position (D) is also not sufficient, as it does not clarify the expectations and roles of the new team member, nor does it leverage their agile experience. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 91; Agile Practice Guide, page 14.