Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam Dumps - Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer

 Oversampling is a technique for dealing with imbalanced datasets, where the majority class dominates the minority class. It balances the distribution of classes by increasing the number of samples in the minority class. Oversampling can improve the performance of a classifier by reducing the bias towards the majority class and increasing the sensitivity to the minority class.

In this case, the dataset includes transactions, of which 1% are identified as fraudulent. This means that the fraudulent transactions are the minority class and the non-fraudulent transactions are the majority class. A random forest model trained on this dataset might have a low recall for the fraudulent transactions, meaning that it might miss many of them and fail to detect fraud. This could have a high cost for the bank and its customers.

One way to overcome this problem is to oversample the fraudulent transactions 10 times, meaning that each fraudulent transaction is duplicated 10 times in the training dataset. This would increase the proportion of fraudulent transactions from 1% to about 10%, making the dataset more balanced. This would also make the random forest model more aware of the patterns and features that distinguish fraudulent transactions from non-fraudulent ones, and thus improve its accuracy and recall for the minority class.

For more information about oversampling and other techniques for imbalanced data, see the following references:

Random Oversampling and Undersampling for Imbalanced Classification

Exploring Oversampling Techniques for Imbalanced Datasets

Cloud Vision API offers pre-trained models specialized in identifying explicit or inappropriate content. By sending a copy of each image to a Cloud Storage bucket and triggering Cloud Vision through Cloud Run, the detection of explicit content is automated with minimal development time. Vertex AI custom models require more training data and infrastructure management, while AutoML-based solutions add more complexity. Cloud Vision’s existing capabilities meet the requirement effectively and are highly scalable for real-time moderation needs.

=================

Option A is incorrect because it does not separate the training dataset into two tables based on the features, which is necessary to train the two models separately and accurately.

Option B is incorrect because it does not separate the training dataset into two tables based on the features, and because it uses the same monitoring-config-from parameter for both models, which would not account for the different feature selections.

Option C is incorrect because it deploys the models to two separate endpoints, which would increase the management effort and complexity of the pipeline.

Option D is correct because it separates the training dataset into two tables based on the features, which would enable the two models to be trained separately and accurately. It also deploys both models to the same endpoint, which would simplify the pipeline and reduce the management effort. It also submits a Vertex Al Model Monitoring job with a monitoring-config-from parameter that accounts for the model IDs and training datasets, which would enable the skew detection to work properly for each model.

Explanation: TensorFlow Extended (TFX) is a platform for building end-to-end machine learning pipelines using TensorFlow. TFX provides a set of components that can be orchestrated using either the TFX SDK or Kubeflow Pipelines. TFX components can handle different aspects of the pipeline, such as data ingestion, data validation, data transformation, model training, model evaluation, model serving, and more. TFX components can also leverage other Google Cloud services, such as BigQuery, Dataflow, and Vertex AI.

Why not A: Using the Kubeflow Pipelines SDK to implement the pipeline is a valid option, but using the BigQueryJobOp component to run the preprocessing script is not optimal. This would require writing and maintaining a separate SQL script for data transformation, which could introduce inconsistencies and errors. It would also make it harder to reuse the same preprocessing logic for both training and serving.

Why not B: Using the Kubeflow Pipelines SDK to implement the pipeline is a valid option, but using the DataflowPythonJobOp component to preprocess the data is not optimal. This would require writing and maintaining a separate Python script for data transformation, which could introduce inconsistencies and errors. It would also make it harder to reuse the same preprocessing logic for both training and serving.

Why not D: Using the TensorFlow Extended SDK to implement the pipeline is a valid option, but implementing the preprocessing steps as part of the input_fn of the model is not optimal. This would make the preprocessing logic tightly coupled with the model code, which could reduce modularity and flexibility. It would also make it harder to reuse the same preprocessing logic for both training and serving.

Medical entity extraction is a task that involves identifying and classifying medical terms or concepts from unstructured textual data, such as electronic health records, clinical notes, or research papers. Medical entity extraction can help with various use cases, such as information retrieval, knowledge discovery, decision support, and data analysis1.

One possible approach to perform medical entity extraction is to use a BERT-based model to fine-tune a medical entity extraction model. BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) is a pre-trained language model that can capture the contextual information from both left and right sides of a given token2. BERT can be fine-tuned on a specific downstream task, such as medical entity extraction, by adding a task-specific layer on top of the pre-trained model and updating the model parameters with a small amount of labeled data3.

A BERT-based model can achieve high performance on medical entity extraction by leveraging the large-scale pre-training on general-domain corpora and the fine-tuning on domain-specific data. For example, Nesterov and Umerenkov4 proposed a novel method of doing medical entity extraction from electronic health records as a single-step multi-label classification task by fine-tuning a transformer model pre-trained on a large EHR dataset. They showed that their model can achieve human-level quality for most frequent entities.

References:

1: Medical Named Entity Recognition from Un-labelled Medical Records based on Pre-trained Language Models and Domain Dictionary | Data Intelligence | MIT Press

2: BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

3: Fine-tuning BERT for Medical Entity Extraction

4: Distantly supervised end-to-end medical entity extraction from electronic health records with human-level quality

According to the web search results, BigQuery ML1 is a service that allows you to create and execute machine learning models in BigQuery using SQL queries. BigQuery ML supports various types of models, such as linear regression, logistic regression, k-means clustering, matrix factorization, deep neural networks, and time series forecasting1. ARIMA_PLUS2 is a statistical model for time series forecasting that is built in to BigQuery ML. ARIMA_PLUS stands for AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average with eXogenous regressors. ARIMA_PLUS models the relationship between a target variable and its past values, as well as other external factors that might influence the target variable. ARIMA_PLUS can handle multiple time series, seasonality, holidays, and missing values2. Therefore, option C is the best way to use a solution that can be implemented quickly with minimal effort for the given use case, as it allows you to use SQL queries to build and run a forecasting model in BigQuery without moving the data or writing custom code. The other options are not relevant or optimal for this scenario. References:

BigQuery ML

ARIMA_PLUS

Google Professional Machine Learning Certification Exam 2023

Latest Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Actual Free Exam Questions

Option A is correct because using F-score where recall is weighed more than precision is a suitable metric for binary classification with imbalanced data. F-score is a harmonic mean of precision and recall, which are two metrics that measure the accuracy and completeness of the positive class1. Precision is the fraction of true positives among all predicted positives, while recall is the fraction of true positives among all actual positives1. When the data is imbalanced, the positive class is the minority class, which is usually the class of interest. For example, in this case, the positive class is the images that contain the company’s logo, which are rare but important to detect. By weighing recall more than precision, we can emphasize the importance of finding all the positive examples, even if some false positives are included2.

Option B is incorrect because using RMSE (root mean squared error) is not a valid metric for binary classification with imbalanced data. RMSE is a metric that measures the average magnitude of the errors between the predicted and actual values3. RMSE is suitable for regression problems, where the target variable is continuous, not for classification problems, where the target variable is discrete4.

Option C is incorrect because using F1 score is not the best metric for binary classification with imbalanced data. F1 score is a special case of F-score where precision and recall are equally weighted1. F1 score is suitable for balanced data, where the positive and negative classes are equally important and frequent5. However, for imbalanced data, the positive class is more important and less frequent than the negative class, so F1 score may not reflect the performance of the model well2.

Option D is incorrect because using F-score where precision is weighed more than recall is not a good metric for binary classification with imbalanced data. By weighing precision more than recall, we can emphasize the importance of minimizing the false positives, even if some true positives are missed2. However, for imbalanced data, the true positives are more important and less frequent than the false positives, so this metric may not reflect the performance of the model well2.

References:

Precision, recall, and F-measure

F-score for imbalanced data

RMSE

Regression vs classification

F1 score

[Imbalanced classification]

[Binary classification]

The best business metric to track to measure the model’s performance is user engagement as measured by the number of battles played daily per user. This metric reflects the main goal of the model, which is to enhance the user experience and satisfaction by creating balanced and fair battles. If the model is successful, it should increase the user retention and loyalty, as well as the word-of-mouth and referrals. This metric is also easy to measure and interpret, as it can be directly obtained from the user activity data.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

A. Average time players wait before being assigned to a team is not a good metric, as it does not capture the quality or outcome of the battles. It only measures the efficiency of the model, which is not the primary objective. Moreover, this metric can be influenced by external factors, such as the availability and demand of players, the network latency, and the server capacity.

B. Precision and recall of assigning players to teams based on their predicted versus actual ability is not a good metric, as it is difficult to measure and interpret. It requires having a reliable and consistent way of estimating the player’s ability, which can be subjective and dynamic. It also requires having a ground truth label for each assignment, which can be costly and impractical to obtain. Moreover, this metric does not reflect the user feedback or satisfaction, which is the ultimate goal of the model.

D. Rate of return as measured by additional revenue generated minus the cost of developing a new model is not a good metric, as it is not directly related to the model’s performance. It measures the profitability of the model, which is a secondary objective. Moreover, this metric can be affected by many other factors, such as the market conditions, the pricing strategy, the marketing campaigns, and the competition.

References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

How to measure user engagement

How to choose the right metrics for your machine learning model