Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam Dumps - Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer

One-hot encoding is a technique that converts categorical variables into numerical variables by creating dummy variables for each possible category. Each dummy variable has a value of 1 if the original variable belongs to that category, and 0 otherwise1. One-hot encoding can help linear regression models to capture the effect of different categories on the target variable without imposing any ordinal relationship among them2. Dataprep is a service that allows you to explore, clean, and transform your data for analysis and machine learning. You can use Dataprep to apply one-hot encoding to your city name variable and make each city a column with binary values3. This way, you can prepare your data using the least amount of coding while maintaining the predictive variables. Therefore, using Dataprep to transform the state column using a one-hot encoding method is the best option for this use case.

References:

One Hot Encoding: A Beginner’s Guide

One-Hot Encoding in Linear Regression Models

Dataprep documentation

Option A is incorrect because reinforcement learning is not a suitable approach to build a model that identifies defects in products based on images of the product taken at the end of the assembly line. Reinforcement learning is a type of machine learning that learns from its own actions and rewards, rather than from labeled data or explicit feedback1. Reinforcement learning is more suitable for problems that involve sequential decision making, such as games, robotics, or control systems1. However, defect detection is a problem that involves image classification or segmentation, which requires supervised learning, not reinforcement learning.

Option B is incorrect because a recommender system is not a relevant approach to build a model that identifies defects in products based on images of the product taken at the end of the assembly line. A recommender system is a system that suggests items or actions to users based on their preferences, behavior, or context2. A recommender system is more suitable for problems that involve personalization, such as e-commerce, entertainment, or social media2. However, defect detection is a problem that involves image classification or segmentation, which requires supervised learning, not recommender system.

Option C is incorrect because recurrent neural networks (RNN) are not the most efficient approach to build a model that identifies defects in products based on images of the product taken at the end of the assembly line. RNNs are a type of neural networks that can process sequential data, such as text, speech, or video, by maintaining a hidden state that captures the temporal dependencies3. RNNs are more suitable for problems that involve natural language processing, speech recognition, or video analysis3. However, defect detection is a problem that involves image classification or segmentation, which does not require temporal dependencies, but rather spatial dependencies. Moreover, RNNs are computationally expensive and prone to vanishing or exploding gradients4.

Option D is correct because convolutional neural networks (CNN) are the best approach to build a model that identifies defects in products based on images of the product taken at the end of the assembly line. CNNs are a type of neural networks that can process image data, by applying convolutional filters that extract local features and reduce the dimensionality of the data5. CNNs are more suitable for problems that involve image classification, object detection, or segmentation5. CNNs can preprocess the images with lower computation to quickly extract features of defects in products, by using techniques such as pooling, dropout, or batch normalization6.

References:

Reinforcement learning

Recommender system

Recurrent neural network

Vanishing and exploding gradients

Convolutional neural network

CNN techniques

[Defect detection]

[Image classification]

[Image segmentation]

A fairness metric is a way to measure how well a machine learning model treats different groups of customers, such as by sex or age. A common fairness metric is accuracy, which is the proportion of correct predictions among all predictions. Accuracy across the sensitive features means calculating the accuracy for each group separately, and then comparing them. For example, if the model has 90% accuracy for male customers and 80% accuracy for female customers, there is a 10% accuracy gap that indicates potential bias against female customers.

To investigate and mitigate potential bias, it is important to define a fairness metric and evaluate it on a test set. A test set is a subset of the data that is not used for training the model, but only for evaluating its performance. By joining the test set predictions with the sensitive features, you can calculate the fairness metric and see if it meets your requirements. For example, you may require that the accuracy gap between any two groups is less than 5%. If the fairness metric does not meet your requirements, you may need to adjust the model or the data to reduce bias.

Option A is not the best answer because excluding the sensitive features and any meaningfully correlated features may not eliminate bias. For example, if salary is correlated with sex, and salary is also a predictive feature for the target variable, excluding both features may reduce the model accuracy and still leave some residual bias. Moreover, excluding features based on correlation may not capture the complex interactions and dependencies among the features that may affect bias.

Option B is not the best answer because using the global attribution values for each feature of the model may not reflect the individual-level impact of the features on the predictions. Global attribution values are calculated by averaging the attribution values across all the data points, and they indicate how important each feature is for the overall model performance. However, they do not show how each feature affects each customer’s prediction, which may vary depending on the values of the other features. For example, sex may have a low global attribution value, but it may have a high impact on some customers’ predictions, especially if it interacts with other features such as salary or age.

Option C is not the best answer because discarding the model and training the model again without a feature based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be a robust or scalable way to mitigate bias. Attribution values are calculated by measuring how much each feature contributes to the prediction for a given data point, and they indicate how sensitive the prediction is to the feature value. However, they do not show how the feature affects the overall fairness metric or the model accuracy. For example, sex may have a high attribution value for a customer, but it may not affect the accuracy gap between the groups. Moreover, discarding and retraining the model based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be feasible if there are many customers with high attribution values for different features.

A caching layer is essential to reduce database access time, meeting the <100ms requirement. Caches store high-frequency, low-latency queries in memory, minimizing access delays caused by database lookups. While AlloyDB (Option B) provides performance benefits, a caching layer is more efficient and cost-effective for this purpose. BigQuery ML (Option A) is less ideal for real-time personalized responses due to access speed, and vector embeddings (Option C) are not needed unless semantic search is a requirement.

=================

 The main advantage of implementing machine learning for this business case is that new problematic phrases can be identified in spam posts. This is because machine learning can learn from the data and the feedback, and adapt to the changing patterns and trends of spam posts. Machine learning can also capture the semantic and contextual meaning of the posts, and not just rely on the presence or absence of keywords. By using machine learning, you can improve the accuracy and coverage of your anti-spam service, and detect new and emerging types of spam posts that may not be captured by the keyword list.

The other options are not advantages of implementing machine learning for this business case for the following reasons:

A. Posts can be compared to the keyword list much more quickly is not an advantage, as it does not improve the quality or effectiveness of the anti-spam service. It only improves the efficiency of the service, which is not the primary objective. Moreover, machine learning may not necessarily be faster than the keyword list, depending on the complexity and size of the model and the data.

C. A much longer keyword list can be used to flag spam posts is not an advantage, as it does not address the limitations or challenges of the keyword list approach. It only increases the size and complexity of the keyword list, which can make it harder to maintain and update. Moreover, a longer keyword list may not improve the accuracy or coverage of the anti-spam service, as it may introduce more false positives or false negatives, or miss new and emerging types of spam posts.

D. Spam posts can be flagged using far fewer keywords is not an advantage, as it does not reflect the capabilities or benefits of machine learning. It only reduces the size and complexity of the keyword list, which can make it easier to maintain and update. However, using fewer keywords may not improve the accuracy or coverage of the anti-spam service, as it may lose some information or meaning of the posts, or miss some types of spam posts.

References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

Machine Learning for Spam Detection

Spam Detection Using Machine Learning

Vertex AI Model Registry is a central repository where you can manage the lifecycle of your ML models1. You can import models from various sources, such as BigQuery ML, AutoML, or custom models, and assign them to different versions and aliases1. You can also deploy models to endpoints, which are resources that provide a service URL for online prediction2.

By importing the new model to the same Vertex AI Model Registry as a different version of the existing model, you can keep track of the model versions and compare their performance metrics1. You can also use aliases to label the model versions according to their readiness for production, such as default or staging1.

By deploying the new model to the same Vertex AI endpoint as the existing model, you can use traffic splitting to gradually shift the production traffic from the old model to the new model2. Traffic splitting is a feature that allows you to specify the percentage of prediction requests that each deployed model in an endpoint should handle2. This way, you can minimize the impact to the existing and future model users, and monitor the performance of the new model over time2.

The other options are not suitable for your scenario, because they either require creating a separate endpoint or a Cloud Run service, which would increase the complexity and maintenance of your deployment, or they do not allow you to use traffic splitting, which would create a sudden change in your prediction results. References:

Introduction to Vertex AI Model Registry | Google Cloud

Deploy a model to an endpoint | Vertex AI | Google Cloud

 The trace in the question shows that the training time is taking longer than expected. This is likely due to the input function not being optimized. To decrease training time in a cost-efficient way, the best option is to rewrite the input function using parallel reads, parallel processing, and prefetch. This will allow the model to process the data more efficiently and decrease training time. References:

[Cloud TPU Performance Guide]

[Data input pipeline performance guide]

TFX ModelValidator is a tool that allows you to compare new models against a baseline model and evaluate their performance on different metrics and data slices1. You can use this tool to validate your models before deploying them to production and ensure that they meet your expectations and requirements.

k-fold cross-validation is a technique that splits the data into k subsets and trains the model on k-1 subsets while testing it on the remaining subset. This is repeated k times and the average performance is reported2. This technique is useful for estimating the generalization error of a model, but it does not account for the dynamic nature of customer behavior or the potential changes in data distribution over time.

Using the last relevant week of data as a validation set is a simple way to check the model’s performance on recent data, but it may not be representative of the entire data or capture the long-term trends and patterns. It also does not allow you to compare the model with a baseline or evaluate it on different data slices.

Using the entire dataset and treating the AUC ROC as the main metric is not a good practice because it does not leave any data for validation or testing. It also assumes that the AUC ROC is the only metric that matters, which may not be true for your business problem. You may want to consider other metrics such as precision, recall, or revenue.